Learning culture and feedback: An international study of medical athletes and musicians

Medical Education

Volumn 48, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 713-723

  Watling, Christopher ^a   Driessen, Erik ^b   van der Vleuten, Cees P M ^b   Lingard, Lorelei ^a  

^a WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; MOTIVATION; MUSIC; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PHYSICIAN; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SPORT;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FACULTY, MEDICAL; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; GOALS; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; LEARNING; MUSIC; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; PHYSICIANS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SPORTS; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 84902084098     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/medu.12407     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Kluger AN, Denisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 1996;119 (2):254-84.
2. Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback. Med Educ 2010;44:101-8.
3. Sargeant J, Mann K, Ferrier S. Exploring family physicians' reactions to multi-source feedback: perceptions of credibility and usefulness. Med Educ 2005;39:497-504.
4. Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2008;13:275-88.
5. Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CPM, Vanstone M, Lingard L. Beyond individualism: professional culture and its influence on feedback. Med Educ 2013;47:585-94.
6. Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res 2007;77 (1):81-112.
7. Higgins ET. Beyond pleasure and pain. Am Psychol 1997;52 (12):1280-300.
8. Kluger AN, Van Dijk D. Feedback, the various tasks of the doctor, and the feedforward alternative. Med Educ 2010;44:1166-74.
9. Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CPM, Vanstone M, Lingard L. Understanding responses to feedback: the potential and limitations of regulatory focus theory. Med Educ 2012;46:593-603.
10. Kuper A, Reeves S, Levinson W. An introduction to reading and appraising qualitative research. BMJ 2008;337:a288.
11. Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 2006; 123-50.
12. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 2008;73-8.
13. Morse JM. The significance of saturation. Qual Health Res 1995;5:147-9.
14. Hodkinson P, Biesta G, James D. Understanding learning cultures. Educ Rev 2007;59 (4):415-27.
15. Volet S. Learning across cultures: appropriateness of knowledge transfer. Int J Educ Res 1999;31:625-43.
16. Ramani S, Krackov SK. Twelve tips for giving feedback effectively in the clinical environment. Med Teach 2012;34:787-91.
17. Bienstock JL, Katz NT, Cox SM, Hueppchen N, Erickson S, Puscheck EE. To the point: medical education reviews - providing feedback. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196 (6):508-13.
18. Thomas JD, Arnold RM. Giving feedback. J Palliat Med 2011;14 (2):233-9.
19. Bing-You RG, Paterson J. Feedback falling on deaf ears: residents' receptivity to feedback tempered by sender credibility. Med Teach 1997;19 (1):40-4.
20. Watling CJ, Kenyon C, Zibrowski E, Schulz V, Singh I, Goldszmidt M, Maddocks HL, Lingard L. Rules of engagement: residents' perceptions of the in-training evaluation process. Acad Med 2008;10 (Suppl):97-100.
21. Hoff TJ, Pohl H, Bartfield J. Creating a learning environment to produce competent residents: the roles of culture and context. Acad Med 2004;79 (6):532-40.
22. Kogan JR, Conforti LN, Bernabeo EC, Durning SJ, Hauer KE, Holmboe ES. Faculty staff perceptions of feedback to residents after direct observation of clinical skills. Med Educ 2012;46:201-15.
23. Moss HA, Derman PB, Clement RC. Medical student perspective: working toward specific and actionable clinical clerkship feedback. Med Teach 2012;34:665-7.
24. Cushion CJ, Armour KM, Jones RL. Locating the coaching process in practice: models 'for' and 'of' coaching. Phys Educ Sports Pedagog 2006;11 (1):83-99.
25. Bates J, Konkin J, Suddards C, Dobson S, Pratt D. Student perceptions of assessment and feedback in longitudinal integrated clerkships. Med Educ 2013;47:362-74.
26. Frank JR, ed. The CanMEDS 2005 Physician Competency Framework. Better standards. Better physicians. Better care. Ottawa, ON: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada 2005.
27. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Common program requirements. http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/CPRs2013.pdf. [Accessed 11 December 2013.]