Medical student perspective: Working toward specific and actionable clinical clerkship feedback

Medical Teacher

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 665-667

  Moss, Haley A ^a   Derman, Peter B ^a   Clement, R Carter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL EDUCATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MEDICAL STUDENT; PEER REVIEW; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REVIEW;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL CLERKSHIP; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 84864272518     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.687849     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. 2011. ACGME program requirements for resident education in internal medicine. [Accessed 22 February 2011] Available from http://wwwacgme.org/acwebsite/downloads/RRC-progReq./140- internal-medicine-07012009.pdf
2. Ende J. 1983. Feedback in clinical medical education. J Am Med Assoc 250(6):777-781.
3. Gabarro J, Hill L. 1996. Managing Performance. Harvard Business School Note, 9-496-022. pp. 1-7.
4. Kogan JR, Holmboe ES, Hauer KE. 2009. Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees. J Am Med Assoc 302(12):1316-1326.
5. Longenecker C, Gioia D. 2000. Confronting the ''Politics'' in performance appraisal. Business Forum (25). pp. 17-23.
6. Richards M, Paukert J, Downing S, Bordage G. 2007. Reliability and usefulness of clinical encounter cards for a third-year surgical clerkship. J Surg Res 140(1):139-148.
7. Turnbull J, MacFadyen J, van Barneveld C, Norman G. 2000. Clinical work sampling: A new approach to the problem of in-training evaluation. J Gen Intern Med 15(8):556-561.