Exploring family physician's reactions to multisource feedback: Perceptions of credibility and usefulness

Medical Education

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 497-504

  Sargeant, Joan ^a   Mann, Karen ^a   Ferrier, Suzanne ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attitude of health personnel; Clinical competence *standards; Feedback; Focus groups; Physicians *psychology; Pilot projects

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; COMPETENCE; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; CANADA; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HEALTH; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; PILOT STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; MALE; NOVA SCOTIA; PERCEPTION; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; PILOT PROJECTS; RURAL HEALTH; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; URBAN HEALTH;

EID: 17844400822     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02124.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA 2002;287:226-35.
2. Bracken DW, Timmreck CW, Church AH. The Handbook for Multisource Feedback. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass 2001.
3. Tornow WW, London M, CLL. Associates. Maximizing the Value of 360-Degree Feedback, 1st edn. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass 1998.
4. Ramsey PG, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Inui TS, Larson EB, LoGerfo JP. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. JAMA 1993;269:1655-60.
5. Wooliscroft JO, Howell JD, Patel BP. Resident-patient interactions: the humanistic qualities of internal medicine residents assessed by patients, attending physicians, program supervisors and nurses. Acad Med 1993;68:680-7.
6. Weinrich MD, Carline JD, Giles LM, Ramsey PG. Ratings of the performances of practicing internists by hospital-based registered nurses. Acad Med 1993;68:680-7.
7. Violato C, Marini A, Toews J, Lockyer J, Fidler H. Feasibility and psychometric properties of using peers, consulting physicians, co-workers, and patients to assess physicians. Acad Med 1997;72 (Suppl. 10): S82-4.
8. Hall W, Violato C, Lewkonia R, Lockyer J et al. Assessment of physician performance in Alberta: the physician achievement review. CMAJ 1999;161:52-7.
9. Lipner RS, Blank LL, Leas BF, Fortna GS. The value of patient and peer ratings in recertification. Acad Med 2002;77 (Suppl. 10): S64-6.
10. Fidler H, Lockyer JM, Toews J, Violato C. Changing physicians' practices: the effect of individual feedback. Acad Med 1999;74 (702):14.
11. Lockyer J. Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies. J Contin Educ Health Profess 2003;23 (1):4.
12. Thompson PH, Dalton GW. Performance appraisal: managers beware. Harvard Business Rev 1970;48:149-57.
13. Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bul 1996;119:254-84.
14. Pearce JL, Porter LW. Employee responses to formal performance appraisal feedback. J Appl Psych 1986;71 (2):211-8.
15. McCall MW, Lombardo MM. Off the track: why and how successful executives get derailed. Greenboro, NC: Centre for Creative Leadership 1983.
16. Brett JF, Atwater L. 360 Feedback, accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. J Appl Psych 2001;86 (5):930-42.
17. Atwater LE, Ostroff C, Yammarino FJ, Fleenor JW. Self-other agreement: does it really matter? Personnel Psychol 1998;51:577-98.
18. Walker AG, Smither JW. A five-year study of upward feedback: what managers do with their results matters. Personnel Psychol 1999;52:393-423.
19. Bing-You RG, Paterson J. Feedback falling on deaf ears: residents' receptivity to feedback tempered by sender credibility. Med Teach 1997;19:40-4.
20. Sargeant JM, Mann KV, Ferner SN et al. Responses of rural family physicians and their colleague and co-worker raters to a multi-source feedback process: a pilot study. Acad Med 2003;78 (10):S42-S44.
21. Alberta's Physician Achievement Review (PAR) Program: A review of the first three years. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta. Available at: http:// www.cpsa.ab.ca/collegeprograms/attachments/ par_evaluation.pdf. Accessed 30 April 2004.
22. Alberta's Physician Achievement Review (PAR) Program. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta. Available at: http://www.cpsa.ab.ca/ collegeprograms/ par_program.asp. Accessed 28 April 2004.
23. Nova Scotia Physician Achievement Review (NSPAR) Program. College of Physician and Surgeons of Nova Scotia. Available at: http://www.nspar.ca/. Accessed 28 April 2004.
24. Rice PL, Ezzy D. Qualitative Research Methods. Victoria, Australia: Oxford University Press 2000.
25. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 1998.
26. Johnson D, Cujec B. Comparison of self, nurse, and physician assessment of residents rotating through an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1998;26:1811-16.
27. Norcini JJ. Peer assessment of competence. Med Educ 2003;37 (6):539-43.
28. Pringle M, Wilson T, Grol R. Measuring 'goodness' in individuals and healthcare systems. BMJ 2002;325 (7366):704-7.
29. London M. Job Feedback: Giving, Seeking and Using Feedback for Performance Improvement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1997.