PRIOR KNOWLEDGE AND ONLINE INQUIRY-BASED SCIENCE READING: EVIDENCE FROM EYE TRACKING

International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 525-554

  Ho, Hsin Ning Jessie ^a   Tsai, Meng Jung ^a   Wang, Ching Yeh ^a   Tsai, Chin Chung ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

eye tracking; inquiry based data inspection; prior knowledge; text graphic integration; web based science reading

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901940336     PISSN: 15710068     EISSN: 15731774     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10763-013-9489-6     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16, 183-198.
2. Butcher, K. R. (2006). Learning from text with diagrams: Promoting mental model development and inference generation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 182-197.
3. Chase, W. G. & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81.
4. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
5. Clark, R. E. & Clark, V. P. (2010), From Neo-Behaviorism to neuroscience: Perspectives on the origins and future contributions of cognitive load research. In J. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Bruken (Eds.), Cognitive load: Theory and application. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Clark, R. & Mayer, R. E. (2008). E-learning and the science of instruction (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Clark, R. E. & Salomon, G. (1986). Media in teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 464-478). New York: Macmillan.
8. Cromley, J. G., Snyder-Hogan, L. E. & Luciw-Dubas, U. A. (2010). Cognitive activities in complex science text and diagrams. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 59-74.
9. de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, K. H., Rikers, M. J. P. R. & Paas, F. (2010). Attention guidance in learning from complex animation: Seeing is understanding? Learning and Instruction, 20, 111-122.
10. Ericsson, K. A. & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211-245.
11. Gegenfurtner, A., Lehtinen, E. & Saljo, R. (2011). Expertise differences in the comprehension of visualizations: A meta-analysis of eye-tracking research in professional domains. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 523-552.
12. Grant, E. R., & Spivey, M. J. (2003). Eye movements and problem solving: Guiding attention guides thought. Psychological Science, 14, 462-466.
13. Hannus, M. &Hyona, J. (1999). Utilization of illustrations during learning of science textbook passages among low- and high- ability children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 95-123.
14. Hegarty, M., Carpenter, P. A. & Just, M. A. (1991). Diagrams in the comprehension of scientific texts. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal & P. D. Person (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 641-668). New York: Longman.
15. Hegarty, M. & Just, M. A. (1993). Constructing mental models of machines from texts and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 717-742.
16. Hoffman, J. L., Wu, H. K., Krajcik, J. S. & Soloway, E. (2003). The nature of middle school learners' science content understandings with the use of on-line resources. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(3), 323-346.
17. Holsanova, J., Holmberg, N. & Holmqvist, K. (2009). Reading information graphics: The role of spatial contiguity and dual attentional guidance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1215-1226.
18. Hyona, J. (2010). The use of eye movements in the study of multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, 172-176.
19. Hyona, J., Lorch, J. R. F. & Kaakinen, J. K. (2002). Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text: Evidence from eye fixation patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 44-55.
20. Ikpeze, C. H. & Boyd, F. B. (2007). Web-based inquiry learning: Facilitating thoughtful literacy with WebQuests. The Reading Teacher, 60(7), 644-654.
21. Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38, 23-32.
22. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1998). Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors, 40, 1-17.
23. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J. & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based experiential and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
24. Kozma, R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13, 205-226.
25. Lai, M.-L., Tsai, M.-J., Yang, F.-Y., Hsu, C.-Y., Liu, T.-C., Lee, S. W.-Y., Lee, M.-H., Chiou, G.-L., Liang, J.-C. & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012. Educational Research Review, 10, 90-115.
26. Levie, W. H. & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communication and Technology, 30, 195-232.
27. Liu, X., Gale, A., & Song, T. (2007). Detection of terrorist threats in air passenger luggage: Expertise development. In: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (Ed.), Proceedings of the 41st Annual IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (pp. 301-306). Ottawa, Canada: Editor.
28. Mareno, R., Ozogul, G. & Reisslein, M. (2011). Teaching with concrete and abstract visual representations: Effects on students' problem solving, problem representations, and learning perceptions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 32-47.
29. Mason, L., Pluchino, P., Tornatora, M. C. & Ariasi, N. (2013a). An eye-tracking study of learning from science text with concrete and abstract illustrations. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81(3), 356-384.
30. Mason, L., Tornatora, M. C. & Pluchino, P. (2013b). Do fourth graders integrate text and picture in processing and learning from illustrated science text? Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Computers & Education, 60(1), 95-109.
31. Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13, 125-139.
32. Mayer, R. E. (2010). Unique contributions of eye-tracking research to the study of learning with graphics. Learning and Instruction, 20, 167-171.
33. Mayer, R. E. & Gallini, J. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715-726.
34. Meyer, K., Rasch, T. & Schnotz, W. (2010). Effects of animation's speed of presentation on perceptual processing and learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 136-145.
35. National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
36. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual approach. New York: New Oxford University Press.
37. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
38. Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457-1506.
39. Salomon, G. (1979). Interaction of media, cognition, and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40. Schmidt-Weigand, F., Kohnert, A. & Glowalla, U. (2010). A closer look at split visual attention in system- and self-paced instruction in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, 100-110.
41. Schnotz, W. & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13, 141-156.
42. Schwonke, R., Berthold, K. & Renkl, A. (2009). How multiple external representations are used and how they can be made more useful. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1227-1243.
43. Sloutsky, V. M., Kaminski, J. A. & Heckler, A. F. (2005). The advantage of simple symbols for learning and transfer. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 508-513.
44. Sutherland-Smith, W. (2002). Weaving the literacy Web: Changes in reading from page to screen. The reading teacher, 55(7), 662-669.
45. Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. K. G. & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296.
46. Tsai, M.-J., Hsu, C.-Y. & Tsai, C.-C. (2012). Investigation of high school students' online searching performance: The role of implicit and explicit approaches. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(2), 246-254.
47. van Gog, T., Jarodzka, H., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P. & Paas, F. (2009a). Attention guidance during example study via the model's eye movements. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 785-591.
48. van Gog, T., Kester, L., Nievelstein, F., Giesbers, B. & Paas, F. (2009b). Uncovering cognitive processes: Different techniques that can contribute to cognitive load research and instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 325-331.
49. van Gog, T., Paas, F. & van Merrienboer, J. K. G. (2005). Uncovering expertise-related differences in troubleshooting performance: Combining eye movement and concurrent verbal protocol data. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 205-221.
50. van Gog, T. & Scheiter, K. (2010). Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, 95-99.
51. Weber, N. & Brewer, N. (2003). Expert memory: The interaction of stimulus structure, attention, and expertise. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 295-308.
52. Yore, L. D. & Shymansky, J. A. (1991). Reading in science: Developing an operational conception to guide instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2(2), 29-36.