Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 95-99

  van Gog, Tamara ^a   Scheiter, Katharina ^b  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Animations; Expertise; Eye tracking; Multimedia learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 71749098384     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.009     Document Type: Editorial

References (39)

1. Ayres P., and Sweller J. The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In: Mayer R.E. (Ed). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2005), Cambridge University Press, New York 134-146
2. Boucheix J.-M., and Lowe R.K. An eye-tracking comparison of external pointing cues and internal continuous cues in learning with complex animations. Learning and Instruction 20 2 (2010) 123-135
3. Brand-Gruwel S., Van Meeuwen L., and Van Gog T. The use of evaluation criteria when searching the WWW: An eye-tracking study. In: Maes A., and Ainsworth S. (Eds). Proceedings of EARLI Special Interest Group Text and Graphics 'Exploiting the opportunities: Learning with textual, graphical, and multimodal representations' (2008), Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands 34-37
4. Brunyé T.T., and Taylor H.A. When goals constrain: eye movements and memory for goal-oriented map study. Applied Cognitive Psychology 23 (2009) 772-787
5. Canham M., and Hegarty M. Effects of knowledge and display design on comprehension of complex graphics. Learning and Instruction 20 2 (2010) 155-166
6. Chandler P., and Sweller J. Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction 8 (1991) 293-332
7. Charness N., Reingold E.M., Pomplun M., and Stampe D.M. The perceptual aspect of skilled performance in chess: evidence from eye movements. Memory and Cognition 29 (2001) 1146-1152
8. De Koning B.B., Tabbers H.K., Rikers R.M.J.P., and Paas F. Attention guidance in learning from complex animation: Seeing is understanding?. Learning and Instruction 20 2 (2010) 111-122
9. Duncker K. On problem solving. Psychological Monographs 58 (1945) (5, whole no. 270).
10. Fischer S., Lowe R.K., and Schwan S. Effects of presentation speed of a dynamic visualization on the understanding of a mechanical system. Applied Cognitive Psychology 22 (2008) 1126-1141
11. Ginns P. Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learning and Instruction 15 (2005) 313-331
12. Grant E.R., and Spivey M.J. Eye movements and problem solving: Guiding attention guides thought. Psychological Science 14 (2003) 462-466
13. Haider H., and Frensch P.A. Eye movement during skill acquisition: More evidence for the information reduction hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 25 (1999) 172-190
14. Hannus M., and Hyönä J. Utilization of illustrations during learning of science textbook passages among low- and high-ability children. Contemporary Educational Psychology 24 (1999) 95-123
15. Hansen J.P. The use of eye mark recordings to support verbal retrospection in software testing. Acta Psychologica 76 (1991) 31-49
16. Hegarty M., and Just M.A. Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language 32 (1993) 717-742
17. Holsanova J., Holmberg N., and Holmqvist K. Reading information graphics: the role of spatial contiguity and dual attentional guidance. Applied Cognitive Psychology 23 (2009) 1215-1226
18. Hyönä J. The use of eye movements in the study of multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction 20 2 (2010) 172-176
19. Hyönä J., and Niemi P. Eye movements during repeated reading of a text. Acta Psychologica 73 (1990) 259-280
20. Jarodzka H., Scheiter K., Gerjets P., and Van Gog T. In the eyes of the beholder: How experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli. Learning and Instruction 20 2 (2010) 146-154
21. Just M.A., and Carpenter P.A. A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review 87 (1980) 329-355
22. Kostons D., Van Gog T., and Paas F. How do I do? Investigating effects of expertise and performance-process records on self-assessment. Applied Cognitive Psychology 23 (2009) 1256-1265
23. Louwerse M.M., Graesser A.C., McNamara D.S., and Lu S. Embodied conversational agents as conversational partners. Applied Cognitive Psychology 23 (2009) 1244-1255
24. Low R., and Sweller J. The modality principle in multimedia learning. In: Mayer R.E. (Ed). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2005), Cambridge University Press, New York 147-158
25. In: Mayer R.E. (Ed). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2005), Cambridge University Press, New York
26. Mayer R.E. Unique contributions of eye-tracking research to the study of learning with graphics. Learning and Instruction 20 2 (2010) 167-171
27. Meyer K., Rasch T., and Schnotz W. Effects of animation's speed of presentation on perceptual processing and learning. Learning and Instruction 20 2 (2010) 136-145
28. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 124 (1998) 372-422
29. Richardson D.C., and Dale R. Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers' and listeners' eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive Science 29 (2005) 1046-1060
30. Russo J.E., Johnson E.J., and Stephens D.L. The validity of verbal protocols. Memory and Cognition 17 (1989) 759-769
31. Schmidt-Weigand F., Kohert A., and Glowalla U. A closer look at split visual attention in system- and self-paced instruction in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction 20 2 (2010) 100-110
32. Schwonke R., Berthold K., and Renkl A. How multiple external representations are used and how they can be made more useful. Applied Cognitive Psychology 23 (2009) 1227-1243
33. Sweller J., and Levine M. Effects of goal specificity on means-ends analysis and learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 8 (1982) 463-474
34. Sweller J., Van Merriënboer J.J.G., and Paas F. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review 10 (1998) 251-296
35. Van Gog T., Jarodzka H., Scheiter K., Gerjets P., and Paas F. Attention guidance during example study via the model's eye movements. Computers in Human Behavior 25 (2009) 785-791
36. Van Gog T., Paas F., and Van Merriënboer J.J.G. Uncovering expertise-related differences in troubleshooting performance: Combining eye movement and concurrent verbal protocol data. Applied Cognitive Psychology 19 (2005) 205-221
37. Van Gog T., Paas F., Van Merriënboer J.J.G., and Witte P. Uncovering the problem-solving process: Cued retrospective reporting versus concurrent and retrospective reporting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 11 (2005) 237-244
38. Velichkovsky B.M. Communicating attention: Gaze position transfer in cooperative problem-solving. Pragmatics and Cognition 3 (1995) 199-224
39. Verschaffel L., De Corte E., and Pauwels A. Solving compare word problems: An eye movement test of Lewis and Mayer's consistency hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology 84 (1992) 85-94