Utilization of Illustrations during Learning of Science Textbook Passages among Low- and High-Ability Children

Contemporary Educational Psychology

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 95-123

  Hannus, Matti ^a   Hyönä, Jukka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345252512     PISSN: 0361476X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1998.0987     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Carpenter P. A., Just M. A., Shell P. What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review. 97:1990;404-431.
2. Craik F. I. M., Lockhart R. S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 26:1972;274-284.
3. Hannus, M. 1996, Oppikirjan kuvitus-Koriste vai ymmärtämisen apu.
4. Harber J. N. Effects of illustrations on reading performance: Implications for future research. Learning Disability Quarterly. 3:1980;60-70.
5. Harber J. N. The effects of illustrations on the reading performance of learning disabled and normal children. Learning Disability Quarterly. 6:1983;55-60.
6. Hegarty M., Carpenter P. A., Just M. A. Diagrams in the comprehension of scientific text. Handbook of reading research: Vol. 2. 1991;Longman, New York. p. 641-668.
7. Holliday W. G. The effects of verbal and adjunct pictorial-verbal information in science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 12:1975;77-83.
8. Holliday W. G., Harvey D. A. Adjunct labeled drawings in teaching physics to junior high school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 13:1976;37-43.
9. Hyönä J. Processing of topic shifts by adults and children. Reading Research Quarterly. 29:1994;77-90.
10. Hyönä, J. Kaakinen, J. Keenan, J. 1997, November, On-line processing of perspective-relevant and perspective-irrelevant information during reading.
11. Kara P., Koskenniemi A., Kovakoski H., Nurmi M. Värikäs luonto 4. 1989;WSOY, Porvoo.
12. Koran M. L., Koran J. J. Interaction of learner characteristics with pictorial adjuncts in learning from science text. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 17:1980;477-483.
13. Kulhavy R. W., Stock W. A., Verdi M. P., Rittschoff K. A., Savenye W. Why maps improve memory for text: The influence of structural information on working memory operations. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 5:1993;375-392.
14. Levie W. H., Lentz R. Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communication and Technology. 30:1982;195-232.
15. Marshalek B., Lohman D. F., Snow R. E. The complexity continuum in the radex and hierarchical models of intelligence. Intelligence. 7:1983;107-127.
16. Mayer R. E. Models for understanding. Review of Educational Research. 59:1989;43-64.
17. Mayer R. E., Gallini J. K. When is an illustration worth a thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology. 82:1990;715-726.
18. Mattila R., Nyberg T., Vestelin O. Koulun biologia 4. 1991;Otava, Keuruu.
19. Muller P., Cavegn D., d'Ydewalle G., Gröner R. A comparison of a new limbus tracker, corneal reflection technique, Purkinje eye tracking and electro-oculography. d'Ydewalle G., Van Rensbergen J. Perception and cognition: Advances in eye movement research. 1993;393-401 North-Holland, Amsterdam.
20. Paivio A. Mental representations: A dual coding approach. 1986;Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
21. Paivio A., Csapo K. Concrete image and verbal memory codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 80:1969;279-285.
22. Peeck J. The role of illustrations in processing and remembering illustrated text. Willows D. M., Houghton H. A. The psychology of illustrations: Basic research. 1987;115-151 Springer-Verlag, New York.
23. Peeck J. Increasing picture effects in learning from illustrated text. Learning and Instructions. 3:1993;227-238.
24. Raven J. C. Standard progressive matrices: Sets A, B, C, D, and E. 1958;Cambridge Univ. Press, London.
25. Raven J. C., Court J. H., Raven J. Standard progressive matrices: 1992 edition. 1992;Oxford Psychologists Press, Oxford.
26. Rayner K. Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading. 1992;Springer-Verlag, New York.
27. Reid D. J., Beveridge M. Effects of text illustration on children's learning of a school science topic. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 56:1986;294-303.
28. Reid D. J., Beveridge M. Reading illustrated science texts: A microcomputer based investigation of children's strategies. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 60:1990;76-87.
29. Reynolds R. E. Selective attention and prose learning: Theoretical and empirical research. Educational Psychology Review. 4:1992;345-389.
30. Reynolds R. E., Shepard C., Lapan R., Kreek C., Goetz E. T. Differences in the use of selective attention by more successful and less successful tenth-grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology. 82:1990;749-759.
31. Rusted J., Coltheart M. Facilitation of children's prose recall by the presence of pictures. Memory and Cognition. 7:1979;354-359.
32. Schnotz W., Picard E., Hron A. How do successful and unsuccessful learners use text and graphics. Learning and Instructions. 3:1993;181-199.
33. Vauras M., Hyönä J., Niemi P. Comprehending coherent and incoherent texts: Evidence from eye movement patterns and recall performance. Journal of Research in Reading. 15:1992;39-54.
34. Williams C. M. Learning from pictures. 1968;Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Washington.
35. Willows D. M., Borwick D., Hayvren M. The content of school readers. Waller T. G., MacKinnon G. E. Reading research: Advances in theory and practice. 1981;97-175 Academic Press, New York.