Reading information graphics: The role of spatial contiguity and dual attentional guidance

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 23, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1215-1226

  Holsanova, Jana ^a   Holmberg, Nils ^a   Holmqvist, Kenneth ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BOOK; COGNITION; EYE MOVEMENT; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; READING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 70449356948     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1525     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bateman, J. (2008). Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
2. Carroll, P. J., Young, R. J., & Guertin, M. S. (1992). Visual analysis of cartoons: Aview from the far side. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading (pp. 444-461). New York: Springer.
3. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332.
4. Cierniak, G., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (in press). Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load? Computers in Human Behavior.
5. De Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P.,&Paas, F. (2007). Attention cueing as a means to enhance learning from an animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 731-746.
6. Folker, S., Sichelschmidt, L., & Ritter, H. (2005). Processing and integrating multimodal material: The influence of color-coding. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, &M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 690-695). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Hannus, M., & Hyönä, J. (1999). Utilization of illustrations during learning of science textbook passages among low- and high-ability children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 95-123.
8. Hegarty, M., & Just, M. A. (1993). Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 717-742.
9. Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (2004). Scene perception for psycholinguists. In J. M. Henderson, & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world (pp. 1-58). New York: Psychology Press.
10. Holmqvist, K., Holsanova, J., Barthelson, M., & Lundqvist, D. (2003). Reading or scanning? A study of newspaper and net paper reading. In J. Hyon,ä R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 657-670). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
11. Holmqvist, K., & Wartenberg, C. (2005). The role of local design factors for newspaper reading behaviour: An eye tracking perspective, Lund University Cognitive Studies 127. Retrieved<2008-06-09> from http://www.lucs.lu.se
12. Holsanova, J. (2008). Discourse, vision, and cognition. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Benjamins.
13. Holsanova, J., Rahm, H., & Holmqvist, K. (2006). Entry points and reading paths on the newspaper spread: Comparing semiotic analysis with eye-tracking measurements. Visual Communication, 5, 65-93.
14. Jeung, H.-J., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). The role of visual indicators in dual sensory mode instruction. Educational Psychology, 17, 329-343.
15. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351-371.
16. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
17. Mautone, P. D., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Cognitive aids for guiding graph comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology 99, 640-652.
18. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Mayer, R. E. (2005). Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signalling, redundancy, spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 183-200). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 358-368.
21. Radach, R., Lemmer, S., Vorstius, C., Heller, D., & Radach, K. (2003). Eye movements in the processing of print advertisements. In J. Hyon,ä R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 609-632). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
22. Rayner, K., Rotello, C. M., Stewart, A. J., Keir, J., &Duffy, S. A. (2001). Integrating text and pictorial information: Eye movements when looking at print advertisements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 219-226.
23. Rayner, K., Miller, B., & Rotello, C. M. (2008). Eye movements when looking at print advertisements: The goal of the viewer matters. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 697-707.
24. Scheiter, K., Wiebe, E., & Holsanova, J. (in press). Theoretical and instructional aspects of learning with visualizations. In R. Zheng (Ed.), Cognitive effects of multimedia learning. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
25. Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 13, 141-156.
26. Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185-233.
27. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296.
28. Van Gog, T., Paas, F., & Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2005). Uncovering expertise-related differences in troubleshooting performance: Combining eye movement and concurrent verbal data. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 205-221.
29. Van Gog, T., Kester, L., Nielvelstein, F., Giesbers, B., & Paas, F. (in press). Uncovering cognitive processes: Different techniques that can contribute to cognitive load research and instruction. Computers in Human Behavior.