Including secondary structure, fossils and molecular dating in the centipede tree of life

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 301-313

  Murienne, Jerome ^a   Edgecombe, Gregory D ^b   Giribet, Gonzalo ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chilopoda; Direct optimization; Molecular dating; Structural alignment

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTHROPOD; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CONFORMATION; DNA SEQUENCE; FOSSIL; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPODS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FOSSILS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

CHILOPODA; CRATEROSTIGMOMORPHA;

EID: 77956230468     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.06.022     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Altschul S., Madden T., Schaffer A., Zhang J., Zhang Z., Miller W., Lipman D. Gapped Blast and Psi-blast: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25(17):3389-3402.
2. Anderson L.I., Trewin N.H. An Early Devonian arthropod fauna from the Windyfield Cherts, Aberdeenshire, Scotland. Palaeontology 2003, 46:457-509.
3. Attems, C., 1929. Myriapoda I. Geophilomorpha. In: Schultze, F. E., Kükenthal, W. (Eds.), Das Tierreich. vol. 52. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 338p.
4. Attems, C., 1930. Myriapoda 2. Scolopendromorpha. In: Schultze, F.E., Kükenthal, W. (Eds.), Das Tierreich. vol.52. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 308p.
5. Borucki H. Evolution und Phylogenetisches System der Chilopoda (Mandibulata, Tracheata). Verh. naturwiss. Ver. Hamburg 1996, 35:95-226.
6. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000, 17(4):540-552.
7. Cock P.J.A., Antao T., Chang J.T., Chapman B.A., Cox C.J., Dalke A., Friedberg I., Hamelryck T., Kauff F., Wilczynski B., de Hoon M.J.L. Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:1422-1423.
8. De Jong R., Vane-Wright R.I., Ackery P.R. The higher classification of butterflies (Lepidoptera): problems and prospects. Entomol. Scand. 1996, 27:65-101.
9. Dell'Ampio E., Szucsich N.U., Carapelli A., Frati F., Steiner G., Steinacher A., Pass G. Testing for misleading effects in the phylogenetic reconstruction of ancient lineages of hexapods: influence of character dependence and character choice in analyses of 28s rRNA sequences. Zool. Scr. 2009, 38:155-170.
10. Dohle W. Phylogenetic pathways in the Chilopoda. Bijdr. Dierkd. 1985, 55:55-66.
11. Edgar R.C. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32(5):1792-1797.
12. Edgecombe G.D., Giribet G. Myriapod phylogeny and the relationships of Chilopoda. Biodiversidad, taxonomía y biogeografia de artrópodos de México: hacia una síntesis de su conocimiento 2002, vol. 3:143-168. Prensas de Ciencias, Mexico.
13. Edgecombe G.D., Giribet G. Adding mitochondrial sequence date (16SrRNA and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I) to the phylogeny of centipedes (Myriapoda: Chilopoda): an analysis of morphology and four molecular loci. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 2004, 42:89-134.
14. Edgecombe G.D., Giribet G. Molecular phylogeny of Australasian anopsobiine centipedes (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha). Invertebr. Syst. 2004, 18:235-249.
15. Edgecombe G.D., Giribet G. A century later - a total evidence re-evalutation of the phylogeny of scutigeromorph centipedes (Myriapoda: Chilopoda). Invertebr. Syst. 2006, 20:503-525.
16. Edgecombe G.D., Giribet G. Evolutionary biology of Centipedes (Myriapoda: Chilopoda). Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2007, 52:151-170.
17. Edgecombe G.D., Giribet G. A New Zealand species of the trans-Tasman centipede order Craterostigmomorpha (Arthropoda: Chilopoda) corroborated by molecular evidence. Invertebr. Syst. 2008, 22:1-15.
18. Edgecombe G.D., Giribet G. Phylogenetics of scutigeromorph centipedes (Myriapoda: Chilopoda) with implications for species delimitation and historical biogeography of the Australian and New Caledonian faunas. Cladistics 2009, 25:406-427.
19. Edgecombe G.D., Giribet G., Wheeler W.C. Phylogeny of Chilopoda: Combining 18S and 28S rRNA sequences and morphology. Evolución y Filogenia de Arthropoda 1999, vol. 26:293-331. Bol. Soc. Entomol. Arag, pp.
20. Edgecombe G.D., Koch M. Phylogeny of scolopendromorph centipedes (Chilopoda): morphological analysis featuring characters from the peristomatic area. Cladistics 2008, 24:872-901.
21. Edgecombe G.D., Koch M. The contribution of preoral chamber and foregut morphology to the phylogenetics of Scolopendromorpha (Chilopoda). Soil Organisms 2009, 81:295-318.
22. Fahlander K. Beiträge zur Anatomie und systematischen Einteilung der Chilopoden. Zool. Bidr. Upps. 1938, 17:1-148.
23. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39(4):783-791.
24. Foddai D., Minelli A. Phylogeny of geophilomorph centipedes: old wisdom and new insights from morphology. Frag. Faun. 2000, 43(supplement):61-71.
25. Folmer O., Black M., Hoeh W., Lutz R., Vrijenhoek R.C. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotech. 1994, 3:294-299.
26. Gascuel O. BIONJ: an improved version of the NJ algorithm based on a simple model of sequence data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1997, 14:685-695.
27. Giribet G. Relationships among metazoan phyla as inferred from 18S rRNA sequence data: a methodological approach. Molecular Systematics and Evolution: Theory and Practice 2002, 85-101. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel. R. DeSalle, G. Giribet, W.C. Wheeler (Eds.).
28. Giribet G., Carranza S., Baguñà J., Riutort M., Ribera C. First molecular evidence for the existence of a Tardigrada + Arthropoda clade. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1996, 13(1):76-84.
29. Giribet G., Carranza S., Riutort J., Baguñà J., Ribera C. Internal phylogeny of the Chilopoda (Myriapoda, Arthropoda) using complete 18S rDNA and partial 28S rDNA sequences. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 1999, 354:215-222.
30. Giribet G., Edgecombe G.D. Conflict between datasets and phylogeny of centipedes: an analysis based on seven genes and morphology. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 2006, 273:531-538.
31. Giribet G., Edgecombe G.D. The importance of looking at small-scale patterns when inferring Gondwanan biogeography: a case study of the centipede Paralamyctes (Chilopoda, Lithobiomorpha, Henicopidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2006, 89:65-78.
32. Giribet G., Ribera C. A review of arthropod phylogeny: new data based on ribosomal DNA sequences and direct character optimization. Cladistics 2000, 16:204-231.
33. Giribet G., Vogt L., Pérez-González A., Sharma P., Kury A.B. A multilocus approach to harvestman (Arachnida: Opiliones) phylogeny with emphasis on biogeography and the systematics of Laniatores. Cladistics 2010, 26. 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00296.x.
34. Giribet G., Wheeler W.C. Some unusual small-subunit ribosomal RNA sequences of metazoans. Am. Mus. Novit. 2001, 3337:1-14.
35. Goloboff P. Analyzing large data sets in reasonable times: solutions for composite optima. Cladistics 1999, 15(4):415-428.
36. Goloboff P.A. A reanalysis of mygalomorph spider families (Araneae). Am. Mus. Novit. 1993, 3056:1-32.
37. Goloboff P.A. Estimating character weights during tree search. Cladistics 1993, 9:83-91.
38. Goloboff P.A. Parsimony and weighting: a reply to Turner and Zandee. Cladistics 1995, 11:91-104.
39. Goloboff P.A., Farris J.S., Nixon K. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 2008, 24:774-786.
40. Gorodkin J., Lyngso R.B., Stormo G.D. A mini-greedy algorithm for faster structural RNA stem-loop search. Genome Inform. 2001, 12:184-193.
41. Griswold C.E., Coddington J.A., Hormiga G., Scharff N. Phylogeny of the orb-web building spiders (Araneae, Orbiculariae, Deinopoidea, Araneoidea). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 1998, 123:1-99.
42. Guindon S., Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 2003, 52(5):696-704.
43. Hilken G. Tracheal systems in Chilopoda: a comparison under phylogenetic aspects. Entomol. Scand. Supp. 1997, 51:49-60.
44. Ho S.Y.W. Calibrating molecular estimates of substitution rates and divergence times in birds. J. Avian. Biol. 2007, 38:409-414.
45. Ho S.Y.W., Phillips M. Accounting for calibration uncertainty in phylogenetic estimation of evolutionary divergence times. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58(3):367-380.
46. Hofacker I.L., Bernhart S.H.F., Stadler P.F. Alignment of RNA base pairing probability matrices. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:2222-2227.
47. Holmes I. A probabilistic model for the evolution of RNA structure. BMC Bioinformatics 2004, 5:166.
48. Johnson E.W., Briggs D.E.G., Suthren R.J., Wright J.L., Tunnicliff S.P. Non-marine arthropod traces from the subaerial Ordovician Borrowdale Volcanic Group, English Lake District. Geol. Mag. 1994, 131:395-406.
49. Kjer K., Gillespie R.G., Ober K.A. Opinions on multiple sequence alignment and an empirical comparison of repeatability and accuracy between POY and structural alignment. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:1330146.
50. Kjer K., Roshan U., Gillespie J.J. Structural and evolutionary considerations for multiple sequence alignment of RNA, and the challenges for algorithms that ignore them. Sequence alignment: methods, models, concepts and strategies 2009, 1050-1149. Univ. California Press, Berkeley. M.S. Rosenberg (Ed.).
51. Koch M., Edgecombe G.D. The peristomatic structures in Scutigeromorpha (Chilopoda): a comparative study, with new characters for higher-level systematics. Zoomorphology 2006, 125:187-207.
52. Koch M., Edgecombe G.D. The peristomatic structures of Lithobiomorpha (Myriapoda, Chilopoda): comparative morphology and phylogenetic significance. J. Morphol. 2008, 269:153-174.
53. Koch M., Pärschke S., Edgecombe G.D. Phylogenetic implications of gizzard morphology in scolopendromorph centipedes (Chilopoda). Zool. Scr. 2009, 38:269-288.
54. Langley C.H., Fitch W. An estimation of the constancy of the rate of molecular evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 1974, 3:161-177.
55. Lee M.S.Y., Oliver P.M., Hutchinson M.N. Phylogenetic uncertainty and molecular clock calibrations: a case study of legless lizards (Pygopodidae, Gekkota). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 50:661-666.
56. Letsch H.O., Greve C., Kück P., Fleck G., Stocsits R.R., Misof B. Simultaneous alignment and folding of 28S rRNA sequences uncovers phylogenetic signal in structure variation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 53:758-771.
57. Lewis P.O. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst. Biol. 2001, 50(6):913-925.
58. Mallatt J., Giribet G. Further use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA genes to classify Ecdysozoa: 37 more arthropods and a kinorhynch. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2006, 40:772-794.
59. Mallatt, J., Waggoner Craig, C., Yoder, M.J., 2009. Nearly complete rRNA genes assembled from across the metazoan animals: effects of more taxa a structure-based alignment and paired-sites evolutionary models on phylogeny reconstruction. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. doi: doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2009.09.028.
60. Miller, M.A., Hilder, M.T., Vos, R., Midford, P.E., Liebowitz, T., Chan, L., Hoover, P., Warnow, T., 2009. The CIPRES Portals. Archived by WebCite(r) at http://www.phylo.org/sub_sections/portal.
61. Misof B., Fleck G. Comparative analysis of mt LSU secondary structure of odonates: structural variability and phylogenetic signal. Insect Mol. Biol. 2003, 12:535-547.
62. Misof B., Misof K. A Monte Carlo approach successfully identifies randomness in multiple sequence alignments: a more objective means of data exclusion. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58(1):21-34.
63. Müller C.H.G., Meyer-Rochow V.B. Fine structural description of the lateral ocellus of Craterostigmus tasmanianus Pocock, 1902 (Chilopoda: Craterostigmomorpha) and phylogenetic considerations. J. Morphol. 2006, 267:850-865.
64. Müller C.H.G., Meyer-Rochow V.B. Fine structural organization of the lateral ocelli in two species of Scolopendra (Chilopoda: Pleurostigmophora): an evolutionary evaluation. Zoomorphology 2006, 125:13-26.
65. Müller C.H.G., Rosenberg J. Homology of lateral ocelli in the Pleurostigmophora? New evidence from the retinal fine structure in some lithobiomorph species (Chilopoda: Lithobiidae). Norwegian J. Entomol. 2006, 53:165-186.
66. Murienne J. Molecular data confirm family status of the Tryonicus-Lauraesilpha group (Insecta, Blattodea, Tryonicidae). Org. Divers. Evol. 2009, 9:44-51.
67. Murienne J., Harvey M.S., Giribet G. First molecular phylogeny of the major clades of Pseudoscorpiones (Arthropoda: Cehlicerata). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 49:170-184.
68. Murienne J., Karaman I., Giribet G. Explosive evolution of an ancient group of Cyphophthalmi (Arachnida: Opiliones) in the Balkan Peninsula. J. Biogeogr. 2010, 37:90-102.
69. Niehuis O., Naumann C.M., Misof B. Identification of evolutionary conserved structural elements in the mt SSU rRNA of Zygaenoidea (Lepidoptera): a comparative sequence analysis. Org. Divers. Evol. 2006, 6:17-32.
70. Nixon K.C. The Parsimony Ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 1999, 15(4):407-414.
71. Notredame C., O'Brien E.A., Higgins D.G. RAGA: RNA sequence alignment by genetic algorithm. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25:4570-4580.
72. Pocock R.I. A new and annectant type of chilopod. Quart. J. Microscop. Sci. 1902, 45:417-448.
73. Prendini L. Phylogeny and classification of the superfamily Scorpionoidea Latreille 1802 (Chelicerata, Scorpiones): an exemplar approach. Cladistics 2000, 16:1-78.
74. Prendini L., Weygoldt P., Wheeler W.C. Systematics of the Damon variagatus group of African whip spiders (Chelicerata: Amblypygi): evidence from behaviour, morphology and DNA. Org. Divers. Evol. 2005, 5:203-236.
75. Prunescu C.C. Contribution à l'étude de l'évolution des Chilopodes. Rev. Roum. Biol. Zool. 1965, 10:89-102.
76. Regier J.C., Shultz J.W., Zwick A., Hussey A., Ball B., Wetzer R., Martin J.W., Cunningham C.W. Arthropod relationships revealed by phylogenomic analysis of nuclear protein-coding sequences. Nature 2010, 463:1079-1083.
77. Regier J.C., Wilson H.M., Shultz J.W. Phylogenetic analysis of Myriapoda using three nuclear protein-coding genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2005, 34:147-158.
78. Sanderson M.J. A nonparametric approach to estimating divergence times in the absence of rate constancy. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1997, 14(12):1218-1231.
79. Sanderson M.J. Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2002, 19:101-109.
80. Sanderson M.J. R8s: Inferring absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence dates in the absence of a molecular clock. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:301-302.
81. Sanderson, M.J., 2006. r8s version 1.71, program and documentation. Available at: http://www.loco.biosci.arizona.edu/r8s/.
82. Schmidt H.A., Strimmer K., Vingron M., von Haeseler A. TREE-PUZZLE: maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis using quartets and parallel computing. Bioinformatics 2002, 18(2):502-504.
83. Schmidt, H.A., Strimmer, K., Vingron, M., von Haeseler, A., 2003. Tree-puzzle 5.3, Available at: http://www.tree-puzzle.de/.
84. Schwendinger J., Giribet G. The systematics of south-east Asian genus Fangensis Rambla (Opiliones: Cyphophthalmi: Stylocellidae). Invertebr. Syst. 2005, 19:297-323.
85. Shear W.A., Bonamo P.M. Devonobiomorpha, a new order of centipeds (Chilopoda) from the Middle Devonian of Gilboa, New York State, USA, and the phylogeny of centiped orders. Am. Mus. Novit. 1988, 2927:1-30.
86. Shear W.A., Edgecombe G.D. Geological history and phylogeny of the Myriapoda. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 2010, 39:174-190.
87. Shear W.A., Jeram A.J., Selden P.A. Centiped legs (Arthropoda, Chilopoda, Scutigeromorpha) from the Silurian and Devonian of Britain and the Devonian of North America. Am. Mus. Novit. 1998, 3231:1-16.
88. Shinohara K. On the phylogeny of Chilopoda. Proc. Jap. Soc. Syst. Zool. 1970, 65:35-42.
89. Smith S.A., Dunn C.W. Phyutility: a phyloinformatics tool for trees, alignments, and molecular data. Bioinformatics 2008, 24(5):715-716.
90. Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22(21):2688-2690.
91. Stamatakis A., Hoover P., Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst. Biol. 2008, 57(5):758-771.
92. Stocsits R.R., Letsch H., Hertel J., Misof B., Stadler P.F. Accurate and efficient reconstruction of deep phylogenies from structured RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37(18):6184-6193.
93. Stocsits, R.R., Letsch, H., Hertel, J., Misof, B., Stadler, P.F., 2009b. RNAsalsa version 0.7.4, Available at: http://www.rnasalsa.zfmk.de.
94. Strimmer K., von Haeseler A. Likelihood-mapping: a simple mehod to visualize phylogenetic content of a sequence alignment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94:6815-6819.
95. Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G., Gibson T.J. Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22(22):4673-4680.
96. Turner H., Zandee R. The behaviour of Goloboff's tree fitness measure. Cladistics 1995, 11:57-72.
97. Varón A., Vinh L.S., Wheeler W.C. POY version 4: phylogenetic analysis using dynamic homologies. Cladistics 2010, 26:72-85.
98. Verhoeff, K.W., 1902-1925. Chilopoda. In: Bronn, H.G. (Ed.), Klassen und Ordnungen des Tier-reichs. vol. 5, Abteilung 2, Buch 1. C. F. Winter'sche Verlagshandlung, Leipzig, pp. 1-725.
99. von Reumont B., Meusemann K., Szucsich N.U., Dell'Ampio E., Gowri-Shankar V., Bartel D., Simon S., Letsch H.O., Stocsits R.R., Luan Y.-X., Wägele J.W., Pass G., Hadrys H., Misof B. Can comprehensive background knowledge be incorporated into substitution models to improve phylogenetic analyses? A case study on major arthropod relationships. BMC Evol. Biol. 2009, 9:119.
100. Waterhouse A.M., Procter J.B., Martin D.M.A., Clamp M., Barton G.J. Jalview Version 2-a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 2009, 25(9):1189-1191.
101. Wheeler W.C. Optimization alignment: the end of multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetics?. Cladistics 1996, 12(1):1-9.
102. Whiting M.F., Carpenter J.M., Wheeler Q.D., Wheeler W.C. The Strepsiptera problem: phylogeny of the holometabolous insect orders inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal DNA sequences and morphology. Syst. Biol. 1997, 46(1):1-68.
103. Wilson H.M., Anderson L.I. Morphology and taxonomy of Paleozoic millipedes (Diplopoda: Chilognatha: Archipolypoda) from Scotland. J. Paleontol. 2004, 78:169-184.
104. Wirkner C.S., Pass G. The circulatory system in Chilopoda: functional morphology and phylogenetic aspects. Acta Zool. 2002, 83:193-202.
105. Xiong B., Kocher T.D. Comparison of mitochondrial DNA sequences of seven morphospecies of black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae). Genome 1991, 34(2):306-311.
106. Yang Z. Maximum-likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1993, 10(6):1396-1401.
107. Zwickl, D.J., 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.