The complex folding network of single calmodulin molecules

Science

Volumn 334, Issue 6055, 2011, Pages 512-516

  Stigler, Johannes ^a   Ziegler, Fabian ^a   Gieseke, Anja ^a   Gebhardt, J Christof M ^a,c   Rief, Matthias ^a,b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b Munich Center for Integrated Protein Science   (Germany)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM ION; CALMODULIN; HELIX LOOP HELIX PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN;

BIOASSAY; BIOCHEMISTRY; CALCIUM; CHEMICAL BINDING; CHEMICAL PROPERTY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; PROTEIN; SPECTROSCOPY;

ALPHA HELIX; ARTICLE; BIOASSAY; CALCIUM BINDING; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; OPTICAL TWEEZERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN UNFOLDING; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 80055087629     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1207598     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. J. N. Onuchic, P. G. Wolynes, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14, 70 (2004).
2. D. Thirumalai, C. Hyeon, Biochemistry 44, 4957 (2005).
3. D. E. Shaw et al., Science 330, 341 (2010).
4. P. L. Freddolino, F. Liu, M. Gruebele, K. Schulten, Biophys. J. 94, L75 (2008).
5. V. A. Voelz, G. R. Bowman, K. Beauchamp, V. S. Pande, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 1526 (2010).
6. B. Schuler, W. A. Eaton, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 18, 16 (2008).
7. E. M. Puchner et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 13385 (2008).
8. H. Li, A. F. Oberhauser, S. B. Fowler, J. Clarke, J. M. Fernandez, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 6527 (2000).
9. M. Rief, M. Gautel, F. Oesterhelt, J. M. Fernandez, H. E. Gaub, Science 276, 1109 (1997).
10. P. Zheng, Y. Cao, T. Bu, S. K. Straus, H. Li, Biophys. J. 100, 1534 (2011).
11. J. P. Junker, F. Ziegler, M. Rief, Science 323, 633 (2009).
12. E. A. Shank, C. Cecconi, J. W. Dill, S. Marqusee, C. Bustamante, Nature 465, 637 (2010).
13. C. Cecconi, E. A. Shank, C. Bustamante, S. Marqusee, Science 309, 2057 (2005).
14. J. C. M. Gebhardt, T. Bornschlögl, M. Rief, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 2013 (2010).
15. J. Liphardt, B. Onoa, S. B. Smith, I. Tinoco Jr., C. Bustamante, Science 292, 733 (2001).
16. M. T. Woodside et al., Science 314, 1001 (2006).
17. C.-R. Rabl, S. R. Martin, E. Neumann, P. M. Bayley, Biophys. Chem. 101-102, 553 (2002).
18. J. P. Junker, M. Rief, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 49, 3306 (2010).
19. C. F. Shuman, R. Jiji, K. S. Åkerfeldt, S. Linse, J. Mol. Biol. 358, 870 (2006).
20. M. B. Borgia et al., Nature 474, 662 (2011).
21. A. F. Oberhauser, P. E. Marszalek, M. Carrion-Vazquez, J. M. Fernandez, Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 1025 (1999).
22. L. Masino, S. R. Martin, P. M. Bayley, Protein Sci. 9, 1519 (2000).
23. C. Cecconi, E. A. Shank, F. W. Dahlquist, S. Marqusee, C. Bustamante, Eur. Biophys. J. 37, 729 (2008).
24. M. Schlierf, H. Li, J. M. Fernandez, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 7299 (2004).
25. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
26. M. P. Landry, P. M. McCall, Z. Qi, Y. R. Chemla, Biophys. J. 97, 2128 (2009).
27. M. de Messieres, B. Brawn-Cinani, A. La Porta, Biophys. J. 100, 2736 (2011).
28. H. Dietz, M. Rief, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 1244 (2006).
29. At a pretension of 11 pN, the expected length difference from the fully folded state to the fully unfolded state of calmodulin is 19.3 nm, if one assumes a persistence length of 0.5 nm and a contour length gain of 0.365 nm per amino acid residue.
30. J. Krebs, C. W. Heizmann, New Compr. Biochem. 41, 51 (2007).
31. S. Fefeu et al., Biochemistry 39, 15920 (2000).
32. K. Nakashima, H. Ishida, S. Y. Ohki, K. Hikichi, M. Yazawa, Biochemistry 38, 98 (1999).
33. T. M. Lakowski, G. M. Lee, M. Okon, R. E. Reid, L. P. McIntosh, Protein Sci. 16, 1119 (2007).
34. Y.-G. Chen, G. Hummer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 2414 (2007).
35. -1. This may be explained by considering that, in all those transitions, binding of calcium ions dominates the folding process.
36. Z. Guo, D. Thirumalai, Biopolymers 36, 83 (1995).