Peer evaluation in a clinical clerkship: Students' attitudes, experiences, and correlations with traditional assessments

Academic Psychiatry

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 19-24

  Levine, Ruth E ^a,c   Kelly, P Adam ^b   Karakoc, Tayfun ^a   Haidet, Paul ^b  

^a University of Texas Medical Branch School of Medicine   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EDUCATION; CURRICULUM; HUMAN; MEDICAL STUDENT; PEER REVIEW; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS REVIEW ORGANIZATION; SCORING SYSTEM; STUDENT ATTITUDE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STANDARD; STATISTICS; STUDENT; UNITED STATES;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL CLERKSHIP; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW; STUDENTS; TEXAS;

EID: 33947538992     PISSN: 10429670     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ap.31.1.19     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Arnold L, Willoughby L, Calkins V, et al: Use of peer evaluation in the assessment of medical students. J Med Educ 1981; 56:35-42
2. Von Rosendaal GMA, Jennett PA: Comparing peer and faculty evaluations in an internal medicine residency. Acad Med 1994; 69:299-303
3. Sullivan ME, Hitchcock MA, Dunnington GL: Peer and self-assessment during problem-based tutorials. Am J Surg 1999; 177:266-269
4. Ramsey PG, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, et al: Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. JAMA 1993; 269:1655-1660
5. Eva KW: Assessing tutorial-based assessment. Adv H Sci Educ 2001; 6:243-257
6. Norcini JJ: Peer assessment of competence. Med Educ 2003; 37:539-543
7. Cheng W, Warren M: Making a difference: Using peers to assess individual students' contributions to a group project. Teach Higher Educ 2000; 5:243-255
8. Heylings DJ, Stefani LAJ: Peer assessment feedback marking in a large medical anatomy class. Med Educ 1997; 31:281-286
9. Thomas PA, Gebo KA, Hellmann DB: A pilot study of peer review in residency training. J Gen Intern Med 1999; 14:551-554
10. Magzoub ME, Schmidt HG, Dolmans D: Assessing students in community settings: the role of peer evaluation. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 1998; 3:3-13
11. Vuorinen R, Tarkka MT, Meretoja R: Peer evaluation in nurses' professional development: a pilot study to investigate the issues. J Clin Nurs 2000; 9:273-281
12. Ramsey PG, Carline JD, Blank LL, et al: Feasibility of hospital-based use of peer ratings to evaluate the performances of practicing physicians. Acad Med 1996; 71:364-370
13. Wendling A, Hoekstra L: Interactive peer review: an innovative resident evaluation tool. Fam Med 2002; 34:738-743
14. Van Rosendaal GM, Jennett PA: Resistance to peer evaluations in an internal medicine residency. Acad Med 1992; 67:63
15. Reiter HI, Eva KW, Hatala RM, et al: Self and peer assessment in tutorials: application of a relative-ranking model. Acad Med 2002; 77:1134-1139
16. Greenbaum DS, Hoban JD: Teaching peer review at Michigan State University. J Med Educ 1976; 51:392-395
17. Searle NS, Haidet P, Kelly PA, et al: Team learning in medical education: initial experiences at 10 institutions. Acad Med 2003; 78(suppl 10):555-558
18. Levine RE, O'Boyle M, Haidet P, et al: Transforming a clinical clerkship through team learning. Teach Learn Med 2004; 16:270-275
19. Michaelsen LK, Knight AB, Fink LD (eds): Team-Based Learning: A Transformative Use of Small Groups in College Teaching. Sterling, Va, Stylus Publishing, 2004
20. Michaelsen LK, Fink LD (eds): Calculating peer evaluation scores, in Team-Based Learning: A Transformative Use of Small Groups in College Teaching. Sterling, Va, Stylus Publishing, 2004, pp 241-248
21. Association of American Medical Colleges: Learning objectives for medical student education: guidelines for medical schools: report I of the Medical School Objectives Project. Acad Med 1999; 74:13-18