Factors influencing the effectiveness of multisource feedback in improving the professional practice of medical doctors: A systematic review

BMC Medical Education

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Ferguson, Julie ^a,b   Wakeling, Judy ^a   Bowie, Paul ^a  

^a NHS EDUCATION FOR SCOTLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARGARET UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assessment; Multisource Feedback; Physicians; Revalidation; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PHYSICIAN; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; UNITED KINGDOM;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL; FEEDBACK; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; PHYSICIANS; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT;

EID: 84899901698     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726920     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-76     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Self assessment and the concept of the lifelong learning nurse. Gopee N, Brit J Nurs 2000 9 724 729
2. Defining and assessing professional competence. Epstein RM, Hundert EM, JAMA 2002 287 226 235 10.1001/jama.287.2.226 11779266 (Pubitemid 34251949)
3. Assessment in medical education. Epstein RM, New Engl J Med 2007 356 387 396 10.1056/NEJMra054784 17251535 (Pubitemid 46148781)
4. Using standardized oral examinations to evaluate general competencies. Hayes OW, Reisdorff EJ, Walker GL, Carlson DJ, Reinoehl B, Acad Emerg Med 2002 9 1334 1337 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01597.x 12414491 (Pubitemid 35291569)
5. A blueprint to assess professionalism: results of a systematic review. Wilkinson TJ, Wade WB, Knock LD, Acad Med 2009 84 551 558 10.1097/ACM. 0b013e31819fbaa2 19704185
6. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Norcini J, Burch V, Med Teach 2007 29 855 871 10.1080/01421590701775453 18158655
7. Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors' education and performance: a systematic review. Miller A, Archer J, BMJ 2007 341 710 715
8. Doctor performance assessment in daily practise: does it help doctors or not? A systematic review. Overeem K, Faber MJ, Arah OA, Elwyn G, Lombarts KM, Wollersheim HC, Grol RP, Med Educ 2007 41 1039 1049 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007. 02897.x 17973764 (Pubitemid 350029289)
9. The assessment of professional competence: building blocks for theory development. van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT, Scheele MD, Driessen EW, Hodges B, Best Pract Res Cl Ob 2010 24 703 719
10. Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of reliability. van der Vleuten CPM, Norman GR, De Graaf E, Med Educ 1991 25 110 118 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1991.tb00036.x 2023552
11. General Medical Council, Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation London: General Medical Council 2012
12. How do 360 degree performance reviews affect employee attitudes, effectiveness and performance? Alexander DM, University of Rhode Island, Schmidt Labor Research Center Seminar Research Series [online] 2006 1 12 [ http://www.uri.edu/research/lrc/research/papers/Alexander-360.pdf ]
13. Brett J, Atwater L, 360 degree feedback: Accuracy, reactions and perceptions of usefulness. J Appl Psychol 2001 86 930 942 11596809
14. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, O'Brien MA, Oxman AD, Cochrane Db Syst Rev 2006 2 Art. No.: CD000259
15. Changes in performance: a 5year longitudinal study of participants in a multisource feedback programme. Violato C, Lockyer JM, Fidler H, Med Educ 2008 42 1007 1013 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03127.x 18823520
16. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D, PLoS Med 2009 6 1000100 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 19621070
17. Barr H, Freeth D, Hammick M, Koppel I, Reeves S, Evaluations of Interprofessional Education: A United Kingdom Review of Health and Social Care London: CAIPE 2000
18. The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11. Buckley S, Coleman J, Davison I, Khan KS, Zamora J, Malick S, Morely D, Pollard D, Ashcroft T, Popovic C, Sayers J, Med Teach 2009 31 282 298 10.1080/01421590902889897 19404891
19. Effect of multisource feedback on resident communication skills and professionalism: a randomized controlled trial. Brinkman WB, Geraghty SR, Lanphear BP, Khoury JC, Gonzalez Del Rey JA, De Witt TG, Britto MT, Arch Pediat Adol Med 2007 161 44 49 10.1001/archpedi.161.1.44 (Pubitemid 46045462)
20. User perceptions of multi-source feedback tools for junior doctors. Burford B, Illing J, Kergon C, Morrow G, Livingston M, Med Educ 2010 44 165 176 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03565.x 20059677
21. Changing physicians' practices: the effect of individual feedback. Fidler H, Lockyer JM, Toews J, Violato C, Acad Med 1999 74 702 10.1097/00001888- 199906000-00019 10386101
22. Assessment of physician performance in Alberta: the physician achievement review. Hall W, Violato C, Lewkonia R, Lockyer J, Fidler H, Toews J, Jennett P, Donoff M, Moores D, Can Med Assoc J 1999 161 52 57 (Pubitemid 29363823)
23. The value of patient and peer ratings in recertification. Lipner RS, Blank LL, Leas BF, Fortna GS, Acad Med 2002 77 64 10.1097/00001888-200210001- 00021 12377708
24. Likelihood of change: a study assessing surgeon use of multisource feedback data. Lockyer J, Violato C, Fidler H, Teach Learn Med 2003 15 168 174 10.1207/S15328015TLM1503-04 12855387 (Pubitemid 37026160)
25. Three methods of multi-source feedback compared: a plea for narrative comments and coworkers' perspectives. Overeem K, Lombarts MJMH, Arah OA, Klazinga NS, Grol RP, Wollersheim HC, Med Teach 2010 32 141 147 10.3109/01421590903144128 20163230
26. Doctors' perceptions of why 360-degree feedback does (not) work: a qualitative study. Overeem K, Wollersheim H, Driessen E, Lombarts K, Van De Ven G, Grol R, Arah O, Med Educ 2009 43 874 882 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03439.x 19709012
27. Factors predicting doctors' reporting of performance change in response to multisource feedback. Overeem K, Wollersheimh HC, Arah OA, Cruijsberg JK, Grol RP, Lombarts KM, BMC Med Educ 2012 12 52 10.1186/1472-6920-12-52 22781214
28. Is multi-source feedback (MSF) seen as a useful educational tool in primary care? A qualitative study. Owens J, Educ Prim Care 2010 21 180 20515546
29. Responses of rural family physicians and their colleague and coworker raters to a multi-source feedback process: a pilot study. Sargeant JM, Mann KV, Ferrier SN, Langille DB, Muirhead PD, Hayes VM, Sinclair DE, Acad Med 2003 78 42 10.1097/00001888-200310001-00014 14557092
30. Exploring family physicians' reactions to multisource feedback: perceptions of credibility and usefulness. Sargeant J, Mann K, Ferrier S, Med Educ 2005 39 497 504 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02124.x 15842684 (Pubitemid 40592959)
31. Challenges in multisource feedback: intended and unintended outcomes. Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, Van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J, Med Educ 2007 41 583 591 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02769.x 17518839 (Pubitemid 46789583)
32. Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, Van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J, Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2008 13 275 288 10.1007/s10459-006-9039-x 17091339
33. Reflection: a link between receiving and using assessment feedback. Sargeant JM, Mann KV, van der Vleuten CP, Metsemakers JF, Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009 14 399 410 10.1007/s10459-008-9124-4 18528777
34. What is a good general practitioner (GP)? The development and evaluation of a multi-source feedback instrument for GP appraisal. Shepherd A, Lough M, Educ Prim Care 2010 21 149 164 20515544
35. Systematic revew of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians' clinical performance: BEME Guide No. 7. Veloski J, Med Teach 2006 28 117 128 10.1080/01421590600622665 16707292 (Pubitemid 43771960)
36. Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis and review of empirical findings. Smither JW, London M, Reilly RR, Pers Psychol 2005 58 33 66 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.514-1.x (Pubitemid 40622796)
37. When does 360-degree feedback create behavior change? And how would we know it when it does? Bracken DW, Rose DS, J Bus Psychol 2011 26 183 192 10.1007/s10869-011-9218-5
38. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Systematic Reviews CRD's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care Heslington: CRD, University of York 2008
39. Different patterns of duplicate publication. Von Elm E, Poglia G, Walder B, Tramer MR, JAMA 2004 291 974 980 10.1001/jama.291.8.974 14982913 (Pubitemid 38543755)
40. Do self-reported intentions predict clinicians' behaviour: a systematic review. Eccles MP, Hrisos S, Francis J, Kaner EF, Dickinson HO, Beyer F, Johnston M, Implement Science 2004 1 28
41. Are there valid proxy measures of clinical behaviour? A systematic review. Hrisos S, Eccles MP, Francis JJ, Dickinson HO, Kaner EF, Beyer F, Johnston M, Implement Science 2009 4 37 10.1186/1748-5908-4-37
42. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. Ajzen I, Action-control: From cognition to behavior Heidelberg: Springer, Kuhl J, Beckmann J, 1985 11 39
43. Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Ajzen I, Madden TJ, J Exp Soc Psychol 1986 22 453 474 10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4
44. Ajzen I, Attitudes, personality and behavior Chicago: Dorsey Press 1988
45. A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Rogers RW, J Psychol 1975 91 93 114 10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803
46. Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. Rogers RW, Social psychophysiology: A source book London: Guildford Press, Cacioppo BL BL, Petty LL, 1983 153 176
47. Attitude change and information integration in fear appeals. Rogers RW, Psychol Rep 1985 56 179 182 10.2466/pr0.1985.56.1.179
48. Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Webb TL, Sheeran P, Psychol Bull 2006 132 249 268 16536643 (Pubitemid 43439928)