Likelihood of change: A study assessing surgeon use of multisource feedback data

Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 168-174

  Lockyer, Jocelyn ^a   Violato, Claudio ^a   Fidler, Herta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; INFORMATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; JOB PERFORMANCE; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF CONCEPT; STUDY; SURGEON; VARIANCE; WORKER;

EID: 0042922809     PISSN: 10401334     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1503_04     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bracken DW, Timmreck CW, Church AH (Eds.). The handbook of multisource feedback: The comprehensive resource for designing and implementing MSF processes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.
2. Hall W, Violato C, Lewkonia R, et al. Assessment of physician performance in Alberta: The Physician Achievement Review Project. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1999; 161:52-7.
3. Violato C, Marini A, Toews J, Lockyer J, Fidler H. Using peers, consulting physicians, patients, co-workers and self to assess physicians. Academic Medicine 1997; 70:57-63.
4. Ramsey PG, Carline JD, Inui TS, Larson EB, LoGerfo JP, Wenrich MD. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. Journal of the American Medical Association 1993; 1655-60.
5. Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Giles LM, Ramsey PG. Ratings of the performances of practicing internists by hospital-based registered nurses. Academic Medicine 1993; 68:680-7.
6. Lipner RS, Blank LL, Leas BF, Fortna GS. The value of patient and peer ratings in recertification. Academic Medicine 2002;77(10, Suppl.):64-6.
7. Griffin E, Sanders C, Craven D, King J. A computerized 360° feedback tool for personal and organizational development in general practice. Health Informatics Journal 2000;6:71-80.
8. Woolliscroft JO, Howell JD, Patel BP, Swanson DB. Resident-patient interactions: The humanistic qualities of internal medicine residents assessed by patients, attending physicians, program supervisors and nurses. Academic Medicine 1994;69:216-24.
9. Fidler H, Lockyer J, Toews J, Violato C. Changing physicians' practices: The effect of individual feedback. Academic Medicine 1999;74:702-14.
10. Johnson JW, Ferstl KL. The effects of interrater and self-other agreement on performance improvement following upward feedback. Personnel Psychology 1999;52:271-303.
11. Hazucha JF, Hezlett SA, Schneider RJ. The impact of 360-degree feedback on management skills development. Human Resources Management 1993;32:325-51.
12. Reilly RB, Smither IW, Vasilopoulos NL. A longitudinal study of upward feedback. Personnel Psychology 1996;49:599-612.
13. Smither JW, London M, Vasilopoulos NL, Reilly RR, Millsap RE, Salvemini N. An examination of the effects of an upward feedback program over time. Personnel Psychology 1995;48:1-34.
14. Brett JF, Atwater LE. 360° feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology 2001;86:930-42.
15. Walker AG, Smither JW. A five-year study of upward feedback: What managers do with their results matters. Personnel Psychology 1999;5:393-423.
16. Societal Needs Working Group of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Skills for the New Millennium: Canadian Medical Education Directions for Specialists 2000 Project. Annals of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada 1996;29:206-16.
17. ACGME Outcome Project. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Web site. Retrieved November 22, 2002, from http://www.acgme.org/outcome/comp/compFull.asp
18. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta - Physician Achievement Review Program. Retrieved November 22, 2002, from http://www.par-program
19. Connors GP, Munro TW. 360-degree physician evaluations. Healthcare Executive 2001;58-9.
20. Jako RA. Evolution of multisource feedback in a dynamic environment. In DW Bracken, CW Timmreck, AH Church (Eds.), The handbook of multisource feedback: The comprehensive resource for designing and implementing MSF processes (pp. 403-17). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.
21. Lockyer JM. Physician performance: The role of knowledge, skill and environment. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 1992;4:86-96.
22. Levine AM. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: A physician charter. Annals of Internal Medicine 2002;136:243-6.
23. Cassie JM, Armbruster JS, Bowmer MI, Leach DC. Accreditation of postgraduate medical education in the United States and Canada: A comparison of two systems. Medical Education 1999;33:493-8.
24. Southgate L, Hays RB, Norcini J, et al. Setting performance standards for medical practice: A theoretical framework, Medical Education 2001;35:474-81.