Factors predicting doctors reporting of performance change in response to multisource feedback

BMC Medical Education

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Overeem, Karlijn ^a   Wollersheimh, Hub C ^a   Arah, Onyebuchi A ^b,c,d   Cruijsberg, Juliette K ^a   Grol, Richard Ptm ^a   Lombarts, Kiki Mjmh ^d  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Continuous medical education; Mentoring; Multisource feedback; Performance assessment; Physicians

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; NETHERLANDS; PHYSICIAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SELF REPORT; STATISTICS;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PHYSICIANS; SELF REPORT;

EID: 84863599662     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726920     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-52     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Assessment of physician performance in Alberta: the physician achievement review. Hall W, Violato C, Lewkonia R, et al. CMAJ 1999 161 1 52 7 10420867 (Pubitemid 29363823)
2. Exploring family physicians' reactions to multisource feedback: perceptions of credibility and usefulness. Sargeant J, Mann K, Ferrier S, Med Educ 2005 39 5 497 504 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02124.x 15842684 (Pubitemid 40592959)
3. Specialty-specific multi-source feedback: assuring validity, informing training. Davies H, Archer J, Bateman A, Dewar S, Crossley J, Grant J, Southgate L, Med Educ 2008 42 10 1014 20 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03162.x 18823521
4. Combining a leadership course and multi-source feedback has no effect on leadership skills of leaders in postgraduate medical education. Malling B, Mortensen L, Bonderup T, Scherpbier A, Ringsted C, An intervention study with a control group. BMC Med Educ 2010 9 72
5. The power of feedback. Hattie J, Timperley H, Rev Educ Res 2007 77 1 81 112 10.3102/003465430298487
6. Focus on formative feedback. Shute VJ, Rev Educ Res 2008 78 1 153 89 10.3102/0034654307313795
7. Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians' clinical performance*: BEME Guide No. 7. Veloski J, Boex JR, Grasberger MJ, Evans A, Wolfson DB, Med Teach 2006 28 2 117 28 10.1080/01421590600622665 16707292 (Pubitemid 43771960)
8. Responses of rural family physicians and their colleague and coworker raters to a multi-source feedback process: a pilot study. Sargeant JM, Mann KV, Ferrier SN, Langille DB, Muirhead PD, Hayes VM, Sinclair DE, Acad Med 2003 78 10 Suppl 42 4
9. User perceptions of multi-source feedback tools for junior doctors. Burford B, Illing J, Kergon C, Morrow G, Livingston M, Med Educ 2010 44 2 165 76 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03565.x 20059677
10. Changing physicians' practices: the effect of individual feedback. Fidler H, Lockyer JM, Toews J, Violato C, Acad Med 1999 74 6 702 14 10.1097/00001888-199906000-00019 10386101 (Pubitemid 29283168)
11. Likelihood of change: a study assessing surgeon use of multisource feedback data. Lockyer J, Violato C, Fidler H, Teach Learn Med 2003 15 168 74 10.1207/S15328015TLM1503-04 12855387 (Pubitemid 37026160)
12. Sex differences in response to evaluative feedback: A field study. Johnson M, Helgeson VS, Psychol Women Quart 2002 26 242 51 10.1111/1471-6402. 00063
13. A longitudinal study of upward feedback. Reilly RR, Smither JW, Vasilopoulos NL, Pers Psychol 1996 49 599 612 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01586.x
14. An Examination of the Effects of An Upward Feedback Program Over Time. Smither JW, London M, Vasilopoulos ML, Reilly RR, Millsap RE, Salvemini N, Pers Psychol 1995 48 1 34 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01744.x
15. -360 degrees feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. Brett JF, Atwater LE, J Appl Psychol 2001 86 930 42 11596809
16. Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, et al. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2008 13 3 275 88 10.1007/s10459-006-9039-x 17091339
17. Understanding self-other agreement: A look at rater and ratee characteristics, context, and outcomes. Ostroff C, Atwater LE, Feinberg BJ, Pers Psychol 2004 57 333 75 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02494.x (Pubitemid 38882233)
18. Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors' education and performance: a systematic review. Miller A, Archer J, BMJ 2010 341 5064 10.1136/bmj.c5064 20870696
19. Why doctors do (not) improve their performance after 360-degree feedback: a qualitative study. Overeem K, Wollersheim HC, Driessen E, et al. Med Educ 2009 43 9 874 82 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03439.x 19709012
20. Three methods of multi-source feedback compared: a plea for narrative comments and coworkers' perspectives. Overeem K, Lombarts MJ, Arah OA, Klazinga NS, Grol RP, Wollersheim HC, Med Teach 2010 32 2 141 7 10.3109/01421590903144128 20163230
21. Increasing number of women in medicine: past, present and future. van der Velden L, Hingstman L, Heiligers P, Hansen J, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2008 152 40 2165 71 18953778
22. Understanding and optimizing multisource feedback. Atwater LE, Waldman DA, Brett JF, Hum Resource Manage 2002 41 193 208 10.1002/hrm.10031 (Pubitemid 37239374)
23. A systematic review of qualitative research on the meaning and characteristics of mentoring in academic medicine. Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marusic A, J Gen Intern Med 2010 25 1 72 8 10.1007/s11606-009-1165-8 20077156
24. The impact of mentoring during postgraduate training on doctors career success. Stamm M, Buddeberg-Fisscher B, Med Educ 2011 45 5 488 96 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03857.x 21486324
25. Peer-mentoring in doctor performance assessments. Strategies, obstacles and benefits. Overeem K, Driessen EW, Arah OA, Lombarts MJMH, Wollersheim HC, Grol RPTM, Med Educ 2010 44 2 140 147 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03580.x 20040054