What is a good general practitioner (GP)? The development and evaluation of a multi-source feedback instrument for GP appraisal

Education for Primary Care

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 149-164

  Shepherd, Annabel ^a   Lough, Murray ^a  

^a NHS EDUCATION FOR SCOTLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Appraisal; Continuing medical education; Feedback; Multi source feedback; Primary care; Revalidation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COOPERATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERSONALITY; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMMUNICATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; PERSONALITY; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 77952975710     PISSN: 14739879     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14739879.2010.11493901     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Davies H and Archer J (2005) Multi source feedback: development and practical aspects. The Clinical Teacher 2: 77-81.
2. Gray A, Lewis A, Fletcher C et al (2007) 360 Degree Feedback Best Practice Guidelines: the British Psychological Society 2007. www.psychtesting.org.uk/the-ptc/guide linesandinformation.cfm (accessed 20 January 2010)
3. Campbell JL, Richards SH, Dickens A, Greco M, Narayanan A and Brearley S (2008) Assessing the professional performance of UK doctors: an evaluation of the utility of the General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires. Quality and Safety in Health Care 17: 187-193
4. Ramsey P, Carline JD, Inui TS, Larson EB, LoGerfo J and Wenrich MD (1989) Predictive validity of certification by the American Board of Internal Medicine. Annals of Internal Medicine 110: 719-726
5. Lockyer J (2003) Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 23: 4-12.
6. Archer J, Norcini J, Southgate L, Heard S and Davies H (2008) mini-PAT (Peer Assessment Tool): a valid component of a national assessment programme in the UK? Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice 13: 181-192
7. Carr S (2006) The Foundation Programme assessment tools: an opportunity to enhance feedback to trainees? Postgraduate Medical Journal 82: 576-579
8. Hrisos S, Illing JC and Burford BC. (2008) Portfolio learning for foundation doctors: early feedback on its use in the clinical workplace. Medical Education 42: 214-223
9. Whitehouse A, Hassell A, Bullock A, Wood L and Wall D (2007) 360 degree assessment (multisource feedback) of UK trainee doctors: field testing of team assessment of behaviours (TAB). Medical Teaching 29: 171-176
10. Wilkinson JR, Crossley JG, Wragg A, Mills P, Cowan G and Wade W (2008) Implementing workplace-based assessment across the medical specialties in the United Kingdom. Medical Education 42: 364-373
11. Royal College of General Practitioners (2006) Multisource Feedback. Royal College of General Practitioners: London. www.rcgp-curriculum.org.uk/nmrgcp/ wpba/multi-source-feedback.aspx (accessed 18/12/09).
12. Davies H, Archer J, Bateman A, et al (2008) Specialtyspecific multi-source feedback: assuring validity, informing training. Medical Education 42: 1014-1020
13. The Academy's MSF Working Group (2009) Multi-source Feedback, Patient Surveys and Revalidation: report and recommendations. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, London.
14. Waltz CW and Bausell RB (1981) Nursing Research: design, statistics and computer analysis. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis.
15. McKay J, Shepherd A, Bowie P and Lough M (2008) Acceptability and educational impact of a peer feedback model for significant event analysis. Medical Education 42: 1210-1217
16. Crossley J, Humphris G and Jolly B (2002) Assessing health professionals. Medical Education 36: 800-804
17. Rees C and Shepherd M (2005) The acceptability of 360- degree judgements as a method of assessing undergraduate medical students' personal and professional behaviours. Medical Education 39: 49-57.
18. Sargeant J, Mann K and Ferrier SN (2005). Exploring family physicians' reactions to multisource feedback: perceptions of credibility and usefulness. Medical Education 39: 497-504.
19. Brett JF and Atwater LE (2001) 360 degree feedback: accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology 86: 930-942
20. Archer JC, Norcini J and Davies HA (2005). Use of SPRAT for peer review of paediatricians in training. BMJ 330: 1251-1253
21. UK General Medical Council (2006) Good Medical Practice. General Medical Council: London.
22. General Medical Council (2008) Working Framework for Appraisal and Assessment. www.gmc-uk.org/about/reform/gmp-framework.asp
23. Bracken D, Timmreck CW and Church AH (2001) The Handbook of Multi-source Feedback: the comprehensive resource for designing and implementing MSF processes. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
24. Hersen M and Thomas J (2004). Comprehensive Handbook of Psychological Assessment: industrial and organizational assessment. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken: New Jersey.
25. Smither JW and Walker AG (2004) Are the characteristics of narrative comments related to improvement in multirater feedback ratings over time? Journal of Applied Psychology 89: 575-581
26. Sargeant JM, Mann KV, van der Vleuten CP and Metsemakers JF (2009) Reflection: a link between receiving and using assessment feedback. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice 14: 399-410.
27. Smither JW, London M and Reilly RR (2005) Does performance improve following multi-source feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology 58: 33-68.
28. Lockyer J, Violato C and Fidler H (2003) Likelihood of change: a study assessing surgeon use of multisource feedback data. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 15: 168-174
29. Overeem K, Faber MJ, Arah OA et al (2007) Doctor performance assessment in daily practise: does it help doctors or not? A systematic review. Medical Education 41: 1039-1049
30. Violato C, Lockyer JM and Fidler H (2008) Changes in performance: a five-year longitudinal study of participants in a multi-source feedback programme. Medical Education 42: 1007-1013
31. Fidler H, Lockyer JM, Toews J and Violato C (1999) Changing physicians' practices: the effect of individual feedback. Academic Medicine 74: 702-714
32. Sargeant JM, Mann KV, Ferrier SN et al (2003) Responses of rural family physicians and their colleague and coworker raters to a multi-source feedback process: a pilot study. Academic Medicine 78: S42-4.
33. Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, Van der Vleuten C and Metsemakers J (2008) Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice 13: 275-288
34. Violato C and Lockyer J (2006) Self and peer assessment of pediatricians, psychiatrists and medicine specialists: implications for self-directed learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice 11: 235-244