Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors' education and performance: A systematic review

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 341, Issue 7775, 2010, Pages 710-

  Miller, Alice ^a   Archer, Julian ^a  

^a PLYMOUTH UNIVERSITY PENINSULA SCHOOLS OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL EVALUATION; DATA BASE; JOB PERFORMANCE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WORKPLACE;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; EUROPE; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; PATIENT CARE; WORKPLACE;

EID: 77957373546     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c5064     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Van der Vleuten CPM. The assessment of professional competence: development, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ 1996;1:41-67.
2. Modernising Medical Careers. Medical specialty training (England). 2010. www.mmc.nhs.uk.
3. Scheele F, Teunissen P, Van Luijk S, Heineman E, Fluit L, Mulder H, et al. Introducing competency-based postgraduate medical education in the Netherlands. Med Teach 2008;30:248-53. (Pubitemid 351943179)
4. Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board Workplace Based Assessment Subcommittee. Workplace based assessment. Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board, 2005.
5. Swanwick T, Chana N. Workplace-based assessment. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2009;70:290-3.
6. Rethans JJ, Norcini JJ, Baron-Maldonado M, Blackmore D, Jolly BC, LaDuca T, et al. The relationship between competence and performance: implications for assessing practice performance. Med Educ 2002;36:901-9. (Pubitemid 35286311)
7. Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med 1990;65:S63-7.
8. General Medical Council, Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. Workplace based assessment: a guide for implementation. 2010. www.gmc-uk.org/Workplace- Based-Assessment.pdf-31300577.pdf.
9. Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No 31. Med Teach 2007;29:855-71.
10. Veloski J, Boex JR, Grasberger MJ, Evans A, Wolfson DB. Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians' clinical performance: BEME Guide No 7. Med Teach 2006;28:117-28.
11. Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback. Med Educ 2010;44:101-8.
12. Carr S. The foundation programme assessment tools: an opportunity to enhance feedback to trainees? Postgrad Med J 2006;82:576-9.
13. Davies H, Archer J, Heard S, Southgate L. Assessment tools for foundation programmes - a practical guide. BMJ Careers 2005;330:195-6.
14. Norcini JJ. Workplace-based assessment in clinical training. In: Swanwick T, ed. Understanding medical education. Association for the Study of Medical Education, 2007.
15. Buckley S, Coleman J, Davison I, Khan KS, Zamora J, Malick S, et al. The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No 11. Med Teach 2009;31:282-98.
16. Barr H, Freeth D, Hammick M, Koppel I, Reeves S. Evaluations of interprofessional education: a United Kingdom review of health and social care. CAIPE/BERA, 2000.
17. Brinkman WB, Geraghty SR, Lanphear BP, Khoury JC, Gonzalez del Rey JA, Dewitt TG, et al. Effect of multisource feedback on resident communication skills and professionalism: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:44-9.
18. Burford B, Illing J, Kergon C, Morrow G, Livingston M. User perceptions of multi-source feedback tools for junior doctors. Med Educ 2010;44:165-76.
19. Lockyer J, Violato C, Fidler H. Likelihood of change: a study assessing surgeon use of multisource feedback data. Teach Learn Med 2003;15:168-74.
20. Murphy DJ, Bruce DA, Mercer SW, Eva KW. The reliability of workplace-based assessment in postgraduate medical education and training: a national evaluation in general practice in the United Kingdom. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009;14:219-32.
21. Sargeant JM, Mann KV, Ferrier SN, Langille DB, Muirhead PD, Hayes VM, et al. Responses of rural family physicians and their colleague and coworker raters to a multi-source feedback process: a pilot study. Acad Med 2003;78:S42-4.
22. Sargeant J, Mann K, Ferrier S. Exploring family physicians' reactions to multisource feedback: perceptions of credibility and usefulness. Med Educ 2005;39:497-504. (Pubitemid 40592959)
23. Violato C, Lockyer J, Fidler H. Multisource feedback: a method of assessing surgical practice. BMJ 2003;326:546-8.
24. Violato C, Lockyer JM, Fidler H. Changes in performance: a 5-year longitudinal study of participants in a multi-source feedback programme. Med Educ 2008;42:1007-13.
25. Malhotra S, Hatala R, Courneya CA. Internal medicine residents' perceptions of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise. Med Teach 2008;30:414-9. (Pubitemid 351935927)
26. Nair BR, Alexander HG, McGrath BP, Parvathy MS, Kilsby EC, Wenzel J, et al. The mini clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) for assessing clinical performance of international medical graduates. Med J Aust 2008;189:159-61.
27. Weller JM, Jolly B, Misur MP, Merry AF, Jones A, Crossley JG, et al. Miniclinical evaluation exercise in anaesthesia training. Br J Anaesth 2009;102:633-41.
28. Weller JM, Jones A, Merry AF, Jolly B, Saunders D. Investigation of trainee and specialist reactions to the mini-clinical evaluation exercise in anaesthesia: implications for implementation. Br J Anaesth 2009;103:524-30.
29. Morris A, Hewitt J, Roberts CM. Practical experience of using directly observed procedures, mini clinical evaluation examinations, and peer observation in pre-registration house officer (FY1) trainees. Postgrad Med J 2006;82:285-8.
30. Pereira EA, Dean BJ. British surgeons' experiences of mandatory online workplace-based assessment. J R Soc Med 2009;102:287-93.
31. Ryland I, Brown J, O'Brien M, Graham D, Gillies R, Chapman T, et al. The portfolio: how was it for you? Views of F2 doctors from the Mersey Deanery Foundation Pilot. Clin Med 2006;6:378-80.
32. Wilkinson JR, Crossley JG, Wragg A, Mills P, Cowan G, Wade W. Implementing workplace-based assessment across the medical specialties in the United Kingdom. Med Educ 2008;42:364-73.
33. Smither JW, London M, Reilly RR. Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis and review of empirical findings. Pers Psychol 2005;58:33-66. (Pubitemid 40622796)
34. Fidler H, Lockyer JM, Toews J, Violato C. Changing physicians' practices: the effect of individual feedback. Acad Med 1999;74:702-14.
35. Overeem K, Wollersheim H, Driessen E, Lombarts K, van de Ven G, Grol R, et al. Doctors' perceptions of why 360-degree feedback does (not) work: a qualitative study. Med Educ 2009;43:874-82.
36. Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, Van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multisource feedback acceptance and use. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2008;13:275-88.
37. Kogan JR, Holmboe ES, Hauer KE. Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills ofmedical trainees: a systematic review. JAMA 2009;302:1316-26.
38. Overeem K, Faber MJ, Arah OA, Elwyn G, Lombarts KM, Wollersheim HC, et al. Doctor performance assessment in daily practise: does it help doctors or not? A systematic review. Med Educ 2007;41:1039-49. (Pubitemid 350029289)