Responses of rural family physicians and their colleague and coworker raters to a multi-source feedback process: A pilot study

Academic Medicine

Volumn 78, Issue 10 SUPPL., 2003, Pages

  Sargeant, Joan M ^a   Mann, Karen V ^b   Ferrier, Suzanne N ^b   Langille, Donald B ^b   Muirhead, Philip D ^b   Hayes, Vonda M ^b   Sinclair, Douglas E ^b  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSULTATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSICIAN; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RURAL AREA; SELF EVALUATION;

EID: 0141889952     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200310001-00014     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Ramsey PG, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Inui TS, Larson EB, LoGerfro JP. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. JAMA. 1993;269:1655-60.
2. Weinrich MD, Carline JD, Giles LM, Ramsey PG. Rating of the performances of practicing internists by hospital-based registered nurses. Acad Med. 1993;68:680-7.
3. Wolliscroft JO, Howell JD, Patel BP, Swanson DB. Resident-patient interactions: the humanistic qualities of internal medicine residents assessed by patients, attending physicians, program supervisors, and nurses. Acad Med. 1994;69:216-24.
4. Violato C, Marini A, Towes J, Lockyer J, Fidler H. Using peers, consulting physicians, patients, co-workers and self to assess physicians. Acad Med. 1997;72:57-63.
5. Lipner RS, Black LL, Leas BF, Fortna GS. The value of patient and peer ratings in recertification. Acad Med. 2002;77(10 suppl):S64-S66.
6. Hall W, Violato C, Lewkonis R, et al. Assessment of physician performance in Alberta: the Physician Achievement Review. Can Med Assoc J. 1999;161:52-7.
7. Fidler H, Lockyer J, Toews J, Violato C. Changing physicians' practices: the effect of individual feedback. Acad Med. 1999;74:02-14.
8. Lockyer J. Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2003;23:2-10.
9. Skills for the new millennium: CanMEDS 2000 project. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 1996;29:206-16.
10. Levine AM. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:243-6.
11. Kluger AN, DeNisi AS. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull. 1996;136:243-6.
12. Walker AG, Smither JW. A five-year study of the upward feedback: what managers do with their results matters. Pers Psychol. 1999;52:393-423.
13. Brett JF, Atwater LE. 360° feedback: accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86:930-42.
14. Hewson MG, Little ML. Giving feedback in medical education: verification of recommended techniques. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(2):111-6.