From GATT to the WTO: The internal struggle for external competences in the EU

Journal of Common Market Studies

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 899-919

  Billiet, Stijn ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845448539     PISSN: 00219886     EISSN: 14685965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00667.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Billiet, S. (2005) 'The EC and WTO Dispute Settlement: The Initiation of Trade Disputes by the EC'. European Foreign Affairs Review, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 197-214.
2. Bourgeois, J.H.J. (1995) 'The EC in the WTO and Advisory Opinion 1/94: An Echternach Procession'. Common Market Law Review, Vol.32, pp. 763-87.
3. Carney, T. (1998) 'The EU's Locus Standi in GATT Article III Trade Disputes: A Reappraisal'. European Foreign Affairs Review, Vol. 3, pp. 95-114.
4. Commission of the European Communities (1991) 'Intergovernmental Conferences: Contributions by the Commission'. Bulletin of the European Communities. Supplement 2/91 (Luxembourg: OOPEC).
5. Council of the European Union (2004) 'Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights'. Official Journal, L157, 30 April.
6. Cremona, M. (2001) 'A Policy of Bits and Pieces? The Common Commercial Policy after Nice'. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, Vol. 4, pp. 61-91.
7. European Parliament (1987) 'Resolution on relations between the European Community and the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (CMEA) and the Eastern European member states of the CMEA'. Official Journal, C46, 23 February 1987.
8. Featherstone, K. and Dyson, K. (1999) The Road to Maastricht: Negotiating Economic and Monetary Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
9. Heliskosi, J. (1999) 'Joint Competence of the European Community and its Member States and the Dispute Settlement Practice of the World Trade Organization'. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, Vol. 2, pp. 61-86.
10. Hilf, M. (1995) 'The ECJ's Opinion 1/94 on the WTO - No Surprise, but Wise?'. European Journal of International Law, Vol. 6, No.1, pp. 1-15.
11. Hudec, R.E. (1993) Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System (Salem, NH: Butterworth Legal).
12. Jackson, J.H. (1998) The World Trade Organization: Constitutions and Jurisprudence (London: Pinter).
13. Kuyper, P.-J. (1995) 'The New WTO Dispute Settlement System: The Impact on the Community'. In Bourgeois, J.H.J., Berrod, F. and Fournier, E.G. (eds) The Uruguay Round Results: A European Lawyers' Perspective (Brussels: European Interuniversity Press).
14. Maresceau, M. (1993) 'The Concept of the "Common Commercial Policy" and the Difficult Road to Maastricht'. In Maresceau, M. (ed.) The European Community's Commercial Policy after 1992. The Legal Dimension (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic).
15. Meunier, S. and Nicolaïdis, K. (1999) 'Who Speaks for Europe? The Delegation of Trade Authority in the EU'. Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 477-501.
16. Meunier, S. and Nicolaïdis, K. (2001) 'Trade Competence in the Nice Treaty'. ECSA Review Forum: Analyzing the Treaty of Nice, available at «www.eustudies.org/NiceTreatyForum.html».
17. Moravcsik, A. (1993) 'Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach'. Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 473-524.
18. Narbrough, C. (1993) 'Free Trade, not Fine Detail, is the Real Boost from Gatt'. The Times, 15 December 1993, p. 25.
19. O'Keeffe, D. and Schermers, H.G. (eds) (1983) Mixed Agreements (Deventer: Kluwer).
20. Paemen, H. and Bensch, A. (1995) From the GATT to the WTO. The European Community in the Uruguay Round (Leuven: Leuven University Press).
21. Pescatore, P. (1999) 'Opinion 1/94 on "Conclusion" of the WTO Agreement: Is there an Escape from a Programmed Disaster?'. Common Market Law Review, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 387-405.
22. Petersmann, E-U. (1996) 'The GATT Dispute Settlement System as an Instrument of the Foreign Trade Policy of the EC'. In Emiliou, N. and O'Keeffe, D. (eds) Legal Aspects of Integration in the European Union (London: Kluwer International).
23. Pollack, M.A. (1996) 'The New Institutionalism and EC Governance: The Promise and Limits of Institutional Analysis'. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 429-58.
24. Pollack, M.A. (1997) 'Delegation, Agency and Agenda Setting in the European Community'. International Organization, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 99-134.
25. Pollack, M.A. (2000) 'The Commission as an Agent'. In Nugent, N. (ed.) At the Heart of the Union. Studies of the European Commission (Basingstoke: Macmillan).
26. Van den Bossche, P. (1997) 'The European Community and the Uruguay Round Agreements'. In Jackson, J.H. and Sykes, A.O. (eds) Implementing the Uruguay Round (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
27. Weiler, J.J.H. (1980) 'The European Parliament and Foreign Affairs: External Relations of the European Economic Community'. In Cassese, A. (ed) Parliamentary Control over Foreign Policy. Legal Essays (Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff).
28. WTO (1998) Dispute Settlement Body. Minutes of the Meeting Held in the Centre William Rappard, 22 January 1998, WT/DSB/M/41.
29. WTO (1999) United States - Section 211 Omnibus Appropriations Act of 1998, Request for consultations by the European Communities and their Member States, WT/DS176/1-IP/D/20, 15 July 1999.