Cooperation and control in the European Union: The case of the European Union as international environmental negotiator

Cooperation and Conflict

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 189-208

  Delreux, Tom ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Control; Cooperation; European Union; International environmental negotiations; Multilateral environmental agreements; Principal " agent; Representation

Indexed keywords

EID: 65649139105     PISSN: 00108367     EISSN: 14603691     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010836709102739     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Baldwin, M. (2006) 'EU Trade Politics - Heaven or Hell ? ' Journal of European Public Policy 13: 926-42.
2. Billiet, S. (2006) 'From GATT to the WTO: The Internal Struggle for External Competences in the EU', Journal of Common Market Studies 44: 899-919.
3. Damro, C. (2007) 'EU Delegation and Agency in International Trade Negotiations: a Cautionary Comparison', Journal of Common Market Studies 45: 883-903.
4. De Biøvre, D. and Dar, A. (2005) 'Constituency Interests and Delegation in European and American Trade Policy', Comparative Political Studies 38: 1271-96.
5. Delreux, T. (2006) 'The European Union in International Environmental Negotiations: a Legal Perspective on the Internal Decision-making Process', International Environmental Agreements 6: 231-48.
6. Delreux, T. (2008) 'The EU as a Negotiator in Multilateral Chemicals Negotiations: Multiple Principals, Different Agents', Journal of European Public Policy 15: 1069-86.
7. Dur, A. (2006) 'Assessing the EU's Role in International Trade Negotiations', European Political Science 5: 362-76.
8. Elgström, O. (2007) 'Outsiders' Perceptions of the European Union in International Trade Negotiations', Journal of Common Market Studies 45: 949-67.
9. Elsig, M. (2007) 'Delegation and Agency in EU Trade Policy Making: Bringing Brussels Back In', NCCR Working Paper 21, Geneva, 35 pp.
10. Frennhoff Larsén, M. (2007) 'Trade Negotiations between the EU and South Africa: a Three-Level Game', Journal of Common Market Studies 45: 857-81.
11. Gupta, A. (2000) 'Governing Trade in Genetically Modified Organisms. The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety', Environment 42: 22-33.
12. Jupille, J. (1999) 'The European Union and International Outcomes', International Organization 53: 409-25.
13. Kerremans, B. (2004) 'The European Commission and the EU Member States as Actors in the WTO Negotiating Process: Decision-Making between Scylla and Charybdis?' in B. Reinalda and B. Verbeek (eds) Decision Making Within International Organizations, pp. 45-58. London: Routledge.
14. Kerremans, B. (2006) 'Pro-Active Policy Entrepreneur or Risk Minimizer? A Principal-Agent Interpretation of the EU's Role in the WTO', in O. Elgström and M. Smith (eds) The European Union's Roles in International Politics, pp. 172-88. Oxford: Routledge.
15. Menon, A. (2003) 'Member States and International Institutions: Institutionalizing Intergovernmentalism in the European Union', Comparative European Politics 1: 171-201.
16. Meunier, S. (2005) Trading Voices. The European Union in International Commercial Negotiations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 223 pp.
17. Milner, H. (1992) 'International Theories of Cooperation among Nations. Strengths and Weaknesses', World Politics 44: 466-96.
18. Moravcsik, A. (1993) 'Introduction. Integrating International and Domestic Theories of International Bargaining', in P. Evans, H. Jacobson and R. Putnam (eds) International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Double-Edged Diplomacy, pp. 3-42. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
19. Nicolaadis, K. (1999) 'Minimizing Agency Costs in Two-Level Games. Lessons from the Trade Authority Controversies in the United States and the European Union', in R. Mnookin and L. Susskind (eds) Negotiating on Behalf of Others, pp. 87-126. London: Sage.
20. Oberthur, S. and Ott, H. (1999) The Kyoto Protocol. International Climate Change Policy for the 21st Century. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 359 pp.
21. Pollack, M. (2003) The Engines of European Integration. Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the EU. New York: Oxford University Press, 496 pp.
22. Putnam, R. (1988) 'Diplomacy and Domestic Policies: The Logic of Two-Level Games', International Organization 42: 427-60.
23. Shapiro, S. (2005) 'Agency Theory', Annual Review of Sociology 31: 263-84.
24. Smith, K. (2006) 'The European Union, Human Rights and the United Nations', in K. Smith and K. Laatikainen (eds) Intersecting Multilateralisms. The European Union and the United Nations, pp. 154-74. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
25. Tallberg, J. (2002) 'Delegation to Supranational Institutions: Why, How, and with What Consequences?' West European Politics, 25: 23-46.
26. Winfield, M. (2000) 'Reflections on the Biosafety Protocol Negotiations in Montreal, Bio-Tech Info'. Available at: http://www.biotech-info.net/BSP- reflections.html[www.]