Carbohydrate-Binding Modules of Fungal Cellulases. Occurrence in Nature, Function, and Relevance in Industrial Biomass Conversion

Advances in Applied Microbiology

Volumn 88, Issue , 2014, Pages 103-165

  Várnai, Anikó ^a   Mäkelä, Miia R ^b   Djajadi, Demi T ^b   Rahikainen, Jenni ^c   Hatakka, Annele ^b   Viikari, Liisa ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Adsorption; Ascomycetes; Basidiomycetes; Brown rot; Carbohydrate binding modules; Cellulases; Desorption; Fungi; High substrate concentration; Lignocellulose biomass conversion; White rot

Indexed keywords

BETA MANNOSIDASE; CARBOHYDRATE; CELLULASE; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE 1,4 BETA CELLOBIOSIDASE; FUNGAL CELLULASE; FUNGAL ENZYME; HEMICELLULOSE; HYDROLASE; LIGNIN; LIGNOCELLULOSE; MONOSACCHARIDE; OXIDOREDUCTASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; ASCOMYCETES; BASIDIOMYCETES; BINDING AFFINITY; BIOMASS CONVERSION; BROWN ROT; CARBON SOURCE; COVALENT BOND; DEGRADATION; DEPOLYMERIZATION; DESORPTION; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENZYMATIC DEGRADATION; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME BINDING; ENZYME REGULATION; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; FENTON REACTION; FLUID INTAKE; FUNGAL GENOME; GENOME; HYDROGEN BOND; HYDROLYSIS; HYPOCREA JECORINA; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; NONHUMAN; OXIDATION; POLYMERIZATION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; SOLUBILIZATION; STATIC ELECTRICITY; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; TRAMETES VERSICOLOR; WHITE ROT FUNGUS; WOOD CHIP;

ADSORPTION; ASCOMYCETES; BASIDIOMYCETES; BROWN ROT; CARBOHYDRATE-BINDING MODULES; CELLULASES; DESORPTION; FUNGI; HIGH SUBSTRATE CONCENTRATION; LIGNOCELLULOSE/BIOMASS CONVERSION; WHITE ROT;

ADSORPTION; BASIDIOMYCOTA; BIOMASS; CARBOHYDRATES; CELLULASES; CELLULOSE; FUNGI; HYDROLYSIS; LIGNIN;

EID: 84899154526     PISSN: 00652164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800260-5.00004-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (205)

1. Aden A., Foust T. Technoeconomic analysis of the dilute sulfuric acid and enzymatic hydrolysis process for the conversion of corn stover to ethanol. Cellulose 2009, 16:535-545.
2. Ander P., Eriksson K.-E. Selective degradation of wood components by white-rot fungi. Physiologia Plantarum 1977, 41:239-248.
3. Arantes V., Saddler J.N. Access to cellulose limits the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis: The role of amorphogenesis. Biotechnology for Biofuels 2010, 3:4.
4. Atalla R.H., Van der Hart D.L. Native cellulose: A composite of two distinct crystalline forms. Science 1984, 223:283-285.
5. Baldrian P., Valášková V. Degradation of cellulose by basidiomycetous fungi. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 2008, 32:501-521.
6. Bayer E.A., Lamed R., Himmel M.E. The potential of cellulases and cellulosomes for cellulosic waste management. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2007, 18:237-245. 10.1016/j.copbio.2007.04.004.
7. Beckham G.T., Bomble Y.J., Bayer E.A., Himmel M.E., Crowley M.F. Applications of computational science for understanding enzymatic deconstruction of cellulose. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2011, 22:231-238.
8. Beckham G.T., Matthews J.F., Bomble Y.J., Bu L., Adney W.S., Himmel M.E., et al. Identification of amino acids responsible for processivity in a family 1 carbohydrate-binding module from a fungal cellulase. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2010, 113:1447-1453.
9. Berlin A., Balakshin M., Gilkes N., Kadla J., Maximenko V., Kubo S., et al. Inhibition of cellulase, xylanase and β-glucosidase activities by softwood lignin preparations. Journal of Biotechnology 2006, 125:198-209.
10. Berlin A., Gilkes N., Kurabi A., Bura R., Tu M.B., Kilburn D., et al. Weak lignin-binding enzymes-A novel approach to improve activity of cellulases for hydrolysis of lignocellulosics. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2005, 121:163-170.
11. Berlin A., Maximenko V., Gilkes N., Saddler J.N. Optimization of enzyme complexes for lignocellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2007, 97:287-296.
12. Biely P., Vršanská M., Claeyssens M. The endo-1,4-β-glucanase I from Trichoderma reesei. Action on β-1,4-oligomers and polymers derived from D-glucose and D-xylose. European Journal of Biochemistry 1991, 200:157-163.
13. Boisset C., Fraschini C., Schülein M., Henrissat B., Chanzy H. Imaging the enzymatic digestion of bacterial cellulose ribbons reveals the endo character of the cellobiohydrolase Cel6A from Humicola insolens and its mode of synergy with cellobiohydrolase Cel7A. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2000, 66:1444-1452.
14. Boraston A.B., Bolam D.N., Gilbert H.J., Davies G.J. Carbohydrate-binding modules: Fine-tuning polysaccharide recognition. The Biochemical Journal 2004, 382:769-781.
15. Börjesson J., Peterson R., Tjerneld F. Enhanced enzymatic conversion of softwood lignocellulose by poly(ethylene glycol) addition. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2007, 40:754-762.
16. Boussaid A., Saddler J.N. Adsorption and activity profiles of cellulases during hydrolysis of two Douglas fir pulps. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 1999, 24:138-143.
17. Bu L., Beckham G.T., Crowley M.F., Chang C.H., Matthews J.F., Bomble Y.J., et al. The energy landscape for interaction of the family 1 carbohydrate-binding module and the cellulose surface is altered by hydrolyzed glycosidic bonds. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2009, 113:10994-11002.
18. Buranov A.U., Mazza G. Lignin in straw of herbaceous crops. Industrial Crops and Products 2008, 28:237-259.
19. Burdsall H.H., Eslyn W. A new Phanerochaete with a Chrysosporium imperfect state. Mycotaxon 1974, 1:124.
20. Cannella D., Hsieh C.W., Felby C., Jørgensen H. Production and effect of aldonic acids during enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose at high dry matter content. Biotechnology for Biofuels 2012, 5:26.
21. Carpita N.C. Limiting diameters of pores and the surface structure of plant cell walls. Science 1982, 218:813-814.
22. Carrard G., Koivula A., Söderlund H., Beguin P. Cellulose-binding domains promote hydrolysis of different sites on crystalline cellulose. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2000, 97:10342-10347.
23. Cascao-Pereira, L., Kaper, T., Kelemen, B. R., & Liu, A. (2009). Compositions and methods comprising cellulase variants with reduced affinity to non-cellulosic materials. Application no. WO/2009/149202. Publication date 10/12/2009.
24. Chen S., Xu J., Liu C., Zhu Y., Nelson D.R., Zhou S., et al. Genome sequence of the model medicinal mushroom Ganoderma lucidum. Nature Communications 2012, 3:913. 10.1038/ncomms1923.
25. Cheng H., Jin S. Effect of ethanol and yeast on cellulase activity and hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2006, 39:1430-1432.
26. Chundawat S.P.S., Beckham G.T., Himmel M.E., Dale B.E. Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass to fuels and chemicals. Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering 2011, 2:121-145.
27. Chylenski P., Felby C., Haven M.Ø., Gama M., Selig M.J. Precipitation of Trichoderma reesei commercial cellulase preparations under standard enzymatic hydrolysis conditions for lignocelluloses. Biotechnology Letters 2012, 34:1475-1482.
28. Cohen R., Suzuki M.R., Hammel K.E. Processive endoglucanase active in crystalline cellulose hydrolysis by the brown rot basidiomycete Gloeophyllum trabeum. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2005, 71:2412-2417.
29. Coughlan M.P. The properties of fungal and bacterial cellulases with comment on their production and application. Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews 1985, 3:37-109.
30. Crestini C., Melone F., Sette M., Saladino R. Milled wood lignin: A linear oligomer. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12:3928-3935.
31. Cruys-Bagger N., Tatsumi H., Ren G.R., Borch K., Westh P. Transient kinetics and rate-limiting steps for the processive cellobiohydrolase Cel7A: Effects of substrate structure and carbohydrate binding domain. Biochemistry 2013, 52:8938-8948.
32. Dagel D.D., Liu Y.-S., Zhong L., Luo Y., Himmel M.E., Xu Q., et al. In situ imaging of single carbohydrate-binding modules on cellulose microfibrils. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2011, 115:635-641.
33. Davies G., Henrissat B. Structures and mechanisms of glycosyl hydrolases. Structure 1995, 3:853-859.
34. Deacon J. Fungal biology 2005, 371. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.
35. Demirbas M.F. Biorefineries for biofuel upgrading: A critical review. Applied Energy 2009, 86:S151-S161.
36. Dijkerman R., Op den Camp H.J.M., van der Drift C., Vogels G.D. The role of the cellulolytic high molecular mass (HMM) complex of the anaerobic fungus Piromyces sp. Strain E2 in the hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose. Archives of Microbiology 1997, 167:137-142.
37. Divne C., Ståhlberg J., Reinikainen T., Ruohonen L., Pettersson G., Knowles J.K., et al. The three-dimensional crystal structure of the catalytic core of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. Science 1994, 265:524-528.
38. Divne C., Ståhlberg J., Teeri T.T., Jones T.A. High-resolution crystal structures reveal how a cellulose chain is bound in the 50 ångstrom long tunnel of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. Journal of Molecular Biology 1998, 275:309-325.
39. Donaldson L. Cellulose microfibril aggregates and their size variation with cell wall type. Wood Science and Technology 2007, 41:443-460.
40. Donaldson L.A., Wong K.K.Y., Mackie K.L. Ultrastructure of steam-exploded wood. Wood Science and Technology 1988, 22:103-114.
41. Eastwood D.C., Floudas D., Binder M., Majcherczyk A., Schneider P., Aerts A., et al. The plant cell wall-decomposing machinery underlies the functional diversity of forest fungi. Science 2011, 333:762-765.
42. Eriksson K.-E.L., Blanchette R.A., Ander P. Microbial and enzymatic degradation of wood and wood components. Springer series in wood science 1990, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.
43. Eriksson T., Börjesson J., Tjerneld F. Mechanism of surfactant effect in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2002, 31:353-364.
44. Fägerstam L.G., Pettersson L.G. The 1,4-β-D-glucan cellobiohydrolases of T. reesei QM 9414. A new type of cellulolytic synergism. FEBS Letters 1980, 119:97-100.
45. Felby C., Thygesen L.G., Kristensen J.B., Jørgensen H., Elder T. Cellulose-water interactions during enzymatic hydrolysis as studied by time domain NMR. Cellulose 2008, 15:703-710.
46. Fernandez-Fueyo E., Ruiz-Dueñas F.J., Ferreira P., Floudas D., Hibbett D.S., Canessa P., et al. Comparative genomics of Ceriporiopsis subvermispora and Phanerochaete chrysosporium provide insight into selective ligninolysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2012, 109:5458-5463.
47. Fischer M. A new wood-decaying basidiomycete species associated with esca of grapevine: Fomitiporia mediterranea (Hymenochaetales). Mycological Progress 2002, 1:315-324.
48. Floudas D., Binder M., Riley R., Barry K., Blanchette R.A., Henrissat B., et al. The Paleozoic origin of enzymatic lignin decomposition reconstructed from 31 fungal genomes. Science 2012, 336:1715-1719. 10.1126/science.1221748.
49. Fox J.M., Jess P., Jambusaria R.B., Moo G.M., Liphardt J., Clark D.S., et al. A single-molecule analysis reveals morphological targets for cellulase synergy. Nature Chemical Biology 2013, 9:356-361.
50. Gao P.-J., Chen G.-J., Wang T.-H., Zhang Y.-S., Liu J. Non-hydrolytic disruption of crystalline structure of cellulose by cellulose binding domain and linker sequence of cellobiohydrolase I from Penicillium janthinellum. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica 2001, 33:13-18.
51. Gilbert H.J. Cellulosomes: Microbial nanomachines that display plasticity in quaternary structure. Molecular Microbiology 2007, 63:1568-1576.
52. Gilkes N.R., Henrissat B., Kilburn D.G., Miller R.C., Warren R.A.J. Domains in microbial β-1,4-glycanases: Sequence conservation, function, and enzyme families. Microbiological Reviews 1991, 55:303-315.
53. Glass N.L., Schmoll M., Cate J.H.D., Coradetti S. Plant cell wall deconstruction by ascomycete fungi. Annual Review of Microbiology 2013, 67:477-498.
54. Gritzali M., Brown R.D. The cellulase system of Trichoderma. Relationships between purified extracellular enzymes from induced or cellulose-grown cells. Advances in Chemistry Series 1979, 81:237-260.
55. Guerriero G., Fugelstad J., Bulone V. What do we really know about cellulose biosynthesis in higher plants?. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 2010, 52:161-175.
56. Guillén D., Sánchez S., Rodríguez-Sanoja R. Carbohydrate-binding domains: Multiplicity of biological roles. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2010, 85:1241-1249.
57. Guo J., Catchmark J.M. Binding specificity and thermodynamics of cellulose-binding modules from Trichoderma reesei Cel7A and Cel6A. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14:1268-1277.
58. Hakala T.K., Maijala P., Konn J., Hatakka A. Evaluation of novel wood-rotting polypores and corticioid fungi for the decay and biopulping of Norway spruce (Picea abies) wood. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2004, 34:255-263.
59. Hall M., Rubin J., Behrens S.H., Bommarius A.S. The cellulose-binding domain of cellobiohydrolase Cel7A from Trichoderma reesei is also a thermostabilizing domain. Journal of Biotechnology 2011, 155:370-376.
60. Harris P.J., Stone B.A. Chemistry and molecular organization of plant cell walls. Biomass recalcitrance: Deconstructing the plant cell wall for bioenergy 2008, 61-93. Blackwell, Oxford. M.E. Himmel (Ed.).
61. Harris P.V., Welner D., McFarland K.C., Re E., Navarro Poulsen J.C., Brown K., et al. Stimulation of lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis by proteins of glycoside hydrolase family 61: Structure and function of a large, enigmatic family. Biochemistry 2010, 49:3305-3316.
62. Hartl L., Zach S., Seidl-Seiboth V. Fungal chitinases: Diversity, mechanistic properties and biotechnological potential. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2012, 93:533-543.
63. Hatakka, A., & Hammel, K. E. (2010). Fungal biodegradation of lignocelluloses. In K. Esser (Ed-in-chief), The Mycota: A comprehensive treatise on fungi as experimental systems for basic and applied research (2nd ed.). In M. Hofrichter (Vol. Ed.), Mycota X. Industrial applications (pp. 319-340). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg (chapter 15).
64. Hibbett D.S., Binder M., Bischoff J.F., Blackwell M., Cannon P.F., Eriksson O.E., et al. A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the fungi. Mycological Research 2007, 111:509-547.
65. Himmel M.E., Ding S.Y., Johnson D.K., Adney W.S., Nimlos M.R., Brady J.W., et al. Biomass recalcitrance: Engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 2007, 315:804-807.
66. Hori C., Gaskell J., Igarashi K., Samejima M., Hibbett D., Henrissat B., et al. Genome-wide analysis of polysaccharides degrading enzymes in 11 white- and brown-rot Polyporales provides insight into mechanisms of wood decay. Mycologia 2013, 105:1412-1427.
67. Horn S.J., Sikorski P., Cederkvist J.B., Vaaje-Kolstad G., Sørlie M., Synstad B., et al. Costs and benefits of processivity in enzymatic degradation of recalcitrant polysaccharides. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103:18089-18094.
68. Horn S.J., Vaaje-Kolstad G., Westereng B., Eijsink V.G.H. Novel enzymes for the degradation of cellulose. Biotechnology for Biofuels 2012, 5:45.
69. Huang R., Su R., Qi W., He Z. Bioconversion of lignocellulose into bioethanol: Process intensification and mechanism research. Bioenergy Research 2011, 4:225-245.
70. Humbird D., Davis R., Tao L., Kinchin C., Hsu D., Aden A., et al. Process design and economics for biochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol. NREL technical report: NREL/TP-5100-47764 2011, Available at:. http://www.nrel.gov/biomass/pdfs/47764.pdf.
71. Igarashi K., Koivula A., Wada M., Kimura S., Penttilä M., Samejima M. High speed atomic force microscopy visualizes processive movement of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I on crystalline cellulose. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2009, 284:36186-36190.
72. Igarashi K., Uchihashi T., Koivula A., Wada M., Kimura S., Okamoto T., et al. Traffic jams reduce hydrolytic efficiency of cellulase on cellulose surface. Science 2011, 333:1279-1282.
73. Imai T., Boisset C., Samejima M., Igarashi K., Sugiyama J. Unidirectional processive action of cellobiohydrolase Cel7A on Valonia cellulose microcrystals. FEBS Letters 1998, 432:113-116.
74. Jalak J., Kurašin M., Teugjas H., Väljamäe P. Endo-exo synergism in cellulose hydrolysis revisited. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 2012, 287:28802-28815.
75. Jalak J., Väljamäe P. Mechanism of initial rapid rate retardation in cellobiohydrolase catalyzed cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2010, 106:871-883.
76. Jin M.J., Gunawan C., Uppugundla N., Balan V., Dale B.E. A novel integrated biological process for cellulosic ethanol production featuring high ethanol productivity, enzyme recycling and yeast cells reuse. Energy & Environmental Science 2012, 5:7168-7175.
77. Jørgensen H., Vibe-Pedersen J., Larsen J., Felby C. Liquefaction of lignocellulose at high-solids concentrations. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2007, 96:862-870.
78. Kajisa T., Igarashi K., Samejima M. The genes encoding glycoside hydrolase family 6 and 7 cellulases from the brown-rot fungus Coniophora puteana. Journal of Wood Science 2009, 55:376-380.
79. Karlsson J., Siika-aho M., Tenkanen M., Tjerneld F. Enzymatic properties of the low molecular mass endoglucanases Cel12A (EG III) and Cel45A (EG V) of Trichoderma reesei. Journal of Biotechnology 2002, 99:63-78.
80. Kim D.W., Jang Y.H., Jeong Y.K. Adsorption behaviors of two cellobiohydrolases and their core proteins from Trichoderma reesei on Avicel PH101. Biotechnology Letters 1997, 19:893-897.
81. Kirk T.K., Highley T.L. Quantitative changes in structural components of conifer wood during decay by white-rot and brown-rot fungi. Phytopathology 1973, 63:1338-1342.
82. Kleman-Leyer K.M., Siika-aho M., Teeri T.T., Kirk T.K. The cellulases endoglucanase I and cellobiohydrolase II of Trichoderma reesei act synergistically to solubilize native cotton cellulose but not to decrease its molecular size. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1996, 62:2883-2887.
83. Koivula A., Kinnari T., Harjunpää V., Ruohonen L., Teleman A., Drakenberg T., et al. Tryptophan 272: An essential determinant of crystalline cellulose degradation by Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase Cel6A. FEBS Letters 1998, 429:341-346.
84. Kostylev M., Wilson D. Synergistic interactions in cellulose hydrolysis. Biofuels 2012, 3:61-70.
85. Kotiranta P., Karlsson J., Siika-aho M., Medve J., Viikari L., Tjerneld F., et al. Adsorption and activity of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I, endoglucanase II and the corresponding core proteins on steam pretreated willow. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 1999, 81:81-90.
86. Kraulis P.J., Clore G.M., Nilges M., Jones T.A., Pettersson G., Knowles J., et al. Determination of the 3-dimensional solution structure of the C-terminal domain of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. A study using nuclear magnetic-resonance and hybrid distance geometry dynamical simulated annealing. Biochemistry 1989, 28:7241-7257.
87. Kristensen J.B., Börjesson J., Bruun M.H., Tjerneld F., Jørgensen H. Use of surface active additives in enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw lignocellulose. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2007, 40:888-895.
88. Kumar L., Arantes V., Chandra R., Saddler J. The lignin present in steam pretreated softwood binds enzymes and limits cellulose accessibility. Bioresource Technology 2012, 103:201-208.
89. Kurasin M., Väljamäe P. Processivity of cellobiohydrolases is limited by the substrate. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2011, 286:169-177.
90. Larsen J., Haven M.Ø., Thirup L., Li H.W., Iversen F.K. The IBUS process-Lignocellulosic bioethanol close to a commercial reality. Chemical Engineering Technology 2008, 31:765-772.
91. Lavigne, J., Scott, B., Whissel, M., & Tomashek, J. (2010). Family 6 cellulase with decreased inactivation by lignin. Application no. WO/2010/012102. Publication date 04/02/2010.
92. Le Costaouëc T., Pakarinen A., Várnai A., Puranen T., Viikari L. The role of carbohydrate binding module (CBM) at high substrate consistency: Comparison of Trichoderma reesei and Thermoascus aurantiacus Cel7A (CBH I) and Cel5A (EG II). Bioresource Technology 2013, 143:196-203.
93. Lee I., Evans B.R., Woodward J. The mechanism of cellulase action on cotton fibers: Evidence from atomic force microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 2000, 82:213-221.
94. Lee D., Yu A.H.C., Saddler J.N. Evaluation of cellulase recycling strategies for the hydrolysis of lignocellulosic substrates. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 1995, 45:328-336.
95. Lehtiö J., Sugiyama J., Gustavsson M., Fransson L., Linder M., Teeri T.T. The binding specificity and affinity determinants of family 1 and family 3 cellulose binding modules. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2003, 100:484-489.
96. Levasseur A., Drula E., Lombard V., Coutinho P.M., Henrissat B. Expansion of the enzymatic repertoire of the CAZy database to integrate auxiliary redox enzymes. Biotechnology for Biofuels 2013, 6:41.
97. Li X.L., Chen H., Ljungdahl L.G. Two cellulases, CelA and CelC, from the polycentric anaerobic fungus Orpinomyces strain PC-2 contain N-terminal docking domains for a cellulase±hemicellulase complex. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1997, 63:4721-4728.
98. Li J., Henriksson G., Gellerstedt G. Lignin depolymerisation/repolymerization and its critical role for delignification of aspen wood by steam explosion. Bioresource Technology 2007, 98:3061-3068.
99. 3-alginate composite gel. Composites Science and Technology 2008, 69:539-544.
100. Lindedam J., Haven M.Ø., Chylenski P., Jørgensen H., Felby C. Recycling cellulases for cellulosic ethanol production at industrial relevant conditions: Potential and temperature dependency at high solid processes. Bioresource Technology 2013, 148:180-188.
101. Linder M., Mattinen M.L., Kontteli M., Lindeberg G., Ståhlberg J., Drakenberg T., et al. Identification of functionally important amino acids in the cellulose-binding domain of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I. Protein Science 1995, 4:1056-1064.
102. Linder M., Teeri T.T. The cellulose-binding domain of the major cellobiohydrolase of Trichoderma reesei exhibits true reversibility and a high exchange rate on crystalline cellulose. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1996, 93:12251-12255.
103. Liu Y.-S., Baker J.O., Zeng Y., Himmel M.E., Haas T., Ding S.Y. Cellobiohydrolase hydrolyzes crystalline cellulose on hydrophobic faces. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2011, 286:11195-11201.
104. Lombard V., Ramulu H.G., Drula E., Coutinho P.M., Henrissat B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Research 2014, 42. 10.1093/nar/gkt1178.
105. Lu Y., Yang B., Gregg D., Saddler J.N., Mansfield S.D. Cellulase adsorption and an evaluation of enzyme recycle during hydrolysis of steam-exploded softwood residues. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2002, 98-100:641-654.
106. Lynd L.R., Weimer P.J., van Zyl W.H., Pretorius I.S. Microbial cellulose utilization: Fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 2002, 66:506-577.
107. Lynd L.R., Wyman C.E., Gerngross T.U. Biocommodity engineering. Biotechnology Progress 1999, 15:777-793.
108. Ma A., Hu Q., Qua Y., Bai Z., Liu W., Zhuang G. The enzymatic hydrolysis rate of cellulose decreases with irreversible adsorption of cellobiohydrolase I. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2008, 42:543-547.
109. MacDonald J., Doering M., Canam T., Gong Y.C., Guttman D.S., Campbell M.M., et al. Transcriptomic responses of the softwood-degrading white-rot fungus Phanerochaete carnosa during growth on coniferous and deciduous wood. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2011, 77:3211-3218.
110. MacDonald J., Suzuki H., Master E.R. Expression and regulation of genes encoding lignocellulose-degrading activity in the genus Phanerochaete. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2012, 94:339-351.
111. Mahajan S., Master E.R. Lignocellulose-degrading enzymes secreted by Phanerochaeate carnosa grown on spruce and microcrystalline cellulose. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2010, 86:1903-1914.
112. Mäkelä, M. R., Hildén, K. S., & de Vries, R. P. (2014). Degradation and modification of plant biomass by fungi. In K. Esser & M. Nowrousian (Eds.), The Mycota: A comprehensive treatise on fungi as experimental systems for basic and applied research. In M. Nowrousian (Vol. Ed.), Fungal genomics. Springer-Verlag (in press).
113. Malmsten M., van Alstine J.M. Adsorption of poly(ethylene glycol) amphiphiles to form coatings which inhibit protein adsorption. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 1996, 177:502-512.
114. Martinez D., Berka R.M., Henrissat B., Saloheimo M., Arvas M., Baker S.E., et al. Genome sequencing and analysis of the biomass-degrading fungus Trichoderma reesei (syn. Hypocrea jecorina). Nature Biotechnology 2008, 26:553-560.
115. Martinez D., Challacombe J., Morgenstern I., Hibbett D., Schmoll M., Kubicek C.P., et al. Genome, transcriptome, and secretome analysis of wood decay fungus Postia placenta supports unique mechanisms of lignocellulose conversion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 106:1954-1959. 10.1073/pnas.0809575106.
116. Martinez D., Larrondo L.F., Putnam N., Gelpke M.D., Huang K., Chapman J., et al. Genome sequence of the lignocellulose degrading fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium strain RP78. Nature Biotechnology 2004, 22:695-700.
117. Mba Medie F., Davies G.J., Drancourt M., Henrissat B. Genome analyses highlight the different biological roles of cellulases. Nature Reviews Microbiology 2012, 10:227-234.
118. Medve J., Karlsson J., Lee D., Tjerneld F. Hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose by cellobiohydrolase I and endoglucanase II from Trichoderma reesei: Adsorption, sugar production pattern, and synergism of the enzymes. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 1998, 59:621-634.
119. Medve J., Ståhlberg J., Tjerneld F. Adsorption and synergism of cellobiohydrolase I and II of Trichoderma reesei during hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 1994, 44:1064-1073.
120. Menon V., Rao M. Trends in bioconversion of lignocellulose: Biofuels, platform chemicals & biorefinery concept. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 2012, 38:522-550.
121. Mikkelson A., Maaheimo H., Hakala T.K. Hydrolysis of konjac glucomannan by Trichoderma reesei mannanase and endoglucanases Cel7B and Cel5A for the production of glucomanno-oligosaccharides. Carbohydrate Research 2013, 372:60-68.
122. Mooney C.A., Mansfield S.D., Touhy M.G., Saddler J.N. The effect of initial pore volume and lignin content on the enzymatic hydrolysis of softwoods. Bioresource Technology 1998, 64:113-119.
123. Moore D., Robson G.D., Trinci A.P.J. 21st Century guidebook to fungi 2011, 29. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
124. Mosier N., Wyman C., Dale B., Elander R., Lee Y.Y., Holtzapple M., et al. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technology 2005, 96:673-686.
125. Nakagame S., Chandra R.P., Kadla J.F., Saddler J.N. The isolation, characterization and effect of lignin isolated from steam pretreated Douglas-fir on the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Bioresource Technology 2011, 102:4507-4517.
126. Nakagame S., Chandra R.P., Saddler J.N. The influence of lignin on the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated biomass substrates. ACS Symposium Series 2011, Vol. 1067:145-167. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, chapter 6. J.Y. Zhu, X. Zhang, X.J. Pan (Eds.).
127. Nakamura A., Tsukuda T., Auer S., Furuta T., Wada M., Koivula A., et al. The tryptophan residue at the active site tunnel entrance of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase Cel7A is important for initiation of degradation of crystalline cellulose. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 2013, 288:13503-13510.
128. Nakasone K.K., Eslyn W.E. A new species, Phlebia brevispora, a cause of internal decay in utility poles. Mycologia 1981, 73:803-810.
129. Nidetzky B., Claeyssens M. Specific quantification of Trichoderma reesei cellulases in reconstituted mixtures and its application to cellulase-cellulose binding studies. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 1994, 44:961-966.
130. Nidetzky B., Steiner W., Claeyssens M. Cellulose hydrolysis by the cellulases from Trichoderma reesei: Adsorptions of two cellobiohydrolases, two endocellulases and their core proteins on filter paper and their relation to hydrolysis. The Biochemical Journal 1994, 303:817-823.
131. Niemelä T., Wallenius T., Kotiranta H. The kelo tree, a vanishing substrate of specified wood-inhabiting fungi. Polish Botanical Journal 2002, 47:91-101.
132. Nimlos M.R., Beckham G.T., Matthews J.F., Bu L., Himmel M.E., Crowley M.F. Binding preferences, surface attachment, diffusivity, and orientation of a family 1 carbohydrate-binding module on cellulose. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2012, 287:20603-20612.
133. Nimlos M.R., Matthews J.F., Crowley M.F., Walker R.C., Chukkapalli G., Brady J.W., et al. Molecular modeling suggests induced fit of family I carbohydrate-binding modules with a broken-chain cellulose surface. Protein Engineering, Design & Selection 2007, 20:179-187.
134. Norde W. Driving forces for protein adsorption at solid surfaces. Macromolecular Symposia 1996, 103:5-18.
135. Ouyang J., Dong Z., Song X., Lee X., Chen M., Yong Q. Improved enzymatic hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel PH101) by polyethylene glycol addition. Bioresource Technology 2010, 101:6685-6691.
136. Pakarinen A., Haven M.Ø., Djajadi D.T., Várnai A., Puranen T., Viikari L. Cellulases without carbohydrate binding modules in high consistency ethanol production process. Biotechnology for Biofuels 2014, 7:27.
137. Palonen H., Tjerneld F., Zacchi G., Tenkanen M. Adsorption of Trichoderma reesei CBH I and EG II and their catalytic domains on steam pretreated softwood and isolated lignin. Journal of Biotechnology 2004, 107:65-72.
138. Petersen M.Ø., Larsen J., Thomsen M.H. Optimization of hydrothermal pretreatment of wheat straw for production of bioethanol at low water consumption without addition of chemicals. Biomass and Bioenergy 2009, 33:834-840.
139. Priwobo A., Arantes V., Saddler J.N. The adsorption and enzyme activity profiles of specific Trichoderma reesei cellulase/xylanase components when hydrolyzing steam pretreated corn stover. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2012, 50:195-203.
140. Pu Y., Hu F., Huang F., Davison B.H., Ragauskas A.J. Assessing the molecular structure basis for biomass recalcitrance during dilute acid and hydrothermal pretreatments. Biotechnology for Biofuels 2013, 6:15.
141. Quinlan R.J., Sweeney M.D., Lo Leggio L., Otten H., Poulsen J.-N., Johansen K.S., et al. Insights into the oxidative degradation of cellulose by a copper metalloenzyme that exploits biomass components. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2011, 108:15079-15084.
142. Rahikainen J. Cellulase-lignin interactions in the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose 2013, 41. VTT, VTT Science, Espoo.
143. Rahikainen J.L., Evans J.D., Mikander S., Kalliola A., Puranen T., Tamminen T., et al. Cellulase-lignin interactions-The role carbohydrate-binding module and pH in non-productive binding. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2013, 53:315-321.
144. Rahikainen J.L., Martin-Sampedro R., Heikkinen H., Rovio S., Marjamaa K., Tamminen T., et al. Inhibitory effect of lignin during cellulose bioconversion: The effect of lignin chemistry on non-productive enzyme adsorption. Bioresource Technology 2013, 133:270-278.
145. Rahikainen J., Mikander S., Marjamaa K., Tamminen T., Lappas A., Viikari L., et al. Inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis by residual lignins from softwood-Study of enzyme binding and inactivation on lignin-rich surface. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2011, 108:2823-2834.
146. Rahikainen J.L., Moilanen U., Nurmi-Rantala S., Lappas A., Koivula A., Viikari L., et al. Effect of temperature on lignin-derived inhibition studied with three structurally different cellobiohydrolases. Bioresource Technology 2013, 146:118-125.
147. Ramos L.P., Saddler J.N. Enzyme recycling during fed-batch hydrolysis of cellulose derived from steam-exploded Eucalyptus viminalis. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 1994, 45:193-207.
148. Rättö M., Ritschkoff A.-C., Viikari L. The effect of oxidative pretreatment on cellulose degradation by Poria placenta and Trichoderma reesei cellulases. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 1997, 48:53-57.
149. Ravalason H., Jan G., Mollé D., Pasco M., Coutinho P.M., Lapierre C., et al. Secretome analysis of Phanerochaete chrysosporium strain CIRM-BRFM41 grown on softwood. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2008, 80:719-733.
150. Reinikainen T., Ruohonen L., Nevanen T., Laaksonen L., Kraulis P., Jones T.A., et al. Investigation of the function of mutated cellulose-binding domains of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics 1992, 14:475-482.
151. Rouvinen J., Bergfors T., Teeri T., Knowles J.K., Jones T.A. Three-dimensional structure of cellobiohydrolase II from Trichoderma reesei. Science 1990, 249:380-386.
152. Rytioja J., Hildén K., Hatakka A., Mäkelä M.R. Transcriptional analysis of selected cellulose-acting enzymes encoding genes of the white-rot fungus Dichomitus squalens on spruce wood and microcrystalline cellulose. Fungal Genetics and Biology 2014, in press. 10.1016/j.fgb.2013.12.008.
153. Schmidhalter D.R., Canevascini G. Characterization of the cellulolytic enzyme system from the brown-rot fungus Coniophora puteana. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 1992, 37:431-436.
154. Scott, B. R., StPierre, P., Lavigne, J., Masri, N., White, T. C., & Tomashek, J.J. (2010). Novel lignin-resistant cellulase enzymes. Application no. WO2010096931. Publication date 02/09/2010.
155. Selig M.J., Knoshaug E.P., Adney W.S., Himmel M.E., Decker S.R. Synergistic enhancement of cellobiohydrolase performance on pretreated corn stover by addition of xylanase and esterase activities. Bioresource Technology 2008, 99:4997-5005.
156. Sethuraman A., Akin D.E., Eriksson K.-E.L. Plant-cell-wall-degrading enzymes produced by the white-rot fungus Ceriporiopsis subvermispora. Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry 1998, 27:37-47.
157. Sipos B., Dienes D., Schleicher Á., Perazzini R., Crestini C., Siika-aho M., et al. Hydrolysis efficiency and enzyme adsorption on steam-pretreated spruce in the presence of poly(ethylene glycol). Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2010, 47:84-90.
158. Sjöström E. Wood chemistry: Fundamentals and applications 1993, Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 2nd ed.
159. Skovgaard P.A., Jørgensen H. Influence of high temperature and ethanol on thermostable lignocellulolytic enzymes. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 2013, 40:447-456.
160. Somerville C., Bauer S., Brininstool G., Facette M., Hamann T., Milne J., et al. Towards a systems approach to understanding plant cell walls. Science 2004, 306:2206-2211.
161. Ståhlberg J., Johansson G., Pettersson G. A binding-site-deficient, catalytically active, core protein of endoglucanase III from the culture filtrate of Trichoderma reesei. European Journal of Biochemistry 1988, 173:179-183.
162. Ståhlberg J., Johansson G., Pettersson G. A new model for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose based on the two-domain structure of cellobiohydrolase I. Nature Biotechnology 1991, 9:286-290.
163. Suzuki H., Igarashi K., Samejima M. Cellotriose and cellotetraose as inducers of the genes encoding cellobiohydrolases in the basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2010, 76:6164-6170.
164. Szijártó N., Siika-aho M., Sontag-Strohm T., Viikari L. Liquefaction of hydrothermally pretreated wheat straw at high-solids content by purified Trichoderma enzymes. Bioresource Technology 2011, 102:1968-1974.
165. Tabka M.G., Herpoël-Gimbert I., Monod F., Asther M., Sigoillot J.C. Enzymatic saccharification of wheat straw for bioethanol production by a combined cellulase xylanase and feruloyl esterase treatment. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2006, 39:897-902.
166. Takashima S., Ohno M., Hidaka M., Nakamura A., Masaki H., Uozumi T. Correlation between cellulose binding and activity of cellulose-binding domain mutants of Humicola grisea cellobiohydrolase 1. FEBS Letters 2007, 581:5891-5896.
167. Taylor C.B., Talib M.F., McCabe C., Bu L., et al. Computational investigation of glycosylation effects on a family 1 carbohydrate-binding module. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2012, 287:3147-3155.
168. Teeri T.T. Crystalline cellulose degradation: New insight into the function of cellobiohydrolases. Trends in Biotechnology 1997, 15:160-167.
169. Tjerneld F. Enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis and recycling in cellulose bioconversion. Methods in Enzymology 1994, 228:549-558.
170. Tomashek, J. J., Scott, B. R., & Kolczynski, D. (2011). Carbohydrate binding modules with reduced binding to lignin. Application no. WO/2011/097713. Publication date 18/08/2011.
171. Tomme P., van Tilbeurgh H., Pettersson G., van Damme J., Vandekerckhove J., Knowles J., et al. Studies of the cellulolytic system of Trichoderma reesei QM 9414. Analysis of domain function in two cellobiohydrolases by limited proteolysis. European Journal of Biochemistry 1988, 170:575-581.
172. Tu M., Chandra R.P., Saddler J.N. Evaluating the distribution of cellulases and the recycling of free cellulases during the hydrolysis of lignocellulosic substrates. Biotechnology Progress 2007, 23:398-406.
173. Tu M., Chandra R.P., Saddler J.N. Recycling cellulases during the hydrolysis of steam exploded and ethanol pretreated lodgepole pine. Biotechnology Progress 2007, 23:1130-1137.
174. Tu M., Zhang X., Paice M., MacFarlane P., Saddler J.N. The potential of enzyme recycling during the hydrolysis of a mixed softwood feedstock. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100:6407-6415.
175. Uzcategui E., Johansson G., Ek B., Pettersson G. The 1,4-beta-D-glucan glucanohydrolases from Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Re-assessment of their significance in cellulose degradation mechanisms. Journal of Biotechnology 1991, 21:143-160.
176. Vaaje-Kolstad G., Westereng B., Horn S.J., Liu Z., Zhai H., Sørlie M., et al. An oxidative enzyme boosting the enzymatic conversion of recalcitrant polysaccharides. Science 2010, 330:219-222.
177. van den Brink J., de Vries R.P. Fungal enzyme sets for plant polysaccharide degradation. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2011, 91:1477-1492.
178. Vanden Wymelenberg A., Gaskell J., Mozuch M., Sabat G., Ralph J., Skyba O., et al. Comparative transcriptome and secretome analysis of wood decay fungi Postia placenta and Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2010, 76:3599-3610.
179. van Tilbeurgh H., Tomme P., Claeyssens M., Bhikhabhai R., Pettersson G. Limited proteolysis of the cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei-Separation of functional domains. FEBS Letters 1986, 204:223-227.
180. Várnai A. Improving enzymatic conversion of lignocellulose to platform sugars 2012, 17. VTT, VTT Science, Espoo.
181. Várnai A., Huikko L., Pere J., Siika-aho M., Viikari L. Synergistic action of xylanase and mannanase improves the total hydrolysis of softwood. Bioresource Technology 2011, 102:9096-9104.
182. Várnai A., Siika-aho M., Viikari L. Restriction of enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated spruce by lignin. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2010, 46:185-193.
183. Várnai A., Siika-aho M., Viikari L. Carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs) revisited. Reduced amount of water counterbalances the need for CBMs. Biotechnology for Biofuels 2013, 6:30.
184. Várnai A., Viikari L., Marjamaa K., Siika-aho M. Adsorption of monocomponent enzymes in enzyme mixture analyzed quantitatively during hydrolysis of lignocellulose substrates. Bioresource Technology 2011, 102:1220-1227.
185. Vincken J.-P., Beldman G., Voragen A.G.J. Substrate specificity of endoglucanases: What determines xyloglucanase activity?. Carbohydrate Research 1997, 298:299-310.
186. Vlasenko E., Schülein M., Cherry J., Xu F. Substrate specificity of family 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, and 45 endoglucanases. Bioresource Technology 2010, 101:2405-2411.
187. Wang L., Zhang Y., Gao P. A novel function for the cellulose binding module of cellobiohydrolase I. Science in China. Series B 2008, 51:620-629.
188. Wang Q.Q., Zhu J.Y., Hunt C.G., Zhan H.Y. Kinetics of adsorption, desorption, and re-adsorption of a commercial endoglucanase in lignocellulosic suspensions. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2012, 109:1965-1975.
189. Watanabe H., Tokuda G. Animal cellulases. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 2001, 58:1167-1178.
190. Willför S., Sundberg K., Tenkanen M., Holmbom B. Spruce-derived mannans-A potential raw material for hydrocolloids and novel advanced natural materials. Carbohydrate Polymers 2008, 72:197-210.
191. Wilson D.B., Kostylev M. Cellulase processivity. Methods in Molecular Biology 2012, 908:93-99.
192. Wilson C.A., Wood T.M. The anaerobic fungus Neocallimastix frontalis: Isolation and properties of a cellulosome-type enzyme fraction with the capacity to solubilize hydrogen-bond-ordered cellulose. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 1992, 37:125-129.
193. Wingren A., Galbe M., Zacchi G. Techno-economic evaluation of producing ethanol from softwood: Comparison of SSF and SHF and identification of bottlenecks. Biotechnology Progress 2003, 19:1109-1117.
194. Wood T.M., Wilson C.A. Studies on the capacity of the cellulase of the anaerobic rumen fungus Piromonas communis P to degrade hydrogen bond-ordered cellulose. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 1995, 43:572-578.
195. Xiao Z., Zhang X., Gregg D.J., Saddler J.N. Effects of sugar inhibition on cellulases and β-glucosidase during enzymatic hydrolysis of softwood substrates. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2004, 113-116:1115-1126.
196. Ximenes E., Kim Y., Mosier N., Dien B., Ladisch M. Deactivation of cellulases by phenols. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2011, 48:54-60.
197. Yakovlev I.A., Hietala A.M., Courty P.-E., Lundell T., Solheim H., Fossdal C.G. Genes associated with lignin degradation in the polyphagous white-rot pathogen Heterobasidion irregulare show substrate-specific regulation. Fungal Genetics and Biology 2013, 56:17-24.
198. Yang B., Wyman C.E. BSA treatment to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose in lignin containing substrates. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2006, 94:611-617.
199. Yang B., Wyman C.E. Pretreatment: The key to unlocking low-cost cellulosic ethanol. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefineries 2008, 2:26-40.
200. Yoon J.J., Cha C.J., Kim Y.S., Kim W. Degradation of cellulose by the major endoglucanase produced from the brown-rot fungus Fomitopsis pinicola. Biotechnology Letters 2008, 30:1373-1378.
201. Youngs H., Somerville C. Development of feedstocks for cellulosic biofuels. Biology Reports 2012, 4:10. Available at:. http://f1000.com/reports/b/4/10.
202. Zhang Y.H.P., Lynd L.R. Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: Noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2004, 88:797-824.
203. Zhang J., Siika-aho M., Tenkanen M., Viikari L. The role of acetyl xylan esterase in solubilisation of xylan and enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw and giant reed. Biotechnology for Biofuels 2011, 4:60.
204. Zhang J., Tang M., Viikari L. Xylans inhibit enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials by cellulases. Bioresource Technology 2012, 121:8-12.
205. Zhong L., Matthews J.F., Hansen P.I., Crowley M.F., Cleary J.M., Walker R.C., et al. Computational simulations of the Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I acting on microcrystalline cellulose Iβ: The enzyme-substrate complex. Carbohydrate Research 2009, 344:1984-1992.