Cellulases without carbohydrate-binding modules in high consistency ethanol production process

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Pakarinen, Annukka ^a   Haven, Mai Østergaard ^b   Djajadi, Demi Tristan ^a   Várnai, Anikó ^a,c   Puranen, Terhi ^d   Viikari, Liisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b DONG Energy AS   (Denmark)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^d Roal Oy   (Finland)

Author keywords

Carbohydrate binding modules; CBM; Cellobiohydrolases; Cellulases; High consistency; Hydrolysis; Lignocellulose; Recyclability

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATES; CELLULOSE; HYDROLYSIS; LIGNIN;

CARBOHYDRATE-BINDING MODULES; CBM; CELLOBIOHYDROLASES; CELLULASES; HIGH CONSISTENCY; LIGNOCELLULOSE; RECYCLABILITY;

ENZYMES;

CARBOHYDRATE; CHEMICAL BINDING; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ENZYME; ETHANOL; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HYDROLYSIS;

THERMOASCUS AURANTIACUS;

EID: 84898040049     PISSN: 17546834     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-7-27     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Technoeconomic analysis of the dilute sulfuric acid and enzymatic hydrolysis process for the conversion of corn stover to ethanol. Aden A, Foust T, Cellulose 2009 16 535 545 10.1007/s10570-009-9327-8
2. Humbird D, Davis R, Tao L, Kinchin C, Hsu D, Aden A, Schoen P, Lukas J, Olthof B, Worley M, Sexton D, Dudgeon D, Process Design and Economics for Biochemical Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL Technical Report: NREL/TP-5100-47764. 2011
3. Outlook for cellulase improvement: screening and selection strategies. Zhang YHP, Himmel ME, Mielenz JR, Biotechnol Adv 2006 24 452 481 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.03.003 16690241
4. What is (and is not) vital to advancing lignocellulosic ethanol. Wyman CE, Trends Biotechnol 2007 25 4 153 157 10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.02.009 17320227
5. The realm of cellulases in biorefinery development. Chandel AK, Chandrasekhar G, Silva MBG, da Silva SS, Crit Rev Biotechnol 2011 32 3 187 202 21929293
6. Recycling cellulases for cellulosic ethanol production at industrial relevant conditions: potential and temperature dependency at high solid processes. Lindedam J, Haven MØ Chylenski P, Jørgensen H, Felby C, Bioresour Technol 2013 148 180 188 24045205
7. Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass to fuels and chemicals. Chundawat SPS, Beckham GT, Himmel ME, Dale BE, Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng 2011 2 121 145 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061010-114205 22432613
8. Domains in microbial β-1,4-glycanases: sequence conservation, function, and enzyme families. Gilkes NR, Henrissat B, Kilburn DG, Miller RC, Warren RAJ, Microbiol Rev 1991 55 303 315 1886523
9. The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics. Cantarel BL, Coutinho PM, Rancurel C, Bernard T, Lombard V, Henrissat B, Nucleic Acids Res 2009 37 233 D238 10.1093/nar/gkn663 18838391
10. Investigation of the function of mutated cellulose-binding domains of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I. Reinikainen T, Ruohonen L, Nevanen T, Laaksonen L, Kraulis P, Jones TA, Knowles JKC, Teeri TT, Proteins 1992 14 4 475 482 10.1002/prot.340140408 1438185
11. Carbohydrate-binding modules: Fine-tuning polysaccharide recognition. Boraston AB, Bolam DN, Gilbert HJ, Davies GJ, Biochem J 2004 382 769 781 10.1042/BJ20040892 15214846
12. Limited proteolysis of the cellobioydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. Separation of functional domains. van Tilbeurgh H, Tomme P, Claeyssens M, Bhikhabhai R, Pettersson G, FEBS Lett 1986 204 223 227 10.1016/0014-5793(86) 80816-X
13. Studies of the cellulolytic system of Trichoderma reesei QM 9414. Analysis of domain function in two cellobiohydrolases by limited proteolysis. Tomme P, van Tilbeurgh H, Pettersson G, van Damme J, Vandekerckhove J, Knowles J, Teeri T, Claeyssens M, Eur J Biochem 1988 170 575 581 10.1111/j.1432-1033. 1988.tb13736.x 3338453
14. A new model for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose based on the two-domain structure of cellobiohydrolase I. Ståhlberg J, Johansson G, Pettersson G, Nat Biotechnol 1991 9 286 290 10.1038/nbt0391-286
15. High speed atomic force microscopy visualizes processive movement of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I on crystalline cellulose. Igarashi K, Koivula A, Wada M, Kimura S, Penttilä M, Samejima M, J Biol Chem 2009 284 36186 36190 10.1074/jbc.M109.034611 19858200
16. Mechanism of initial rapid rate retardation in cellobiohydrolase catalyzed cellulose hydrolysis. Jalak J, Väljamäe P, Biotechnol Bioeng 2010 106 871 883 10.1002/bit.22779 20506147
17. The tryptophan residue at the active site tunnel entrance of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase Cel7A is important for initiation of degradation of crystalline cellulose. Nakamura A, Tsukuda T, Auer S, Furuta T, Wada M, Koivula A, Igarashi K, Samejima M, J Biol Chem 2013 288 19 13503 13510 10.1074/jbc.M113.452623 23532843
18. Carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs) revisited: Reduced amount of water counterbalances the need for CBMs. Várnai A, Siika-aho M, Viikari L, Biotechnol Biofuels 2013 6 30 10.1186/1754-6834-6-30 23442543
19. The role of carbohydrate binding module (CBM) at high substrate consistency: comparison of Trichoderma reesei and Thermoascus aurantiacus Cel7A (CBHI) and Cel5A (EGII). Le Costaouëc T, Pakarinen A, Várnai A, Puranen T, Viikari L, Bioresour Technol 2013 143 196 203 23796604
20. The IBUS process-lignocellulosic bioethanol close to a commercial reality. Larsen J, Haven MØ Thirup L, Li HW, Iversen FK, Chem Eng Technol 2008 31 765 772 10.1002/ceat.200800048
21. Optimization of hydrothermal pretreatment of wheat straw for production of bioethanol at low water consumption without addition of chemicals. Petersen MØ Larsen J, Thomsen MH, Biomass Bioenergy 2009 33 834 840 10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.01.004
22. Adsorption of Trichoderma reesei CBH I and EG II and their catalytic domains on steam pretreated softwood and isolated lignin. Palonen H, Tjerneld F, Zacchi G, Tenkanen M, J Biotechnol 2004 107 65 72 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2003.09.011 14687972
23. Effect of temperature on lignin-derived inhibition studied with three structurally different cellobiohydrolases. Rahikainen JL, Moilanen U, Nurmi-Rantala S, Lappas A, Koivula A, Viikari L, Kruus K, Bioresour Technol 2013 146 118 125 23920120
24. Cloning, expression, and characterization of novel thermostable family 7 cellobiohydrolases. Voutilainen SP, Puranen T, Siika-Aho M, Lappalainen A, Alapuranen M, Kallio J, Hooman S, Viikari L, Vehmaanperä J, Koivula A, Biotechnol Bioeng 2008 101 515 528 10.1002/bit.21940 18512263
25. Product inhibition of cellulases studied with 14C-labeled cellulose substrates. Teugjas H, Väljamäe P, Biotechnol Biofuels 2013 6 104 10.1186/1754-6834-6-104 23883520
26. Yield-determining factors in high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Kristensen JB, Felby C, Jørgensen H, Biotechnol Biofuels 2009 2 11 10.1186/1754-6834-2-11 19505292
27. The effect of mixing on the liquefaction and saccharification of cellulosic fibers. Lavenson DM, Tozzi EJ, Karuna N, Jeoh T, Powell RL, McCarthy MJ, Bioresour Technol 2012 111 240 247 22342045
28. Reactor design for minimizing product inhibition during enzymatic lignocellulose hydrolysis: I. Significance and mechanism of cellobiose and glucose inhibition on cellulolytic enzymes. Andric P, Meyer AS, Jensen PA, Dam-Johansen K, Biotechnol Adv 2010 28 308 324 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.01.003 20080173
29. Inhibition of enzymatic cellulolysis by phenolic compounds. Tejirian A, Xu F, Enzyme Microb Technol 2011 48 239 247 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2010.11.004 22112906
30. The challenging measurement of protein in complex biomass derived samples. Haven MØ Jørgensen H, Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2014 172 87 101 10.1007/s12010-013-0466-x 24046255
31. Adsorption and desorption of cellulase components during the hydrolysis of a steam-exploded birch substrate. Yu AHC, Lee D, Saddler JN, Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1995 21 203 216
32. Weak lignin-binding enzymes: A novel approach to improve activity of cellulases for hydrolysis of lignocellulosics. Berlin A, Gilkes N, Kurabi A, Bura R, Tu M, Kilburn D, Saddler J, Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2005 121 163 170 10.1385/ABAB:121:1-3:0163 15917596
33. Synergistic interactions in cellulose hydrolysis. Kostylev M, Wilson D, Biofuels 2012 3 1 61 70 10.4155/bfs.11.150
34. Effect of poly(ethylene glycol) on enzymatic hydrolysis and adsorption of cellulase enzymes to pretreated lignocellulose. Börjesson J, Engqvist M, Sipos B, Tjerneld F, Enzyme Microb Technol 2007 41 186 195 10.1016/j.enzmictec. 2007.01.003
35. Increased enzyme binding to substrate is not necessary for more efficient cellulose hydrolysis. Gao D, Chundawat SPS, Sethi A, Balan V, Gnanakaran S, Dale BE, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013 110 10922 10927 10.1073/pnas.1213426110 23784776
36. Inhibition of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose by ethanol. Wu Z, Lee YY, Biotechnol Lett 1997 19 10 977 979 10.1023/A:1018487015129
37. Effect of ethanol and yeast on cellulase activity and hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose. Cheng H, Jin S, Enzyme Microb Technol 2006 39 1430 1432 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.03.027
38. Influence of high temperature and ethanol on thermostable lignocellulolytic enzymes. Skovgaard PA, Jørgensen H, J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2013 40 447 456 10.1007/s10295-013-1248-8 23483355
39. The cellulose-binding domain of cellobiohydrolase Cel7A from Trichoderma reesei is also a thermostabilizing domain. Hall M, Rubin J, Behrens SH, Bommarius AS, J Biotechnol 2011 155 370 376 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.07.016 21807036
40. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Determination of Sugars, Byproducts, and Degradation Products in Liquid Fraction Process Samples Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL Technical Report: NREL/TP-510-42623. 2008
41. Fluorogenic and chromogenic glycosides as substrates and ligands of carbohydrases. van Tilbeurgh H, Loontiens FG, de Bruyne CK, Claeyssens M, Methods Enzymol 1988 160 45 59
42. Liquefaction of lignocellulose at high-solids concentrations. Jørgensen H, Vibe-Pedersen J, Larsen J, Felby C, Biotechnol Bioeng 2007 96 862 870 10.1002/bit.21115 16865734
43. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Miller GL, Anal Chem 1959 31 3 426 428 10.1021/ac60147a030
44. Evaluation of annual bioenergy crops in the boreal zone for biogas and ethanol production. Pakarinen A, Maijala P, Stoddard F, Santanen A, Kymäläinen M, Tuomainen P, Viikari L, Biomass Bioenergy 2011 35 3071 3078 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.04.022
45. Determining yields in high solids enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass. Kristensen JB, Felby C, Jørgensen H, Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2009 156 127 132 10.1007/s12010-008-8375-0 18836690
46. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ, J Biol Chem 1951 193 265 275 14907713
47. Direct quantitative determination of adsorbed cellulase on lignocellulosic biomass with its application to study cellulase desorption for potential recycling. Zhu Z, Sathitsuksanoh N, Zhang YHP, Analyst 2009 134 11 2267 2272 10.1039/b906065k 19838414