Kinetics of adsorption, desorption, and re-adsorption of a commercial endoglucanase in lignocellulosic suspensions

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 109, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1965-1975

  Wang, Q Q ^a,b   Zhu, J Y ^b,c   Hunt, C G ^b   Zhan, H Y ^a  

^a SOUTH CHINA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Adsorption; Binding reversibility; Cellulase binding kinetics; Desorption; Enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocelluloses; Enzyme recycling

Indexed keywords

BINDING CAPACITIES; BINDING REVERSIBILITY; CELLULASE ADSORPTION; CELLULOSIC SUBSTRATES; ENDOGLUCANASES; ENGINEERING PARAMETERS; ENZYME RECYCLING; IN-SITU; LIGNOCELLULOSIC SUBSTRATES; PHYSICAL STRUCTURES; QUANTITATIVE KINETICS; RECYCLABILITY; RECYCLING STRATEGY; TEMPORALLY RESOLVED MEASUREMENTS;

ADSORPTION; CELLULOSE; DESORPTION; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; KINETICS; LIGNIN; RECYCLING;

SUBSTRATES;

CELLULOSE; GLUCAN SYNTHASE; LIGNIN; LIGNOCELLULOSE;

ADSORPTION KINETICS; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; DESORPTION; ENZYME BINDING; ENZYME STRUCTURE; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; FILTRATION; MOLECULAR MODEL; PH; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; READSORPTION; RECYCLING; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY; THERMODYNAMICS; TIME;

ADSORPTION; CELLULASE; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; KINETICS; LIGNIN; PROTEIN BINDING; SUSPENSIONS; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 84862801071     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.24483     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bradford M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive for the quantitation of microgram quantitites of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72(1-2): 248- 254.
2. Hart PW, Waite DM, Thibault L, Tomashek J, Rousseau M-E, Hill C, Sabourin MJ. 2009. Refining energy reduction and pulp characteristic modification of alkaline peorxide mechanical pulp (APMP) through enzyme application. TAPPI J 9(5): 19- 25.
3. Henriksson M, Henriksson G, Berglund L, Lindstrom T. 2007. An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers. Eur Polym J 43(8): 3434- 3441.
4. Jung H, Wilson DB, Walker LP. 2003. Binding and reversibility of Thermobifida fusca Cel5A, Cel6B, and Cel48A and their respective catalytic domains to bacterial microcrystalline cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 84(2): 151- 159.
5. Kumar L, Chandra R, Saddler JN. 2011. Influence of steam pretreatment severity on post-treatments used to enhance the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated softwoods at low enzyme loadings. Biotechnol Bioeng 108(10): 2300- 2311.
6. Linder M, Teeri TT. 1996. The cellulose-binding domain of the major cellobiohydrolase of Trichoderma reesei exhibits true reversibility and a high exchange rate on crystalline cellulose. Proc Natl Acad Sci 93(22): 12251- 12255.
7. Liu H, Zhu JY, Fu S. 2010. Effects of lignin-metal complexation on enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. J Agric Food Chem 58: 7233- 7238.
8. Liu H, Zhu JY, Chai XS. 2011. In situ, rapid, and temporally resolved measurements of cellulase adsorption onto lignocellulosic substrates by UV-Vis spectrophotometry. Langmuir 27(1): 272- 278.
9. Luo X, Zhu JY. 2011. Effects of drying-induced fiber hornification on enzymatic saccharification oflignocelluloses. Enzyme Microb Technol 48(1): 92- 99.
10. Luo X, Zhu JY, Gleisner R, Zhan HY. 2011. Effect of wet pressing-induced fiber hornification on enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses. Cellulose 18: 1339- 1344.
11. Lynd LR, Laser MS, Bransby D, Dale BE, Davison B, Hamilton R, Himmel M, Keller M, McMillan JD, Sheehan J, Wyman C.E. 2008. How biotech can transform biofuels. Nat Biotechnol 26: 169- 172.
12. Mansfield SD, Mooney C, Saddler JN. 1999. Substrate and enzyme characteristics that limit cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Prog 15: 804- 816.
13. Mes Hartree M, Hogan C, Saddler J. 1987. Recycle of enzymes and substrate following enzymatic hydrolysis of steam pretreated aspenwood. Biotechnol Bioeng 30(4): 558- 564.
14. Moran-Mirabal JM, Bolewski JC, Walker LP. 2011. Reversibility and binding kinetics of Thermobifida fusca cellulases studied through fluorescence recovery after photobleaching microscopy. Biophys Chem 155(1): 20- 28.
15. Otter DE, Munro PA, Scott GK, Geddes R. 1989. Desorption of Trichoderma reesei cellulase from cellulose by a range of desorbents. Biotechnol Bioeng 34(3): 291- 298.
16. Pääkkö M, Ankerfors M, Kosonen H, Nykänen A, Ahola S, Österberg M, Ruokolainen J, Laine J, Larsson PT, Ikkala O, et al. 2007. Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 8(6): 1934- 1941.
17. Qi B, Chen X, Su Y, Wan Y. 2011. Enzyme adsorption and recycling during hydrolysis of wheat straw lignocellulose. Bioresour Technol 102(3): 2881- 2889.
18. Qing Q, Yang B, Wyman CE. 2010. Xylooligomers are strong inhibitors of cellulose hydrolysis by enzymes. Bioresour Technol 101(24): 9624- 9630.
19. Rad BL, Yazdanparast R. 1998. Desorption of the cellulase systems of Trichoderma reesei and a Botrytis sp. from Avicel. Biotechnol Tech 12(9): 693- 696.
20. Sabourin MJ, Hart PW. 2010. Enhanced fiber quality of black spruce (Picea mariana) thermomechanical pulp fiber through selective enzyme application. Ind Eng Chem Res 49: 5945- 5951.
21. Seo D-J, Fujita H, Sakoda A. 2011. Effects of a non-ionic surfactant, Tween 20, on adsorption/desorption of saccharification enzymes onto/from lignocelluloses and saccharification rate. Adsorption 17(5): 813- 822.
22. Sewalt VJH, Glasser WG, Beauchemin KA. 1997. Lignin impact on fiber degradation. 3. Reversal of inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis by chemical modification of lignin and by additives. J Agric Food Chem 45(5): 1823- 1828.
23. Spence K, Venditti R, Rojas O, Habibi Y, Pawlak J. 2011. A comparative study of energy consumption and physical properties of microfibrillated cellulose produced by different processing methods. Cellulose 18(4): 1097- 1111.
24. Sprague BL, Pego RL, Stavreva DA, McNally JG. 2004. Analysis of binding reactions by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Biophys J 86: 3473- 3495.
25. Tu M, Chandra RP, Saddler JN. 2007a. Evaluating the distribution of cellulases and the recycling of free cellulases during the hydrolysis of lignocellulosic substrates. Biotechnol Prog 23(2): 398- 406.
26. Tu M, Chandra RP, Saddler JN. 2007b. Recycling cellulases during the hydrolysis of steam exploded and ethanol pretreated Lodgepole pine. Biotechnol Prog 23(5): 1130- 1137.
27. Tu M, Zhang X, Paice M, MacFarlane P, Saddler JN. 2009. The potential of enzyme recycling during the hydrolysis of a mixed softwood feedstock. Bioresour Technol 100(24): 6407- 6415.
28. Wang QQ, He Z, Zhu Z, Zhang Y-HP, Ni Y, Luo XL, Zhu JY. 2012. Evaluations of cellulose accessibilities of lignocelluloses by solute exclusion and protein adsorption techniques. Biotechnol Bioeng 109(2): 381- 389.
29. Wu JC, Ng KR, Chong J, Yang KJ, Lam XP, Nam CT, Nugroho AJ. 2010. Recovery of cellulases by adsorption/desorption using cation exchange resins. Korean J Chem Eng 27(2): 469- 473.
30. Zhu JY, Pan XJ. 2010. Woody biomass pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production: Technology and energy consumption evaluation. Bioresour Technol 101: 4992- 5002.
31. Zhu J, Pan X, Wang G, Gleisner R. 2009a. Sulfite pretreatment (SPORL) for robust enzymatic saccharification of spruce and red pine. Bioresour Technol 100(8): 2411- 2418.
32. Zhu Z, Sathitsuksanoh N, Zhang PYH. 2009b. Direct quantitative determination of adsorbed cellulase on lignocellulosic biomass with its application to study cellulase desorption for potential recycling. Analyst 134(11): 2267- 2272.
33. Zhu JY, Gleisner R, Scott CT, Luo XL, Tian S. 2011a. High titer ethanol production from simultaneous enzymatic saccharification and fermentation of aspen at high solids: A comparison between SPORL and dilute acid pretreatments. Bioresour Technol 102(19): 8921- 8929.
34. Zhu JY, Sabo R, Luo X. 2011b. Integrated production of nano-fibrillated cellulose and cellulosic biofuel (ethanol) by enzymatic fractionation of wood fibers. Green Chem 13(5): 1339- 1344.