Mechanism of initial rapid rate retardation in cellobiohydrolase catalyzed cellulose hydrolysis

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 106, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 871-883

  Jalak, Jürgen ^a   Väljamäe, Priit ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Catalytic constant; Cellobiohydrolase; Cellulase; Cellulose; Non productive binding; Processivity

Indexed keywords

CATALYTIC CONSTANTS; CELLOBIOHYDROLASES; CELLULASE; NON-PRODUCTIVE BINDING; PROCESSIVITY;

CATALYSIS; DISSOCIATION; HYDROLYSIS; RATE CONSTANTS;

CELLULOSE;

4 NITROPHENYLGALACTOSIDE; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE 1,4 BETA CELLOBIOSIDASE; LIGNOCELLULOSE; MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; 4-AMINOPHENYL BETA-LACTOSIDE; GLYCOSIDE;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISSOCIATION CONSTANT; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME MECHANISM; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; HYDROLYSIS; HYPOCREA JECORINA; INHIBITION KINETICS; MEASUREMENT; NONHUMAN; PHANEROCHAETE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; KINETICS; METABOLISM; TRICHODERMA;

CATALYTIC DOMAIN; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE 1,4-BETA-CELLOBIOSIDASE; GLYCOSIDES; HYDROLYSIS; KINETICS; PHANEROCHAETE; TRICHODERMA;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); HYPOCREA JECORINA; KOBUS; PHANEROCHAETE CHRYSOSPORIUM;

EID: 77955691535     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.22779     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bansal P, Hall M, Realff MJ, Lee JH, Bommarius AS. 2009. Modeling cellulase kinetics on lignocellulosic substrates. Biotechnol Adv 27:833-848.
2. Berlin A, Gilkes N, Kurabi A, Bura R, Tu M, Kilburn D, Saddler J. 2005. Weak lignin-binding enzymes: A novel approach to improve activity of cellulases for hydrolysis of lignocellulosics. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 121-124:163-170. (Pubitemid 40691222)
3. Bhikhabhai R, Johansson G, Pettersson G. 1984. Isolation of cellulolytic enzymes from Trichoderma reeseiQM9414. J Appl Biochem 6:336-345. (Pubitemid 15090027)
4. Bommarius AS, Katona A, Cheben SE, Patel AS, Ragauskas AJ, Knudson K, Pu Y. 2008. Cellulase kinetics as a function of cellulose pretreatment. Metab Eng 10:370-381.
5. Boraston AB, Bolam DN, Gilbert HJ, Davies GJ. 2004. Carbohydrate-binding modules: Fine tuning polysaccharide recognition. Biochem J 382:769-781.
6. Claeyssens M, van Tilbeurgh H, Tomme P, Wood TM, McRae SI. 1989. Fungal cellulase systems. Comparison of the specificities of the cellobiohydrolases isolated from Penicillium pinophilum and Trichoderma reesei. Biochem J 261:819-825.
7. Converse AO, Matsuno R, Tanaka M, Taniguchi M. 1988. A model of enzyme adsorption and hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose with slow deactivation of the adsorbed enzyme. Biotechnol Bioeng 32:38-45. (Pubitemid 18621678)
8. Creagh AL, Ong E, Jervis E, Kilburn DG, Haynes CA. 1996. Binding of the cellulose-binding domain of exoglucanase Cex from Cellulomonas fimi to insoluble microcrystalline cellulose is entropically driven. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:12229-12234. (Pubitemid 26367124)
9. Desai SG, Converse AO. 1997. Substrate reactivity as a function of the extent of reaction in the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 56:650-655.
10. Divne C, Ståhlberg J, Reinikainen T, Ruohonen L, Pettersson G, Knowles JKC, Teeri TT, Jones AT. 1994. The three-dimensional structure of the catalytic core of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. Science 265:524-528. (Pubitemid 24264997)
11. Divne C, Ståhlberg J, Teeri TT, Jones AT. 1998. High-resolution crystal structures reveal how a cellulose chain is bound in the 50Å long tunnel of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. J Mol Biol 275:309-325. (Pubitemid 28030006)
12. Donohoe BS, Decker SR, Tucker MP, Himmel ME, Vinzant TB. 2008. Visualizing lignin coalescence and migration through maize cell walls following thermochemical pretreatment. Biotechnol Bioeng 101:913-925.
13. Eriksson T, Karlsson J, Tjerneld F. 2002. A model explaining declining rate in hydrolysis of lignocellulose substrates with cellobiohydrolase I (Cel7A) and endoglucanase I (Cel7B) of Trichoderma reesei. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 101:41-60. (Pubitemid 34460685)
14. Gardner KH, Blackwell J. 1974. The structure of native cellulose. Biopolymers 13:1975-2001.
15. Gill SC, von Hippel PH. 1989. Calculation of protein extinction coefficients from amino acid sequence data. Anal Biochem 182:319-326. (Pubitemid 19277112)
16. Gruno M, Väljamäe P, Pettersson G, Johansson G. 2004. Inhibition of the Trichoderma reesei cellulases by cellobiose is strongly dependent on the nature of the substrate. Biotechnol Bioeng 86:503-511. (Pubitemid 38679768)
17. Hall M, Bansal P, Lee JH, Realff MJ, Bommarius AS. 2010. Cellulose crystallinity - A key predictor of the enzymatic hydrolysis rate. FEBS J 277:1571-1582.
18. Hayashi N, Sugiyama J, Okano T, Ishihara M. 1998. Selective degradation of the cellulose Ia component in Cladophora cellulose with Trichoderma viride cellulase. Carbohydr Res 305:109-116. (Pubitemid 28252846)
19. Henriksson H, Muňoz IG, Isaksson R, Pettersson G, Johansson G. 2000. Cellobiohydrolase 58 (P.c. Cel 7D) is complementary to the homologous CBH I (T.r. Cel 7A) in enantioseparations. J Chromatogr A 898:63-74.
20. Henrissat B, Driguez H, Viet C, Schülein M. 1985. Synergism of cellulases from Trichoderma reesei in the degradation of cellulose. Bio/Technol 3: 722-726.
21. Himmel ME, Ding SY, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimols MR, Brady JW, Foust TD. 2007. Biomass recalcitrance: Engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 315:804-807. (Pubitemid 46255823)
22. Hong J, Ye X, Zhang YHP. 2007. Quantitative determination of cellulose accessibility to cellulase based on adsorption of a non-hydrolytic fusion protein containing CBM and GFP with its applications. Langmuir 23:12535-12540. (Pubitemid 350284536)
23. Horn SJ, Sikorski P, Cederkvist JB, Vaaje-Kolstad G, Sørlie M, Synstad B, Vriend G, Vårum KM, Eijsink VGH. 2006. Costs and benefits of processivity in enzymatic degradation of recalcitrant polysaccharides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:18089-18094. (Pubitemid 44871617)
24. Igarashi K, Wada M, Hori R, Samejima M. 2006. Surface density of cellobiohydrolase on crystalline celluloses. A critical parameter to evaluate enzymatic kinetics at a solid-liquid interface. FEBS J 273: 2869-2878.
25. Igarashi K, Koivula A, Wada M, Kimura S, Penttila M, Samejima M. 2009. High-speed atomic force microscopy visualizes processive movement of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I on crystalline cellulose. J Biol Chem 284:36186-36190.
26. Kipper K, Väljamäe P, Johansson G. 2005. Processive action of cellobiohydrolase Cel7A from Trichoderma reesei is revealed as 'burst' kinetics on fluorescent polymeric model substrates. Biochem J 385:527-535.
27. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS. 2002. Microbial cellulose utilization: Fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66:506-577.
28. Ma A, Hu Q, Qu Y, Bai Z, Liu W, Zhuang G. 2008. The enzymatic hydrolysis rate of cellulose decreases with irreversible adsorption of cellobiohydrolase I. Enzyme Microb Technol 42:543-547.
29. Medve J, Ståhlberg J, Tjerneld F. 1994. Adsorption and synergism of cellobiohydrolase I and II of Trichoderma reesei during hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 44:1064-1073. (Pubitemid 24331656)
30. Mulakala C, Reilly PJ. 2005. Hypocrea jecorina (Trichoderma reesei) Cel7A as a molecular machine: A docking study. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform 60:598-605. (Pubitemid 41266418)
31. Nidetzky B, Steiner W. 1993. A new approach for modeling cellulase-cellulose adsorption and the kinetics of the enzymatic hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 42:469-479. (Pubitemid 23211026)
32. Pace CN, Vajdos F, Fee L, Grimsley G, Gray T. 1995. How to measure and predict the molar absorption coefficient of a protein. Protein Sci 4: 2411-2423.
33. Palonen H, Tjerneld F, Zacchi G, Tenkanen M. 2004. Adsorption of Trichoderma reesei CBH I and EG II and their catalytic domains on steam pretreated softwood and isolated lignin. J Biotechnol 107: 65-72. (Pubitemid 38010270)
34. Rabinowitch ML, Klyosov AA, Melnik MS. 1986. The titration of the active-centers of cellobiohydrolase from Trichoderma reesei. Anal Biochem 156:489-494. (Pubitemid 16051788)
35. Samejima M, Sugiyama J, Igarashi K, Eriksson KEL. 1998. Enzymatic hydrolysis of bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr Res 305:281-288.
36. Ståhlberg J, Johansson G, Pettersson G. 1991. A new model for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose based on the two-domain structure of cellobiohydrolase I. Bio/Technol 9:286-290.
37. Thomsen MH, Thygesen A, Jørgensen H, Larsen J, Christensen BH, Thomsen AB. 2006. Preliminary results on optimizing of pilot scale pretreatment of wheat straw used in coproduction of bioethanol and electricity. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 129-132:448-460. (Pubitemid 43791475)
38. Tomme P, van Tilbeurgh H, Pettersson G, van Damme J, Vandekerckhove J, Knowles J, Teeri T, Claeyssens M. 1988. Studies of the cellulolytic system of Trichoderma reesei QM 9414. Analysis of domain function in two cellobiohydrolases by limited proteolysis. Eur J Biochem 170:575-581.
39. Uzcategui E, Ruiz A, Montesino R, Johansson G, Pettersson G. 1991. The 1,4-β-D-glucan cellobiohydrolase from Phanerochaete chrysosporium. I. A system of synergistically acting enzymes homologous to Trichoderma reesei. J Biotechnol 19:271-286.
40. Väljamäe P, Sild V, Pettersson G, Johansson G. 1998. The initial kinetics of hydrolysis by cellobiohydrolases I and II is consistent with a cellulose surface-erosion model. Eur J Biochem 253:469-475. (Pubitemid 28191849)
41. Väljamäe P, Sild V, Nutt A, Pettersson G, Johansson G. 1999. Acid hydrolysis of bacterial cellulose reveals different modes of synergistic action between cellobiohydrolase I and endoglucanase I. Eur J Biochem 266:327-334.
42. Várnai A, Siika-Aho M, Viikari L. 2010. Restriction of the enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated spruce by lignin and hemicellulose. Enzyme Microb Technol 46:185-193.
43. Velleste R, Teugjas H, Väljamäe P. 2010. Reducing end-specific fluorescence labeled celluloses for cellulase mode of action. Cellulose 17:125-138.
44. von Ossowski I, Ståhlberg J, Koivula A, Piens K, Becker D, Boer H, Harle R, Harris M, Divne C, Mahdi S, Zhao Y, Driguez H, Claeyssens M, Sinnot ML, Teeri TT. 2003. Engineering the exo-loop of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase, Cel7A. J Mol Biol 333:817-829.
45. Xu F, Ding H. 2007. A new kinetic model for heterogeneous (or spatially confined) enzymatic catalysis: Contribution from the fractal and jamming (overcrowding) effects. Appl Catal A Gen 317:70-81. (Pubitemid 44894818)
46. Zhang YHP, Lynd LR. 2004. Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: Non-complexed cellulase systems. Biotechnol Bioeng 88:797-824.
47. Zhang YHP, Cui JB, Lynd LR, Kuang LR. 2006. A transition from cellulose swelling to cellulose dissolution by o-phosphoric acid: Evidence from enzymatic hydrolysis and supramolecular structure. Biomacromolecules 7:644-648. (Pubitemid 43315550)