Analyzing trends in technology acceptance studies in education domain

Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Current Trends in Information Technology, CTIT 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 23-27

  Imtiaz, Md Athar ^a   Mirhashemi, Md Taha ^a  

^a MALAYSIA JAPAN INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Computer Based Assessment; E assessment; E learning; Technology Acceptance

Indexed keywords

E-LEARNING; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; RESEARCH;

ACCEPTANCE OF TECHNOLOGIES; COMPUTER-BASED ASSESSMENTS; E ASSESSMENTS; EDUCATION DOMAIN; JOURNAL ARTICLES; RESEARCH TRENDS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATIONS;

EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84898419296     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CTIT.2013.6749472     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Baek, Y., J. Jung, and B. Kim, What makes teachers use technology in the classroom? Exploring the factors affecting facilitation of technology with a Korean sample. Computers & Education, 2008. 50(1): p. 224-234.
2. Hu, P.J.-H., T.H. Clark, and W. W. Ma, Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: a longitudinal study. Information & management, 2003. 41 (2): p. 227-241.
3. King, W.R. and 1. He, A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 2006. 43(6): p. 740-755.
4. Legris, P., 1. Ingham, and P. Collerette, Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & management, 2003. 40(3): p. 191-204.
5. Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen, Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. 1975.
6. Davis, F.D., Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 1989: p. 319-340.
7. Ajzen, 1., The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 1991. 50(2): p. 179-211.
8. Venkatesh, V. and F.D. Davis, A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 2000. 46(2): p. 186-204.
9. Venkatesh, V., et aI., User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 2003: p. 425-478.
10. Bandura, A., Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 2001. 52( 1): p. 1-26.
11. Padilla-MeleNdez, A, AR. Del Aguila-Obra, and A Garrido-Moreno, Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario. Computers & Education, 2013.
12. Chow, M., et aI., Extending the technology acceptance model to explore the intention to use second life for enhancing healthcare education. Computers & Education, 2012.
13. Galy, E., C. Downey, and J. Johnson, The effect of using E-learning tools in online and campus-based classrooms on student performance. Journal oflnformation Technology Education, 2011. 10: p. 209-230.
14. Liu, I.-F., et aI., Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect Intention to Use an Online Learning Community. Computers & Education, 2010. 54(2): p. 600-610.
15. Lee, M.-C., Explaining and predicting users' continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation-confirmation model. Computers & Education, 2010. 54(2): p. 506-516.
16. Moran, M., M. Hawkes, and O. EI Gayar, Tablet personal computer integration in higher education: Applying the unified theory of acceptance and use technology model to understand supporting factors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2010. 42(1): p. 79-101.
17. Liu, S.-H., H.-L. Liao, and J.A. Pratt, Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance. Computers & Education, 2009. 52(3): p. 599-607.
18. Lee, B.-C., J.-O. Yoon, and 1. Lee, Learners' acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results. Computers & Education, 2009. 53(4): p. 1320-1329.
19. Lee, y.-c., The role of perceived resources in online learning adoption. Computers & Education, 2008. 50(4): p. 1423-1438.
20. Van Raaij, E.M. and 1.1. Schepers, The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers & Education, 2008. 50(3): p. 838-852.
21. Liaw, S.-S., Investigating students' perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 2008. 51(2): p. 864-873.
22. Selim, H.M., Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers & Education, 2007. 49(2): p. 396-413.
23. Ngai, E.W., J. Poon, and Y. Chan, Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM Computers & Education, 2007. 48(2): p. 250-267.
24. Pituch, K.A and Y.-k. Lee, The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education, 2006. 47(2): p. 222-244.
25. Marin, S.T., et aI., Implementation of a web-based educational tool for digital signal processing teaching using the technological acceptance model. Education, IEEE Transactions on, 2005. 48(4): p. 632-641.
26. Lee, M.K., C.M. Cheung, and Z. Chen, Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & management, 2005. 42(8): p. 1095-1104.
27. Saade, R. and B. Bahli, The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 2005. 42(2): p. 317-327.
28. Selim, H.M., An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites. Computers & Education, 2003. 40(4): p. 343-360.
29. Carswell, AD. and V. Venkatesh, Learner outcomes in an asynchronous distance education environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2002. 56(5): p. 475-494.
30. Brown, LT., Individual and technological factors affecting perceived ease of use of web-based learning technologies in a developing country. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 2002. 9.
31. Pynoo, B., et aI., Teachers' acceptance and use of an educational portal. Computers & Education, 2012. 58(4): p. 1308-1317.
32. Teo, T., Factors influencing teachers' intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 2011. 57(4): p. 2432-2440.
33. Pynoo, B., et aI., Predicting secondary school teachers' acceptance and use of a digital learning environment: A cross-sectional study. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011. 27(1): p. 568-575.
34. Wang, W.-T. and c.-C. Wang, An empirical study of instructor adoption of web-based learning systems. Computers & Education, 2009. 53(3): p. 761-774.
35. Sorebo, 0., et aI., The role of self-determination theory in explaining teachers' motivation to continue to use e-learning technology. Computers & Education, 2009. 53(4): p. 1177-1187.
36. Wong, K.-T., T. Teo, and S. Russo, influence of gender and computer teaching efficacy on computer acceptance among Malaysian student teachers: An extended technology acceptance model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2012. 28(7): p. 1190-1207.
37. Teo, T., Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of preservice teachers. Computers & Education, 2009. 52(2): p. 302-312.
38. Teo, T., et aI., Assessing the intention to use technology among preservice teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Computers & Education, 2009. 53(3): p. 1000-1009.
39. Chen, J.-L., The effects of education compatibility and technological expectancy on e-learning acceptance. Computers & Education, 2011. 57(2): p. 1501-1511.
40. Liaw, S.-S. and H.-M. Huang, Developing a collaborative e-learning system based on users' perceptions, in Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design lll. 2007, Springer. p. 751-759.
41. Terzis, Y., C.N. Moridis, and AA Economides, Continuance Acceptance of Computer Based Assessment through the integration of User's Expectations and Perceptions. Computers & Education, 2013.
42. Terzis, Y., C.N. Moridis, and AA Economides, How student's personality traits affect Computer Based Assessment Acceptance: integrating BFi with CBAAM Computers in Human Behavior, 2012. 28(5): p. 1985-1996.
43. Terzis, Y., C.N. Moridis, and A.A. Economides, The effect of emotional feedback on behavioral intention to use computer based assessment. Computers & Education, 2012. 59(2): p. 710-721.
44. Deutsch, T., et aI., implementing computer-based assessment-A webbased mock examination changes attitudes. Computers & Education, 2012. 58(4): p. 1068-1075.
45. Terzis, Y. and A.A. Economides, The acceptance and use of computer based assessment. Computers & Education, 2011. 56(4): p. 1032-1044.
46. Terzis, Y. and AA Economides, Computer based assessment: Gender differences in perceptions and acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011. 27(6): p. 2108-2122.
47. Siozos, P., et aI., Computer based testing using "digital ink": Participatory design of a tablet PC based assessment application for secondary education. Computers & Education, 2009. 52(4): p. 811-819.