Influence of gender and computer teaching efficacy on computer acceptance among Malaysian student teachers: An extended technology acceptance model

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 28, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1190-1207

  Wong, Kung Teck ^a   Teo, Timothy ^b   Russo, Sharon ^c  

^a SULTAN IDRIS EDUCATION UNIVERSITY   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869748695     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.796     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ahmad, T. B. T., Basha, K. M., Marzuki, A. M., Hisham, N. A. & Sahari, M. (2010). Faculty's acceptance of computer based technology: Cross-validation of an extended model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 268-279. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet26/ahmad.html
2. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 11-39). http://people.umass.edu/aizen/
3. Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
4. Almekhlafi, A. G. & Almeqdadi, F. A. (2010). Teachers' perceptions of technology integration in the United Arab Emirates school classrooms. Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 165-175. http://www.ifets.info/journals/13_1/16.pdf
5. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
6. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L. & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers' development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 63-73. http://www.ifets.info/journals/13_4/7.pdf
7. Chen, R. (2010). Investigating models for preservice teachers' use of technology to support student-centered learning. Computers & Education, 55(1), 32-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.015
8. Chou, C., Wu, H. C., & Chen, C. H. (2011). Re-visiting college students' attitudes toward the Internet-based on a 6-T model: Gender and grade level difference. Computers & Education, 56(4), 939-947. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.004
9. Chu, R. J. (2010). How family support and Internet self-efficacy influence the effects of e-learning among higher aged adults: Analyses of gender and age differences. Computers & Education, 55(1), 255-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.011
10. Compeau, D. R. & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211. http://www.jstor.org/stable/249688
11. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
12. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. http://www.jstor.org/stable/249008
13. Gefen, D. & Straub, D. W. (1997). Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quarterly, 21(4), 389-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249720
14. Gibson, S. & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582. http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?id=1985-10856-001
15. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson-Hall International.
16. Hayes, D. N. A. (2007). ICT and learning: Lessons from Australian classrooms. Computers & Education, 49(2), 385-395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.003
17. Hong, K. S. & Songan, P. (2011). ICT in the changing landscape of higher education in Southeast Asia. In K. S. Hong & K. W. Lai (Eds), ICT for accessible, effective and efficient higher education: Experiences of Southeast Asia. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(Special issue, 8), 1276-1290. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet27/hong.html
18. King, W. R. & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740-755. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003
19. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
20. Koch, S., Muller, S. & Sieverding, M. (2008). Women and computers. Effects of stereotype threat on attribution of failure. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1795-1803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.007
21. MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Erlbaum Press.
22. Moran, M., Hawkes, M., & El Gayar, O. (2010). Tablet personal computer integration in higher education: Applying the unified theory of acceptance and use technology model to understand supporting factors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(1), 79-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/EC.42.1.d
23. Ong, C. S. & Lai, J. Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 816-829. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.006
24. Pynoo, B., Devolder, P., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Duyck, W. & Duyck, P. (2011). Predicting secondary school teachers' acceptance and use of a digital learning environment: A crosssectional study. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 568-575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.005
25. Rasimah, C. M. Y., Ahmad, A. & Zaman, H. B. (2011). Evaluation of user acceptance of mixed reality technology. In K. S. Hong & K. W. Lai (Eds), ICT for accessible, effective and efficient higher education: Experiences of Southeast Asia. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(Special issue, 8), 1369-1387. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet27/rasimah.html
26. Riggs, I. M. & Enochs, L. G. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teacher's science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74(6), 625-637. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740605
27. Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J. & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers' thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010
28. Shroff, R. H., Deneen, C. C. & Ng, E. M. W. (2011). Analysis of the technology acceptance model in examining students' behavioural intention to use an e-portfolio system. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(4), 600-618. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet27/shroff.html
29. Sieverding, M. & Koch, S. C. (2009). (Self-)Evaluation of computer competence: How gender matters. Computers & Education, 52(3), 696-701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.016
30. Teo, T. (2010). Measuring the effect of gender on computer attitudes among pre-service teachers: A multiple indicators, multiple causes (MIMIC) modeling. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27(4), 227-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10650741011073770
31. Teo, T. & Noyes, J. (2011). An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1645-1653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.002
32. Teo, T. (2009a). Examining the relationship between student teachers' self-efficacy beliefs and their intended uses of technology for teaching: A structural equation modelling approach. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(4), 7-16. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v8i4/841.pdf
33. Teo, T. (2009b). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(2), 302-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006
34. Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers' intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432-2440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008
35. Terzis, V. & Economides, A. A. (2011). The acceptance and use of computer based assessment. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1032-1044. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.017
36. Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A. & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 125-143. http://www.jstor.org/stable/249443
37. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
38. Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
39. Venkatesh, V. & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3250981
40. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30036540
41. Wang, H. Y. & Wang, S.H. (2010). User acceptance of mobile Internet based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: Investigating the determinants and gender differences. Social Behavior and Personality, 38(3), 415. http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2010.38.3.415
42. Wang, Y. S. & Shih, Y. W. (2009). Why do people use information kiosks? A validation of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 158-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.07.001
43. Wong, K. T., Goh, S. C., Hanafi, H. F. & Osman, R. (2010). Computer attitudes and use among novice teachers: The moderating effects of school environment. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 7, 93-112. http://mjli.uum.edu.my/index.php/joomla-home/category/7-mjli-vol.-7-2010?download=52
44. Wong, S. L. & Teo, T. (2009). Investigating the technology acceptance among student teachers in Malaysia: An application of the technology acceptance model (TAM). The Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 18(2), 261-272.
45. Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V. & Abrami, P. C. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers' perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 173-207. http://www.editlib.org/p/5437; also at http://doe.concordia.ca/cslp/wozneyetaljtte141.pdf
46. Sumak, B., Hericko, M., Pusnik, M. & Polancic, G. (2011). Factors affecting acceptance and use of Moodle: An empirical study based on TAM. Informatica, 35, 91-100. [verified 29 Jul 2012] http://www.informatica.si/PDF/35-1/12_Sumak-Factors%20affecting%20acceptance% 20and%20use%20of%20Moodle.pdf