Flipped or inverted learning: Strategies for course design

Enhancing Instruction with Visual Media: Utilizing Video and Lecture Capture

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 241-263

  Davis, Christine ^a  

^a WALDEN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; TEACHING;

ACTIVE LEARNING; COURSE DESIGN; FACE TO FACE; FUNCTIONAL APPROACH; HYBRID COURSE; INVERTED CLASSROOM; METACOGNITIVES; MULTIMEDIA TOOL;

EDUCATION;

EID: 84898145365     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-3962-1.ch017     Document Type: Chapter

References (102)

1. (2009). Keynote. Cupertino, CA: Apple, Inc. [Computer software]
2. (2009). VoiceThread. Boca Raton, FL: Educause Inc. [Computer software]
3. (2010). Camtasia: Mac, Version 1.1. Okemos, MI: TechSmith. [Computer software]
4. (2010). Captivate. San Jose, CA: Adobe. [Computer software]
5. (2010). Elluminate. Washington, DC: Blackboard Inc. [Computer software]
6. (2010). Jing. Okemos, MI: TechSmith. [Computer software]
7. (2010). PowerPoint (12.0). Redmond, VA: Microsoft Corp. [Computer software]
8. (2011). Wimba. New York, NY: Blackboard, Inc. [Computer software]
9. (2012). Flash. San Jose, CA: Adobe. [Computer software]
10. (2012). Quicktime. Cupertino, CA: Apple, Inc. [Computer software]
11. Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
12. Amer, A. (2006). Reflections on Bloom's revised taxonomy. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 4(1), 213-230.
13. Anderson, T. (2002, May). An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. ITFORUM. Retrieved from http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper63/paper63.htm
14. Articulate Rapid E-Learning. (2009). Computer software. San Francisco, CA: Studio Pro.
15. Arum, R., & Roska, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16. Association of American Colleges Universities. (2005). Liberal education outcomes: A preliminary report on student achievement in college. Washington, DC. Retrieved from www.aacu.org/advocacy/pdfs/leap_report_final.pdf.
17. Baker, J. W. (2000). The "classroom flip": Using Web course management tools to become the guide on the side. In J. A. Chambers (Ed.). Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning (pp. 9-17). Jacksonville, FL: Florida Community College at Jacksonville.
18. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York, NY: General Learning Press.
19. Bannan-Ritland, B., Dabbagh, N., & Murphy, K. (2000). Learning object systems as constructivist learning environments: Related assumptions, theories, and applications. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.). The instructional use of learning objects. Retrieved from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/bannab-ritland.doc
20. Bates, S., & Galloway, R. (2012). The inverted classroom in a large enrollment introductory physics course: A case study. University of Edinburgh, Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/stem-conference/Physical%20Sciences/Simon_Bates_Ross_Galloway.pdf
21. Blackboard Collaborate. (2012). Computer software. Washington, DC: Blackboard Inc.
22. Bloom, B. S. (1994). Reflections on the development and use of the taxonomy. In Anderson, L. W., & Sosniak, L. A. (Eds.), Bloom's taxonomy: A forty year retrospective (pp. 1-8). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
23. Bok, D. (2006). Our underachieving colleges: A candid look on how much students' learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE- ERIC Higher Education Report Washington, DC: School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University.
25. Bransford, J., Brophy, S., & Williams, S. (2000). When computer technologies meet the learning sciences: Issues and opportunities. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 59-84. doi:10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00051-9
26. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
27. Broad, M., Mathews, M., & McDonald, A. (2004). Accounting education through an onlinesupported virtual learning environment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(2), 135-151. doi:10.1177/1469787404043810
28. Brockbank, A., & McGill, I. (2007). Facilitating reflective learning in higher education (2nd ed.). McGraw Hill.
29. Brown, R. (2001). The process of community building in distance learning classes. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 18-35.
30. Bruner, J., & Olson, D. (1986). Learning through experience and learning through media. In Gerbner, G., Gross, L. P., & Melody, W. (Eds.), Communications technology and social policy: Understanding the new "cultural revolution". New York, NY: Wiley.
31. Buerck, L. A., Malmstrom, T., & Peppers, E. (2003). Learning environments and learning styles: Non-traditional student enrollment and success in an Internet-based versus a lecture-based computer science course. Learning Environments Research, 6(2), 137-155. doi:10.1023/A:1024939002433
32. Chickering, A. W., & Ehrmann, S. C. (1996). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever. American Association of Higher Education. AAHE Bulletin, 49(2), 3-6.
33. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 40(7), 3-7.
34. Cole, N. (1990). Conceptions of educational achievement. Educational Researcher, 19(3), 2-7.
35. Crouch, C., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970-977. doi:10.1119/1.1374249
36. Davis, C. (2010). Using student-centered discussion forums to enhance student participation in online courses. In Proceedings: 26th Annual Distance Teaching and Learning Conference, (pp. 1-5). Madison, WI.
37. Davis, C., & Froriep, K. (2009). Using multimedia for modeling reading instruction in teacher education. In Proceedings: 25th Annual Distance Teaching and Learning Conference, (pp. 485-488). Madison: WI.
38. DeLeng, B., Dolmans, D., & van de Wiel, M. (2007). How video cases should be used as authentic stimuli in problem-based medical education. Medical Education, 41(2), 181-188. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02671.x
39. Dewey, J. (1990). The school and society and the child and the curriculum. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
40. Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press.
41. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (1996). Navigating the bumpy road to student-centered instruction. College Teaching, 44(2), 43-47. doi:10.1080/87 567555.1996.9933425
42. Fenrich, P. (1997). Practical guidelines for creating instructional multimedia applications. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
43. Fink, L. D. (2003). A self-directed guide to designing courses for significant learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
44. Foertsch, J., Moses, G., Strikwerda, J., & Litzkow, M. (2002). Reversing the lecture/homework paradigm using e-teach web-based streaming video software. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(3), 267-274. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002. tb00703.x
45. Foreman, J. (2003, September/October). Nextgeneration educational technology versus the lecture. EDUCAUSE Review, 35(5), 12-22.
46. Frand, J. K. (2000, September-October). The information-age mindset: Changes in students and implications for higher education. EDUCAUSE Review, 35(5), 15-24.
47. Frederickson, N., Reed, P., & Clifford, V. (2005). Evaluating web-supported learning versus lecturebased teaching: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Higher Education, 50, 645-664. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6370-0
48. Gannod, G. C., Burge, J. E., & Helmick, M. T. (2007). Using the inverted classroom to teach software engineering. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering (Leipzig, Germany, 2008) ICSE '08, (pp. 777-786). New York, NY: ACM.
49. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical thinking in a text-based environment. Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87-105. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
50. Gee, J. P. (2000). The new literacy studies: from: "socially situated" to the work of the social. In Barton, D., & Ivanic, R. (Eds.), Writing in community. London, UK: Sage.
51. Gibbs, G. (1992). Improving the quality of student learning. Bristol, UK: TES.
52. Gleason, M. (1986). Better communication in large courses. College Teaching, 34, 20-24. doi :10.1080/87567555.1986.10532325
53. Graziadei, W. D., Gallagher, S., Brown, R. N., & Sasiadek, J. (1997). Building asynchronous and synchronous teaching-learning environments: Exploring a course/classroom management system solution. Retrieved from http://horizon.unc.edu/projects/monograph/CD/Technological_Tools/Graziadei.asp
54. Griffin, M. M. (1995). You can't get there from here: Situated learning, transfer and map skills. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 65-87. doi:10.1006/ceps.1995.1004
55. Grooms, L. (2000). Interaction in the computermediated adult distance-learning environment: Leadership development through on-line distance education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Regent University, Virginia Beach.
56. Grunert, J. (2000). The course syllabus: A learning-centered approach. Bolton, MA: Anchor Publishing.
57. Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Dispositions, skills, structure training, and meta-cognitive monitoring. The American Psychologist, 53(4), 449-455. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.53.4.449
58. Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In Kaye, A. R. (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers (pp. 116-136). Berlin, UK: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-77684- 7_8
59. Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23-48. doi:10.1007/BF02319856
60. Herrington, J., & Standon, P. (2000). Moving from an instructivist to a constructivist multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(3), 195-205.
61. Hung, D. (2001). Design principles for web-based learning: Implications for Vygotskian thought. Educational Technology, 41(3), 33-41.
62. Hung, D., & Nichani, M. (2001). Constructivism and e-learning: Balancing between the individual and social levels of cognition. Educational Technology, 41(2), 40-44.
63. Johnson, C. (2007, January). Clickers in your classroom. Wakonse-Arizona E-Newsletter, 3(1), 71-77.
64. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Constructing learning environments on the web: Engaging students in meaningful learning. EdTech 99: Educational Technology Conference and Exhibition 1999: Thinking Schools. Learning Nation.
65. Juwah, C., Macfarlane-Dick, D., Mathew, B., Nicol, D., Ross, D., & Smith, B. (2004). Enhancing student learning through effective formative feedback. York, UK: Higher Education Academy.
66. Khan, S. (2011, March). Salman Khan: Let's use video to reinvent education. TED 2011. Retrieved from http://blog.ted.com/2011/03/09/lets-usevideo- to-reinvent-education-salman- khan-onted- com/
67. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
68. Lage, M. J., & Platt, G. J. (2000). The Internet and the inverted classroom. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(11). Retrieved from http://www. jstor.org/stable/1183338
69. Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31, 30-43.
70. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511815355
71. Liao, W. C. (2012, February). Using short videos in teaching a social science subject: Values and challenges. Journal of the NUS Teaching Academy, 2(1), 42-55.
72. Lipman, M. (1988). Critical thinking: What can it be? Educational Leadership, 46(1), 38-43.
73. Manninen, T. (2000). Interaction in networked virtual environments as communicative action - Social theory and multiplayer games. In Proceedings of CRIWG2000 Workshop, Madera, Portugal, (pp. 154-157). IEEE Computer Society Press.
74. Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: Outcome and process. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4-11. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
75. Mathie, V. A., Beins, B., Benjamin, L. T., Ewing, M. M., Hall, C. C., & Henderson, B. ... Smith, R. A. (1993). Promoting active learning in psychology courses. In T. V. McGovern (Ed.), Handbook for enhancing undergraduate education in psychology, (pp. 183-214). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
76. Matlin, M. W. (2002). Cognitive psychology and college-level pedagogy: Two siblings that rarely communicate. In Halpern, D. F., & Hakel, M. D. (Eds.), Applying the science of learning to university teaching and beyond (pp. 87-103). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. doi:10.1002/tl.49
77. McKeachie, W. J. (2002). McKeachie's teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
78. Meyer, C., & Jones, T. B. (1993). Promoting active learning: Strategies for the college classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
79. Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6. doi:10.1080/08923648909526659
80. Newby, T. J., Stepich, D. A., Lehman, J. D., & Russell, J. D. (1996). Introduction to instructional technology. Instructional Technology for Teaching and Learning. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
81. Newman, F., & Scurry, J. (2001). Online technology pushes pedagogy to the forefront. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 47(44), B7.
82. Newmann, F. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
83. Papadopoulos, C., Santiago-Roman, A., & Portela, G. (2010, October). Developing and implementing an inverted classroom for engineering statics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://fie-conference. org/fie2010/papers/1741/pdf
84. Phillips, D. (2000). Constructivism in education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
85. Piaget, J. (1971). Genetic epistemology. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
86. Ponti, M., & Ryberg, T. (2004). Rethinking virtual space as a place for sociability: Theory and design implications. In Proceedings of Networked Learning Conference 2004, Sheffield University.
87. Reddi, U. V., & Mishra, S. (Eds.). (2003). Educational multimedia: A handbook for teacherdevelopers. New Delhi, India: The Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia.
88. Resnick, L. B. (1987). Learning in school and out: 1987 presidential address. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13-20+54. Retrieved from http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-189X%281 98712%2916%3A9%3C13%3AT1PALI%3E2.0 .CO%3B2-X
89. Rice, R. E., & Bunz, U. (2006). Evaluating a wireless course feedback system: The role of demographics, expertise, fluency, competency, and usage. Studies in Media & Information Literacy Education, 6, 1-10. doi:10.3138/sim.6.3.002
90. Roblyer, M. D. (2006). Integrating educational technology into teaching (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
91. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning theory, research and practice. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
92. Solvie, P., & Kloek, M. (2007). Using technology tools to engage students with multiple learning styles in a constructivist learning environment. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 7(2), 7-27.
93. Sorensen, C. K., & Baylen, D. M. (2009). Learning online. In Orellana, A., Hudgins, T., & Simonson, M. (Eds.), The perfect online course: Best practices for designing and teaching (pp. 69-86). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
94. Sparrow, L., Sparrow, H., & Swan, P. (2000). Student-centered learning: Is it possible? In A. Hermann & M. M. Kulski (Eds.), Flexible Futures in Tertiary Teaching: Proceedings of the 9th Annual Teaching Learning Forum. Perth, Australia: Curtin University of Technology. Retrieved from http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2000/sparrow.html
95. Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). The theory of successful intelligence as a basis for instruction and assessment in higher education. In Halpern, D. F., & Hakel, M. D. (Eds.), Applying the science of learning to university teaching and beyond (pp. 45-54). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. doi:10.1002/tl.46
96. Stone, L. L. (1999, Summer). Multimedia instruction methods. The Journal of Economic Education, 253-258.
97. Stowell, J. R., & Nelson, J. M. (2007). Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning, and emotion. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 253-258. doi:10.1080/00986280701700391
98. Trees, A., & Jackson, M. (2007). The learning environment in clicker classrooms: Student processes of learning and involvement in large university-level courses using student response systems. Learning, Media and Technology, 32, 21-40. doi:10.1080/17439880601141179
99. Walker, D., & Lambert, L. (1995). Learning and leading theory: A century in the making. In Lambert, L., Walker, D., Zimmerman, D., Cooper, J., Lambert, M., Gardner, M., & Slack, P. (Eds.), The constructivist leader (pp. 1-27). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
100. Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
101. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
102. Zappe, S., Leicht, R., Messner, J., Litzinger, T., & Woo Lee, H. (2009). Flipping the classroom to explore active learning in a large undergraduate course. American Society of Engineering. Retrieved from soa.asee.org/paper/conference/paper-view.cfm?id=10046