When Computer Technologies Meet the Learning Sciences: Issues and Opportunities

Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 59-84

  Bransford, John ^a   Brophy, Sean ^a   Williams, Susan ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041911233     PISSN: 01933973     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00051-9     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (1997, September). Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Business Review, 84-93.
2. Barrows H.S. How to design a problem-based curriculum for the preclinical years. 1985;Springer, New York.
3. Bateman, H. V., Goldman, S. R., Newbrough, J., Bransford, J. D., & the Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997, August). Fostering social skills and prosocial behavior through learning communities. Paper presented at the seventh biennial conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Athens, Greece.
4. Bereiter C., Scardamalia M. Surpassing ourselves. An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise:1993;Open Court Publishing, Chicago.
5. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6. Bransford J.D., Franks J.J., Vye N.J., Sherwood R.D. New approaches to instruction. Because wisdom can't be told Vosniadou S., Ortony A. Similarity and analogical reasoning. 1989;470-497 Cambridge University Press, New York.
7. Bransford J.D., Schwartz D. Rethinking transfer. A simple proposal with multiple implications Iran-Nejad A., Pearson P.D. Review of research in education (Vol. 24). 1999;61-100 American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
8. Bransford J.D., Zech L., Schwartz D., Barron B., Vye N., the Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt Designs for environments that invite and sustain mathematical thinking. Cobb P. Symbolizing, communicating, and mathematizing. Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design:1999;275-324 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
9. Bray, M. H. (1998). Leading in learning: An analysis of teachers' interactions with their colleagues as they implement a constructivist approach to learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Peabody College.
10. Brophy, S. P., Biswas, G., Katzlberger, T., Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Teachable agents: Combining insights from learning theory and computer science. In S. P. Lajoie & M. Vivet (Eds.), Open learning environments: New computational technologies to support learning, exploration, and collaboration. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
11. Brown A.L., Campione J.C. Guided discovery in a community of learners. McGilly K. Classroom lessons. Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practices:1994;229-270 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
12. Brown A.L., Campione J.C. Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments. On procedures, principles, and systems Schauble L., Glaser R. Innovations in learning. New environments for education:1996;289-325 Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
13. Center for Innovative Learning Technologies (CILT). Available at http://CILT.org . Accessed January 20, 2000.
14. Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Constructive Learning Environments (CIRCLE). Available at http://www.pitt.edu/~circle/ . Accessed January 20, 2000.
15. Center for Learning Technologies in Urban Schools (LeTUS). http://www.letus.nwu.edu/ . Accessed January 20, 2000.
16. Challenge Grant. Available at http://www.ed.gov/Technology/challenge/ . Accessed January 20, 2000.
17. Chi M.T.H., Feltovich P., Glaser R. Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science. 5:1981;121-152.
18. Cobb P. Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher. 23(7):1994;13-20.
19. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt The Jasper project. Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development:1997;Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
20. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (in press). Adventures in anchored instruction: Lessons from beyond the ivory tower. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 5). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Dede, C. (Ed.). (1998). Learning with technology. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Yearbook Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
22. deGroot A. Thought and choice in chess. 1965;Mouton, The Hague.
23. De Jong T., van Joolingen W.R. Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research. 68(2):1998;179-201.
24. Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D., & Pellegrino, J. W. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Bridging research and practice. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
25. Dufresne R.J., Gerace W.J., Leonard W.J., Mestre J.P., Wenk L. Classtalk. A classroom communication system for active learning Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 7:1996;3-47.
26. Elmore R.F., Peterson P.L., McCarthey S.J. Restructuring in the classroom. Teaching, learning, and school organization:1996;Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
27. Georgia Tech Future Computing Group. Available at http://www.cc.gatech.edu/fce/ . Accessed January 20, 2000.
28. Hatano G., Inagaki K. Two courses of expertise. Stevenson H.W., Azuma H., Hakuta K. Child development and education in Japan. 1986;262-272 W. H. Freeman, New York.
29. Hunt E., Minstrell J. A cognitive approach to the teaching of physics. McGilly K. Classroom lessons. Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice:1994;51-74 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
30. Koedinger K.R., Anderson J.R., Hadley W.H., Mark M.A. Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 8:1997;30-43.
31. Landauer T.K., Foltz P.W., Laham D. Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes. 25:1998;259-284.
32. Langemann E.C. Contested terrain. A history of education research in the United States, 1890-1990 Educational Researcher. 26(9):1997;5-17.
33. Linn M.C., Hsi S. Computers, teachers, peers. Science learning partners:1999;Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
34. Lionni L. Fish is fish. 1970;Scholastic Press, New York.
35. Means, B., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. (in press). Technology support for classroom-based assessments. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
36. Mestre J.P. Cognitive aspects of learning and teaching science. Fitzsimmons S.J., Kerpelman L.C. Teacher enhancement for elementary and secondary science and mathematics. Status, issues, and problems:1994;3-53 National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
37. Mestre J.P., Gerace W.J., Dufresne R.J., Leonard W.J. Promoting active learning in large classes using a classroom communication system. Redish E.F., Rigden J.S. The changing role of physics departments in modern universities. Proceedings of the international conference on undergraduate physics education:1997;1019-1036 American Institute of Physics, Woodbury, NY.
38. Michaels A.L., Klee T., Bransford J.D., Warren S. The transition from theory to therapy. Test of two instructional methods Applied Cognitive Psychology. 7:1993;139-154.
39. Minstrell J.A. Teaching science for understanding. Resnick L.B., Klopfer L.E. Toward the thinking curriculum. Current cognitive research:1989;129-149 ASCD, Alexandria, VA.
40. Moll L.C., Tapia J., Whitmore K.F. Living knowledge. The social distribution of cultural sources for thinking Salomon G. Distributed cognitions. 1993;139-163 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
41. Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. 1989;Author, Reston, VA.
42. Professional standards for teaching mathematics. 1991;Author, Reston, VA.
43. Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI). Available at http://www.ed.gov/offices/OERI/ . Accessed January 20, 2000.
44. Pea, R. D. (1999). New media communication forums for improving education research and practice. In E. C. Langemann & L. S. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
45. Pellegrino J., Baxter G., Glaser R. Addressing the "Two Disciplines" problem. Linking theories of cognition and learning with assessment and instructional practice Iran-Nejad A., Pearson P.D. Review of research in education (Vol. 24;). 1999;307-353 American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
46. Pfaffman, J., & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1999). Assessment software that lets students control their own destiny. Unpublished manuscript, Vanderbilt University.
47. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children (M. Cook, Trans.). New York: International Universities Press. (Original work published in 1948).
48. Roschelle, J., & Pea, R. (1999). Trajectories from today's WWW to a powerful educational infrastructure. Educational Researcher, 28 (pp. 22-25). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
49. Schofield J. Computers and classroom culture. 1995;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
50. Schwartz D.L., Bransford J.D. A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction. 16(4):1998;475-522.
51. Schwartz D.L., Lin X., Brophy S., Bransford J.D. Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs. Reigeluth C.M. Instructional design theories and models. A new paradigm of instruction theory (Vol. 2):1999;183-213 Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
52. Shulman L.S. Those who understand. Knowledge growth in teaching Educational Researcher. 15(2):1986;4-14.
53. Shulman L.S. Knowledge and teaching. Foundations of the new reform Harvard Educational Review. 57:1987;1-22.
54. Shulman, L. S. (1999, July/August). Taking learning seriously. Change, 11-17.
55. Simon H.A. Problem solving and education. Tuma D.T., Reif R. Problem solving and education. Issues in teaching and research:1980;81-96 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
56. Singley K., Anderson J.R. The transfer of cognitive skill. 1989;Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
57. Stevens R.H., Wang P. Artificial neural networks can distinguish novice and expert strategies during complex problem solving. Journal of the American Medical Infomatics Association. 3:1996;131-138.
58. Talbert J.E., McLaughlin M.W. Understanding teaching in context. Cohen D.K., McLaughlin M.W., Talbert J.E. Teaching for understanding. Challenges for policy and practice:1993;167-206 Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
59. Vye N.S., Schwartz D.L., Bransford J.D., Barron B.J., Zech L., Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt SMART environments that support monitoring, reflection, and revision. Hacker D., Dunlosky J., Graesser A. Metacognition in educational theory and practice. 1998;305-346 Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
60. Vygotsky L.S. Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes:1978;Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
61. Wenk L., Dufresne R., Gerace W., Leonard W., Mestre J. Technology-assisted active learning in large lectures. D'Avanzo C., McNichols A. Student-active science. Models of innovation in college science teaching:1997;431-452 Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia.
62. Whitehead A.N. The aims of education. 1929;MacMillan, New York.
63. Wiggins G., McTighe J. Understanding by design. 1998;ASCD, Alexandria, VA.
64. Williams S.M., Burgess K.L., Bray M.H., Bransford J.D., Goldman S.R., The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt Technology and learning in schools for thought classrooms. Dede C. ASCD yearbook. 1998;97-119 Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA.
65. Williams S.M. Putting case-based instruction into context. Examples from legal and medical education The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2(4):1992;367-427.
66. Williams Glaser, C. (1998). Creating new standards for higher education: Effecting pedagogical change in the undergraduate curriculum through the integration of technology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University.
67. Wineburg S.S. Reading Abraham Lincoln. An expert-expert study in the interpretation of historical texts Cognitive Science. 22:1998;319-346.
68. Web-Based Integrated Science Environment (WISE). Available at http://wise.berkeley.edu/ WISE/index.html. Accessed January 20, 2000.