Princeton_TIGRESS: Protein geometry refinement using simulations and support vector machines

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 82, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 794-814

  Khoury, George A ^a   Tamamis, Phanourios ^a   Pinnaduwage, Neesha ^a   Smadbeck, James ^a   Kieslich, Chris A ^a   Floudas, Christodoulos A ^a  

^a Princeton University   (United States)

Author keywords

CASP; Model refinement; Molecular dynamics; Protein folding; Protein structure prediction; Structure selection

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; FILTRATION; GEOMETRY; HYDROGEN BOND; MECHANICAL TORSION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING; QUALITY CONTROL; SIMULATION; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; INTERNET; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; INTERNET; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 84898041027     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24459     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Yang Y, Faraggi E, Zhao H, Zhou Y. Improving protein fold recognition and template-based modeling by employing probabilistic-based matching between predicted one-dimensional structural properties of query and corresponding native properties of templates Bioinformatics 2011;27:2076-2082.
2. Roy A, Kucukural A, Zhang Y. I-tasser: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction Nat Protoc 2010;5:725-738.
3. Wang Z, Eickholt J, Cheng J. Multicom: a multi-level combination approach to protein structure prediction and its assessments in casp8 Bioinformatics 2010;26:882-888.
4. Leaver-Fay A, Tyka M, Lewis S, Lange O, Thompson J, Jacak R, Kaufman K, Renfrew D, Smith C, Sheffler W, Davis I, Cooper S, Treuille A, Mandell D, Richter F, Ban YEA, Fleishman S, Corn J, Kim D, Lyskov S, Berrondo M, Mentzer S, Popovic Z, Havranek J, Karanicolas J, Das R, Meiler J, Kortemme T, Gray J, Kuhlman B, Baker D, Bradley P. Rosetta3 an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules Methods Enzymol 2011;487:545-574.
5. Xu D, Zhang Y. Ab initio protein structure assembly using continuous structure fragments and optimized knowledge-based force field Proteins 2012;80:1715-1735.
6. Klepeis JL, Floudas CA. Astro-fold: a combinatorial and global optimization framework for ab initio prediction of three-dimensional structures of proteins from the amino acid sequence Biophys J 2003;85:2119-2146.
7. Subramani A, Wei Y, Floudas CA. Astro-fold 2.0: an enhanced framework for protein structure prediction AIChE J 2012;58:1619-1637.
8. Floudas CA, Fung H, McAllister S, Mönnigmann M, Rajgaria R. Advances in protein structure prediction and de novo protein design: a review. Chem Eng Sci 2006;61:966-988.
9. Floudas CA. Computational methods in protein structure prediction. Biotechnol Bioeng 2007;97:207-213.
10. Dill KA, MacCallum JL. The protein-folding problem, 50 years on. Science 2012;338:1042-1046.
11. MacCallum JL, Pérez A, Schnieders MJ, Hua L, Jacobson MP, Dill KA. Assessment of protein structure refinement in casp9. Proteins 2011;79:74-90.
12. MacCallum JL, Hua L, Schnieders MJ, Pande VS, Jacobson MP, Dill KA. Assessment of the protein-structure refinement category in casp8. Proteins 2009;77(Suppl 9):66-80.
13. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou Y. Accurate and efficient loop selections by the dfire-based all-atom statistical potential. Protein Sci 2004;13:391-399.
14. Mirjalili V, Feig M. Protein structure refinement through structure selection and averaging from molecular dynamics ensembles. J Chem Theory Comput 2013;9:1294-1303.
15. Rodrigues JPGLM, Levitt M, Chopra G. Kobamin: a knowledge-based minimization web server for protein structure refinement. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:W323-W328.
16. Chopra G, Kalisman N, Levitt M. Consistent refinement of submitted models at casp using a knowledge-based potential. Proteins 2010;78:2668-2678.
17. Chopra G, Summa CM, Levitt M. Solvent dramatically affects protein structure refinement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:20239-20244.
18. Bhattacharya D, Cheng J. 3drefine: consistent protein structure refinement by optimizing hydrogen bonding network and atomic-level energy minimization. Proteins 2013;81:119-131.
19. Heo L, Park H, Seok C. Galaxyrefine: protein structure refinement driven by side-chain repacking. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:W384-W388.
20. Park H, Seok C. Refinement of unreliable local regions in template-based protein models. Proteins 2012;80:1974-1986.
21. Park H, Ko J, Joo K, Lee J, Seok C, Lee J. Refinement of protein termini in template-based modeling using conformational space annealing. Proteins 2011;79:2725-2734.
22. Zhang J, Wang Q, Barz B, He Z, Kosztin I, Shang Y, Xu D. Mufold: a new solution for protein 3d structure prediction Proteins 2010;78:1137-1152.
23. Zhang J, Liang Y, Zhang Y. Atomic-level protein structure refinement using fragment-guided molecular dynamics conformation sampling. Structure 2011;19:1784-1795.
24. Lee MR, Tsai J, Baker D, Kollman PA. Molecular dynamics in the endgame of protein structure prediction J Mol Biol 2001;313:417-430.
25. Chen J, Brooks III CL. Can molecular dynamics simulations provide high-resolution refinement of protein structure? Proteins 2007;67:922-930.
26. Misura KMS, Baker D. Progress and challenges in high-resolution refinement of protein structure models. Proteins 2005;59:15-29.
27. Güntert P. Automated nmr structure calculation with cyana. Methods Mol Biol 2004;278:353-378.
28. Brooks BR, Brooks III CL, Mackerell A Jr, Nilsson L, Petrella RJ, Roux B, Won Y, Archontis G, Bartels C, Boresch S, Caflisch A, Caves L, Cui Q, Dinner AR, Feig M, Fischer S, Gao J, Hodoscek M, Im W, Kuczera K, Lazaridis T, Ma J, Ovchinnikov V, Paci E, Pastor RW, Post CB, Pu JZ, Schaefer M, Tidor B, Venable RM, Woodcock HL, Wu X, Yang W, York DM, Karplus M. Charmm: the biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem 2009;30:1545-1614.
29. Yang Y, Zhou Y. Specific interactions for ab initio folding of protein terminal regions with secondary structures. Proteins 2008;72:793-803.
30. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 2004;57:702-710.
31. Frishman D, Argos P. Knowledge-based protein secondary structure assignment Proteins 1995;23:566-579.
32. Cossio P, Granata D, Laio A, Seno F, Trovato A. A simple and efficient statistical potential for scoring ensembles of protein structures. Sci Rep 2012;2.
33. Wang Z, Tegge AN, Cheng J. Evaluating the absolute quality of a single protein model using structural features and support vector machines Proteins 2009;75:638-647.
34. Wang Z, Eickholt J, Cheng J. Apollo: a quality assessment service for single and multiple protein models. Bioinformatics 2011;27:1715-1716.
35. Qiu J, Sheffler W, Baker D, Noble WS. Ranking predicted protein structures with support vector regression. Proteins 2008;71:1175-1182.
36. Ray A, Lindahl E, Wallner B. Improved model quality assessment using proq2. BMC Bioinformatics 2012;13:224.
37. Dong Q, Chen Y, Zhou S. A machine learning-based method for protein global model quality assessment. Int J Gen Syst 2011;40:417-425.
38. Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 1995;20:273-297.
39. Batuwita R, Palade V. Class imbalance learning methods for support vector machines. Imbalanced Learn 2013;83:83-96.
40. Veropoulos K, Cristianini N, Campbell C. The application of support vector machines to medical decision support: a case study. Adv Course Artif Intell 1999;1-6.
41. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. Ucsf chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis J Comput Chem 2004;25:1605-1612.
42. Seeber M, Cecchini M, Rao F, Settanni G, Caflisch A. Wordom: a program for efficient analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. Bioinformatics 2007;23:2625-2627.
43. Kuhlman B, Dantas G, Ireton GC, Varani G, Stoddard BL, Baker D. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science 2003;302:1364-1368.
44. Chang CC, Lin CJ. Libsvm: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol 2011;2:27.
45. Cheng J, Baldi P. Improved residue contact prediction using support vector machines and a large feature set. BMC Bioinformatics 2007;8:113.
46. Haberthür U, Caflisch A. Facts: fast analytical continuum treatment of solvation J Comput Chem 2008;29:701-715.
47. Neria E, Fischer S, Karplus M. Simulation of activation free energies in molecular systems. J Chem Phys 1996;105:1902.
48. Ryckaert J, Ciccotti G, Berendsen H. Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comput Phys 1977;23:327-341.
49. Kim DS, Kim JK, Won CI, Kim CM, Park JY, Bhak J. Sphericity of a protein via the β-complex. J Mol Graph Model 2010;28:636-649.
50. MacKerell AD, Bashford D, Bellott, Dunbrack RL, Evanseck JD, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha S, Joseph-McCarthy D, Kuchnir L, Kuczera K, Lau FTK, Mattos C, Michnick S, Ngo T, Nguyen DT, Prodhom B, Reiher WE, Roux B, Schlenkrich M, Smith JC, Stote R, Straub J, Watanabe M, Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera J, Yin D, Karplus M. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins J Phys Chem B 1998;102:3586-3616.
51. MacKerell AD. Empirical force fields for biological macromolecules: overview and issues J Comput Chem 2004;25:1584-1604.
52. Mendelson E. Introduction to mathematical logic. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida; 1997.
53. Zhang Y. Interplay of i-tasser and quark for template-based and ab initio protein structure prediction in casp10. Proteins, in press, doi: 10.1002/prot.24341.
54. Joo K, Lee J, Sim S, Lee SY, Lee K, Heo S, Lee IH, Lee SJ, Lee J. Protein structure modeling for casp10 by multiple layers of global optimization. Proteins, in press, doi: 10.1002/prot.24397.
55. Söding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. The hhpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:W244-W248.
56. Källberg M, Wang H, Wang S, Peng J, Wang Z, Lu H, Xu J. Template-based protein structure modeling using the raptorx web server. Nat Protoc 2012;7:1511-1522.
57. Zhou H, Skolnick J. Template-based protein structure modeling using tasservmt Proteins 2012;80:352-361.
58. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Tm-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the tm-score Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:2302-2309.
59. Tamamis P, Kasotakis E, Mitraki A, Archontis G. Amyloid-like self-assembly of peptide sequences from the adenovirus fiber shaft: insights from molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem B 2009;113:15639-15647.
60. Tamamis P, Archontis G. Amyloid-like self-assembly of a dodecapeptide sequence from the adenovirus fiber shaft: perspectives from molecular dynamics simulations. J Non-Cryst Solids 2011;357:717-722.
61. Buck M, Bouguet-Bonnet S, Pastor RW, MacKerell AD Jr. Importance of the cmap correction to the charmm22 protein force field: dynamics of hen lysozyme. Biophys J 2006;90:L36-L38.
62. Mackerell AD Jr, Feig M, Brooks III CL. Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem 2004;25:1400-1415.
63. Im W, Lee MS, Brooks III CL. Generalized born model with a simple smoothing function J Comput Chem 2003;24:1691-702.
64. Lee MS, Salsbury FR, Brooks III CL. Novel generalized born methods J Chem Phys 2002;116:10606-10614.
65. Lee MS, Feig M, Salsbury FR, Brooks III CL. New analytic approximation to the standard molecular volume definition and its application to generalized born calculations J Comput Chem 2003;24:1348-1356.
66. Feig M, Onufriev A, Lee MS, Im W, Case DA, Brooks III CL. Performance comparison of generalized born and poisson methods in the calculation of electrostatic solvation energies for protein structures J Comput Chem 2004;25:265-284.
67. Gotz AW, Williamson MJ, Xu D, Poole D, Le Grand S, Walker RC. Routine microsecond molecular dynamics simulations with amber on gpus. 1. Generalized born J Chem Theory Comput 2012;8:1542-1555.
68. Raval A, Piana S, Eastwood MP, Dror RO, Shaw DE. Refinement of protein structure homology models via long, all-atom molecular dynamics simulations Proteins 2012;80:2071-2079.
69. Wroblewska L, Jagielska A, Skolnick J. Development of a physics-based force field for the scoring and refinement of protein models. Biophys J 2008;94:3227-3240.
70. Jagielska A, Wroblewska L, Skolnick J. Protein model refinement using an optimized physics-based all-atom force field. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:8268-8273.