Refinement of unreliable local regions in template-based protein models

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 80, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1974-1986

  Park, Hahnbeom ^a   Seok, Chaok ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Loop modeling; Protein model refinement; Protein structure prediction; Template based modeling; Terminus modeling

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; ENERGY; HYDROGEN BOND; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; UNRELIABLE LOCAL REGION;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84863783282     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24086     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alberts B, Bray D, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Watson JD. Molecular biology of the cell. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.; 1994.
2. Shi L, Javitch JA. The second extracellular loop of the dopamine D2 receptor lines the binding-site crevice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 100: 440-445.
3. Apricio R, Ferreira ST, Polikarpov I. Closed conformation of the active site loop of rabbit muscle triosephosphate isomerase in the absence of substrate: evidence of conformational heterogeneity. JMol Biol 2003; 334: 1023-1041.
4. Jacobson MP, Pincus DL, Rapp CS, Day TJ, Honig B, Shaw DE, Friesner RA. A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction. Proteins 2004; 55: 351-367.
5. Felts AK, Galicchio E, Chekmarev D, Paris KA, Friesner RA, Levy RM. Prediction of protein loop conformations using the AGBNP implicit solvent model and torsion angle sampling. J Chem Theory Comput 2008; 4: 855-868.
6. Soto CS, Fasnacht M, Zhu J, Lucy F, Honig B. Loop modeling: sampling filtering, and scoring. Proteins 2008; 70: 834-843.
7. Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K. Protein structure prediction and model quality assessment. Drug Discov Today 2009; 14: 386-393.
8. Fiser A, Do RK, Sali A. Modeling of loops in protein structures. Protein Sci 2000; 9: 1753-1773.
9. Rohl CA, Strauss CEM, Chivian D, Baker D. Modeling structurally variable regions in homologous proteins with Rosetta. Proteins 2004; 55: 656-677
10. Park H, Ko J, Joo K, Lee J, Seok C, Lee J. Refinement of protein termini in template-based modeling using conformational space annealing. Proteins 2011; 79: 2725-2734.
11. Coutsias EA, Seok C, Jacobson MP, Dill KA. A kinematic view of loop closure. J. Comput. Chem. 2004; 25: 510-528.
12. Lee J, Liwo A, Scheraga HA. Energy-based de novo protein folding by conformational space annealing and an off-lattice united-residue force field: application to the 10-55 fragment of staphylococcal protein A and apo calbindin d9k. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 2025-2030.
13. Joo K, Lee J, Seo JH, Lee K, Kim BG, Lee J. All-atom chain-building by optimizing MODELLER energy function using conformational space annealing. Proteins 2009; 75: 1010-1023
14. Lee J, Lee J, Sasaki TN, Sasai M, Seok C, Lee J. De novo protein structure prediction by dynamic fragment assembly and conformational space annealing. Proteins 2011; 79: 2403-2417.
15. Söding J. Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 951-960.
16. Pei J, Kim B, Grishin NV. PROMALS3D: a tool for multiple sequence and structure alignment. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36: 2295-2300.
17. Wallner B, Elofsson A. Identification of correct regions in protein models using structural, alignment, and consensus information. Protein Sci 2006; 15: 900-913.
18. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983; 22: 2577-2637.
19. Mandell DJ, Coutsias EA, Kortemme T. Sub-angstrom accuracy in protein loop reconstruction by robotics-inspired conformational sampling. Nature methods 2009; 6: 551-552.
20. Wang C, Bradley P, Baker D. Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility. J. Mol. Biol. 2007; 373: 503-519.
21. Lee J, Lee D, Park H, Coutsias EA, Seok C. Protein loop modeling by using fragment assembly and analytical loop closure. Proteins 2010; 78: 3426-3436.
22. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou Y. Accurate and efficient loop selections by the DFIRE-based all-atom statistical potential. Protein Sci 2004; 13: 391-399.
23. Zhu J, Xie L, Honig B. Structural refinement of protein segments containing secondary structure elements: local sampling, knowledge-based potentials and clustering. Proteins 2006; 65: 463-479.
24. Chopra G, Kalisman N, Levitt M. Consistent refinement of submitted models at CASP using a knowledge-based potential. Proteins 2010; 78: 2668-2678.
25. MacKerell ADJr, Bashford D, Bellott M, Dunbrack RLJr, Evanseck JD, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha S, Joseph-McCarthy D, Kuchnir L, Kuczera K, Lau FTK, Mattos C, Michnick S, Ngo T, Nguyen DT, Prodhom B, Reiher WEIII, Roux B, Schienkrich M, Smith JC, Stote R, Straub J, Watanabe M, Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera J, Yin D, Karplus M. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 2002; 102: 3586-3616
26. Neria E, Fischer S, Karplus M. Simulation of activation free energies in molecular systems. J Chem Phys 1996; 105: 1902-1921.
27. Yang Y, Zhou Y. Specific interactions for ab initio folding of protein termini with secondary structures. Proteins 2008; 72: 793-803.
28. Sasaki TN, Cetin H, Sasai MA. Coarse-grained Langevin molecular dynamics approach to de novo protein structure prediction. BBRC 2008; 369: 500-506.
29. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. Effective energy function for proteins in solution. Proteins 1999; 35: 133-152.
30. Sali A, Blundell T. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 1993; 234: 779-815.
31. Kortemme T, Morozov AV, Baker D. An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for protein and protein-protein complexes. J Mol Biol 2003; 326: 1239-1259.
32. Press WH. Numerical recipes, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
33. Liu D, Nocedal J. On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization. Math Prog B 1998; 45: 503-528.
34. Wang G, Dunbrack RLJr. PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 2003; 19: 1589-1591.
35. Ko J, Lee D, Park H, Coutsias EA, Lee J, Seok C. The FALC-loop web server for protein loop modeling. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39: 210-214.
36. Canutescu AA, Shelenkov AA, Dunbrack RLJr. A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Sci 2003; 12; 2001-2014.
37. Mariani V, Kiefer F, Schmidt T, Haas J, Schwede T. Assessment of template based protein structure predictions in CASP9. Proteins 2011; 79 SUPPL 10: 37-58.
38. Clarke ND, Ezkurida I, Kopp J, Read RJ, Schwede T, Tress ML. Domain definition and arget classification for CASP7. Proteins 2007; 69: 10-18.
39. Tress ML, Ezkurdia I, Richardson JS. Target domain definition and classification in CASP8. Proteins 2009; 77: 10-17.
40. MacCallum JL, Pérez AM, Schnieders MJ, Hua L, Jacobson MP, Dill KA. Assessment of protein structure refinement in CASP9. Proteins 2011; 79: 74-90.
41. Sellers BD, Zhu K, Zhao S, Friesner RA, Jacobson MP. Toward better refinement of comparative models: predicting loops in inexact environments. Proteins 2008; 72: 959-971.
42. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. TM-align: A protein structure alignment algorithm based on TMscore. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33: 2302-2309.