A machine learning-based method for protein global model quality assessment

International Journal of General Systems

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 417-425

  Dong, Qiwen ^a   Chen, Yufei ^a   Zhou, Shuigeng ^a  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

model quality assessment; protein structure prediction; support vector regression

Indexed keywords

3D COORDINATES; CROSS VALIDATION; DATA SETS; EXISTING METHOD; GLOBAL MODELS; GOOD CORRELATIONS; INPUT AND OUTPUTS; MACHINE-LEARNING; MODEL QUALITIES; NATIVE STRUCTURES; PROTEIN MODELS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE PREDICTION; SECONDARY STRUCTURES; SOLVENT ACCESSIBILITY; STRUCTURAL FEATURE; SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION; SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSIONS; WEB SERVERS;

DATA HANDLING; FORECASTING; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROTEINS; RATING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL TESTS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 79952673719     PISSN: 03081079     EISSN: 15635104     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03081079.2010.544869     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Benkert, P., Tosatto, S.C. and Schomburg, D., 2008. QMEAN: A comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment. Proteins, 71 (1), 261-277, Journal Article Research Support, Non-US Gov't. (Pubitemid 351358609)
2. Bujnicki, J.M., Elofsson, A., Fischer, D. and Rychlewski, L., 2001. LiveBench-1: Continuous benchmarking of protein structure prediction servers. Protein science, 10 (2), 352-361, Comparative Study Journal Article. (Pubitemid 32225655)
3. Chang, C. and Lin, C., 2001. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines [online]. Available from: Http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/cjlin/libsvm .
4. Costantini, S., Facchiano, A.M. and Colonna, G., 2007. Evaluation of the structural quality of modeled proteins by using globularity criteria. BMC structural biology, 7, 9, Journal Article Research Support, Non-US Gov't.
5. Cozzetto, D., Kryshtafovych, A., Ceriani, M. and Tramontano, A., 2007. Assessment of predictions in the model quality assessment category. Proteins, 69 (Suppl 8), 175-183, Comparative Study Evaluation Studies Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-US Gov't. (Pubitemid 350210125)
6. Dor, O. and Zhou, Y., 2006. Achieving 80 secondary structure prediction by large-scale training. Proteins, 66 (4), 838-845.
7. Fasnacht, M., Zhu, J. and Honig, B., 2007. Local quality assessment in homology models using statistical potentials and support vector machines. Protein science, 16 (8), 1557-1568, Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-US Gov't. (Pubitemid 47195683)
8. Fitzgerald, J.E., et al., 2007. Reduced C(beta) statistical potentials can outperform all-atom potentials in decoy identification. Protein science, 16 (10), 2123-2139, Evaluation Studies Journal Article. (Pubitemid 47481648)
9. Ginalski, K., Elofsson, A., Fischer, D. and Rychlewski, L., 2003. 3D-Jury: A simple approach to improve protein structure predictions. Bioinformatics, 19 (8), 1015-1018, 1367-4803, Evaluation Studies Journal Article Validation Studies. (Pubitemid 36675823)
10. Guntert, P., Mumenthaler, C. and Wuthrich, K., 1997. Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA. Journal of molecular biology, 273 (1), 283-298. (Pubitemid 27460230)
11. Jones, D., 1999. Protein secondary structure based on position-specific scoring matrices. Journal of molecular biology, 292 (2), 195-202. (Pubitemid 29435759)
12. Kabsch, W. and Sander, C., 1983. Dictionary of secondary structure in proteins: Pattern recognition of hydrogenbonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers, 22 (12), 2577-2637.
13. Loose, C., Klepeis, J.L. and Floudas, C.A., 2004. A new pairwise folding potential based on improved decoy generation and side-chain packing. Proteins, 54 (2), 303-314, Journal Article Research Support, US Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Research Support, US Gov't, P.H.S. (Pubitemid 38084071)
14. Lu, M., Dousis, A.D. and Ma, J., 2008. OPUS-PSP: An orientation-dependent statistical all-atom potential derived from side-chain packing. Journal of molecular biology, 376 (1), 288-301, Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-US Gov't Research Support, US Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
15. Mereghetti, P., et al., 2008. Validation of protein models by a neural network approach. BMC bioinformatics, 9, 66, Evaluation Studies Journal Article Validation Studies.
16. Montuori, A., Raimondo, G. and Pasero, E., 2008. An information theoretic approach for improving data driven prediction of protein model quality. Computers and mathematics with applications, 55 (5), 997-1006.
17. Moult, J., et al., 2007. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction-round VII. Proteins, 69 (Suppl 8), 3-9, Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-US Gov't. (Pubitemid 350210108)
18. Qiu, J. and Elber, R., 2005. Atomically detailed potentials to recognize native and approximate protein structures. Proteins, 61 (1), 44-55, Journal Article. (Pubitemid 41262916)
19. Rajgaria, R., McAllister, S.R. and Floudas, C.A., 2008. Distance dependent centroid to centroid force fields using high resolution decoys. Proteins, 70 (3), 950-970, Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, US Gov't, Non-P.H.S. (Pubitemid 351161953)
20. Siew, N., Eloffson, A., Rychlewski, L. and Fischer, D., 2000. MaxSub: An automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction quality. Bioinformatics, 16 (9), 776-785, Evaluation Studies Journal Article Research Support, Non-US Gov't.
21. Summa, C.M. and Levitt, M., 2007. Near-native structure refinement using in vacuo energy minimization. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America, 104 (9), 3177-3182, Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, US Gov't, Non-P.H.S. (Pubitemid 46364133)
22. Tan, C.W. and Jones, D.T., 2008. Using neural networks and evolutionary information in decoy discrimination for protein tertiary structure prediction. BMC bioinformatics, 9, 94, Journal Article Research Support, Non-US Gov't.
23. Tosatto, S.C., 2005. The Victor/FRST function for model quality estimation. Journal of computational biology, 12 (10), 1316-1327, Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-US Gov't. (Pubitemid 44743646)
24. Tosatto, S.C. and Battistutta, R., 2007. TAP score: Torsion angle propensity normalization applied to local protein structure evaluation. BMC bioinformatics, 8, 155, Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-US Gov't.
25. Vapnik, V., 1998. Statistical learning theory. New York: The MIT Press.
26. Verma, A. and Wenzel, W., 2007. Protein structure prediction by all-atom free-energy refinement. BMC structural biology, 7, 12.
27. Wallner, B. and Elofsson, A., 2003. Can correct protein models be identified? Protein science, 12 (5), 1073-1086, Journal Article. (Pubitemid 36505441)
28. Wallner, B. and Elofsson, A., 2007. Prediction of global and local model quality in CASP7 using Pcons and ProQ. Proteins, 69 (Suppl 8), 184-193. (Pubitemid 350210126)
29. Wang, Z., Tegge, A.N. and Cheng, J., 2008. Evaluating the absolute quality of a single protein model using structural features and support vector machines. Proteins, 75, 638-647.
30. Zhang, Y., 2008. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC bioinformatics, 9, 40, Journal Article Research Support, Non-US Gov't.
31. Zhang, Y. and Skolnick, J., 2004. SPICKER: A clustering approach to identify near-native protein folds. Journal of computational chemistry, 25 (6), 865-871.
32. Zhang, C., Liu, S., Zhou, H. and Zhou, Y., 2004. An accurate, residue-level, pair potential of mean force for folding and binding based on the distance-scaled, ideal-gas reference state. Protein science, 13 (2), 400-411, Journal Article Research Support, Non-US Gov't Research Support, US Gov't, P.H.S. (Pubitemid 38124961)
33. Zhou, H. and Skolnick, J., 2008. Protein model quality assessment prediction by combining fragment comparisons and a consensus C(alpha) contact potential. Proteins, 71 (3), 1211-1218, Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural. (Pubitemid 351564047)