Template-based protein structure modeling using TASSER VMT

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 352-361

  Zhou, Hongyi ^a   Skolnick, Jeffrey ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alignment; SP 3; TASSER; Template based modeling; Threading

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; KNOWLEDGE BASE; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING; SIMULATION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

CASPASE 9; PROTEIN;

ALGORITHMS; CASPASE 9; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 84855672321     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.23183     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Zhang Y. Progress and challenges in protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2008; 18: 342-348.
2. Venclovas C, Margelevicius M. Comparative modeling in CASP6 using consensus approach to template selection, sequence-structure alignment, and structure assessment. Proteins 2005;61:( Suppl 7): 99-105.
3. Xu J. Fold recognition by predicted alignment accuracy. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinfo 2005; 2: 157-165.
4. Fischer D, Eisenberg D. Protein fold recognition using sequence-derived predictions. Protein Sci 1992; 5: 947-955.
5. Jones DT. GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J Mol Biol 1999; 287: 797-815.
6. Fischer D. Hybrid fold recognition: combining sequence derived properties with evolutionary information. In: Altman RB, Dunker AK, Hunter L, Lauderdale K, Klein TE, editors. Hawaii: World Scientific; 2000. pp 119-130.
7. Jaroszewski L, Rychlewski L, Li W, Godzik A. Comparison of sequence profiles. Strategies for structural predictions using sequence information. Protein Sci 2000; 9: 232-241.
8. Ginalski K, Pas J, Wyrwicz LS, von Grotthuss M, Bujnicki JM, Rychlewski L. ORFeus: dectection of distant homology using sequence profiles and predicted secondary structure. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31: 3804-3807.
9. Yona G, Levitt M. Within the twilight zone: a sensitive profile-profile comparison tool based on information theory. J Mol Biol 2002; 315: 1257-1275.
10. Karplus K, Barrett C, Hughey R. Hidden markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics 1998; 14: 846-856.
11. Wu S, Zhang Y. MUSTER: improving protein sequence profile-profile alignments by using multiple sources of structure information. Proteins 2008; 72: 547-556.
12. 3 servers in CASP6. Proteins 2005;61( suppl 7): 152-156.
13. Lundsröm J, Rychlewski L, Bunnicki J, Elofsson A. Pcons: a neural-network-based consensus predictor that improves fold recognition. Protein Sci 2001; 10: 2354-2362.
14. Xu Y, Xu D, Olman V. A practical method for interpretation of threading scores: an application of neural networks. Statistica Sinica Special Issue on Bioinformatics 2002; 12: 159-177.
15. Fischer D. 3D-SHOTGUN: a novel, cooperative, fold-recognition meta-predictor. Proteins 2003; 51: 434-441.
16. Ginalski K, Elofsson A, Fischer D, Rychlewski L. 3D-jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions. Bioinformatics 2003; 19: 1015-1018.
17. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on genomic scale. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101: 7594-7599.
18. Zhang Y, Arakaki A, Skolnick J. TASSER: an automated method for the prediction of protein tertiary structures in CASP6. Proteins 2005;61( suppl. 7): 91-98.
19. Al-Lazikani B, Sheinerman FB, Honig B. Combining multiple structure and sequence alignments to improve sequence detection and alignment: application to the SH2 domains of Janus kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98: 14796-14801.
20. Peng J, Xu J. A multiple-template approach to protein threading. Proteins, in press.
21. Cheng J. A multi-template combination algorithm for protein comparative modeling. BMC Struc Biol 2008; 8: 18.
22. Zhou H, Skolnick J. Protein structure prediction by pro-sp3-TASSER. Biophys J 2009; 96: 2119-2127.
23. Moult J, Fidelis K, Kryshtafovych A, Tramontano A. 9th Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction. 2010. Available at.
24. Zhang Y. Template-based modeling and free modeling by I-TASSER in CASP7. Proteins 2007; 69( Suppl 8): 108-117.
25. Wu S, Zhang Y. LOMETS: a local meta-threading-server for protein structure prediction. Nucl Aci Res 2007; 35: 3375-3382.
26. Söding J. Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 951-960.
27. Hildebrand A, Remmert M, Biegert A, Söding J. Fast and accurate automatic structure prediction with HHpred. Proteins 2009; 77( Suppl 9): 128-132.
28. Sali AaB TL. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 1993; 234: 779-815.
29. Peng J, Xu J. Boosting Protein Threading Accuracy. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2009; 31: 5541.
30. Peng J, Xu J. Low-homology protein threading. Bioinformatics 2010; 26: i294-i300.
31. Zhou H, Pandit S, Skolnick J. Performance of the Pro-sp3-TASSER server in CASP8. Proteins 2009; 77: 123-127.
32. Wu S, Zhang Y. SEGMER: identifying protein sub-structural similarity by segmental threading. Structure 2010; 18: 858-867.
33. Wu S, Zhang Y. A comprehensive assessment of sequence-based and template-based methods for protein contact prediction. Bioinformatics 2008; 24: 924-931.
34. Zhou H, Zhou Y. Fold recognition by combining sequence profiles derived from evolution and from depth-dependent structural alignment of fragments. Proteins 2005; 58: 321-328.
35. Chivian D, Baker D. Homology modeling using parametric alignment ensemble generation with consensus and energy-based model selection. Nucl Aci Res 2006; 34: e112.
36. Zhou H, Skolnick J. Protein model quality assessment prediction by combining fragment comparisons and a consensus Cα contact potential. Proteins 2007; 71: 1211-1218.
37. Waterman MS, Eggert M, Lander E. Parametric sequence comparisons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992; 89: 6090-6093.
38. Zhou H, Skolnick J. Improving threading algorithms for remote homology modeling by combining fragment and template comparisons. Proteins 2010; 78: 2041-2048.
39. Zhou H, Zhou Y. Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci 2002; 11: 2714-2726.
40. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. SPICKER: a clustering approach to identify near-native protein fold. J Comput Chem 2004; 25: 865-871.
41. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucl Acids Res 2005; 33: 2302-2309.
42. Rotkiewicz P, Skolnick J. Fast procedure for reconstruction of full-atom protein models from reduced representations. J Comput Chem 2008; 29: 1460-1465.
43. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. A scoring function for the automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 2004; 57: 702-710.
44. Zemla A, Venclovas C, Moult J, Fidelis K. Processing and analysis of CASP3 protein structure predictions. Proteins 1999; 3: 22-29.
45. Zhang Y, Hubner I, Arakaki A, Shakhnovich E, Skolnick J. On the origin and highly likely completeness of single-domain protein structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103: 2605-2610.
46. Cheng J, Wang Z, Tegge A, Eickholt J. Prediction of global and local quality of CASP8 models by MULTICOM series. Proteins 2009; 77( Suppl 9): 181-184.