Assessment of the protein-structure refinement category in CASP8

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 77, Issue SUPPL. 9, 2009, Pages 66-80

  MacCallum, Justin L ^a   Hua, Lan ^a   Schnieders, Michael J ^b   Pande, Vijay S ^b   Jacobson, Matthew P ^a   Dill, Ken A ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

CASP; Refinement; Structure prediction

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF TECHNIQUES FOR PROTEIN STRUCTURE PRODUCTION 8; MOLECULAR MODEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING; QUALITY CONTROL; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

PROTEIN;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN;

EID: 74249121740     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22538     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Zemla A. LGA: a method for finding 3d similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3370-3374. (Pubitemid 37442162)
2. Chopra G, Summa. CM, Levitt M, Solvent dramatically affects protein structure refinement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:20239-20244.
3. Fan H, Mark AE. Refinement, of homology-based protein structures by molecular dynamics simulation techniques. Protein Sci 2004;13: 211-220. (Pubitemid 38021155)
4. Ishitani R, Terada T, Shimizu K. Refinement of comparative models of protein structure by using multicanonical molecular dynamics simulations. Mol Simulation 2008;34:327-336.
5. Jagielska A, Wroblewska L, Skolnick J. Protein model refinement using an optimized physics-based all-atom force field. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:8268-8273. (Pubitemid 351904745)
6. Lee MR, Tsai J, Baker D, Kollman PA. Molecular dynamics in the endgame of protein, structure prediction. J Mol Biol 2001;313:417-430. (Pubitemid 33587197)
7. Lu H, Skolnick J. Application of statistical potentials to protein structure refinement from low resolution ab initio models. Biopolymers 2003;70:575-584. (Pubitemid 37531839)
8. Misura KMS, Baker D. Progress and challenges in high-resolution refinement of protein structure models. Proteins 2005;59:15-29. (Pubitemid 40316474)
9. Misura KMS, Chivian D, Rohl CA, Kim DE, Baker D. Physically realistic homology models built with rosetta can be more accurate than their templates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:5361-5366.
10. Sellers BD, Zhu K, Zhao S, Friesner RA, Jacobson MP. Toward better refinement of comparative models: predicting loops in inexact environments. Proteins 2008;72:959-971.
11. Wroblewska L, Skolnick J. Can a physics-based, all-atom potential find a protein's native structure among misfolded structures? i. Large scale amber benchmarking. J Comput Chem 2007;28:2059-2066. (Pubitemid 47153603)
12. Wroblewska L, Jagielska A, Skolnick J. Development of a physics-based force field for the scoring and refinement of protein models? Biophys J 2008;94:3227-3240.
13. Zhu J, Fan H, Periole X, Honig B, Mark AE. Refining homology models by combining replica-exchange molecular dynamics and statistical potentials. Proteins 2008;72:1171-1188.
14. Chen J, Brooks CL, III. Can molecular dynamics simulations provide high-resolution refinement of protein structure? Proteins 2007; 67:922-930.
15. Fiser A, Do RK, Sali A. Modeling of loops in protein structures. Protein Sci 2000;9:1753-1773.
16. Qian B, Ortiz AR, Baker D. Improvement of comparative model accuracy by free-energy optimization along principal components of natural structural variation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101: 15346-15351. (Pubitemid 39441544)
17. Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Moult J. Progress from CASP6 to CASP7. Proteins 2007;69(Suppl 8):194-207.
18. Kryshtafovych A, Prlic A, Dmytriv Z, Daniluk P, Milostan M, Eyrich V, Hubbard T, Fidelis K. New tools and expanded data analysis capabilities at the protein structure prediction center. Proteins 2007; 69(Suppl 8):19-26. (Pubitemid 350210110)
19. Kopp J, Bordoli L, Battey JND, Kiefer F, Schwede X Assessment of CASP7 predictions for template-based modeling targets. Predictions for template-based modeling targets. Proteins 2007;69(Suppl 8):38-56. (Pubitemid 350210112)
20. Keedy DA, Williams CJ, Headd JJ, Arendall WB, III, Chen VB, Kapral GJ, Gillespie RA, Zemla A, Richardson DC, Richardson JS. The other 90 percent of the protein: assessment beyond the calphas for CASP8 template-based models. Proteins, in press.
21. Davis IW, Leaver-Fay A, Chen VB, Block JN, Kapral GJ, Wang X, Murray LW, Arendall WB, III, Snoeyink J, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35:W375-W383.
22. Word JM, Lovell SC, LaBean TH, Taylor HC, Zalis ME, Presley BK, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. Visualizing and quantifying molecular goodness-of-fit: small-probe contact dots with explicit hydrogen atoms. J Mol Biol 1999;285:1711-1733.
23. Read RJ, Chavali. G. Assessment of CASP7 predictions in the high accuracy template-based modeling category. Proteins 2007;69(Suppl 8):27-37. (Pubitemid 350210111)
24. DePristo MA, de Bakker PIW, Blundell TL. Heterogeneity and inaccuracy in protein structures solved by x-ray crystallography. Structure 2004;12:831-838. (Pubitemid 38595771)
25. Furnham N, Blundell TL, DePristo MA, Terwilliger TC. Is one solution good enough? Nat Struct Mol Biol 2006;13:184-185.
26. Benkovic SJ, Hommes-Schiffer S. A perspective on enzyme catalysis. Science 2003;301:1196-1202.
27. Eisenmesser EZ, Bosco DA, Akke M, Kern D. Enzyme dynamics during catalysis. Science 2002;295:1520-1523.
28. Rasmussen BF, Stock AM, Ringe D, Petsko GA. Crystalline ribonuclease A loses function below the dynamical transition at 220 K. Nature 1992;357:423-424.
29. Teng Q. Structural biology: practical NMR applications. New York: Springer; 2005.
30. Lipari G, Szabo A. Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic-resonance relaxation in macromolecules. 1. Theory and range of validity. J Am Chem. Soc 1982;104:4546-4559.
31. Lindorff-Larsen K, Best RB, Depristo MA, Dobson CM, Vendruscolo M. Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics. Nature 2005;433:128-132.
32. Zagrovic B, van Gunsteren WF. Comparing atomistic simulation data with the NMR experiment; how much can NOEs actually tell us? Proteins 2006;63:210-218.
33. LaskowskiRA,RullmannJ,MacArthurM,KapteinR,ThorntonJ.AQUAandPROCHECK-NMR: programsforcheckingthequalityofproteinstructuressolvedbyNMR.JBiomolNMR1996;8: 477-486.(Pubitemid126706801)
34. Doreleijers JF, Rullmann JA, Kaptein R. Quality assessment of NMR structures: a statistical survey. J Mol Biol 1998;281:149-164. (Pubitemid 28360678)
35. Doreleijers JF, Raves ML, Rullmann T, Kaptein R. Completeness of NOEs in protein structure: a statistical analysis of NMR. J Biomol NMR 1999;14:123-132. (Pubitemid 29322966)
36. Tropp J. Dipolar relaxation and nuclear overhauser effects in non-rigid molecules: the effect of fluctuating internuclear distances. J Chem Phys 1980;72:6035-6043.
37. Drenth J, Mesters J. Principles of protein x-ray crystallography, 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 2007.
38. Raimondo D, Giorgetti A, Giorgetti A, Bosi S, Tramontano A. Automatic procedure for using models of proteins in molecular replacement. Proteins 2007;66:689-696. (Pubitemid 46106773)
39. Giorgetti A, Raimondo D, Miele AE, Tramontano A. Evaluating the usefulness of protein structure models for molecular replacement. Bioinformatics 2005;21 (Suppl 2):72-76. (Pubitemid 41535431)
40. Das R, Baker D. Prospects for de novo phasing with de novo protein models. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2009;65:169-175.
41. McCoy AJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Adams PD, Winn MD, Storoni LC, Read RJ. Phaser crystallographic software. J Appl Crystallography 2007;40:658-674.
42. Sullivan DC, Kuntz I. Conformation spaces of proteins. Proteins 2001;42:495-511.
43. Sullivan DC, Kuntz I. Distributions in protein conformation space: implications for structure prediction and entropy. Biophys J 2004; 87:113-120. (Pubitemid 38880070)
44. Bowman GR, Pande VS. Simulated tempering yields insight into the low-resolution rosetta scoring functions. Proteins 2009;74:777-788.