Searching for stages of teacher's skills in assessment

Studies in Educational Evaluation

Volumn 40, Issue , 2014, Pages 1-11

  Christoforidou, Margarita ^a   Kyriakides, Leonidas ^b   Antoniou, Panayiotis ^c   Creemers, Bert P M ^d  

^a Cyprus International Institute of Management   (Cyprus)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Assessment skills; Formative assessment; Teacher developmental stages; Teacher effectiveness

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897963493     PISSN: 0191491X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Adams R.J., Khoo S.T. Quest - The interactive test analysis system 1996, Australian Council of Educational Research, Victoria, Australia.
2. American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education, & National Education Association (AFT/NCME/NEA) Standards for teacher competence in educational assessment of students. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 1990, 9(4):30-32.
3. Anderson L. Classroom assessment: Enhancing the quality of teacher decision making 2003, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
4. Andrich D. A general form of Rasch's extended logistic model for partial credit scoring. Applied Measurement in Education 1988, 1(4):363-378.
5. Antoniou P., Kyriakides L. The impact of a dynamic approach to professional development on teacher instruction and student learning: Results from an experimental study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2011, 22(3):291-311.
6. Baird J.-A. Beliefs and practice in teacher assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 2010, 17(1):1-5.
7. Berliner D.C. Expertise: The wonder of exemplary performances. Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students: Diverse perspectives 1994, 161-186. Holt, Reinhardt, & Winston, Fort Worth, TX. J.N. Mangieri, C.C. Block (Eds.).
8. Birenbaum M. Assessment and instruction preferences and their relationship with test anxiety and learning strategies. Higher Education 2007, 53(6):749-768.
9. Black P., Harrison C., Lee C., Marshall B., Wiliam D. Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom 2002, King's College London, Department of Education and Professional Studies, London.
10. Black P., Wiliam D. Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment 1998, King's College London School of Education, London.
11. Black P., Wiliam D. Developing a theory of formative assessment. Assessment and learning 2006, 81-100. Sage, London. J. Gardner (Ed.).
12. Black P., Wiliam D. Developing a theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 2009, 21(1):5-31.
13. Boaler J. What's math got to do with it? 2008, Penguin Press, London.
14. Bond T.G., Fox C.M. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences 2001, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
15. Borko H., Wolf S.A., Simone G., Uchiyama K. Schools in transition: Reform efforts and school capacity in Washington state. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 2003, 25(2):171-201.
16. Bright G.W., Joyner J.M. Understanding and improving classroom assessment: Summary of issues raised. Classroom assessment in mathematics: Views from a National Science Foundation working conference 1998, 27-57. University Press of America, Lanham, MD. G.W. Bright, J.M. Joyner (Eds.).
17. Broadfoot P., Black P. Redefining assessment? The first ten years of Assessment in Education. Assessment in Education 2004, 11(1):7-27.
18. Brookhart S.M. Effects of the classroom assessment environment on mathematics and science achievement. Journal of Educational Research 1997, 90(6):323-330.
19. Brookhart S.M. Developing measurement theory for classroom assessment purposes and uses. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 2003, 22(4):5-12.
20. Brookhart S.M. Classroom assessment: Tensions and intersections in theory and practice. Teachers College Record 2004, 106(3):429-458.
21. Brookhart S.M. Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 2011, 30(1):3-12.
22. Brown G. Teachers' conceptions of assessment: Implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 2004, 11(3):301-318.
23. Burry J.A., Shaw D. Defining teacher effectiveness on a continuum: A Rasch model approach 1988, April, Paper presented at the National Council on Measurement in Education 1988, New Orleans, LA.
24. Bryk A.S., Raudenbush S.W. Hierarchical linear models in social and behavioural research: Applications and data analysis methods 1992, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
25. Calfee R.C., Masuda W.V. Classroom assessment as inquiry. Handbook of classroom assessment: Learning, adjustment, and achievement 1997, 69-102. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. G.D. Phye (Ed.).
26. Christoforidou M. Teacher professional development in classroom assessment: Using the dynamic model of educational effectiveness to improve assessment practice 2013, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Cyprus, Cyprus.
27. Creemers B.P.M., Kyriakides L. The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools 2008, Routledge, London.
28. Creemers B.P.M., Kyriakides L. Explaining stability and changes in school effectiveness by looking at changes in the functioning of school factors. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2010, 21(4):409-427.
29. Creemers B.P.M., Kyriakides L., Antoniou P. Teacher professional development for improving quality of teaching 2013, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
30. Cronbach L.J. Essentials of psychological testing 1990, Harper & Row, New York. 3rd ed.
31. Dall'Alba G., Sandberg J. Unveiling professional development: A critical review of stage models. Review of Educational Research 2006, 76(3):383-412.
32. De Lange J. Assessment in problem-oriented curricula. Assessment in the mathematics classroom 1993, 197-208. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA. N. Webb, A.F. Coxford (Eds.).
33. Denzin N.K., Lincoln Y.S. Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials 1998, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
34. Duschl R.A., Gitomer D.H. Strategies and challenges to changing the focus of assessment and instruction in science classrooms. Educational Assessment 1997, 4(1):37-73.
35. Earl L. Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning 2003, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
36. Earl L., Katz S. Changing classroom assessment: Teachers' struggles. The sharp edge of educational change 2000, 97-111. Routledge, London. N. Bascia, A. Hargreaves (Eds.).
37. Gardner J., Harlen W., Hayward L., Stobart G., Montgomery M. Developing teacher assessment 2010, Open University Press, Maidenhead.
38. Gipps C. Beyond testing 1994, Routledge Falmer, London.
39. Goldhaber J., Smith D. The development of documentation strategies to support teacher reflection, inquiry and collaboration. Teaching and learning: Collaborative exploration of the Reggio Emilia approach 2002, 147-160. Merrill/Prentice-Hall, Columbus, OH. V. Fu, A. Stremmel, L. Hill (Eds.).
40. Green K.E., Frantom C.G. Survey development and validation with the Rasch model 2002, Paper presented at the international conference on questionnaire development, evaluation, and testing, Charleston, SC, November 14-17.
41. Green S.K., Mantz M. Classroom assessment practices: Examining impact on student learning 2002, April, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
42. Gullickson A.R. Teacher education and teacher-perceived needs in educational measurement and evaluation. Journal of Educational Measurement 1986, 23(4):347-354.
43. Guskey T.R., Bailey J.M. Developing grading and reporting systems for student learning 2001, Corwin Press, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA.
44. Harlen W., James M.J. Assessment and learning: Differences and relationship between formative and summative assessment. Assessment in Education 1997, 4(3):365-380.
45. Hattie J., Timperley H. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 2007, 77(1):81-112.
46. Hayward L., Priestley M., Young M. Ruffling the calm of the ocean floor: Merging practice, policy and research in assessment in Scotland. Oxford Review of Education 2004, 30(3):397-416.
47. Heck R.H., Moriyama K. Examining relationships among elementary schools' contexts, leadership, instructional practices, and added-year outcomes: A regression discontinuity approach. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2010, 21(4):377-408.
48. Herman J.L., Osmundson E., Ayala C., Schneider S., Timms M. The nature and impact of teachers' formative assessment practices 2006, (CSE Technical Report #703), National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
49. Hofman R.H., Hofman W.H., Gray J.M. Institutional contexts and international performances in schooling: Comparing patterns and trends over time in international surveys. European Journal of Education 2010, 45(1):153-173.
50. Kroeger J., Cardy T. Documentation: A hard to reach place. Early Childhood Education Journal 2006, 33(6):389-398.
51. Kyriakides L. Primary teachers' perceptions of policy for curriculum reform in mathematics. Educational Research and Evaluation 1997, 3(3):214-242.
52. Kyriakides L. Extending the comprehensive model of educational effectiveness by an empirical investigation. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2005, 16(2):103-152.
53. Kyriakides L., Archambault I., Janosz M. Searching for stages of effective teaching: a study testing the validity of the dynamic model in Canada. Journal of Classroom Interaction 2013, 48(2):11-24.
54. Kyriakides L., Campbell R.J., Gagatsis A. The significance of the classroom effect in primary schools: An application of Creemers' comprehensive model of educational effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2000, 11(4):501-529.
55. Kyriakides L., Creemers B.P.M. Using a multidimensional approach to measure the impact of classroom level factors upon student achievement: A study testing the validity of the dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2008, 19(2):183-205.
56. Kyriakides L., Creemers B.P.M. The effects of teacher factors on different outcomes: Two studies testing the validity of the dynamic model. Effective Education 2009, 1(1):61-86.
57. Kyriakides L., Creemers B.P.M., Antoniou P. Teacher behaviour and student outcomes: Suggestions for research on teacher training and professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education 2009, 25(1):12-23.
58. Linacre J.M. Understanding Rasch measurement: Estimation methods for Rasch measures. Journal of Outcome Measurement 1999, 3(4):382-405.
59. Lock C.L., Munby H. Changing assessment practices in the classroom: A study of one teacher's change. Alberta Journal of Educational Research 2000, 46(3):267-279.
60. Marcoulides G., Drezner Z. A procedure for detecting pattern clustering in measurement designs. Objective measurement: Theory into practice 1999, Vol. 5. Ablex, New Jersey.
61. Marshall B., Drummond M.J. How teachers engage with assessment for learning: Lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education 2006, 21(2):133-149.
62. Maykut P., Morehouse R. Beginning qualitative research: A philosophical and practical guide 1994, The Falmer Press, London.
63. Mok M.M.C. Self-directed learning oriented assessment: Assessment that informs learning & empowers the learner 2010, Pace Publications Ltd, Hong Kong.
64. Pajares M.F. Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy concept. Review of Educational Research 1992, 62(3):307-332.
65. Panayiotou A., Kyriakides L., Creemers B.P.M., McMahon L., Vanlaar G., Pfeifer M., et al. Teacher behaviour and student outcomes: Results of a European study 2013, Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) 2013 Conference, San Francisco, California, April 27-May 1, 2013.
66. Pellegrino J.W., Chudowsky N., Glaser R. Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment 2001, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
67. Perrenoud P. From formative evaluation to a controlled regulation of learning processes: Towards a wider conceptual field. Assessment in Education 1998, 5(1):85-102.
68. Popham W.J. All about accountability/Why assessment illiteracy is professional suicide. Educational Leadership 2004, 62(1):82-83.
69. Poskitt J., Taylor K. Evaluation of assess to learn professional development end of year report 2007, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
70. Pryor J., Crossouard B. A sociocultural theorization of formative assessment 2005, September, Paper presented at the Socio-cultural Theory in Educational Research and Practice Conference, University of Manchester: Manchester, UK.
71. Rao S., Collins H.L., DiCarlo S.E. Collaborative testing enhances student learning. Advances in Physiology Education 2002, 26(1):37-41.
72. Romesburg H.C. Cluster analysis for researchers 1984, Lifetime Learning Publication and Wadsworth Inc., Belmont, CA.
73. Sach E. Teachers and testing: An investigation into teachers' perceptions of formative assessment. Educational Studies 2012, 38(2):261-276.
74. Sadler D.R. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science 1989, 18(1):119-144.
75. Sammons P. The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2009, 20(1):123-129.
76. Sampson S.O., Bradley K.D. Measuring factors impacting educator supply and demand: An argument for Rasch analysis 2004, Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, San Diego, CA.
77. Schafer W.D. Essential assessment skills in professional education of teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 1991, 10(1):3-6.
78. Scheerens J. The use of theory in school effectiveness research revisited. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2013, 24(1):1-38.
79. Scheerens J., Bosker R.J. The foundations of educational effectiveness 1997, Pergamon, Oxford.
80. Schmoker M. Results now 2006, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA.
81. Shepard L.A. The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher 2000, 29(7):4-14.
82. Shepard L.A. Formative assessment: Caveat emptor. The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning 2007, 279-303. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. C.A. Dwyer (Ed.).
83. Snijders T., Bosker R. Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling 1999, Sage, London.
84. Stiggins R.J. Relevant classroom assessment training for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 1991, 10(1):7-12.
85. Stiggins R.J. High quality classroom assessment: What does it really mean?. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 1992, 11(2):35-39.
86. Stiggins R. New assessment beliefs for a new school mission. Phi Delta Kappan 2004, 86(1):22-28.
87. Stiggins R.J. Essential formative assessment competencies for teachers and school leaders. Handbook of formative assessment 2009, Routledge, New York. H.L. Andrade, G.J. Cizek (Eds.).
88. Stiggins R., DuFour R. Maximizing the power of formative assessments. Phi Delta Kappan 2009, 90(9):640-644.
89. Suurtamm C., Koch M., Arden A. Teachers' emerging assessment practices in mathematics: Classrooms in the context of reform. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice 2010, 17(4):399-417.
90. Teddlie C., Reynolds D. The international handbook of school effectiveness research 2000, Falmer Press, London.
91. Torrance H., Pryor J. Investigating formative assessment. Teaching, learning and assessment in the classroom 1998, Open University Press, Buckingham.
92. Torrance H., Pryor J. Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal 2001, 27(5):615-631.
93. Wang W.C., Cheng Y.Y. Measurement issues in screening outstanding teachers. Journal of Applied Measurement 2001, 2(2):171-186.
94. Webb M.E., Jones J. Exploring tensions in developing assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 2009, 16(2):165-184.
95. Wiliam D., Lee C., Harrison C., Black P.J. Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy and Practice 2004, 11(1):49-65.
96. Wright B.D. Additivity in psychological measurement. Measurement and personality assessment 1985, 101-112. Elsevier Science Publishers BV, Amsterdam. E.E. Roskam (Ed.).
97. Wright B.D., Linacre J.M. Observations are always ordinal: Measurements, however, must be interval. Archives of Physical Measurement and Rehabilitation 1989, 70(12):857-860.
98. Wright B.D., Masters G. The measurement of knowledge and attitude 1981, (Research Memorandum 30), University of Chicago, Department of Education, Statistical Laboratory, Chicago.
99. Yen W.M. Scaling performance assessments: Strategies for managing local item dependence. Journal of Educational Measurement 1993, 30(3):187-213.
100. Yorke J.D. Summative assessment supported by the Internet: The professional diver competency theory assessment system (DCTAS) 2004, Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HMSO), London, UK.