Complex correlations: Replication timing and mutational landscapes during cancer and genome evolution

Current Opinion in Genetics and Development

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 93-100

  Sima, Jiao ^a   Gilbert, David M ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CHROMOSOME BREAKAGE; CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; DNA REPLICATION TIMING; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA SIMULANS; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NEOPLASM; NONHUMAN; POINT MUTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; ANIMAL; DNA REPLICATION; GENETICS; MUTATION;

ANIMALS; DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; DNA REPLICATION; GENOME, HUMAN; HUMANS; MUTATION; NEOPLASMS; S PHASE;

EID: 84896845690     PISSN: 0959437X     EISSN: 18790380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2013.11.022     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Donley N., Thayer M.J. DNA replication timing, genome stability and cancer: late and/or delayed DNA replication timing is associated with increased genomic instability. Semin Cancer Biol 2013.
2. Hansen R.S., Thomas S., Sandstrom R., Canfield T.K., Thurman R.E., Weaver M., Dorschner M.O., Gartler S.M., Stamatoyannopoulos J.A. Sequencing newly replicated DNA reveals widespread plasticity in human replication timing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 107:139-144.
3. Lieberman-Aiden E., van Berkum N.L., Williams L., Imakaev M., Ragoczy T., Telling A., Amit I., Lajoie B.R., Sabo P.J., Dorschner M.O., et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 2009, 326:289-293.
4. Ryba T., Hiratani I., Lu J., Itoh M., Kulik M., Zhang J., Schulz T.C., Robins A.J., Dalton S., Gilbert D.M. Evolutionarily conserved replication timing profiles predict long-range chromatin interactions and distinguish closely related cell types. Genome Res 2010, 20:761-770.
5. Yaffe E., Farkash-Amar S., Polten A., Yakhini Z., Tanay A., Simon I. Comparative analysis of DNA replication timing reveals conserved large-scale chromosomal architecture. PLoS Genet 2010, 6:e1001011.
6. Hiratani I., Ryba T., Itoh M., Rathjen J., Kulik M., Papp B., Fussner E., Bazett-Jones D.P., Plath K., Dalton S., et al. Genome-wide dynamics of replication timing revealed by in vitro models of mouse embryogenesis. Genome Res 2010, 20:155-169.
7. Hiratani I., Takebayashi S., Lu J., Gilbert D.M. Replication timing and transcriptional control: beyond cause and effect - part II. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2009, 19:142-149.
8. Hiratani I., Ryba T., Itoh M., Yokochi T., Schwaiger M., Chang C.W., Lyou Y., Townes T.M., Schubeler D., Gilbert D.M. Global reorganization of replication domains during embryonic stem cell differentiation. PLoS Biol 2008, 6:e245.
9. Stamatoyannopoulos J.A., Adzhubei I., Thurman R.E., Kryukov G.V., Mirkin S.M., Sunyaev S.R. Human mutation rate associated with DNA replication timing. Nat Genet 2009, 41:393-395.
10. Chen C.L., Rappailles A., Duquenne L., Huvet M., Guilbaud G., Farinelli L., Audit B., d'Aubenton-Carafa Y., Arneodo A., Hyrien O., et al. Impact of replication timing on non-CpG and CpG substitution rates in mammalian genomes. Genome Res 2010, 20:447-457.
11. Cui P., Ding F., Lin Q., Zhang L., Li A., Zhang Z., Hu S., Yu J. Distinct contributions of replication and transcription to mutation rate variation of human genomes. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2012, 10:4-10.
12. Koren A., Polak P., Nemesh J., Michaelson J.J., Sebat J., Sunyaev S.R., McCarroll S.A. Differential relationship of DNA replication timing to different forms of human mutation and variation. Am J Hum Genet 2012, 91:1033-1040.
13. Weber C.C., Pink C.J., Hurst L.D. Late-replicating domains have higher divergence and diversity in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Evol 2011, 29:873-882.
14. Schwaiger M., Stadler M.B., Bell O., Kohler H., Oakeley E.J., Schubeler D. Chromatin state marks cell-type- and gender-specific replication of the Drosophila genome. Genes Dev 2009, 23:589-601.
15. Pink C.J., Hurst L.D. Timing of replication is a determinant of neutral substitution rates but does not explain slow Y chromosome evolution in rodents. Mol Biol Evol 2010, 27:1077-1086.
16. Jia P., Jin H., Meador C.B., Xia J., Ohashi K., Liu L., Pirazzoli V., Dahlman K.B., Politi K., Michor F., et al. Next-generation sequencing of paired tyrosine kinase inhibitor-sensitive and -resistant EGFR mutant lung cancer cell lines identifies spectrum of DNA changes associated with drug resistance. Genome Res 2013.
17. Liu L., De S., Michor F. DNA replication timing and higher-order nuclear organization determine single-nucleotide substitution patterns in cancer genomes. Nat Commun 2013, 4:1502.
18. Watanabe Y., Fujiyama A., Ichiba Y., Hattori M., Yada T., Sakaki Y., Ikemura T. Chromosome-wide assessment of replication timing for human chromosomes 11q and 21q: disease-related genes in timing-switch regions. Hum Mol Genet 2002, 11:13-21.
19. Woo Y.H., Li W.H. DNA replication timing and selection shape the landscape of nucleotide variation in cancer genomes. Nat Commun 2012, 3:1004.
20. Ryba T., Battaglia D., Chang B.H., Shirley J.W., Buckley Q., Pope B.D., Devidas M., Druker B.J., Gilbert D.M. Abnormal developmental control of replication-timing domains in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Genome Res 2012, 22:1833-1844.
21. Agier N., Fischer G. The mutational profile of the yeast genome is shaped by replication. Mol Biol Evol 2011, 29:905-913.
22. Lang G.I., Murray A.W. Mutation rates across budding yeast chromosome VI are correlated with replication timing. Genome Biol Evol 2011, 3:799-811.
23. Waters L.S., Walker G.C. The critical mutagenic translesion DNA polymerase Rev1 is highly expressed during G(2)/M phase rather than S phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:8971-8976.
24. Chang D.J., Cimprich K.A. DNA damage tolerance: when it's OK to make mistakes. Nat Chem Biol 2009, 5:82-90.
25. Goodman M.F., Woodgate R. Translesion DNA polymerases. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2013.
26. Sale J.E., Lehmann A.R., Woodgate R. Y-family DNA polymerases and their role in tolerance of cellular DNA damage. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2012, 13:141-152.
27. Hanawalt P.C., Spivak G. Transcription-coupled DNA repair: two decades of progress and surprises. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008, 9:958-970.
28. Hsu T.C. A possible function of constitutive heterochromatin: the bodyguard hypothesis. Genetics 1975, 79(Suppl.):137-150.
29. Malinsky J., Koberna K., Stanek D., Masata M., Votruba I., Raska I. The supply of exogenous deoxyribonucleotides accelerates the speed of the replication fork in early S-phase. J Cell Sci 2001, 114:747-750.
30. Cardoso-Moreira M., Emerson J.J., Clark A.G., Long M. Drosophila duplication hotspots are associated with late-replicating regions of the genome. PLoS Genet 2011, 7:e1002340.
31. Cardoso-Moreira M.M., Long M. Mutational bias shaping fly copy number variation: implications for genome evolution. Trends Genet 2010, 26:243-247.
32. De S., Michor F. DNA replication timing and long-range DNA interactions predict mutational landscapes of cancer genomes. Nat Biotechnol 2011, 29:1103-1108.
33. Bilke S., Gindin Y. Analyzing the association of SCNA boundaries with replication timing. Nat Biotechnol 2012, 30:1043-1045. author reply 1045-1046.
34. Fudenberg G., Getz G., Meyerson M., Mirny L.A. High order chromatin architecture shapes the landscape of chromosomal alterations in cancer. Nat Biotechnol 2011, 29:1109-1113.
35. Branzei D., Foiani M. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010, 11:208-219.
36. Hastings P.J., Lupski J.R., Rosenberg S.M., Ira G. Mechanisms of change in gene copy number. Nat Rev Genet 2009, 10:551-564.
37. Mesner L.D., Valsakumar V., Cieslik M., Pickin R., Hamlin J.L., Bekiranov S. Bubble-seq analysis of the human genome reveals distinct chromatin-mediated mechanisms for regulating early- and late-firing origins. Genome Res 2013.
38. Guilbaud G., Rappailles A., Baker A., Chen C.L., Arneodo A., Goldar A., d'Aubenton-Carafa Y., Thermes C., Audit B., Hyrien O. Evidence for sequential and increasing activation of replication origins along replication timing gradients in the human genome. PLoS Comput Biol 2011, 7:e1002322.
39. Finn K.J., Li J.J. Single-stranded annealing induced by re-initiation of replication origins provides a novel and efficient mechanism for generating copy number expansion via non-allelic homologous recombination. PLoS Genet 2013, 9:e1003192.
40. Beroukhim R., Mermel C.H., Porter D., Wei G., Raychaudhuri S., Donovan J., Barretina J., Boehm J.S., Dobson J., Urashima M., et al. The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers. Nature 2010, 463:899-905.
41. Sporbert A., Gahl A., Ankerhold R., Leonhardt H., Cardoso M.C. DNA polymerase clamp shows little turnover at established replication sites but sequential de novo assembly at adjacent origin clusters. Mol Cell 2002, 10:1355-1365.
42. Goodarzi A.A., Noon A.T., Deckbar D., Ziv Y., Shiloh Y., Lobrich M., Jeggo P.A. ATM signaling facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks associated with heterochromatin. Mol Cell 2008, 31:167-177.
43. Murga M., Jaco I., Fan Y., Soria R., Martinez-Pastor B., Cuadrado M., Yang S.M., Blasco M.A., Skoultchi A.I., Fernandez-Capetillo O. Global chromatin compaction limits the strength of the DNA damage response. J Cell Biol 2007, 178:1101-1108.
44. Black J.C., Manning A.L., Van Rechem C., Kim J., Ladd B., Cho J., Pineda C.M., Murphy N., Daniels D.L., Montagna C., et al. KDM4A lysine demethylase induces site-specific copy gain and rereplication of regions amplified in tumors. Cell 2013, 154:541-555.
45. Fukami M., Tsuchiya T., Vollbach H., Brown K.A., Abe S., Ohtsu S., Wabitsch M., Burger H., Simpson E.R., Umezawa A., et al. Genomic basis of aromatase excess syndrome: recombination- and replication-mediated rearrangements leading to CYP19A1 overexpression. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013, 98:E2013-E2021.
46. Janoueix-Lerosey I., Hupe P., Maciorowski Z., La Rosa P., Schleiermacher G., Pierron G., Liva S., Barillot E., Delattre O. Preferential occurrence of chromosome breakpoints within early replicating regions in neuroblastoma. Cell Cycle 2005, 4:1842-1846.
47. Shugay M., Ortiz de Mendibil I., Vizmanos J.L., Novo F.J. Genomic hallmarks of genes involved in chromosomal translocations in hematological cancer. PLoS Comput Biol 2012, 8:e1002797.
48. Foster H.A., Estrada-Girona G., Themis M., Garimberti E., Hill M.A., Bridger J.M., Anderson R.M. Relative proximity of chromosome territories influences chromosome exchange partners in radiation-induced chromosome rearrangements in primary human bronchial epithelial cells. Mutat Res 2013.
49. Neves H., Ramos C., da Silva M.G., Parreira A., Parreira L. The nuclear topography of ABL, BCR PML, and RARalpha genes: evidence for gene proximity in specific phases of the cell cycle and stages of hematopoietic differentiation. Blood 1999, 93:1197-1207.
50. Parada L.A., McQueen P.G., Misteli T. Tissue-specific spatial organization of genomes. Genome Biol 2004, 5:R44.
51. Parada L.A., McQueen P.G., Munson P.J., Misteli T. Conservation of relative chromosome positioning in normal and cancer cells. Curr Biol 2002, 12:1692-1697.
52. Roix J.J., McQueen P.G., Munson P.J., Parada L.A., Misteli T. Spatial proximity of translocation-prone gene loci in human lymphomas. Nat Genet 2003, 34:287-291.
53. Roukos V., Voss T.C., Schmidt C.K., Lee S., Wangsa D., Misteli T. Spatial dynamics of chromosome translocations in living cells. Science 2013, 341:660-664.
54. Branco M.R., Pombo A. Intermingling of chromosome territories in interphase suggests role in translocations and transcription-dependent associations. PLoS Biol 2006, 4:e138.
55. Nikiforova M.N., Stringer J.R., Blough R., Medvedovic M., Fagin J.A., Nikiforov Y.E. Proximity of chromosomal loci that participate in radiation-induced rearrangements in human cells. Science 2000, 290:138-141.
56. Cowell I.G., Sondka Z., Smith K., Lee K.C., Manville C.M., Sidorczuk-Lesthuruge M., Rance H.A., Padget K., Jackson G.H., Adachi N., et al. Model for MLL translocations in therapy-related leukemia involving topoisomerase IIbeta-mediated DNA strand breaks and gene proximity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:8989-8994.
57. Chiarle R., Zhang Y., Frock R.L., Lewis S.M., Molinie B., Ho Y.J., Myers D.R., Choi V.W., Compagno M., Malkin D.J., et al. Genome-wide translocation sequencing reveals mechanisms of chromosome breaks and rearrangements in B cells. Cell 2011, 147:107-119.
58. Engreitz J.M., Agarwala V., Mirny L.A. Three-dimensional genome architecture influences partner selection for chromosomal translocations in human disease. PLoS One 2012, 7:e44196.
59. Klein I.A., Resch W., Jankovic M., Oliveira T., Yamane A., Nakahashi H., Di Virgilio M., Bothmer A., Nussenzweig A., Robbiani D.F., et al. Translocation-capture sequencing reveals the extent and nature of chromosomal rearrangements in B lymphocytes. Cell 2011, 147:95-106.
60. Kovalchuk A.L., Ansarah-Sobrinho C., Hakim O., Resch W., Tolarova H., Dubois W., Yamane A., Takizawa M., Klein I., Hager G.L., et al. Mouse model of endemic Burkitt translocations reveals the long-range boundaries of Ig-mediated oncogene deregulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:10972-10977.
61. Rocha P.P., Micsinai M., Kim J.R., Hewitt S.L., Souza P.P., Trimarchi T., Strino F., Parisi F., Kluger Y., Skok J.A. Close proximity to Igh is a contributing factor to AID-mediated translocations. Mol Cell 2012, 47:873-885.
62. Zhang Y., McCord R.P., Ho Y.J., Lajoie B.R., Hildebrand D.G., Simon A.C., Becker M.S., Alt F.W., Dekker J. Spatial organization of the mouse genome and its role in recurrent chromosomal translocations. Cell 2012, 148:908-921.
63. Lin C., Yang L., Tanasa B., Hutt K., Ju B.G., Ohgi K., Zhang J., Rose D.W., Fu X.D., Glass C.K., et al. Nuclear receptor-induced chromosomal proximity and DNA breaks underlie specific translocations in cancer. Cell 2009, 139:1069-1083.
64. Santos-Pereira J.M., Herrero A.B., Garcia-Rubio M.L., Marin A., Moreno S., Aguilera A. The Npl3 hnRNP prevents R-loop-mediated transcription-replication conflicts and genome instability. Genes Dev 2013, 27:2445-2458.
65. Osborne C.S., Chakalova L., Mitchell J.A., Horton A., Wood A.L., Bolland D.J., Corcoran A.E., Fraser P. Myc dynamically and preferentially relocates to a transcription factory occupied by Igh. PLoS Biol 2007, 5:e192.
66. Dejardin J. How chromatin prevents genomic rearrangements: locus colocalization induced by transcription factor binding. Bioessays 2011, 34:90-93.
67. Mani R.S., Tomlins S.A., Callahan K., Ghosh A., Nyati M.K., Varambally S., Palanisamy N., Chinnaiyan A.M. Induced chromosomal proximity and gene fusions in prostate cancer. Science 2009, 326:1230.
68. Helmrich A., Ballarino M., Nudler E., Tora L. Transcription-replication encounters, consequences and genomic instability. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2013, 20:412-418.
69. Juan D., Rico D., Marques-Bonet T., Fernandez-Capetillo O., Valencia A. Late-replicating CNVs as a source of new genes. Biol Open 2013.
70. Fritz A., Sinha S., Marella N., Berezney R. Alterations in replication timing of cancer-related genes in malignant human breast cancer cells. J Cell Biochem 2012, 114:1074-1083.
71. Lawrence M.S., Stojanov P., Polak P., Kryukov G.V., Cibulskis K., Sivachenko A., Carter S.L., Stewart C., Mermel C.H., Roberts S.A., et al. Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes. Nature 2013.
72. Karnani N., Taylor C., Malhotra A., Dutta A. Pan-S replication patterns and chromosomal domains defined by genome-tiling arrays of ENCODE genomic areas. Genome Res 2007, 17:865-876.
73. Weddington N., Stuy A., Hiratani I., Ryba T., Yokochi T., Gilbert D.M. Replication domain: a visualization tool and comparative database for genome-wide replication timing data. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:530.
74. Raghuraman M.K., Winzeler E.A., Collingwood D., Hunt S., Wodicka L., Conway A., Lockhart D.J., Davis R.W., Brewer B.J., Fangman W.L. Replication dynamics of the yeast genome. Science 2001, 294:115-121.
75. Eaton M.L., Prinz J.A., MacAlpine H.K., Tretyakov G., Kharchenko P.V., MacAlpine D.M. Chromatin signatures of the Drosophila replication program. Genome Res 2010, 21:164-174.
76. Guelen L., Pagie L., Brasset E., Meuleman W., Faza M.B., Talhout W., Eussen B.H., de Klein A., Wessels L., de Laat W., et al. Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 2008, 453:948-951.