DNA replication timing and long-range DNA interactions predict mutational landscapes of cancer genomes

Nature Biotechnology

Volumn 29, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1103-1108

  De, Subhajyoti ^a,b   Michor, Franziska ^a,b  

^a DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER GENOME; DNA INTERACTION; DNA REPLICATIONS; GENOMIC REGIONS; LONG RANGE INTERACTIONS; SPATIAL PROXIMITY; TEST DATA;

DNA; GENES; STATISTICAL TESTS;

DISEASES;

DNA; SINGLE STRANDED DNA;

ARTICLE; CANCER GENOME; CELL TYPE; DNA REPLICATION; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; GENE MUTATION; GENOME; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

CELL LINE, TUMOR; DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; DNA REPLICATION; DNA REPLICATION TIMING; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; GENOME, HUMAN; HUMANS; MUTATION; NEOPLASMS;

EID: 83255189766     PISSN: 10870156     EISSN: 15461696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2030     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Beroukhim, R. et al. The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers. Nature 463, 899-905 (2010).
2. Bell, S.P. & Dutta, A. DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 71, 333-374 (2002). (Pubitemid 34800224)
3. Gilbert, D.M. Evaluating genome-scale approaches to eukaryotic DNA replication. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 673-684 (2010).
4. Hansen, R.S. et al. Sequencing newly replicated DNA reveals widespread plasticity in human replication timing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 139-144 (2010).
5. Woodfine, K. et al. Replication timing of human chromosome 6. Cell Cycle 4, 172-176 (2005). (Pubitemid 41038947)
6. Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289-293 (2009).
7. Meister, P., Taddei, A. & Gasser, S.M. In and out of the replication factory. Cell 125, 1233-1235 (2006). (Pubitemid 43929099)
8. Ryba, T. et al. Evolutionarily conserved replication timing profiles predict long-range chromatin interactions and distinguish closely related cell types. Genome Res. 20, 761-770 (2010).
9. Saleh-Gohari, N. et al. Spontaneous homologous recombination is induced by collapsed replication forks that are caused by endogenous DNA single-strand breaks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 7158-7169 (2005). (Pubitemid 41105912)
10. Lisby, M., Barlow, J.H., Burgess, R.C. & Rothstein, R. Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118, 699-713 (2004). (Pubitemid 39221730)
11. Hastings, P.J., Lupski, J.R., Rosenberg, S.M. & Ira, G. Mechanisms of change in gene copy number. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 551-564 (2009).
12. Hastings, P.J., Ira, G. & Lupski, J.R. A microhomology-mediated break-induced replication model for the origin of human copy number variation. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000327 (2009).
13. Lukasova, E. et al. Localisation and distance between ABL and BCR genes in interphase nuclei of bone marrow cells of control donors and patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. Hum. Genet. 100, 525-535 (1997). (Pubitemid 28072350)
14. Wijchers, P.J. & de Laat, W. Genome organization influences partner selection for chromosomal rearrangements. Trends Genet. 27, 63-71 (2011).
15. Misteli, T. & Soutoglou, E. The emerging role of nuclear architecture in DNA repair and genome maintenance. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 243-254 (2009).
16. Futreal, P.A. et al. A census of human cancer genes. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 177-183 (2004). (Pubitemid 38337497)
17. TCGA. Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature 455, 1061-1068 (2008).
18. TCGA. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature 474, 609-615 (2011).
19. Kobayashi, T. & Ganley, A.R. Recombination regulation by transcription-induced cohesin dissociation in rDNA repeats. Science 309, 1581-1584 (2005). (Pubitemid 41266487)
20. Zhang, F., Gu, W., Hurles, M.E. & Lupski, J.R. Copy number variation in human health, disease, and evolution. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 10, 451-481 (2009).
21. Stamatoyannopoulos, J.A. et al. Human mutation rate associated with DNA replication timing. Nat. Genet. 41, 393-395 (2009).
22. Watanabe, Y. et al. Chromosome-wide assessment of replication timing for human chromosomes 11q and 21q: disease-related genes in timing-switch regions. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11, 13-21 (2002). (Pubitemid 34100764)
23. Fisher, R.A. The Design of Experiments, edn. 8 (Hafner, Edinburgh, 1966).
24. Rheinfurth, M.H. & Howell, L.W. Probability and Statistics in Aerospace Engineering. NASA, (1998).
25. Slack, A., Thornton, P.C., Magner, D.B., Rosenberg, S.M. & Hastings, P.J. On the mechanism of gene amplification induced under stress in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet. 2, e48 (2006).
26. De, S. & Michor, F. DNA secondary structures and epigenetic determinants of cancer genome evolution. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 950-955 (2011).
27. Zhao, J., Bacolla, A., Wang, G. & Vasquez, K.M. Non-B DNA structure-induced genetic instability and evolution. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 67, 43-62 (2010).
28. Snyder, R.D. Consequences of the depletion of cellular deoxynucleoside triphosphate pools on the excision-repair process in cultured human fibroblasts. Mutat. Res. 200, 193-199 (1988).
29. Song, S., Wheeler, L.J. & Mathews, C.K. Deoxyribonucleotide pool imbalance stimulates deletions in HeLa cell mitochondrial DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 43893-43896 (2003). (Pubitemid 37377127)
30. Kumar, D., Viberg, J., Nilsson, A.K. & Chabes, A. Highly mutagenic and severely imbalanced dNTP pools can escape detection by the S-phase checkpoint. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 3975-3983 (2010).
31. Meyerson, M., Gabriel, S. & Getz, G. Advances in understanding cancer genomes through second-generation sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 685-696 (2010).
32. Koboldt, D.C., Ding, L., Mardis, E.R. & Wilson, R.K. Challenges of sequencing human genomes. Brief. Bioinform. 11, 484-498 (2010).