Defying DNA double-strand break-induced death during prophase i meiosis by temporal TAp63α phosphorylation regulation in developing mouse oocytes

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1460-1473

  Kim, Dal Ah ^a   Suh, Eun Kyung ^a  

^a Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATM PROTEIN; CALYCULIN A; PHOSPHATASE; PROTEIN P53; SERINE; TAP63 ALPHA PROTEIN; THREONINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; DNA; PHOSPHOPROTEIN; TRANSACTIVATOR PROTEIN; TRP63 PROTEIN, MOUSE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CELL DEATH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA RECOMBINATION; DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; DOWN REGULATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; GAMMA RADIATION; GERM LINE; IMMUNOBLOTTING; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IONIZING RADIATION; LETHAL DOSE; MALE; MEIOTIC PROPHASE I; MOUSE; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; PREMATURITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIATION INJURY; REGULATORY MECHANISM; WESTERN BLOTTING; ANIMAL; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PHOSPHORYLATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CELL DEATH; DNA; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPAIR; FEMALE; MEIOTIC PROPHASE I; MICE; OOCYTES; PHOSPHOPROTEINS; PHOSPHORYLATION; TRANS-ACTIVATORS;

EID: 84896505494     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: 10985549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01223-13     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Tilly JL. 2001. Commuting the death sentence: how oocytes strive to survive. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2:838-848. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35099086.
2. Byskov AG. 1986. Differentiation of mammalian embryonic gonad. Physiol. Rev. 66:71-117.
3. Di Giacomo M, Barchi M, Baudat F, Edelmann W, Keeney S, Jasin M. 2005. Distinct DNA-damage-dependent and -independent responses drive the loss of oocytes in recombination-defective mouse mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:737-742. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0406212102.
4. Hanoux V, Pairault C, Bakalska M, Habert R, Livera G. 2006. Caspase-2 involvement during ionizing radiation-induced oocyte death in the mouse ovary. Cell Death Differ. 14:671-681. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4402052.
5. Rodrigues P, Limback D, McGinnis LK, Plancha CE, Albertini DF. 2008. Oogenesis: prospects and challenges for the future. J. Cell Physiol. 216:355-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcp.21473.
6. Morita Y, Tilly JL. 1999. Oocyte apoptosis: like sand through an hourglass. Dev. Biol. 213:1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1999.9344.
7. Yang A, Kaghad M, Wang Y, Gillett E, Fleming MD, Dötsch V, Andrews NC, Caput D, McKeon F. 1998. p63, a p53 homolog at 3q27-29, encodes multiple products with transactivating, death-inducing, and dominant-negative activities. Mol. Cell 2:305-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80275-0.
8. Müller M, SchleithoffES, Stremmel W, Melino G, Krammer PH, Schilling T. 2006. One, two, three: p53, p63, p73 and chemosensitivity. Drug Resist. Updates 9:288-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drup.2007.01.001.
9. Belyi VA, Ak P, Markert E, Wang H, Hu W, Puzio-Kuter A, Levine AJ. 2010. The origins and evolution of the p53 family of genes. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 2:a001198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a001198.
10. Crum CP, McKeon FD. 2010. p63 in epithelial survival, germ cell surveillance, and neoplasia. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 5:349-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathol-121808-102117.
11. Suh EK, Yang A, Kettenbach A, Bamberger C, Michaelis AH, Zhu Z, Elvin JA, Bronson RT, Crum CP, McKeon F. 2006. p63 protects the female germ line during meiotic arrest. Nature 444:624-628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05337.
12. Levine AJ, Tomasini R, McKeon FD, Mak TW, Melino G. 2011. The p53 family: guardians of maternal reproduction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:259-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3086.
13. Amelio I, Grespi F, Annicchiarico-Petruzzelli M, Melino G. 2012. p63 the guardian of human reproduction. Cell Cycle 11:4545-4551. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.22819.
14. Deutsch GB, Zielonka EM, Coutandin D, Weber TA, Schäfer B, Hannewald J, Luh LM, Durst FG, Ibrahim M, Hoffmann J, Niesen FH, Senturk A, Kunkel H, Brutschy B, SchleiffE, Knapp S, Acker-Palmer A, Grez M, McKeon F, Dotsch V. 2011. DNA damage in oocytes induces a switch of the quality control factor TAp63α from dimer to tetramer. Cell 144:566-576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.013.
15. Kerr JB, Hutt KJ, Michalak EM, Cook M, Vandenberg CJ, Liew SH, Bouillet P, Mills A, Scott CL, Findlay JK, Strasser A. 2012. DNA damage-induced primordial follicle oocyte apoptosis and loss of fertility require TAp63-mediated induction of Puma and Noxa. Mol. Cell 48:343-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.08.017.
16. Livera G, Petre-Lazar B, Guerquin MJ, Trautmann E, Coffigny H, Habert R. 2008. p63 null mutation protects mouse oocytes from radioinduced apoptosis. Reproduction 135:3-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/REP-07-0054.
17. Gonfloni S, Di Tella L, Caldarola S, Cannata SM, Klinger FG, Di Bartolomeo C, Mattei M, Candi E, De Felici M, Melino G, Cesareni G. 2009. Inhibition of the c-Abl-TAp63 pathway protects mouse oocytes from chemotherapy-induced death. Nat. Med. 15:1179-1185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm.2033.
18. Tilly JL, Niikura Y, Rueda BR. 2009. The current status of evidence for and against postnatal oogenesis in mammals: a case of ovarian optimism versus pessimism? Biol. Reprod. 80:2-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.108.069088.
19. Kerr JB, Hutt KJ, Cook M, Speed TP, Strasser A, Findlay JK, Scott CL. 2012. Cisplatin-induced primordial follicle oocyte killing and loss of fertility are not prevented by imatinib. Nat. Med. 18:1170-1172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm.2889.
20. Maiani E, Di Bartolomeo C, Klinger FG, Cannata SM, Bernardini S, Chateauvieux S, Mack F, Mattei M, De Felici M, Diederich M, Cesareni G, Gonfloni S. 2012. Reply to: Cisplatin-induced primordial follicle oocyte killing and loss of fertility are not prevented by imatinib. Nat. Med. 18:1172-1174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm.2852.
21. Keeney S, Baudat F, Angeles M, Zhou ZH, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Manova K, Jasin M. 1999. A mouse homolog of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae meiotic recombination DNA transesterase Spo11p. Genomics 61: 170-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/geno.1999.5956.
22. Cohen PE, Pollack SE, Pollard JW. 2006. Genetic analysis of chromosome pairing, recombination, and cell cycle control during first meiotic prophase in mammalS. Endocrinol. Rev. 27:398-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/er.2005-0017.
23. Hogan B, Beddington R, Costantini F, Lacey E. 1994. Manipulating the mouse embryo: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, NY.
24. Gosden R, Lee B. 2010. Portrait of an oocyte: our obscure origin. J. Clin. Invest. 120:973-983. http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI41294.
25. Racki WJ, Richter JD. 2006. CPEB controls oocyte growth and follicle development in the mouse. Development 133:4527-4537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.02651.
26. Ciccia A, Elledge SJ. 2010. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with kniveS. Mol. Cell 40:179-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019.
27. Baudat F, Manova K, Yuen JP, Jasin M, Keeney S. 2000. Chromosome synapsis defects and sexually dimorphic meiotic progression in mice lacking Spo11. Mol. Cell 6:989-998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765 (00)00098-8.
28. Romanienko PJ, Camerini-Otero RD. 2000. The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsiS. Mol. Cell 5:975-987.
29. Lydall D, Nikolsky Y, Bishop DK, Weinert T. 1996. A meiotic recombination checkpoint controlled by mitotic checkpoint geneS. Nature 383: 840-843. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/383840a0.
30. Roeder GS, Bailis JM. 2000. The pachytene checkpoint. Trends Genet. 16:395-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02080-1.
31. Marcon E, Moens PB. 2005. The evolution of meiosis: recruitment and modification of somatic DNA-repair proteinS. Bioessays 27:795-808. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bieS.20264.
32. Svetlanov A, Cohen PE. 2004. Mismatch repair proteins, meiosis, and mice: understanding the complexities of mammalian meiosiS. Exp. Cell ReS. 296:71-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.03.020.
33. Hunt PA, Hassold TJ. 2002. Sex matters in meiosiS. Science 296:2181-2183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1071907.
34. Mostoslavsky G, Kotton DN, Fabian AJ, Gray JT, Lee JS, Mulligan RC. 2005. Efficiency of transduction of highly purified murine hematopoietic stem cells by lentiviral and oncoretroviral vectors under conditions of minimal in vitro manipulation. Mol. Ther. 11:932-940. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.01.005.
35. Banin S, Moyal L, Shieh S, Taya Y, Anderson CW, Chessa L, Smorodinsky NI, Prives C, Reiss Y, Shiloh Y, Ziv Y. 1998. Enhanced phosphorylation of p53 by ATM in response to DNA damage. Science 281: 1674-1677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5383.1674.
36. Canman CE, Lim DS, Cimprich KA, Taya Y, Tamai K, Sakaguchi K, Appella E, Kastan MB, Siliciano JD. 1998. Activation of the ATM kinase by ionizing radiation and phosphorylation of p53. Science 281:1677-1679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5383.1677.
37. Burma S, Chen BP, Murphy M, Kurimasa A, Chen DJ. 2001. ATM phosphorylates histone H2AX in response to DNA double-strand breakS. J. Biol. Chem. 276:42462-42467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. C100466 200.
38. Bensimon A, Aebersold R, Shiloh Y. 2011. Beyond ATM: the protein kinase landscape of theDNAdamage response. FEBS Lett. 585:1625-1639. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2011.05.013.
39. Kim DA, Lee BL, Suh EK. 2011. Ionizing radiation-induced TAp63alpha phosphorylation at C-terminal S/TQ motifs requires the N-terminal transactivation (TA) domain. Cell Cycle 10:840-849. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.10.5.15008.
40. Wymann MP, Bulgarelli-Leva G, Zvelebil MJ, Pirola L, Vanhaesebroeck B, Waterfield MD, Panayotou G. 1996. Wortmannin inactivates phosphoinositide 3-kinase by covalent modification of Lys-802, a residue involved in the phosphate transfer reaction. Mol. Cell. Biol. 4:1722-1733.
41. Bakkenist CJ, Kastan MB. 2003. DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation. Nature 421: 499-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature01368.
42. Paull TT, Rogakou EP, Yamazaki V, Kirchgessner CU, Gellert M, Bonner WM. 2000. A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage. Curr. Biol. 10:886-895. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00610-2.
43. Peng A, Maller JL. 2010. Serine/threonine phosphatases in the DNA damage response and cancer. Oncogene 29:5977-5988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2010.371.
44. Peng A, Lewellyn AL, Schiemann WP, Maller JL. 2010. Repo-man controls a protein phosphatase 1-dependent threshold for DNA damage checkpoint activation. Curr. Biol. 20:387-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.01.020.
45. Marangos P, Carroll J. 2012. Oocytes progress beyond prophase in the presence of DNA damage. Curr. Biol. 22:989-994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.063.
46. Turner JM, Mahadevaiah SK, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Nussenzweig A, Xu X, Deng CX, Burgoyne PS. 2005. Silencing of unsynapsed meiotic chromosomes in the mouse. Nat. Genet. 1:41-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1484.
47. Shafman T, Khanna KK, Kedar P, Spring K, Kozlov S, Yen T, Hobson K, Gatei M, Zhang N, Watters D, Egerton M, Shiloh Y, Kharbanda S, Kufe D, Lavin MF. 1997. Interaction between ATM protein and c-Abl in response to DNA damage. Nature 387:520-523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/387520a0.
48. Wang X, Zeng L, Wang J, Chau JF, Lai KP, Jia D, Poonepalli A, Hande MP, Liu H, He G, He L, Li B. 2011. A positive role for c-Abl in Atm and Atr activation in DNA damage response. Cell Death Differ. 18:5-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2010.106.
49. Deng X, Hofmann ER, Villanueva A, Hobert O, Capodieci P, Veach DR, Yin X, Campodonico L, Glekas A, Cordon-Cardo C, Clarkson B, Bornmann WG, Fuks Z, Hengartner MO, Kolesnick R. 2004. Caenorhabditis elegans ABL-1 antagonizes p53-mediated germline apoptosis after ionizing irradiation. Nat. Genet. 36:906-912. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1396.
50. Rutkowski R, Dickinson R, Stewart G, Craig A, Schimpl M, Keyse SM, Gartner A. 2011. Regulation of Caenorhabditis elegans p53/CEP-1-dependent germ cell apoptosis by Ras/MAPK signaling. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002238.
51. Tomasini R, Tsuchihara K, Wilhelm M, Fujitani M, Rufini A, Cheung CC, Khan F, Itie-Youten A, Wakeham A, Tsao MS, Iovanna JL, Squire J, Jurisica I, Kaplan D, Melino G, Jurisicova A, Mak TW. 2008. TAp73 knockout shows genomic instability with infertility and tumor suppressor functionS. Genes Dev. 22:2677-2691. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1695308.
52. Tomasini R, Tsuchihara K, Tsuda C, Lau SK, Wilhelm M, Ruffini A, Tsao MS, Iovanna JL, Jurisicova A, Melino G, Mak TW. 2009. TAp73 regulates the spindle assembly checkpoint by modulating BubR1 activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:797-802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnaS.0812096106.
53. Lu WJ, Chapo J, Roig I, Abrams JM. 2010. Meiotic recombination provokes functional activation of the p53 regulatory network. Science 328: 1278-1281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1185640.
54. Derry WB, Putzke AP, Rothman JH. 2001. Caenorhabditis elegans p53: role in apoptosis, meiosis, and stress resistance. Science 294:591-595. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1065486.
55. Schumacher B, Hofmann K, Boulton S, Gartner A. 2001. The Caenorhabditis elegans homolog of the p53 tumor suppressor is required for DNA damage-induced apoptosiS. Curr. Biol. 11:1722-1727. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00534-6.
56. Al Rashid ST, Dellaire G, Cuddihy A, Jalai F, Vaid M, Coackly C, Folkard M, Xu Y, Chen DJ, Lilge L, Prise KM, Bazett Jones DP, Bristow RG. 2005. Evidence for the direct binding of phosphorylated p53 to sites of DNA breaks in vivO. Cancer ReS. 65:10810-10821. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0729.
57. Wittlinger M, Grabenbauer GG, Sprung CN, Sauer R, Distel LV. 2007. Time- and dose-dependent activation of p53 serine 15 phosphorylation among cell lines with different radiation sensitivity. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 83:245-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09553000701275432.
58. Perez GI, Knudson CM, Leykin L, Korsmeyer SJ, Tilly JL. 1997. Apoptosis- associated signaling pathways are required for chemotherapymediated female germ cell destruction. Nat. Med. 3:1228-1232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm1197-1228.