Student modeling: Supporting personalized instruction, from problem solving to exploratory open-ended activities

AI Magazine

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 13-26

  Conati, Cristina ^a   Kardan, Samad ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; INTELLIGENT VEHICLE HIGHWAY SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

DIFFERENT STAGES; EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES; EDUCATIONAL GAME; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM (ITSS); INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS; PERSONALIZATIONS; PERSONALIZED INSTRUCTION; STUDENT MODELING;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84896292180     PISSN: 07384602     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1609/aimag.v34i3.2483     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Albacete, P. L., and Van Lehn, K. 2000. The Conceptual Helper: An Intelligent Tutoring System for Teaching Fundamental Physics Concepts. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, ed. G. Gauthier, C. Frasson, and K. Vanlehn, 564-573. Berlin: Springer. dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45108-0-60
2. Aleven, V.; McLaren, B.; Roll, I.; and Koedinger, K. 2006. Toward Metacognitive Tutoring: A Model of Help Seeking with a Cognitive Tutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Education 16(2):101-128.
3. Amershi, S.; Carenini, G.; Conati, C.; Mackworth, A. K.; and Poole, D. 2008. Pedagogy and Usability in Interactive Algorithm Visualizations: Designing and Evaluating Cispace. Interacting with Computers 20(1):64-96. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2007. 08.003 (Pubitemid 350267205)
4. Amershi, S., and Conati, C. 2009. Combining Unsupervised and Supervised Classification to Build User Models for Exploratory Learning Environments. Journal of Educational Data Mining 1(1):18-71.
5. Arroyo, I.; Cooper, D. G.; Burleson, W.; Woolf, B. P.; Muldner, K.; and Christopherson, R. 2009. Emotion Sensors Go to School. In Proceeding of the 2009 Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 17-24. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
6. Baker, R. S. J. D; Corbett, A. T.; Gowda, S. M.; Wagner, A. Z.; MacLaren, B. A.; Kauffman, L. R.; Mitchell, A. P.; and Giguere, S. 2010. Contextual Slip and Prediction of Student Performance after Use of an Intelligent Tutor. In User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, ed. P. D. Bra, A. Kobsa, and D. Chin, 52-63. Berlin: Springer
7. Baker, R. S.; Corbett, A. T.; Roll, I.; and Koedinger, K. R. 2008. Developing a Generalizable Detector of When Students Game the System. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 18(3):287-314. dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11257- 007-9045-6
8. Baker, R. S. J. D.; Corbett, A. T.; Koedinger, K. R.; Evenson, S.; Roll, I.; Wagner, A. Z.; Naim, M.; Raspat, J.; Baker, D. J.; and Beck, J. E. 2006. Adapting to When Students Game an Intelligent Tutoring System. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 392-401. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. dx.doi.org/10.1007/11774303-39 (Pubitemid 44117611)
9. Bernardini, A., and Conati, C. 2010. Discovering and Recognizing Student Interaction Patterns in Exploratory Learning Environments. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ed. V. Aleven, J. Kay, and J. Mostow, 125-134. Berlin: Springer. dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13388-6-17 PMid:20843738
10. Changchien, S., and Lu, T. C. 2001. Mining Association Rules Procedure to Support Online Recommendation by Customers and Products Fragmentation. Expert Systems with Applications 20(4):325-335. dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174 (01) 00017-3 (Pubitemid 32404843)
11. Chi, M. T. H.; De Leeuw, N.; Chiu, M. H.; and Lavancher, C. 1994. Eliciting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding. Cognitive Science 18(3):439-477. DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog1803-3
12. Conati, C. 2004. Toward Comprehensive Student Models: Modeling Metacognitive Skills and Affective States in ITS. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 902. Berlin: Springer. dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4- 114 (Pubitemid 39245991)
13. Conati, C.; Gertner, A.; and Van Lehn, K. 2002. Using Bayesian Networks to Manage Uncertainty in Student Modeling. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 12(4):371-417. dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021258506583
14. Conati, C., and MacLaren, H. 2009a. Modeling User Affect from Causes and Effects. In User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, ed. G.-J. Houben, G. McCalla, F. Pianesi, and M. Zancanaro, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4-15. Berlin: Springer. dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02247-0-4
15. Conati, C., and MacLaren, H. 2009b. Empirically Building and Evaluating a Probabilistic Model of User Affect. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 19(3):267-303. dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11257-009-9062-8
16. Conati, C., and Merten, C. 2007. Eye-Tracking for User Modeling in Exploratory Learning Environments: An Empirical Evaluation. Knowledge-Based Systems 20(6):557-574. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys. 2007.04.010 (Pubitemid 47068960)
17. Conati, C.; Merten, C.; Muldner, K.; and Ternes, D. 2005. Exploring Eye Tracking to Increase Bandwidth in User Modeling. In User Modeling 2005, ed. L. Ardissono, P. Brna, and A. Mitrovic, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 357-366. Berlin: Springer. dx.doi.org/10.1007/11527886-47
18. Corbett, A. T., and Anderson, J. R. 1994. Knowledge Tracing: Modeling the Acquisition of Procedural Knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 4(4):253-278. dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01099821
19. D'Mello, S.; Lehman, B.; Sullins, J.; Daigle, R.; Combs, R.; Vogt, K.; Perkins, L.; and Graesser, A. 2010. A Time for Emoting: When Affect-Sensitivity Is and Isn't Effective at Promoting Deep Learning. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring System, Volume Part I, 245-254. Berlin: Springer.
20. D'Mello, S. K., and Graesser, A. 2010. Multimodal Semi-Automated Affect Detection from Conversational Cues, Gross Body Language, and Facial Features. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 20(2):147-187. dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11257-010-9074-4
21. Desmarais, M. C. 2011. Performance Comparison of Item-to-Item Skills Models with the IRT Single Latent Trait Model. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on User Modeling, Adaption, and Personalization, 75-86. Berlin: Springer. dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22362-4-7
22. Freyberger, J.; Heffernan, N.; and Ruiz, C. 2004. Using Association Rules to Guide a Search for Best Fitting Transfer Models of Student Learning. In Workshop on Analyzing Student-Tutor Interactions Logs to Improve Educational Outcomes at Its Conference, 1-4. Berlin: Springer.
23. García, E.; Romero, C.; Ventura, S.; and Castro, C. 2009a. An Architecture for Making Recommendations to Courseware Authors Using Association Rule Mining and Collaborative Filtering. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 19 (1-2) 99-132. dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11257-008-9047-z
24. García, E.; Romero, C.; Ventura, S.; and Castro, C. De 2009b. An Architecture for Making Recommendations to Courseware Authors Using Association Rule Mining and Collaborative Filtering. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 19, 99-132.
25. Gong, Y.; Beck, J. E.; and Heffernan, N. T. 2011. How to Construct More Accurate Student Models: Comparing and Optimizing Knowledge Tracing and Performance Factor Analysis. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Education. 21(3):27-45.
26. Hall, M.; Frank, E.; Holmes, G.; Pfahringer, B.; Reutemann, P.; and Witten, I. H. 2009. The Weka Data Mining Software: An Update. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 11(1):10-18. dx.doi.org/10.1145/1656274.1656278
27. Isotani, S. and Mizoguchi, R. 2008. Theory-Driven Group Formation Through Ontologies. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, ed. B. P. Woolf, E. Aïmeur, R. Nkambou, and S. Lajoie, 646-655. Berlin: Springer. dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7-67
28. Johnson, W. L. 2010. Serious Use of a Serious Game for Language Learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 20(2):175-195.
29. Kardan, S., and Conati, C. 2011. A Framework for Capturing Distinguishing User Interaction Behaviours in Novel Interfaces. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 6-8 July.
30. Kardan, S., and Conati, C. 2012a. Providing Adaptive Support in an Exploratory Learning Environment by Mining User Interaction Data. Paper presented at the 5th International Workshop on Intelligent Support for Exploratory Environments (ISEE 2012), Chania, Greece, 14-18 June. PMid:22634040
31. Kardan, S., and Conati, C. 2012b. Exploring Gaze Data for Determining User Learning with an Interactive Simulation. In User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, ed. J. Masthoff, B. Mobasher, M. Desmarais, and R. Nkambou, 126-138. Berlin: Springer. dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31454-4-11
32. Kim, Y. S., and Yum, B.-J. 2011. Recommender System Based on Click Stream Data Using Association Rule Mining. Expert Systems with Applications 38(10):13320-13327. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.154
33. Kodaganallur, V.; Weitz, R. R.; and Rosenthal, D. 2005. A Comparison of Model-Tracing and Constraint-Based Intelligent Tutoring Paradigms. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 15(2):117-144.
34. Koedinger, K. R.; Anderson, J. R.; Hadley, W. H.; and Mark, M. A. 1997. Intelligent Tutoring Goes to School in the Big City. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 8(1):30-43.
35. Koedinger, K.; Brunskill, E.; Baker, R. S. J. D.; McLaughlin, E. A.; and Stamper, J. 2013. New Potentials for Data-Driven Intelligent Tutoring System Development and Optimization. AI Magazine 34 (3).
36. Leelawong, K., and Biswas, G. 2008. Designing Learning by Teaching Agents: The Betty's Brain System. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 18(3):181-208.
37. Lynch, C.; Pinkwart, N.; Ashley, K.; and Aleven, V. 2008. What Do Argument Diagrams Tell Us about Students' Aptitude or Experience? A Statistical Analysis in an Ill-Defined Domain. Paper presented at the Workshop on Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Ill-Defined Domains: Assessment and Feedback in Ill-Defined Domains. Montreal, Canada, 23 June.
38. Manske, M., and Conati, C. 2005. Modelling Learning in an Educational Game, In Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning Through Intelligent and Socially Informed Technology, 411-418. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
39. Mayo, M., and Mitrovic, A. 2001. Optimising Its Behaviour with Bayesian Networks and Decision Theory. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12(2):124-153.
40. Merceron, A., and Yacef, K. 2003. A Web-Based Tutoring Tool with Mining Facilities to Improve Teaching and Learning. Paper presented at the 11th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Sydney, Australia, 20-24 July.
41. Milligan, G. W., and Cooper, M. C. 1985. An Examination of Procedures for Determining the Number of Clusters in a Data Set. Psychometrika 50(2):159-179. dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02294245
42. Mitrovic, A. 2012. Fifteen Years of Constraint-Based Tutors: What We Have Achieved and Where We Are Going. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22 (1-2) 39-72. dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11257-011-9105-9
43. Muldner, K.; Burleson, W.; and Vanlehn, K. 2010. "Yes!": Using Tutor and Sensor Data to Predict Moments of Delight During Instructional Activities. In User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, ed. P. Bra, A. Kobsa, and D. Chin, 159-170. Berlin: Springer. dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642- 13470-8-16
44. Muldner, K., and Conati, C. 2007. Evaluating a Decision-Theoretic Approach to Tailored Example Selection. In Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 483-488. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
45. Muldner, K., and Conati, C. 2010. Scaffolding Metacognitive Skills for Effective Analogical Problem Solving Via Tailored Example Selection. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Education 20(2):99-136.
46. Perera, D.; Kay, J.; Koprinska, I.; Yacef, K.; and Zaïane, O. R. 2009. Clustering and Sequential Pattern Mining of Online Collaborative Learning Data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 21(6):759-772. dx.doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2008. 138
47. Qu, L., and Johnson, W. L. 2005. Detecting the Learner's Motivational States in an Interactive Learning Environment. In Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning Through Intelligent and Socially Informed Technology, 547-554. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
48. Roll, I.; Aleven, V.; McLaren, B. M.; and Koedinger, K. R. 2007. Can Help Seeking Be Tutored? Searching for the Secret Sauce of Metacognitive Tutoring, 203-210. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
49. Romero, C.; Romero, J. R.; Luna, J. M.; and Ventura, S. 2010. Mining Rare Association Rules from E-Learning Data. Paper presented at the Third International Conference of Educational Data Mining, Pittsburgh, PA, 11-13 June.
50. Romero, C., and Ventura, S. 2010. Educational Data Mining: A Review of the State of the Art. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews 40(6):601-618. dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSM-CC.2010. 2053532
51. Romero, C.; Ventura, S.; Zafra, A.; and Bra, P. 2009. Applying Web Usage Mining for Personalizing Hyperlinks in Web-Based Adaptive Educational Systems. Computers and Education 53(3):828-840. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.003
52. Rossi, F.; Van Beek, P.; and Walsh, T. 2006. Handbook of Constraint Programming. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
53. Shute, V. J. 1993. A Comparison of Learning Environments: All That Glitters. In Computers and Cognitive Tools, Technology in Education, 47-73. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
54. Thabtah, F. 2007. A Review of Associative Classification Mining. The Knowledge Engineering Review 22(1):37-65. dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0269888907001026 (Pubitemid 46825798)
55. Van Lehn, K. 2006. The Behavior of Tutoring Systems. International Journal of Artifical Intelligence Education 16(3):227-265.
56. Winne, P. H. 2011. A Cognitive and Metacognitive Analysis of Self-Regulated Learning. Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance, 15-32. London: Routledge.
57. Zhang, C., and Zhang, S. 2002. Association Rule Mining: Models and Algorithms. Berlin: Springer. dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46027-6
58. Zhang, Y., and Jiao, J. R. 2007. An Associative Classification-Based Recommendation System for Personalization In B2C E-Commerce Applications. Expert Systems with Applications 33(1):357-367. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.05.005 (Pubitemid 46150042)