Performance comparison of item-to-item skills models with the IRT single latent trait model

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6787 LNCS, Issue , 2011, Pages 75-86

  Desmarais, Michel C ^a  

^a ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bayesian Models; IRT; Learner models; TAN

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; CLASSIFIERS; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

BAYESIAN CLASSIFIER; BAYESIAN MODEL; INTELLIGENT LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; LATENT TRAIT MODEL; LEARNER MODEL; PERFORMANCE COMPARISON; PREDICTIVE PERFORMANCE; TREE AUGMENTED NAIVE BAYES;

PERSONNEL TRAINING;

EID: 79960335238     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-22362-4_7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Amershi, S., Conati, C.: Unsupervised and supervised machine learning in user modeling for intelligent learning environments. In: IUI 2007: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 72-81. ACM, New York (2007)
2. Ayers, E., Nugent, R., Dean, N.: A comparison of student skill knowledge estimates. In: 2nd International Conference on Educational Data mining, Cordoba, Spain, pp. 1-10 (2009)
3. Baker, F.B.: Item Response Theory Parameter Estimation Techniques. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York (1992)
4. Carmona, C., Millán, E., Pérez-de-la-Cruz, J.-L., Trella, M., Conejo, R.: Introducing Prerequisite Relations in a Multi-layered Bayesian Student Model. In: Ardissono, L., Brna, P., Mitrović, A. (eds.) UM 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3538, pp. 347-356. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
5. Conati, C., Gertner, A., VanLehn, K.: Using Bayesian networks to manage uncertainty in student modeling. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 12(4), 371-417 (2002)
6. Desmarais, M.C., Meshkinfam, P., Gagnon, M.: Learned student models with item to item knowledge structures. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 16(5), 403-434 (2006)
7. Desmarais, M.C., Pu, X.: A bayesian inference adaptive testing framework and its comparison with Item Response Theory. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 15, 291-323 (2005)
8. Doignon, J.P., Falmagne, J.C.: Knowledge Spaces. Springer, Berlin (1999)
9. Falmagne, J.C., Cosyn, E., Doignon, J.P., Thiéry, N.: The assessment of knowledge, in theory and in practice. In: Missaoui, R., Schmidt, J. (eds.) Formal Concept Analysis. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3874, pp. 61-79. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
10. Friedman, N., Geiger, D., Goldszmidt, M.: Bayesian network classifiers. Machine Learning 29(2-3), 131-163 (1997)
11. Heller, J., Hockemeyer, C., Albert, D.: Applying competence structures for peer tutor recommendations in CSCL environments. In: Kinshuk, L.C., Sutinen, E., Sampson, D., Aedo, I., Uden, L., Kähkönen, E. (eds.) The 4th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 1050-1051. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2004)
12. Heller, J., Steiner, C., Hockemeyer, C., Albert, D.: Competence-based knowledge structures for personalised learning. International Journal on E-Learning 5(1), 75-88 (2006)
13. Hockemeyer, C., Held, T., Albert, D.: Rath - a relational adaptive tutoring hypertext www-environment based on knowledge space theory (1997)
14. Hornik, K., Buchta, C., Hothorn, T., Meyer, D., Zeileis, A.: The RWeka package (2006)
15. Liu, C.L.: A simulation-based experience in learning structures of bayesian networks to represent how students learn composite concepts. I. J. Artificial Intelligence in Education 18(3), 237-285 (2008)
16. Pavlik, P.I., Cen, H., Koedinger, K.R.: Learning factors transfer analysis: Using learning curve analysis to automatically generate domain models. In: Barnes, T., Desmarais, M.C., Romero, C., Ventura, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Educational Data Mining, EDM 2009, Cordoba, Spain, July 1-3, pp. 121-130 (2009), www.educationaldatamining.org
17. Rizopoulos, D.: ltm: An r package for latent variable modelling and item response theory analyses. Journal of Statistical Software 17(5), 1-25 (2006)
18. Sing, T., Sander, O., Beerenwinkel, N., Lengauer, T.: Rocr: visualizing classifier performance in r. Bioinformatics 21(20), 3940-3941 (2005), http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/21/20/3940.abstract
19. Stamper, J.C., Barnes, T., Croy, M.J.: Extracting student models for intelligent tutoring systems. In: AAAI 2007, pp. 1900-1901. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2007)
20. Tatsuoka, K.K.: Rule space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement 20, 345-354 (1983)
21. van der Linden, W.J., Hambleton, R.K. (eds.): Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
22. VanLehn, K., Niu, Z., Siler, S., Gertner, A.S.: Student modeling from conventional test data: A bayesian approach without priors. In: Goettl, B.P., Halff, H.M., Redfield, C.L., Shute, V.J. (eds.) ITS 1998. LNCS, vol. 1452, pp. 434-443. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
23. Vomlel, J.: Bayesian networks in educational testing. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge Based Systems 12, 83-100 (2004)
24. Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: Data mining. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos (2000)