Evaluating a decision-theoretic approach to tailored example selection

IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 483-488

  Muldner, Kasia ^a   Conati, Cristina ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION-THEORETIC; EMPIRICAL FINDINGS; EXAMPLE SELECTION; FOSTER LEARNING; ITS EVALUATION; TWO-PHASE PROCESS; USER MODELS; WORKED-OUT EXAMPLES;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 77954567608     PISSN: 10450823     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. J. R. Anderson. Rules of the Mind. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1993.
2. R. Atkinson, A. Renkl and D. Wortham. Learning from Examples: Instructional Principles from the Worked Examples Research. Review of Educational Research, 70(2):181-214, 2002. (Pubitemid 33232413)
3. M. Veloso and J. Carbonell. Derivational Analogy in PRODIGY: Automating Case Acquisition, Storage, and Utilization. Machine Learning, 10(3):249-278, 1993.
4. M. T. H. Chi. Self-Explaining: The dual process of generating inferences and repairing mental models. Advances in Instructional Psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pages 161-238, 2000.
5. M. T. H. Chi, M. Bassok, M. W. Lewis, P. Reimann and R. Glaser. Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 15:145-182, 1989.
6. C. Conati, K. Muldner, and G. Carenini. From Example Studying to Problem Solving via Tailored Computer-Based Meta-Cognitive Scaffolding: Hypotheses and Design. Journal of Technology, Instruction, Cognition & Learning, in press.
7. C. Conati, and K. VanLehn. Toward Computer-based Support of Meta-cognitive Skills: A Computational Framework to Coach Self-Explanation. Int. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11:389-415, 2000.
8. M. Mayo and A. Mitrovic. Optimizing ITS behavior with Bayesian networks and decision theory. Int. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12:124-153, 2001.
9. C. Murray, J. Mostow and K. VanLehn. Looking ahead to select Tutorial Actions: a Decision-Theoretic approach. Int. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14(3-4):235-278, 2004.
10. S. Nogry, S. Jean-Daubias and N. Duclosson. ITS Evaluation in Classroom: The Case of Ambre-AWP, In Proc. of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pages 511-520, Maceio, Brazil, 2004. Springer.
11. L. Novick. Some Determinants of Successful Analogical Transfer in the Solution of Algebra Word Problems. Thinking and Reasoning, 1(1):5-30, 1995.
12. K. VanLehn. Analogy Events: How Examples are Used During Problem Solving. Cognitive Science, 22(3):347-388, 1998. (Pubitemid 128179875)
13. K. VanLehn. Rule-Learning Events in the Acquisition of a Complex Skill: An Evaluation of Cascade. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8:71-125, 1999.
14. G. Weber. Individual Selection of Examples in an Intelligent Learning Environment. Int. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 7(1):3-33, 1996.