Alternatives considered but not disclosed: The ambiguous role of powerpoint in cross-project learning

Alternatives Considered But Not Disclosed: The Ambiguous Role of PowerPoint in Cross-Project Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-198

  Schoeneborn, Dennis ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895347094     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-8350-5528-5     Document Type: Book

References (335)

1. Abrahamson, E., & Fairchild, G. (1999). Management fashion: Lifecycles, triggers, and collective learning processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 708-740.
2. Alvesson, M. (1993). Organizations as rhetoric: Knowledge-intensive firms and the struggle with ambiguity. Journal of Management Studies, 30(6), 997-1015.
3. Alvesson, M. (2000). Social identity and the problem of loyalty in knowledge-intensive companies. Journal of Management Studies, 37(8), 1101-1123.
4. Andersen, N. A. (2003). The undecidability of decisions. In: T. Bakken, & T. Hernes (Eds.). Autopoietic organization theory: Drawing on Niklas Luhmann's social systems perspective, (pp. 235-258). Oslo: Copenhagen Business School Press.
5. Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49(4), 571-582.
6. Argyris, C. (1976). Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3), 363-377.
7. Argyris, C. (1992). On organizational learning. Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Argyris, C, & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley.
9. Armbrüster, T. (2004). Rationality and its symbols: Signalling effects and subjectification in management consulting. Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), 1247-1269.
10. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11. Ayas, K., & Zeniuk, N. (2001). Project-based learning: Building communities of reflective practitioners. Management Learning, 32(1), 61-76.
12. Baecker, D. (1993). Die Form des Unternehmens. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
13. Baecker, D. (1999). Organisation als System. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
14. Baecker, D. (2003). Organisation und Management. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
15. Bakken, T., & Hernes, T. (Eds.). (2003). Autopoietic organization theory: Drawing on Niklas Luhmann's social systems perspective. Oslo: Copenhagen Business School Press.
16. Baskerville, R. L., & Wood-Harper, A. T. (1996). A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. Journal of Information Technology, 11(3), 235-246.
17. Bauman, Z. (1991). Modernity and ambivalence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
18. Baumard, P., & Starbuck, W. H. (2005). Learning from failures: Why it may not happen. Long Range Planning, 38(3), 281-298.
19. Berends, H., Boersma, K., & Weggeman, M. (2003). The structuration of organizational learning. Human Relations, 56(9), 1035-1056.
20. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.
21. Beyes, T. (2003). Kontingenz und Management. Hamburg: Kovac.
22. Blaschke, S., & Schoeneborn, D. (2006). The forgotten function of forgetting. Revisiting exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Soziale Systeme, 12(1), 99-119.
23. Bloomfield, B. P., & Vurdubakis, T. (1994). Re-presenting technology: IT consultancy reports as textual reality constructions. Sociology, 28(2), 455-477.
24. Blühdorn, I. (2000). An offer one might prefer to refuse. The systems theoretical legacy of Niklas Luhmann. European Journal of Social Theory, 3(3), 339-354.
25. Bogenrieder, I., & Nooteboom, B. (2004). Learning groups: What types are there? A theoretical analysis and an empirical study in a consultancy firm. Organization Studies, 25(2), 287-313.
26. Bohnsack, R. (1989). Rekonstruktive Sozialforschung. Einführung in Methodologie und Praxis qualitativer Forschung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
27. Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research. A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991-1013.
28. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57.
29. Brunsson, N. (1989). The organization of hypocrisy. Talk, descisions and action in organizations. Chichester: Wiley.
30. Burgleman, R. A. (2002). Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(2), 325-357.
31. Cannon, M. D., & Edmondson, A. C. (2005). Failing to learn and learning to fail (intelligently). How organizations put failure to work to innovate and improve. Long Range Planning, 38(3), 299-319.
32. Carley, K. M. (1992). Organizational learning and personnel turnover. Organization Science, 3(1), 20-47.
33. Castor, T. R. (2005). Constructing social reality in organizational decision making. Account vocabularies in a diversity discussion. Management Communication Quarterly, 18(4), 479-508.
34. Cheney, G., & Christensen, L. T. (2004). Organizational identity: Linkages between internal and external communication. In: M. J. Hatch, & M. Schultz (Eds.). Organizational identity: A reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Clair, R. P. (1999). Standing still in an ancient field. A contemporary look at the organizational communication discipline. Management Communication Quarterly, 13(2), 283-293.
36. Clark, T. (1995). Managing consultants. Consultancy as the management of impressions. Buckingham: Open University Press.
37. Clark, T., & Fincham, R. (Eds.). (2002). Critical consulting: New perspectives on the management advice industry. Oxford: Blackwell.
38. Clark, T., & Salaman, G. (1996). Telling tales: Management consultancy as the art of storytelling. In: D. Grant, & C. Oswick (Eds.). Metaphor and organizations, (pp. 167-184). London: Sage.
39. Clarke, L. (1999). Mission improbable. Using fantasy documents to tame disaster. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Clarke, L. (2005). Worst cases: Terror and catastrophe in the popular imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1-25.
42. Collins, D. (2004). Who put the con in consultancy? Fads, recipes and 'vodka margarine'. Human Relations, 57(5), 553-572.
43. Conrad, C. (1985). Strategic organizational communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
44. Cooren, F. (2000). The organizing property of communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
45. Cooren, F. (2004). Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings. Organization, 11(3), 373-394.
46. Cooren, F., & Fairhurst, G. T. (forthcoming). Dislocation and stabilization: How to scale up from interactions to organization. In: L. L. Putnam, & A. M. Nicotera (Eds.). The communicative constitution of organization: Centering organizational communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47. Cooren, F., & Taylor, J. R. (1997). Organization as an effect of mediation: Redefining the link between organization and communication. Communication Theory, 7(3), 219-259.
48. Corman, S. R. (2000). The need for common ground. In: S. R. Corman, & M. S. Poole (Eds.). Perspectives on organizational communication. Finding common ground, (pp. 3-13). New York: Guilford Press.
49. Cornelissen, J. P. (2005). Beyond compare: Metaphor in organization theory. The Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 751-764.
50. Cunha, J. J. (2006). Making the numbers: Agency in computer-generated formal representations of saleswork. Doctoral dissertation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [Online]. Available: http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/ 1721.1/34682/1/68906971.pdf. [09/30/2007].
51. Cunningham, W., & Leuf, B. (2001). The Wiki Way. Quick collaboration on the Web. Boston: Addison Wesley.
52. Currie, G., & Kerrin, M. (2004). The limits of a technological fix to knowledge management. Epistemological, political and cultural issues in the case of Intranet implementation. Management Learning, 35(1), 9-29.
53. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
54. Czarniawska, B. (2001). Having hope in paralogy. Human Relations, 54(1), 13-21.
55. Czarniawska, B., & Mazza, C. (2003). Consulting as a liminal space. Human Relations, 56(3), 267-290.
56. Daft R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Towards a model of organizations as interpretation systems. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284-295.
57. Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1997). Working knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
58. Davenport T. H., DeLong, D. W., & Beers, M. C. (1998). Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan Management Review, 39(2), 43-57.
59. de Holan, P. M., & Phillips, N. (2004). Remembrance of things past? The dynamics of organizational forgetting. Management Science, 50(11), 1603-1613.
60. Denzin, N. (1970). Strategies of multiple triangulation. In: N. Denzin (Ed.). The research act, (pp. 297-331). New York: McGraw-Hill.
61. Derrida, J. (1988). Limited Inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
62. Derrida, J. (2002), Negotiations: interventions and interviews, 1971-2001. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
63. DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121-147.
64. Donaldson, A., Lank, E., & Maher, J. (2005). Making the invisible visible: How a voluntary organization is learning from its work with groups and communities. Journal of Change Management, 5(2), 191-206.
65. Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. New York: Sage.
66. Edmondson, A. C. (1996). Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32(1), 5-28.
67. Eisenberg, E. M., & Witten, M. G. (1987). Reconsidering openness in organizational communication. The Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 418-426.
68. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
69. Eisenhardt, K. M. & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures 1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 504-529.
70. Elsbach, K. D., & Sutton, R. I. (1992). Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. The Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 699-738.
71. Esser, H. (2002). Wo steht die Soziologie? Soziologie. Forum der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie, 4(1), 20-32.
72. Fairhurst, G. T., & Putnam, L. L. (1999). Reflections on the organization-communication equivalency question: The contributions of James Taylor and his colleagues. Communication Review, 3(1-2), 1-19.
73. Feldman, M. S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11(6), 611-629.
74. Feldman, M. S., & March, J. G. (1981). Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1), 171-186.
75. Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94-118.
76. Flick, U. (1992). Triangulation revisited: Strategy of validation or alternative? Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 22(2), 175-198.
77. Flusser, V. (1996). Kommunikologie. Mannheim: Bollmann.
78. Forster, N. (1994). The analysis of company documentation. In: C. Cassell, & G. Symon (Eds.). Qualitative methods in organizational research, (pp. 147-166). London: Sage.
79. Fortune, J., & Peters, G. (1995). Learning from mistakes-the systems approach. Chichester: Wiley.
80. Friedrichs, R. W. (1970). A sociology of sociology. New York: Free Press.
81. Galliers, R., Mingers, J., & Jackson, M. (1997). Organization theory and systems thinking: the benefits of partnership. Organization, 4(2), 269-278.
82. Gardner, W. L., & Martinko, M. J. (1988). Impression management in organizations. Journal of Management, 14(2), 321-338.
83. Garrick, J., & Clegg, S. (2001). Stressed-out knowledge workers in performative times: A postmodern take on project-based learning. Management Learning, 32(1), 119-134.
84. Garud, R., & Karnoe, P. (Eds.). (2001). Path dependence and creation. London: Lawrence Erl-baum.
85. Geser, H. (1982). Gesellschaftliche Folgeprobleme und Grenzen des Wachstums formaler Organisationen. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 11(2), 113-132.
86. Gherardi, S., & Turner, B. (2002). Real men don't collect soft data. In: A. M. Huberman, & M. B. Miles (Eds.). The qualitative researcher's companion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
87. Gibson, B., Gregory, J., & Robinson, P. G. (2005). The intersection between systems theory and grounded theory: the emergence of the grounded systems observer. Qualitative Sociology Review, 1(2). [Online]. Available: http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume2/QSR-1-2-Gibson-Gregory- Robinson.pdf. [09/30/2007].
88. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. London: Macmillan.
89. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
90. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
91. Glückler, J., & Armbrüster, T. (2003). Bridging uncertainty in management consulting: The mechanisms of trust and networked reputation. Organization Studies, 24(2), 269-297.
92. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
93. Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action, (2 volumes). Boston: Beacon Press.
94. Habscheid, S., & Weik, E. (2003). Talking structure: The shaping of organizational reality in consulting conversations. In: A. Kieser, & A. P. Müller (Eds). Communication in organizations. Structures and practices. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
95. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929-964.
96. Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What's your strategy for managing knowledge. Harvard Business Review, 77(2), 106-116.
97. Harris, J. (2005). The ordering of things. Organization in Bruno Latour. In: C. Jones, & R. Munro (Eds.). Contemporary organization theory, (pp. 178-191). Oxford: Blackwell.
98. Harrison, J. R., & March, J. G. (1984). Decision making and postdecision surprises. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), 26-42.
99. Hartley, J. F. (1994). Case studies in organizational research. In: C. G. Cassell, & G. Symon (Eds.). Qualitative methods in organizational research. A practical guide, (pp. 208-299). London: Sage.
100. Hatch, M. J. (1997). Organization theory: modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
101. Heaton, L., & Taylor, J. R. (2002). Knowledge management and professional work: A communication perspective on the knowledge-based organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(2), 210-236.
102. Hedberg, B. L., Nystrom, P. C., & Starbuck, W. H. (1976). Camping on seesaws: Prescriptions for a self-designing organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 41-65.
103. Hendry, J., & Seidl, D. (2003). The structure and significance of strategic episodes: Social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 175-196.
104. Hernes, T., & Bakken, T. (2003). Implications of self-reference: Niklas Luhmann's autopoi-esis and organization theory. Organization Studies, 24(9), 1511-1535.
105. Heusinkveld, S., & Benders, J. (2005). Contested commodification: Consultancies and their struggle with new concept development. Human Relations, 58(3), 283-310.
106. Hilse, H. (2000). Kognitive Wende in Management und Beratung: Wissensmanagement aus sozialwissenschaftlicher Perspektive. Wiesbaden: DUV.
107. Hobday, M. (2000). The project-based organisation: an ideal form for managing complex products and systems? Research Policy, 29(7-8), 871-893.
108. Hirschauer, S., & Bergmann, J. (2002). Willkommen im Club! Eine Anregung zu mehr Kon-tingenzfreudigkeit in der qualitativen Sozialforschung- Kommentar zu A. Nassehi und I. Saake in ZfS 1/2002. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 31(4), 332-336.
109. Hofstede, G. (1991). Culture and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
110. Huber, G. P. (2001). Transfer of knowledge in knowledge management systems: Unexplored issues and suggested studies. European Journal of Information Systems, 10(2), 72-79.
111. Husted, K., & Michailova, S. (2002). Diagnosing and fighting knowledge sharing hostility. Organizational Dynamics, 31(1), 60-73.
112. Jones, E. E., & Wortman, C. B. (1973). Ingratiation: An attributional approach. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
113. th). Der Philosoph Fichte über PowerPoint. Kein Vortrag mehr ohne eine begleitende Folien-und Bilderfolge. Verbesserte Informationsübertragung oder technischer Selbstlauf? Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung, No. 27, p. 70.
114. Keegan, A., & Turner, J. R. (2001). Quantity versus quality in project-based learning practices. Management Learning, 32(1), 77-98.
115. th). Killing me Microsoftly with PowerPoint. Chicago Tribune Magazine, No. 1, pp. 28-29.
116. Kieser, A. (1997). Rhetoric and myth in management fashion. Organization, 4(1), 49-74.
117. Kieser, A. (1998). Über die allmähliche Verfertigung der Organisation beim Reden. Industrielle Beziehungen, 5(1), 45-75.
118. Kieser, A. (1999). Human Relations-Bewegung und Organisationspsychologie. In: A. Kieser (Ed.). Organisationstheorien, (pp. 101-132). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
119. Kieser, A. (2003). Managers as marionettes? Using fashion theories to explain the success of consultancies. In: A. Kipping, & L. Engwall (Eds.). Management consulting: Emergence and dynamics of a knowledge industry, (pp. 167-183). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
120. Kieser, A., & Hegele, C. (1998). Kommunikation im organisatorischen Wandel. Stuttgart: Schäf-fer-Poeschel.
121. Kieser, A., & Kubicek, H. (1977). Organisation. Berlin: De Gruyter.
122. Kieser, A., & Müller, A. P. (Eds). (2003). Communication in organizations: Structures and practices. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
123. Kieserling, A. (1999). Kommunikation unter Anwesenden. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
124. King, M., & Thornhill, C. (2003). 'Will the real Niklas Luhmann stand up, please'. A reply to John Mingers. Sociological Review, 51(2), 276-285.
125. King, N. (1994). The qualitative research interview. In: C. G. Cassell, & G. Symon (Eds.). Qualitative methods in organizational research. A practical guide, (pp. 118-134). London: Sage.
126. Kipping, A. (2002). Trapped in their wave. The evolution of management consultancies. In: T. Clark, & R. Fincham (Eds.). Critical consulting: New perspectives on the management advice industry, (pp. 28-49). Oxford: Blackwell.
127. Kipping, A., & Engwall, L. (2003). Introduction: Management consulting as a knowledge industry. In: A. Kipping, & L. Engwall (Eds.). Management consulting: Emergence and dynamics of a knowledge industry, (pp. 1-18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
128. rd ed.). München: Fink.
129. Knodt, E. M. (1995). Foreword. In: N. Luhmann (Ed.). Social Systems, (pp. ix-xxxvi). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
130. Knudsen, M. (2006). Displacing the paradox of decision making. In: D. Seidl, & K. H. Becker (Eds.). Niklas Luhmann and organization studies, (pp. 107-126). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
131. Koch, C, & Bendixen, M. (2005). Multiple perspectives on organizing: Projects between tyranny and perforation. Building Research & Information, 33(6), 536-546.
132. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis. An introduction of its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
133. th ed.). Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
134. Kron, T. (Ed.). (2002). Luhmann modelliert: Sozionische Ansätze zur Simulation von Kommunikationsmodellen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
135. Kühl, S. (2002). Jenseits der Face-to-Face-Organisation. Wachstumsprozesse in kapitalmarktorientierten Unternehmen. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 31(3), 186-210.
136. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
137. Kunkel, B. (2006). Indecision: a novel. New York: Random House.
138. Kvale, S. (1983). The qualitative research interview: A phenomenological and a hermeneuti-cal mode of understanding. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 14(2), 171-196.
139. rd ed.). Weinheim: Beltz.
140. Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In: J. Law (Ed.). Power, action and belief, (pp. 264-280). London: Routledge.
141. Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory. A few clarifications. Soziale Welt, 47(4), 369-381.
142. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: An essay on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
143. Latour, B. (2000). When things strike back: A possible contribution of 'science studies' to the social sciences. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 107-123.
144. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
145. Law, J., & Hassard, J. (Eds.). (1999). Actor-network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell.
146. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1-30.
147. Lee, A. S., & Baskerville, R. (2003). Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 14(3), 221-243.
148. Lee, D. B. (2000). The society of society: The grand finale of Niklas Luhmann. Sociological Theory, 18(2), 320-330.
149. Lee, R. A., & Lawrence, P. A. (1985). Organizational behavior: Politics at work. London: Hutchinson.
150. Legge, K. (2002). On knowledge, consultants and the selling of TQM. In: T. Clark, & R. Fincham (Eds.). Critical consulting: New perspectives on the management advice industry, (pp. 74-90). Oxford: Blackwell.
151. Leseure, M. J., & Brookes, N. J. (2004). Knowledge management benchmarks for project management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(1), 103-116.
152. Lesser, E. L., & Storck, J. (2001). Communities of practice and organizational performance. IBM Systems Journal, 40(4), 831-841.
153. Liebowitz, S. J., & Margolis, S. E. (1995). Path dependence, lock-in, and history. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 11(1), 205-226.
154. Linstead, S. (1999). An introduction to the textuality of organizations. Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Society, 5(1), 1-10.
155. th). Mit Zuversicht in die nächsten fünf Jahre. Anmerkungen zur Entwicklung der Managementberatungen in Deutschland. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, No. 201, p. B1.
156. Luhmann, N. (1964). Funktionen und Folgen formaler Organisation. Berlin: Duncker & Hum-blot.
157. Luhmann, N. (1981a). The improbability of communication. International Social Science Journal, 23(1), 122-32.
158. Luhmann, N. (1981b). Unverständliche Wissenschaft: Probleme einer theorieeigenen Sprache. In: N. Luhmann (Ed.). Soziologische Aufklärung 3-Soziales System, Gesellschaft, Organisation, (pp. 170-177). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
159. Luhmann, N. (1981c). Organisation und Entscheidung. In: N. Luhmann (Ed.). Soziologische Aufklärung 3-Soziales System, Gesellschaft, Organisation, (pp. 335-389). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
160. Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
161. Luhmann, N. (1986). The autopoiesis of social systems. In: F. Geyer, & J. van der Zouwen (Eds.). Sociocybernetic paradoxes: Observation, control and evolution of self-steering systems, (pp. 171-192). London: Sage.
162. Luhmann, N. (1988). Organisation. In: W. Küpper, & G. Ortmann (Eds.). Mikropolitik. Rationalität, Macht und Spiele in Organisationen, (pp. 165-185). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
163. Luhmann, N. (1989). Law as a social system. Northwestern University Law Review, 83(1-2), 136-150.
164. Luhmann, N. (1990). Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
165. Luhmann, N. (1992). What is communication? Communication Theory, 2(3), 251-259.
166. Luhmann, N. (1993). Die Paradoxie des Entscheidens. Verwaltungs-Archiv, 84(3), 287-299.
167. Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
168. Luhmann, N. (1998). Observations on modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
169. Luhmann, N. (2000). Organisation und Entscheidung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
170. Luhmann, N. (2002). How can the mind participate in communication? In: W. Rasch (Ed.). Theories of distinction, (pp. 169-184). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
171. Luhmann, N. (2003). Organization. In: T. Bakken, & T. Hernes (Eds.). Autopoietic organization theory: Drawing on Niklas Luhmann's social systems perspective, (pp. 31-52). Oslo: Copenhagen Business School Press.
172. Lundin, R. A., & Söderholm, A. (1995). A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 437-455.
173. Lundin, R. A., & Söderholm, A. (1998). Conceptualizing a project society-discussion of an eco-institutional approach to a theory on temporary organizations. In: R. Lundin, & C. Midler (Eds.). Projects as arenas for renewal and learning processes, (pp. 13-24). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
174. March, J. G. (1988). The technology of foolishness. In: J. G. March (Ed.). Decisions and organizations, (pp. 253-265). Oxford: Blackwell.
175. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen: Universitets-forlaget.
176. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
177. March, J. G., Sproull, L. S., & Tamuz, M. (1991). Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organization Science, 2(1), 1-13.
178. Markus, M. L. (2001). Toward a theory of knowledge reuse: Types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 57-93.
179. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. (1975). Autopoietic systems. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
180. Mayntz, R., & Szyperski, R. (1984). Dokumentation und Organisation. Eine vergleichende Studie zu Primär-und Sekundär-Dokumentationen in Wirtschaft, Wissenschaft und öffentlicher Verwaltung. Bergisch Gladbach: Eul.
181. McCloskey, D. N., & Klamer, A. (1995). One quarter of GDP is persuasion. American Economic Review, 85(2), 191-195.
182. McDermott, R. (1999). Why information technology inspired but cannot deliver knowledge management. California Management Review, 41(4), 103-117.
183. McDermott, R., & O'Dell, C. (2001). Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 76-85.
184. McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1967). The medium is the massage. An inventory of effects. New York: Bantam.
185. McPhee, R. D. (2004). Text, agency, and organization in the light of structuration theory. Organization, 11(3), 355-371.
186. McPhee, R. D., & Poole, M. S. (2001). Organizational structures and configurations. In: F. M. Jablin, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.). The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research and methods, (pp. 503-543). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
187. McPhee, R. D., & Zaug, P. (2000). The communicative constitution of organizations: A framework for explanation. Electronic Journal of Communication, 10(1-2). [Online]. Available: http://www.cios.org/ EJCPUBLIC$$ 765732955489$$/010/1/01017.html. [09/30/2007].
188. Menne-Haritz, A. (1999). Schließung und Öffnung der Verwaltungsentscheidung: Funktionen schriftlicher Aufzeichnungen im Vorgang. Soziale Systeme, 5(1), 137-158.
189. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
190. Michailova, S., & Husted, K. (2004). Decision making in organisations hostile to knowledge sharing. Journal for Eastern European Management Studies, 9(1), 9-19.
191. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
192. Miller, D. (1994). What happens after success: The perils of excellence. Journal of Management Studies, 31(3), 325-358.
193. Mingers, J. (2002). Can social systems be autopoietic? Assessing Luhmann's social theory. Sociological Review, 50(2), 278-299.
194. Mingers, J. (2003). Observing organizations: An evaluation of Luhmann's organization theory. In: T. Bakken, & T. Hernes (Eds.). Autopoietic organization theory: Drawing on Niklas Luhmann's social systems perspective, (pp. 103-122). Oslo: Copenhagen Business School Press.
195. Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.
196. Mintzberg, H., & McHugh, A. (1985). Strategy formation in an adhocracy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(2), 160-197.
197. Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., & Théorêt, A. (1976). The structure of 'unstructured' decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(2), 246-275.
198. Moeller, H. G. (2006). Luhmann explained. Chicago: Open Court.
199. Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics. A word on some questions. In: J. Law, & J. Hassard (Eds.). Actor-network theory and after, (pp. 74-89). Oxford: Blackwell.
200. Monod, E. (2004). Einstein, Heisenberg, Kant: Methodological distinction and conditions of possibilities. Information and Organization, 14(2), 105-121.
201. Morgan, G. (1980). Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solving in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(4), 605-622.
202. Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
203. Nassehi, A. (2005). Organizations as decision machines. Niklas Luhmann's theory of organized social systems. In: C. Jones, & R. Munro (Eds.). Contemporary organization theory, (pp. 178-191). Oxford: Blackwell.
204. Nassehi, A., & Saake, I. (2002). Kontingenz: Methodisch verhindert oder beobachtet? Ein Beitrag zur Methodologie der qualitativen Sozialforschung. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 31(1), 66-86.
205. Neus, A. (2001). Managing information quality in virtual communities of practice. Lessons learned from a decade's experience with exploding Internet communication. Free/Open Source Research Community. [Online]. Available: http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/neus.pdf. [09/30/2007].
206. Newell, S. (2004). Enhancing cross-project learning. Engineering Management Journal, 16(1), 12-20.
207. Newell, S., Bresnen, M., Edelman, L., Scarbrough, H., & Swan, J. (2006). Sharing knowledge across projects: Limits to ICT-led project review practices. Management Learning, 37, 167-185.
208. Nicolai, A. T. (2004). The bridge to the 'real world': Applied science or a 'schizophrenic Tour de Force'? Journal of Management Studies, 41(6), 951-976.
209. Nicolai, A. T., & Kieser, A. (2002). Trotz eklatanter Erfolglosigkeit: Die Erfolgsfaktorenforschung weiter auf Erfolgskurs. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 62(6), 579-596.
210. Noe, E., & Alrøe, H. F. (2006). Combining Luhmann and actor-network theory to see farm enterprises as self-organizing systems. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 13(1), 34-48.
211. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies foster creativity and innovation for competitive advantage. London: Oxford University Press.
212. th). The trouble with PowerPoint. Fortune, pp. 330-334.
213. Olivera, F. (2000). Memory systems in organizations: An empirical investigation of mechanisms for knowledge collection, storage and access. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 811-832.
214. Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249-273.
215. Ortmann, G. (2004). Als ob. Fiktionen des Organisierens. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
216. Ortmann, G., & Salzman, H. (2002). Stumbling giants-The emptiness, fullness, and recursiveness of strategic management. Soziale Systeme, 8(2), 205-230.
217. Orton, D. J., & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. The Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203-223.
218. th). Absolute PowerPoint: Can a software package edit our thoughts? The New Yorker, Annals of Business Section, p. 76.
219. Pentland, B. T. (1995). Grammatical models of organizational processes. Organization Science, 6(5), 541-556.
220. Pentland, B. T. (2003). Sequential variety in work processes. Organization Science, 14(5), 528-540.
221. Pentland, B. T., & Rueter, H. R. (1994). Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 484-510.
222. Pfeffer, J. (1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. The Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 599-620.
223. nd ed.). The Hague: Mouton.
224. Ponzi, L., & Koenig, M. E. (2002). Knowledge management: Another management fad? Information Research, 8(1). [Online]. Available: http://informationr.net/ir/8-1/paper145. html. [09/30/2007].
225. Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
226. Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon.
227. Prencipe, A., & Tell, F. (2001). Inter-project learning: Processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms. Research Policy, 30(9), 1373-1394.
228. Probst, G., Raub, S., & Romhardt K. (1999). Managing knowledge. London: Wiley.
229. Putnam, L. L., & Cooren, F. (2004). Alternative perspectives on the role of text and agency in constituting organizations. Organization, 11(3), 323-333.
230. Putnam, L. L., Phillips, N., & Chapman, P. (1996). Metaphors of communication and organizations. In: S. R. Cless, & W. R. Nord (Eds.). Handbook of organization studies, (pp. 375-408). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
231. Quinn, R. E., & Cameron, K. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management Science, 29(1), 33-51.
232. Raelin, J. A. (1997). A model of work-based learning. Organization Science, 8(6), 599-620.
233. Rafaeli, S., & LaRose, R. J. (1993). Electronic bulletin boards and 'public goods' explanations of collaborative mass media. Communication Research, 20(2), 277-297.
234. Ruggles, R. (1998). The state of notion: Knowledge management in practice. California Management Review, 40(3), 80-89.
235. Reinhardt, R., & Eppler, M. J. (Eds.). (2004). Wissenskommunikation in Organisationen. Methoden, Instrumente, Theorien. Berlin: Springer.
236. Robichaud, D., Giroux, H., & Taylor, J. R. (2004). The metaconversation: The recursive property of language as a key to organizing. The Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 617-634.
237. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
238. Ruesch, J., & Bateson, G. (1951). Communication: The social matrix of psychiatry. New York: Norton.
239. Sacks, O. (1987). The man who mistook his wife for a hat. New York: Harper & Row.
240. Salaman, G. (2002). Understanding advice: Towards a sociology of management consultancy. In: T. Clark, & R. Fincham (Eds.). Critical consulting: New perspectives on the management advice industry, (pp. 247-259). Oxford: Blackwell.
241. Sartre, J. P. (1956). Being and nothingness. New York: Philosophical Library.
242. Scarborough, H., & Swan, J. (2001). Explaining the diffusion of knowledge management: The role of fashion. British Journal of Management, 12(1), 3-12.
243. Schimank, U. (1985). Der mangelnde Akteurbezug systemtheoretischer Erklärungen gesellschaftlicher Differenzierung-ein Diskussionsvorschlag. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 14(6), 421-434.
244. Schindler, M., & Eppler, M. J. (2003). Harvesting project knowledge: A review of project learning methods and success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 21(3), 219-228.
245. th). Die Macht der bunten Bilder. Der Spiegel, No. 12, p. 126.
246. Schneider, W. L. (1995). Objektive Hermeneutik als Forschungsmethode der Systemtheorie. Soziale Systeme, 1(1), 129-152.
247. Schoen, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
248. Schoeneborn, D. B. (2004). Interaktion statt Distribution. Wie kommunikative Barrieren des Wissensmanagements überwunden werden können. In: B. Wyssusek (Ed.). Wissensmanagement komplex: Perspektiven und soziale Praxis, (pp. 135-157). Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.
249. Schoeneborn, D. B. (2006). Wissenskommunikations-Management. Eine Studie zur Neugestaltung des Wissensmanagements aus medien-und kommunikationswissenschaftlicher Perspektive. Stuttgart: ibidem.
250. Schoeneborn, D. B., & Blaschke, S. (2006). The organization that never sleeps. A metaphorical pathology of organizational insomnia. Paper presented at the International Communication Association 2006 Annual Conference, June 19-23, 2006, Dresden (Germany).
251. Schofield, J. W. (1990). Increasing the generalizability of qualitative research. In: E. W. Eisner, & A. Peshkin (Eds.). Qualitative inquiry in education, (pp. 201-232). New York: Teachers College Press.
252. Schreyögg, G., & Sydow, J. (Eds). (2003). Managementforschung 13: Strategische Prozesse und Pfade. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
253. Schumpeter, J. (1943). Socialism, capitalism and democracy. London: Allen & Unwin.
254. Scott, W. R. (1998). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
255. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. An eassy in the philosophy of language. London: Cambridge University Press.
256. Seidl, D. (2006a). The basic concepts of Luhmann's theory of social systems. In: D. Seidl, & K. H. Becker (Eds.). Niklas Luhmann and organization studies, (pp. 21-53). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
257. Seidl, D. (2006b). Organization and interaction. In: D. Seidl, & K. H. Becker (Eds.). Niklas Luhmann and organization studies, (pp. 145-170). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
258. Seidl, D., & Becker, K. H. (Eds.). (2006a). Niklas Luhmann and organization studies. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
259. Seidl, D., & Becker, K. H. (2006b). Organizations as distinction generating and processing systems. Niklas Luhmann's contribution to organization studies. Organization, Special Issue on 'Niklas Luhmann and Organization Studies', 13(1), 9-35.
260. Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
261. Shenhar, A. J. (2001). One size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains. Management Science, 47(3), 394-414.
262. Shwom, B. L. (2003). "The great man has spoken. Now what do I do?" A response to Edward R. Tufte's "The cognitive style of PowerPoint". Communication Insights, 1(1), 1-16. [Online]. Available: http://www.communipartners.com/documents/ComInsV1.- 000.pdf. [09/30/2007].
263. Sitkin, S. B. (1992). Learning from mistakes: The strategy of small losses. In: L. L. Cum-mings, & S. B. Cummings (Eds.). Research in organizational behavior, (vol. 14), (pp. 231-266). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
264. Smith, D. E. (1984). Textually mediated social organization. International Social Science Journal, 36(1), 59-75.
265. Smith, R. C (1993). Images of organizational communication: Root-metaphors of the organization-communication relation. Paper presented at the International Communication Association 1993 Annual Conference, Washington, DC.
266. Soentgen, J. (1992). Der Bau. Betrachtungen zu einer Metapher der Luhmannschen Systemtheorie. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 21(6), 456-466.
267. Sørensen, C, Whitley, E. A., Madon, S., Klyachko, D., Hosein, I., & Johnstone, J. (2001). Cultivating recalcitrance in information systems research. In: N. Russo, B. Fitzgerald, & J. I. DeGross (Eds.). Realigning research and practice in information systems development: The social and organizational perspective, (pp. 297-31). Boston: Kluwer.
268. Sosik, J. J., & Jung, D. I. (2003). Impression management strategies and performance in information technology consulting. The role of self-other rating agreement on charismatic leadership. Management Communication Quarterly, 17(2), 233-268.
269. Spender, J. C. (1996). Organizational knowledge, learning, and memory: Three concepts in search of a theory. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9(1), 63-78.
270. Star, S. L., & Strauss, A. (1999). Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8(1), 9-30.
271. Starbuck, W. H. (1982). Congealing oil: Inventing ideologies to justify acting ideologies out. Journal of Management Studies, 19(1), 3-27.
272. Starbuck, W. H. (1992). Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Management Studies, 29(6), 713-740.
273. Starbuck, W. H., Barnett, M. L., & Baumard P. (forthcoming). Payoffs and pitfalls of strategic learning. Journal Of Economic Behavior.
274. Steinmeyer, J. (2003). Hiding the elephant-How magicians invented the impossible and learned to disappear. New York: Carroll & Graf.
275. th). Ban it now! Friends don't let friends use PowerPoint. Fortune, p. 213.
276. Strauss, A. L. (1988). The articulation of project work: An organizational process. The Sociological Quarterly, 29(2), 163-178.
277. Sturdy, A. (1997). The consultancy process-an insecure business? Journal of Management Studies, 34(3), 389-413.
278. Suchman, L. (1995). Making work visible. Communications of the ACM, 38(9), 56-64.
279. Swan, J. A., Newell, S. M., & Robertson, M. (1999). The illusion of 'best practices' in information systems for operations management. European Journal of Information Systems, 8(3), 284-293.
280. Taylor, B. C, & Trujillo, N. (2001). Qualitative research methods. In: F. M. Jablin, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.). The new handbook of organizational communication. Advances in theory, research, and methods, (pp. 161-194). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
281. Taylor, J. R. (1993). Rethinking the theory of organizational communication: How to read an organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
282. Taylor, J. R. (2000a), Thinking about organization in a new way: An inquiry into the onto-logical foundations of organization. Electronic Journal of Communication, 10(1-2). [Online]. Available: http://www.cios.org/ EJCPUBLIC$$365732955501$$/010/1/01015. html. [09/30/2007].
283. Taylor, J. R. (2000b). A common ground, common grounds, or footbridges? In: S. R. Cor-man, & M. S. Poole (Eds.). Perspectives on organizational communication. Finding common ground, (pp. 190-199). New York: Guilford Press.
284. Taylor, J. R. (2001). The "rational" organization reconsidered: An exploration of some of the organizational implications of self-organizing. Communication Theory, 11(2), 137-177.
285. Taylor, J. R. (2003). Organizational communication: Is it a discipline? Inaugural lecture as Kurt Baschwitz Professor at the University of Amsterdam, June 12, 2003. [Online]. Available: http://www.communicatie.com/documenten/ achtergrondartikel%20james% 20taylor.doc. [09/30/2007].
286. Taylor, J. R. (2005). In praise of ambiguity: Forum response. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(2), 299-306.
287. Taylor, J. R., & van Every, E. J. (2000). The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
288. Taylor, J. R., & Robichaud, D. (2004). Finding the organization in the communication: Discourse as action and sensemaking. Organization, 11(3), 395-413.
289. Taylor, J. R., Flanagin, A. J., Cheney, G., & Seibold, D. R. (2001). Organizational communication research: Key moments, central concerns, and future challenges. Communication Yearbook, 24, 99-137.
290. Te'eni, D. (2001). A cognitive-affective model of organizational communication for designing IT. MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 251-312.
291. Tedeschi, J. T., & Melburg, V. (1984). Impression management and influence in the organization. In: S. B. Bacharach, & E. J. Lawler (Eds.). Research in the sociology of organizations, (vol. 3), (pp. 31-58). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
292. nd ed.). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
293. Theis-Berglmair, A. M. (2005). Public Relations aus organisationssoziologischer Perspektive. In: G. Bentele, R. Fröhlich, & P. Szyszka (Ed.). Handbuch Public Relations, (pp. 37-49). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
294. th). PowerPoint makes you dumb. The New York Times Magazine, pp. 88-89.
295. Totzke, R. (2004). Schrift und Wissen: Was die Wissensmanagement-Theorie von Platons Schriftkritik lernen kann. In: B. Wyssusek (Ed.). Wissensmanagement komplex: Perspektiven und soziale Praxis, (pp. 85-100). Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.
296. Tsoukas, H. (1991). The missing link: A transformational view of metaphors in organizational science. The Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 566-585.
297. Tsoukas, H. (1993). Analogical reasoning and knowledge generation in organizational theory. Organization Studies, 14(3), 323-346.
298. Tufte, E. R. (2003). The cognitive style of PowerPoint. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
299. Türcke, C. (2005). Vom Kainszeichen zum genetischen Code. Kritische Theorie der Schrift. München: Beck.
300. van Maanen, J. (1995). Style as theory. Organization Science, 6(1), 133-143.
301. Vaughan, D. (1999). The dark side of organizations: Mistake, misconduct, and disaster. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 271-305.
302. Vicari, S., & Troilo, G. (1998). Errors and learning in organizations. In: G. von Krogh, J. Roos, & D. Kleine (Eds.). Knowing in firms: Understanding, managing and measuring knowledge, (pp. 204-222). London: Sage.
303. Vogd, W. (2005). Systemtheorie und rekonstruktive Sozialforschung. Eine empirische Versöhnung unterschiedlicher theoretischer Perspektiven. Opladen: Budrich.
304. von Foerster, H. (1992). Ethics and second-order cybernetics. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 1(1), 9-19.
305. von Krogh, G., & Cusumano, M. A. (2000). Three strategies for managing fast growth. Sloan Management Review, 42(2), 53-61.
306. Walgenbach, P., & Hegele, C. (2001). What can an apple learn from an orange? Or: What do companies use benchmarking for? Organization, 8(1), 121-144.
307. Walsh, J. P. (1995). Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6(3), 280-321.
308. Walsh, J. P., & Ungson, G. R. (1991). Organizational memory. The Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 57-91.
309. Weber, M. (1958). Bureaucracy. In: H. H. Gerth, & C. W. Mills (Eds.). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology, (pp. 196-244). New York: Galaxy.
310. Weber, M. (1969). The methodology of the social sciences. New York: Free Press.
311. Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
312. Weick, K. E. (1983). Organizational communication: Toward a research agenda. In: L. L. Putnam, & M. E. Pacanowsky (Eds.). Communication and organization. An interpretive approach, (pp. 13-29). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
313. Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 516-531.
314. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
315. Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective minds in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357-381.
316. Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2001). Managing the unexpected. Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
317. Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sense-making. Organization Science, 16(4), 409-421.
318. Werr, A., & Stjernberg, T. (2003). Exploring management consulting firms as knowledge systems. Organization Studies, 24(6), 881-908.
319. Wiio, O. A., Goldhaber, G. M., & Yates, M. P. (1981). Organizational communication research: Time for reflection? Some conclusions from audit and network studies in different countries. Communication Yearbook, 4, 83-97.
320. Willke, H. (1998). Systemisches Wissensmanagement. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.
321. Winter, S. G., & Szulanski, G. (2001). Replication of organizational routines: Conceptualizing the exploitation of knowledge assets. In: N. Bontis, & C. W. Choo (Eds.). The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge: A collection of readings, (pp. 207-221). New York: Oxford University Press.
322. Witzel, A. (1982). Verfahren der qualitativen Sozialforschung. Überblick und Alternativen. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
323. Witzel, A. (2000). Das problemzentrierte Interview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 1(1) [Online]. Available: http://www.qualitative-research.net/ fqs-texte/1-00/1-00witzel-d. htm. [09/30/2007].
324. Worley, R. B., & Dyrud, M. A. (2004). Presentations and the PowerPoint problem. Business Communication Quarterly, 67(1), 78-80.
325. Wright, C, & Kitay, J. (2002). 'But does it work?' Perceptions of the impact of management consulting. Strategic Change, 11(5), 271-278.
326. Wyssusek, B. (Ed.). (2004). Wissensmanagement komplex: Perspektiven und soziale Praxis. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.
327. Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: A structura-tional approach to studying communication and media. The Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 299-326.
328. Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (forthcoming). The PowerPoint presentation and its corollaries: How genres shape communicative action in organizations. In: M. Zachry, & C. Thralls (Eds.). Communicative practices in workplaces and the professions: Cultural perspectives on the regulation of discourse and organizations, (pp. 67-92). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
329. Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
330. Zhao, N. B., & Olivera, F. (2006). Error reporting in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 1012-1030.
331. Zillien, N. (2005). 'PowerPoint makes you dumb'. Ein Klärungsversuch mit Hilfe der Theorie der Strukturierung. In: M. Jäckel, & M. Mai (Eds.). Online-Vergesellschaftung. Mediensoziologische Perspektiven auf neue Kommunikationstechnologien, (pp. 155-174). Wiesbaden: VS.
332. Zillien, N. (2006). 'Nächste Folie bitte!' Der Einsatz von Präsentationsprogrammen zur Wissensvermittlung und Wissensbewahrung. In: C. Swertz, P. Ohly, & J. Sieglerschmidt (Eds.). Wissensorganisation und Verantwortung. Gesellschaftliche, ökonomische und technische Aspekte. Fortschritte der Wissensorganisation, (pp. 159-168). Würzburg: Ergon.
333. Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351.
334. Zorn, T. E., & Taylor, J. R. (2003). Knowledge management and/as organizational communication. In: D. Tourish, & O. Hargie (Eds.). Key issues in organizational communication, (pp. 96-112). London: Routledge.
335. Zuckerman, L. (1999). Words go right to the brain, but can they stir the heart? Some say popular software debases public speaking. The New York Times. [Online]. Available: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res= 9900EEDA133BF934A25757C0A96F95 8260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all. [09/30/2007].