Can social systems be autopoietic? Assessing Luhmann's social theory

Sociological Review

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 278-299

  Mingers, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036588948     PISSN: 00380261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-954X.00367     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Archer, M., (1996), 'Social integration and system integration: developing the distinction', Sociology 30 (4): 679-699.
2. Archer, M., (1998), 'Realism and morphogenesis' in Archer, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T. and Norrie, A. (eds.), Critical Realism: Essential Readings, London, Routledge: 356-382.
3. Archer, M., (2000), 'For structure: its properties and powers: a reply to Anthony King', Sociological Review 48: 464-472.
4. Beer, S., (1975), 'Preface.' in Maturana, H.M. and Varela, F.G. (eds.), Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, Dordrecht., Reidel.
5. Bhaskar, R., (1979), The Possibility of Naturalism, Sussex: Harvester Press.
6. Bhaskar, R., (1997), 'On the ontological status of ideas', J. for the Theory of Social Behaviour 27 (2/3): 139-147.
7. Brans, M. and Rossbach, S., (1997), 'The autopoiesis of administrative systems: Niklas Luhmann on public administration and public policy', Public Administration 75 (3): 417-439.
8. Brown, C., (1988), 'A new interdisciplinary impulse and the anthropology of the 1990s', International Social Science Journal 40 (2): 211-220.
9. Buckley, W., (1967), Sociology and Modern Systems Theory, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
10. Buckley, W., (ed.) (1968), Modern Systems Research for the Behavioural Scientist. Chicago: Aldine.
11. Burrell, G. and Morgan, G., (1979), Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis, London: Heinemann.
12. Cohen, I., (1989), Structuration Theory: Anthony Giddens and the Constitution of Social Life, London: Macmillan.
13. Ewald, F., (1987), 'The taw of law' in Teubner, G. (ed.) Autopoiesis and the Law, Berlin, de Gruyter: 36-50.
14. Faucheux, C.A.M.,S., (1979), 'Automation or autonomy in organizational design', Int. J. General Systems 5: 213-220.
15. Featherstone, M., Turner, B. and Hepworth, M. (eds.), (1991), The Body: Social Process and Cultural Theory. London: sage.
16. Gergen, K., (1999), An Invitation to Social Construction, London: Sage.
17. Giddens, A., (1984), The Constitution of Society, Cambridge: Polity Press.
18. Grosz, E., (1994), Volatile Bodies: Towards a Corporeal Feminism, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
19. Habermas, J., (1979), Communication and the Evolution of Society, London: Heinemann.
20. Habermas, J., (1984), The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, London: Heinemann.
21. Habermas, J., (1985), 'Excursus on Luhmann's appropriation of the philosophy of the subject through systems theory' in Habermas, J. (ed.) The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge, Polity Press: 368-385.
22. Habermas, J., (1987), The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 2: Lifeworld and System: a Critique of Functionalist Reason, Oxford: Polity Press.
23. Habermas, J. and Luhmann, N. (1971), Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
24. Hayles, N.K., (1999), 'The second wave of cybernetics: from reflexivity to self-organization' in Hayles, N.K. (ed.) How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics, Chicago, University of Chicago Press: 131-159.
25. Kickert, W., (1993), 'Autopoiesis and the science of public administration: essence, sense and nonsense', Organization Studies 14 (2): 261-278.
26. King, A., (1999), 'Against structure: A critique of morphogenetic social theory', Sociological Review 47 (2): 199-227.
27. King, A., (1999), 'The impossibility of naturalism: The antinomies of Bhaskar's realism', J. for the Theory of Social Behaviour 29 (3): 267-290.
28. King, A., (2000), 'The accidental derogation of the lay actor: a critique of Giddens's concept of structure', Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (3): 362-383.
29. Luhmann, N., (1982), The Differentiation of Society, NY.: Columbia University Press.
30. Luhmann, N., (1982), 'The world society as a social system', Int. J. General Systems 8: 131-138.
31. Luhmann N., (1984) Soziale Systeme, Frankfurt.: Suhrkamp.
32. Luhmann, N., (1985), 'The self-reproduction of law and its limits' in Teubner, G. (ed.) Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State, Berlin., de Gruyter.
33. Luhmann, N., (1985), 'Society, meaning, religion - based on self-reference', Sociological Analysis 46 (1): 5-20.
34. Luhmann, N., (1986), 'The autopoiesis of social systems' in Geyer, F. and van der Zouwen, J. (eds.), Sociocybernetic Paradoxes, London, SAGE Publications.
35. Luhmann, N., (1987), 'Closure and openness: on reality in the world of law.' in Teubner, G. (ed.) Autopoiesis and the Law, Berlin, de Gruyter: 335-348.
36. Luhmann, N., (1987), 'The unity of the legal system' in Teubner, G. (ed.) Autopoiesis and the Law, Berlin, de Gruyter: 12-35.
37. Luhmann, N., (1989), Ecological Communication, Cambridge: Polity Press.
38. Luhmann, N., (1989), 'Law as a social system', Northwestern University Law Review 83: 136-150.
39. Luhmann, N., (1990), Essays in Self-Reference, NY.: Columbia University Press.
40. Luhmann, N., (1992), 'Operational closure and structural coupling: the differentiation of the legal system', Cardozo Law Review 13 (5): 1419-1441.
41. Luhmann, N., (1995), Social Systems, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
42. Luhmann, N., (2000), Organisation und Entscheidung, Opladen: Verlag.
43. Luhmann, N., (2000), The Reality of the Mass Media, Cambridge: Polity Press.
44. Manicas, P., (1998), 'A realist social science' in Archer, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T. and Norrie, A. (eds.), Critical Realism: Essential Readings, London, Routledge: 313-338.
45. Maturana, H., (1975), 'Communication and representation functions' in Piaget, J. (ed.) Encyclopedie de la Pleiade, Series Methodique, Paris, Gallimard.
46. Maturana, H., (1975), 'The organization of the living, a theory of the living organization', Int. J. Man Machine Studies 7: 313-332.
47. Maturana, H., (1978), 'Biology of language: the epistemology of reality' in M.G. and Lenneberg, E. (eds.), Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought: Essays in Honour of Eric Lenneberg, New York, Academic Press: 27-63.
48. Maturana, H., (1978), 'Cognition' in Hejl, P. Kock, W. and Roth, G. (eds.) Wahrnehmung und Kommunikation, Frankfurt, Peter Lang: 29-49.
49. Maturana, H., (1980), 'Man and society' in Benseler, F., Hejl, P. and Kock, W. (eds.), Autopoietic Systems in the Social Sciences, Frankfurt, Campus Verlag: 11-31.
50. Maturana, H., (1987), 'The biological foundations of self-consciousness and the physical domain of existence' in Caianiello, E. (ed.) Physics of Cognitive Processes, Singapore, World Scientific: 324-379.
51. Maturana, H., (1988), 'Reality: the search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument', Irish Journal of Psychology 9: 25-82.
52. Maturana, H., (1990), 'Science and daily life: the ontology of scientific explanations.' in Krohn, W., Kuers, G. and Nowotny, H. (eds.), Selforganization: Portrait of a Scientific Revolution, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers: 12-35.
53. Maturana, H., (1993), 'Biology of the aesthetic experience' in Titzmann, M. (ed.) Zeichen (Theorie) in der Praxis, Passau, Wissenschaftsverlag Rothe: 37-56.
54. Maturana, H., (1995), 'Biology of self-consciousness' in Trautteur, G. (ed.) Consciousness: Distinction and Reflection, Naples, Bibliopolis.
55. Maturana, H. and Mpodozis, (1995), 'Brain, language and the origin of human mental functions', Biology Research 28: 15-26.
56. Maturana, H. and Varela, F., (1980), Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, Dordrecht: Reidel.
57. Maturana, H. and Varela, F., (1987), The Tree of Knowledge, Boston: Shambhala.
58. Meynen, H.T., (1992), 'The bringing forth of dialogue: Latour versus Maturana' in van de Vijver, G. (ed.) New Perspectives on Cybernetics: Self-organization, Autonomy and Connectionism, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic: 157-174.
59. Mingers, J., (1989), 'An introduction to autopoiesis:a reply to Fenton Robb', Systems Practice 2 (3): 349-351.
60. Mingers, J., (1992), 'The problems of social autopoiesis', Int. J. Gen. Sys 21 (2): 229-236.
61. Mingers, J., (1995), 'Information and meaning: foundations for an intersubjective account', Information Systems Journal 5: 285-306.
62. Mingers, J., (1995), Self-Producing Systems: Implications and Applications of Autopoiesis, New York.: Plenum Press.
63. Mingers, J., (1997), 'A critical evaluation of Maturana's constructivist family therapy', Systems Practice 10 (2): 137 151.
64. Mingers, J., (2001), 'Embodying information systems: the contribution of phenomenology', Information and Organization (formerly Accounting, Management and Information Technology) 11 (2): 103-128.
65. Morgan, G., (1986), Images of Organisation, Newbury Park: Sage.
66. Near, C., (1994), 'Structure, agency and social transformation', Journal For the Theory of Social Behaviour 24 (3): 187-205.
67. Parsons, T., (1951), The Social System: Glencoe.
68. Paterson, J. and Teubner, G., (1998), 'Changing maps: Empirical legal autopoiesis', Social & Legal Studies 7 (4): 451-486.
69. Porpora, D., (1989), 'Four Concepts of Social Structure', J. for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19 (2): 195-211.
70. Robb, F., (1989), 'Cybernetics and suprahuman autopoietic systems', Systems Practice 2 (1): 47-74.
71. Shilling, C., (1993), The Body and Social Theory, London: Sage.
72. Stichweh, R., (2000), 'Systems theory as an alternative to action theory? The rise of 'communication' as a theoretical option', Acta Sociologica 43 (1): 5-13.
73. Stokes, P., (1990), 'Socio-cybernetics and the project of scientificisation of sociology' in Heylighen, E., Rosseel, E. and Demeyere, F. (eds.), Self-Steering and Cognition in Complex Systems: Towards a New Cybernetics, London, Gordon and Breech.
74. Suber, P., (1990), Paradox of Self-Amendment, New York: P. Lang Publishers.
75. Synnott, A., (1993), The Body Social: Symbolism, Self and Society, London: Routledge.
76. Teubner, G., (1990), And God laughed . . . indeterminancy, self-reference and paradox in law., European University Institute: Florence.
77. Teubner, G., (1993), Law as an Autopoietic System, Oxford.: Blackwell.
78. Teubner, G. and Febbrajo, A., (eds.), (1992), State, Law and Economy as Autopoietic Systems: Regulation and Autonomy in a New Perspective. Milan: Giuffre.
79. Turner, B., (1984), The Body and Society, Oxford: Blackwell.
80. Vanderstraeten, R., (2000), 'Autopoiesis and socialization: on Luhmann's reconceptualization of communication and socialization', British Journal of Sociology 51 (3): 581-598.
81. Varela, F., (1979), Principles of Biological Autonomy, New York: Elsevier-North Holland.
82. Varela, F., Thompson, E. and Rosch, E., (1991), The Embodied Mind, Cambridge: MIT Press.
83. Veld, R.J., Schaap, L., Termeer, C. and Twist, M. (1991), Autopoiesis and Configuration Theory: New Approaches to Societal Steering, Dordrecht.: Kluwer.
84. von Bertalanffy, L., (1971), General Systems Theory, London: Penguin.
85. Wolfe, C., (1995), 'In search of post-humanist theory: the second-order cybernetics of Maturana and Varela', Cultural Critique Spring: 33-70.
86. Zeleny, M. and Hufford, C. (1992),' The application of autopoiesis in systems analysis: Are autopoietic systems also social systems?' Int. J. Gen. Sys. 21 (2): 145-160.