Explaining variability in sodium intake through oral sensory phenotype, salt sensation and liking

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 100, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 369-380

  Hayes, John E ^a   Sullivan, Bridget S ^b   Duffy, Valerie B ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Dietary sodium; Food preferences; Fungiform papillae; Genetics; Hedonics; Propylthiouracil; Sex differences; Sodium chloride; Structural Equation Modeling; Taste

Indexed keywords

PROPYLTHIOURACIL; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM INTAKE;

ADULT; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; BITTER TASTE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIPID DIET; MALE; MASKING; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SODIUM INTAKE; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; TASTE BUD; TASTE PREFERENCE; ADMINISTRATION AND DOSAGE; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EATING; FOOD PREFERENCE; MEDICAL RECORD; PHENOTYPE; PHILOSOPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; TASTE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; DIET RECORDS; EATING; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCES; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHENOTYPE; PHILOSOPHY; PROPYLTHIOURACIL; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM, DIETARY; TASTE; TASTE BUDS; TASTE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77952956371     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.03.017     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2006. Prevention Works: CDC Strategies for a Heart-Healthy and Stroke-Free America [internet]. [cited 8 Feb 2010]. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/dhdsp/library/prevention_works/pdfs/Prevention_works.pdf.
2. World Health Organization. 2009. Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health - Cardiovascular disease: prevention and control [internet]. [cited 8 Feb 2010]. Available at: http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/facts/cvd/en/.
3. Sacks F.M., Svetkey L.P., Vollmer W.M., Appel L.J., Bray G.A., Harsha D., et al. Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med 2001, 344(1):3-10.
4. USDA Agricultural Research Service. 2008. Nutrient Intakes from Food: Mean Amounts Consumed per Individual, One Day, 2005-2006. [internet]. [cited 4 Feb 2010]. Available at: http://www.ars.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/Place/12355000/pdf/0506/Table_1_NIF_05.pdf.
5. Mattes R.D., Donnelly D. Relative contributions of dietary sodium sources. J Am Coll Nutr 1991, 10(4):383-393.
6. James W.P., Ralph A., Sanchez-Castillo C.P. The dominance of salt in manufactured food in the sodium intake of affluent societies. Lancet 1987, 1(8530):426-429.
7. Gillette M. Flavor effects of sodium-chloride. Food Technol 1985, 39(6):47-50.
8. Smith S.L., Quandt S.A., Arcury T.A., Wetmore L.K., Bell R.A., Vitolins M.Z. Aging and eating in the rural, southern United States: beliefs about salt and its effect on health. Soc Sci Med 2006, 62(1):189-198.
9. 2007 food & health survey consumer attitudes toward food, nutrition & health 2007, IFIC, International Food Information Council Foundation, Washington, DC, 52 pp.
10. Snyder D.J., Duffy V.B., Hayes J.E., Bartoshuk L.M. Propylthiouracil (PROP) Taste. In: Allan I. Basbaum A.K., Gordon M. Shepherd, Gerald Westheimer, Thomas D. Albright, Richard H. Masland, Peter Dallos, Donata Oertel, Stuart Firestein, Gary K. Beauchamp, M. Catherine Bushnell, Jon H. Kaas, Esther Gardner, Editor(s)-in-Chief, editor. The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference. New York: Academic Press; 2008. p 391-399.
11. Bajec M.R., Pickering G.J. Thermal taste, PROP responsiveness, and perception of oral sensations. Physiol Behav 2008, 95(4):581-590.
12. Hayes J.E., Bartoshuk L.M., Kidd J.K., Duffy V.B. Supertasting and PROP bitterness depends on more than the TAS2R38 gene. Chem Senses 2008, 33(3):255-265. First published January 21, 2008, doi:10.1093/chemse/bjm084.
13. Bartoshuk L.M., Duffy V.B., Lucchina L.A., Prutkin J., Fast K. PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) supertasters and the saltiness of NaCl. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998, 855:793-796.
14. Lee Y.-M., Prescott J., Kim K.-O. PROP taster status and the rejection of foods with added tastants. Food Sci biotechnol 2008, 17(5):1066-1073.
15. Bartoshuk L.M., Fast K., Snyder D.J. Differences in our sensory worlds: invalid comparisons with labeled scales. Current Direct Psychol Sci 2005, 14(3):122-125.
16. Yackinous C., Guinard J.X. Relation between PROP taster status and fat perception, touch, and olfaction. Physiol Behav 2001, 72(3):427-437.
17. Miller I.J., Reedy F.E. Variations in human taste bud density and taste intensity perception. Physiol Behav 1990, 47(6):1213-1219.
18. Doty R.L., Bagla R., Morgenson M., Mirza N. NaCl thresholds: relationship to anterior tongue locus, area of stimulation, and number of fungiform papillae. Physiol Behav 2001, 72(3):373-378.
19. Leshem M. Biobehavior of the human love of salt. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2009, 33(1):1-17.
20. Duffy V.B. Variation in oral sensation: implications for diet and health. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2007, 23(2):171-177.
21. Tepper B.J. Nutritional implications of genetic taste variation: the role of PROP sensitivity and other taste phenotypes. Annu Rev Nutr 2008.
22. Mattes R. PROP status: dietary modifier, marker, or misleader. Genetic variation in taste sensitivity 2004, 229-250. Marcel Dekker, New York. J. Prescott, B.J. Tepper (Eds.).
23. Beebe-Center J.G. The psychology of pleasantness and unpleasantness 1932, D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc, New York.
24. Stone L.J., Pangborn R.M. Preferences and intake measures of salt and sugar, and their relation to personality traits. Appetite 1990, 15(1):63-79.
25. Green B.G., Gelhard B. Salt as an oral irritant. Chem Senses 1989, 14(2):259-271.
26. Curtis K.S., Contreras R.J. Sex differences in electrophysiological and behavioral responses to NaCl taste. Behav Neurosci 2006, 120(4):917-924.
27. Verma P., Mahajan K.K., Mittal S., Ghildiyal A. Salt preference across different phases of menstrual cycle. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2005, 49(1):99-102.
28. Verma P., Mittal S., Ghildiyal A., Chaudhary L., Mahajan K.K. Salt preference: age and sex related variability. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2007, 51(1):91-95.
29. Curtis K.S., Davis L.M., Johnson A.L., Therrien K.L., Contreras R.J. Sex differences in behavioral taste responses to and ingestion of sucrose and NaCl solutions by rats. Physiol Behav 2004, 80(5):657-664.
30. Duffy V.B., Bartoshuk L.M., Striegel-Moore R., Rodin J. Taste changes across pregnancy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998, 855:805-809.
31. Kanarek R.B., Ryu M., Przypek J. Preferences for foods with varying levels of salt and fat differ as a function of dietary restraint and exercise but not menstrual cycle. Physiol Behav 1995, 57(5):821-826.
32. Schutz H.G. Preference ratings as predictors of food consumption. Am Psychologist 1957, 12(7):412.
33. Tuorila H., Huotilainen A., Lähteenmäki L., Ollila S., Tuomi-Nurmi S., Urala N. Comparison of affective rating scales and their relationship to variables reflecting food consumption. Food Qual Pref 2007, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.06.007.
34. Mattes R.D. The taste for salt in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 1997, 65(2 Suppl):692S-697S.
35. Pangborn R.M., Pecore S.D. Taste perception of sodium chloride in relation to dietary intake of salt. Am J Clin Nutr 1982, 35(3):510-520.
36. Shepherd R., Farleigh C.A., Land D.G. The relationship between salt intake and preferences for different salt levels in soup. Appetite 1984, 5(4):281-290.
37. Shepherd R., Farleigh C.A., Land D.G. Preference and sensitivity to salt taste as determinants of salt-intake. Appetite 1984, 5(3):187-197.
38. Shepherd R. Sensory influences on salt, sugar and fat intake. Nutr Res Rev 1988, 1:125-144.
39. Kim G.H., Lee H.M. Frequent consumption of certain fast foods may be associated with an enhanced preference for salt taste. J Hum Nutr Diet 2009, 22(5):475-480.
40. Contreras R.J. Salt taste and disease. Am J Clin Nutr 1978, 31(6):1088-1097.
41. Mattes R.D., Kumanyika S.K., Halpern B.P. Salt taste responsiveness and preference among normotensive, prehypertensive and hypertensive adults. Chem Senses 1983, 8(1):27-40.
42. Schachter J., Harper P.H., Radin M.E., Caggiula A.W., McDonald R.H., Diven W.F. Comparison of sodium and potassium intake with excretion. Hypertension 1980, 2(5):695-699.
43. Baldwin D., Alexander R.W., Warner E.G. Chronic sodium chloride challenge studies in man. J Lab Clin Med 1960, 55:362-375.
44. Willett W. Nutritional epidemiology 1998, Oxford University Press, New York, xiv, 514 PP.
45. Duffy V.B., Hayes J.E., Sullivan B.S., Faghri P. Surveying food/beverage liking: a tool for epidemiological studies to connect chemosensation with health outcomes. Ann NY Acad Sci 2009, 1170:558-568.
46. Duffy V.B., Lanier S.A., Hutchins H.L., Pescatello L.S., Johnson M.K., Bartoshuk L.M. Food preference as a screen for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk within health risk appraisal. J Am Diet Assoc 2007, 107(2):237-245.
47. Duffy V.B., Hayes J.E., Sullivan B., Faghri P. Surveying food/beverage preference: a tool for epidemiological studies to connect chemosensation with health outcomes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009, 1170:558-568.
48. Leshem M. The excess salt appetite of humans is not due to sodium loss in adulthood. Physiol Behav 2009, 98(3):331-337.
49. Duffy V., Peterson J., Bartoshuk L. Associations between taste genetics, oral sensation and alcohol intake. Physiol Behav 2004, 82(2-3):435-445.
50. Duffy V.B., Peterson J.M., Dinehart M.E., Bartoshuk L.M. Genetic and environmental variation in taste: associations with sweet intensity, preference, and intake. Topics Clin Nutr 2003, 18:209-220.
51. Bartoshuk L.M., Duffy V.B., Green B.G., Hoffman H.J., Ko C.W., Lucchina L.A., et al. Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching. Physiol Behav 2004, 82(1):109-114.
52. Green B.G., Dalton P., Cowart B., Shaffer G., Rankin K., Higgins J. Evaluating the 'Labeled Magnitude Scale' for measuring sensations of taste and smell. Chem Senses 1996, 21(3):323-334.
53. Bartoshuk L.M., Duffy V.B., Miller I.J. PTC/PROP tasting: anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects. Physiol Behav 1994, 56(6):1165-1171.
54. Miller I.J.J., Reedy F.E.J. Variation in human taste bud density and taste intensity perception. Physiol Behav 1990, 47(6):1213-1219.
55. Green B.G., Gelhard B. Salt as an oral irritant. Chem Senses 1989, 14(2):259-271.
56. Matthews J.N., Altman D.G., Campbell M.J., Royston P. Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. Bmj 1990, 300(6719):230-235.
57. Pruessner J.C., Kirschbaum C., Meinlschmid G., Hellhammer D.H. Two formulas for computation of the area under the curve represent measures of total hormone concentration versus time-dependent change. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2003, 28(7):916-931.
58. Larson-Powers N., Pangborn R.M. Paired comparison and time-intensity measurements of sensory properties of beverages and gelatins containing sucrose or synthetic sweeteners. J Food Sci 1978, 43(1):41-46.
59. Nasrawi C.W., Pangborn R.M. Temporal effectiveness of mouth-rinsing on capsaicin mouth-burn. Physiol Behav 1990, 47(4):617-623.
60. Cliff M., Heymann H. Time-intensity evaluation of oral burn. J Sens Stud 1993, 8:201-211.
61. U.S. Department of Agriculture Agriculture Research Service. 2009. USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 22. [internet]. [cited 22 Mar 2010]. Available at: http://www.ars.usda.gov/ba/bhnrc/ndl.
62. Nutrition in prevention and treatment of disease 2001, Academic Press, San Diego. A.M. Coulston, C.L. Rock, E.R. Monsen (Eds.).
63. Espeland M.A., Kumanyika S., Wilson A.C., Wilcox S., Chao D., Bahnson J., et al. Lifestyle interventions influence relative errors in self-reported diet intake of sodium and potassium. Ann Epidemiol 2001, 11(2):85-93.
64. Tabachnick B.G., Fidell L.S. Using multivariate statistics 2000, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA, xxvi, 966 pp.
65. Bartoshuk L.M., Duffy V.B., Chapo A., Fasta K., Yieea J., Hoffman H., et al. From psychophysics to the clinic: missteps and advances. Food Qual Prefer 2004, 15(7-8):617-632.
66. Dinehart M.E., Hayes J.E., Bartoshuk L.M., Lanier S.L., Duffy V.B. Bitter taste markers explain variability in vegetable sweetness, bitterness, and intake. Physiol Behav 2006, 87(2):304-313.
67. Hayes J.E., Duffy V.B. Explaining variance in central adiposity through taste phenotype and food preference. Presented at 7th Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium. Minneapolis MN 2007.
68. Keast R.S., Breslin P.A. Modifying the bitterness of selected oral pharmaceuticals with cation and anion series of salts. Pharm Res 2002, 19(7):1019-1026.
69. Breslin P.A., Beauchamp G.K. Salt enhances flavour by suppressing bitterness. Nature 1997, 387(6633):563.
70. U.S. Department of Agriculture Agriculture Research Service. 2004. What We Eat in America, NHANES 2001-2002: Nutrient Intakes: Mean Amount Consumed per Individual, One Day, 2001-2002 [internet]. [cited 8 Feb 2010]. Available at: http://www.ars.usda.gov/Services/docs.htm?docid=14827.
71. Kline R.B. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling 1998, Guilford Press, New York.
72. Lanier S.A., Hayes J.E., Duffy V.B. Sweet and bitter tastes of alcoholic beverages mediate alcohol intake in of-age undergraduates. Physiol Behav 2005, 83(5):821-831.
73. Hayes J.E., Duffy V.B. Oral sensory phenotype identifies level of sugar and fat required for maximal liking. Physiol Behav 2008, 95(1-2):77-87. Epub 2008 May 2. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.04.023.
74. Bartoshuk L.M., Duffy V.B., Miller I.J. PTC/PROP tasting: anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects. Physiol Behav 1994, 56:1165-1171.
75. Prutkin J., Fisher E.M., Etter L., Fast K., Gardner E., Lucchina L.A., et al. Genetic variation and inferences about perceived taste intensity in mice and men. Physiol Behav 2000, 69(1-2):161-173.
76. Hayes J.E., Duffy V.B. Revisiting sugar-fat mixtures: sweetness and creaminess vary with phenotypic markers of oral sensation. Chem Senses 2007, 32(3):225-236. First published January 4, 2007, doi:10.1093/chemse/bjl050.
77. Prescott J., Bartoshuk L.M., Prutkin J. 6-n-propylthiouracil tasting and the perception of nontaste oral sensations. Genetic variation in taste sensitivity 2004, 89-104. Marcel Dekker, New York. J. Prescott, B.J. Tepper (Eds.).
78. Prutkin J., Fisher E.M., Etter L., Fast K., Gardner E., Lucchina L.A., et al. Genetic variation and inferences about perceived taste intensity in mice and men. Physiol Behav 2000, 69(1-2):161-173.
79. Essick G.K., Chopra A., Guest S., McGlone F. Lingual tactile acuity, taste perception, and the density and diameter of fungiform papillae in female subjects. Physiol Behav 2003, 80(2-3):289-302.
80. Okoro E.O., Uroghide G.E., Jolayemi E.T., Olufunke O.G., Enobakhare C.O. Studies on taste thresholds in a group of adolescent children in rural Nigeria. Food Qual Prefer 1998, 9(4):205-210.
81. Moskowitz H.W., Kumaraiah V., Sharma K.N., Jacobs H.L., Sharma S.D. Cross-cultural differences in simple taste preferences. Science 1975, 190(4220):1217-1218.
82. Pfaffmann C. Wundt's schema of sensory affect in the light of research on gustatory preference. Psychol Res 1980, 42:165-174.
83. Pike R.L., Yao C. Increased sodium chloride appetite during pregnancy in the rat. J Nutr 1971, 101(2):169-175.
84. Blais C.A., Pangborn R.M., Borhani N.O., Ferrell M.F., Prineas R.J., Laing B. Effect of dietary sodium restriction on taste responses to sodium chloride: a longitudinal study. Am J Clin Nutr 1986, 44(2):232-243.
85. Shepherd R., Farleigh C.A., Wharf S.G. Limited compensation by table salt for reduced salt within a meal. Appetite 1989, 13(3):193-200.
86. Drewnowski A., Henderson S.A., Driscoll A., Rolls B.J. Salt taste perceptions and preferences are unrelated to sodium consumption in healthy older adults. J Am Diet Assoc 1996, 96(5):471-474.
87. Wolfram Alpha. 2010. Sodium content in chicken soup [internet]. [cited 8 Feb 2010]. Available at: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sodium+content+in+chicken+soup.
88. U.S. Department of Agriculture Agriculture Research Service. 2009. USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference Release 22 - NDB No. 06425: Soup, chicken vegetable, canned, prepared with equal volume water. [internet]. [cited 8 Feb 2010]. Available at: http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/.
89. De Graaf C., Zandstra E.H. Sweetness intensity and pleasantness in children, adolescents, and adults. Physiol Behav 1999, 67(4):513-520.
90. Duffy V.B., Hayes J.E., Bartoshuk L.M., Snyder D.J. Taste: vertebrate psychophysics. Encyclopedia of neuroscience 2009, 881-886. Academic Press, Oxford. L.R. Squire (Ed.).
91. Potischman N., Carroll R.J., Iturria S.J., Mittl B., Curtin J., Thompson F.E., et al. Comparison of the 60- and 100-item NCI-block questionnaires with validation data. Nutr Cancer 1999, 34(1):70-75.
92. Leiba A., Vald A., Peleg E., Shamiss A., Grossman E. Does dietary recall adequately assess sodium, potassium, and calcium intake in hypertensive patients?. Nutrition 2005, 21(4):462-466.
93. Bathalon G.P., Tucker K.L., Hays N.P., Vinken A.G., Greenberg A.S., McCrory M.A., et al. Psychological measures of eating behavior and the accuracy of 3 common dietary assessment methods in healthy postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr 2000, 71(3):739-745.
94. Ledikwe J.H., Ello-Martin J., Pelkman C.L., Birch L.L., Mannino M.L., Rolls B.J. A reliable, valid questionnaire indicates that preference for dietary fat declines when following a reduced-fat diet. Appetite 2007, 10.1016/j.appet.2006.12.001.
95. Hayes J.E. Translating taste genetics to adiposity: sensation, preference and intake of high-fat sweet foods 2007, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.