Conflicting selection in the course of adaptive diversification: The interplay between mutualism and intraspecific competition

American Naturalist

Volumn 183, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 363-375

  Raimundo, Rafael L G ^a   Gibert, Jean P ^b   Hembry, David H ^c,d   Guimarães Jr , Paulo R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Assortative mating; Disruptive selection; Magic traits; Stabilizing selection; Trait complementarity

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ANT; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC SELECTION; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SEED DISPERSAL; SYMBIOSIS;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; ANTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REPRODUCTION; SEED DISPERSAL; SELECTION, GENETIC; SYMBIOSIS;

EID: 84894324055     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/674965     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Anderson, B., and S. D. Johnson. 2008. The geographical mosaic of coevolution in a plant-pollinator mutualism. Evolution 62:220-225.
2. Anderson, B., J. S. Terblanche, and A. G. Ellis. 2010. Predictable patterns of trait mismatches between interacting plants and insects. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10:204.
3. Bascompte, J., and P. Jordano. 2007. Plant-animal mutualistic networks: the architecture of biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 38:567-593.
4. Bascompte, J., P. Jordano, C. J. Melián, and J. Olesen. 2003. The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 100:9383-9387.
5. Bentley, B. L. 1977. Extrafloral nectaries and protection by nectaries and pugnacious body guards. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 8:407-427.
6. Bhattacharyay, A., and B. Drossel. 2005. Modeling coevolution and sympatric speciation of flowers and pollinators. Physica A 345: 159-172.
7. Bolnick, D. I., and B. M. Fitzpatrick. 2007. Sympatric speciation: models and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 38:459-487.
8. Bolnick, D. I., R. Svanbaeck, J. A. Fordyce, L. H. Yang, J. M. Davis, C. D. Hulsey, and M. L. Forister. 2003. The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. American Naturalist 161:1-28.
9. Bond, W. J. 1994. Do mutualisms matter? assessing the impact of pollinator and disperser disruption on plant extinction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 344:83-90.
10. Bronstein, J. L. 2009. Mutualism and symbiosis. Pages 233-238 in S. A. Levin, ed. The Princeton guide to ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
11. Bronstein, J. L., R. Alarcón, and M. Geber. 2006. The evolution of plant-insect mutualisms. New Phytologist 172:412-428.
12. Bshary, R., A. Hohner, K. Ait-el-Djoudi, and H. Fricke. 2006. Interspecific communicative and coordinated hunting between groupers and giant moray eels in the Red Sea. PLoS Biology 4:e431.
13. Bürger, R. 2002. On a genetic model of intraspecific competition and stabilizing selection. American Naturalist 160:661-682.
14. Bürger, R., K. A. Schneider, and M. Willensdorfer. 2006. The conditions for speciation through intraspecific competition. Evolution 60:2185-2206.
15. Dalsgaard, B., A. M. Martin-Gonzalez, J. M. Olesen, A. Timmermann, L. H. Andersen, and J. Ollerton. 2008. Pollination networks and functional specialization: a test using Lesser Antillean plant-hummingbird assemblages. Oikos 117:789-793.
16. Dáttilo, W. 2012. Different tolerances of symbiotic and nonsymbiotic ant-plant networks to species extinctions. Network Biology 2:127-138.
17. Dieckmann, U., M. Doebeli, J. A. J. Metz, and D. Tautz. 2004. Adaptive speciation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. Doebeli, M. 2011. Adaptive diversification. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
19. Doebeli, M., and U. Dieckmann. 2000. Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interactions. American Naturalist 156(suppl.):S77-S101.
20. Felsenstein, J. 1979. Excursions along the interface between disruptive and stabilizing selection. Genetics 93:773-795.
21. Ferdy, J.-B., L. Després, and B. Godelle. 2002. Evolution of mutualism between globeflowers and their pollinating flies. Journal of Theoretical Biology 217:219-234.
22. Fonseca, C. R. 1999. Amazonian ant-plant interactions and the nesting space limitation hypothesis. Journal of Tropical Ecology 15: 807-825.
23. Fonseca, C. R., and G. Ganade. 1996. Asymmetries, compartments and null interactions in an Amazonian ant-plant community. Journal of Animal Ecology 65:339-347.
24. Fontaine, C., P. R. Guimarães Jr., S. Kéfi, N. Loeuille, J. J. Memmott, W. H. van der Putten, F. J. F. van Veen, and E. Thébault. 2011. The ecological and evolutionary implications of merging different types of networks. Ecology Letters 14:1170-1181.
25. Gokhale, C. S., and A. Traulsen. 2012. Mutualism and evolutionary multiplayer games: revisiting the Red King. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279:4611-4616.
26. Gómez, J. M., and F. Perfectti. 2012. Fitness consequences of centrality in mutualistic individual-based networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279:1754-1760.
27. Gómez, J. M., and M. Verdú. 2012. Mutualism with plants drives primate diversification. Systematic Biology 61:567-577.
28. Guerrero, A. M., and A. Tye. 2009. Darwin's finches as seed predators and dispersers. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 121:752-764.
29. Guimarães, P. R., Jr., P. Jordano, and J. N. Thompson. 2011. Evolution and coevolution in mutualistic networks. Ecology Letters 14:877-885.
30. Guimarães, P. R., Jr., V. Rico-Gray, P. S. Oliveira, T. J. Izzo, S. F. Reis, and J. N. Thompson. 2007. Interaction intimacy affects structure and coevolutionary dynamics in mutualistic networks. Current Biology 17:1797-1803.
31. Hattori, A. 2012. Determinants of body size composition in limited shelter space: why are anemonefishes protandrous? Behavioral Ecology 23:512-520.
32. Herrera, C. M. 1995. Plant-vertebrate seed dispersal systems in the Mediterranean: ecological, evolutionary, and historical determinants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26:705-727.
33. Jones, E. I. 2010. Optimal foraging when predation risk increases with patch resources: an analysis of pollinators and ambush predators. Oikos 119:835-840.
34. Jones, E. I., J. L. Bronstein, and R. G. Ferrière. 2012. The fundamental role of competition in the ecology and evolution of mutualisms. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1256:66-88.
35. Kawakita, A., and M. Kato. 2009. Repeated independent evolution of obligate pollination mutualism in the Phyllantheae-Epicephala association. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276:417-426.
36. Kiester, A. R., R. Lande, and D. W. Schemske. 1984. Models of coevolution and speciation in plants and their pollinators. American Naturalist 124:220-243.
37. Kingsolver, J. G., H. E. Hoekstra, J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. N. Vignieri, C. E. Hill, A. Hoang, P. Gibert, and P. Beerli. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. American Naturalist 157:245-261.
38. Lankinen, A°., and M. C. Larsson. 2009. Conflicting selection pressures on reproductive functions and speciation in plants. Evolutionary Ecology 23:147-157.
39. Lanza, J., G. C. Smith, S. Sack, and A. Cash. 1995. Variation in nectar volume and composition of Impatiens capensis at the individual, plant, and population levels. Oecologia (Berlin) 102:113-119.
40. Léotard, G., A. Saltmarsh, F. Kjellberg, and D. McKey. 2008. Mutualism, hybrid inviability and speciation in a tropical ant-plant. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21:1133-1143.
41. Minta, S., K. Minta, and D. Lott. 1992. Hunting associations between badgers (Taxidea taxus) and coyotes (Canis latrans). Journal of Mammalogy 73:814-820.
42. Ollerton, J. 2006. "Biological barter": patterns of specialization compared across different mutualisms. Pages 411-435 in N. M. Waser and J. Ollerton, eds. Plant-pollinator interactions: from specialization to generalization. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
43. Palmer, T. M., M. L. Stanton, and T. P. Young. 2003. Competition and coexistence: exploring mechanisms that restrict and maintain diversity within mutualist guilds. American Naturalist 162(suppl.): S63-S79.
44. Pellmyr, O. 2003. Yuccas, yucca moths, and coevolution: a review. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Gardens 90:35-55.
45. Pires, M. M., and P. R. Guimarães Jr. 2013. Interaction intimacy organizes networks of antagonistic interactions in different ways. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. doi:10.1098/rsif.2012.0649.
46. Ramírez, S. R., T. Eltz, M. K. Fujiwara, G. Gerlach, B. Goldman-Huertas, N. D. Tsutsui, and N. E. Pierce. 2011. Asynchronous divergence in a specialized plant-pollinator mutualism. Science 333:1742-1746.
47. Ricciardi, F., Massimo B., and J. Ollerton. 2010. Assemblage and interaction structure of the anemonefish-anemone mutualism across the Manado Region of Sulawesi, Indonesia. Environmental Biology of Fishes 87:333-347.
48. Rosenzweig, M. L. 1978. Competitive speciation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 10:275-289.
49. Rymer, P. D., S. D. Johnson, and V. Savolainen. 2010. Pollinator behaviour and plant speciation: can assortative mating and dis-ruptive selection maintain distinct floral morphs in sympatry?New Phytologist 188:426-436.
50. Servedio, M. R., G. S. van Doorn, and M. Kopp. 2011. Magic traits in speciation: "magic" but not rare? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26:389-397.
51. Siepielski, A. M., and C. W. Benkman. 2009. Conflicting selection from an antagonist and a mutualist enhances phenotypic variation in a plant. Evolution 64:1120-1128.
52. Stevens, M. H. H., M. Sanchez, J. Lee, and S. E. Finkel. 2007. Diversification rates increase with population size and resource concentration in an unstructured habitat. Genetics 177:2243-2250.
53. Strauss, S. Y., and R. E. Irwin. 2004. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of multispecies plant-animal interactions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35:435-466.
54. Tarayre, M., G. Bowman, A. Schermann-Legionnet, M. Barat, and A. Atlan. 2007. Flowering phenology of Ulex europaeus: ecological consequences of variation within and among populations. Evolutionary Ecology 21:395-409.
55. Thompson, J. N. 2005. The geographic mosaic of coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
56. Thompson, J. N. 2009. Coevolution. Pages 247-252 in S. A. Levin, ed. The Princeton guide to ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
57. Thompson, J. N., C. Schwind, P. R. Guimarães Jr., and M. Friberg. 2013. Diversification through multitrait evolution in a coevolving interaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 110:11487-11492.
58. Waser, N. M., L. Chittka, M. V. Price, N. M. Williams, and J. Ollerton. 1996. Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77:1043-1060.
59. Weiblen, G. D. 2002. How to be a fig wasp. Annual Review of Entomology 47:299-330.
60. Yoder, J. B., and S. L. Nuismer. 2010. When does coevolution promote diversification? American Naturalist 176:802-817.