Fitness consequences of centrality in mutualistic individual-based networks

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 279, Issue 1734, 2012, Pages 1754-1760

  Gómez, José M ^a   Perfectti, Francisco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Centrality; Individual generalization; Individual based networks; Interacting phenotype; Plant fitness; Pollination

Indexed keywords

COEXISTENCE; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FITNESS; FLOWER VISITING; GENERALIST; HERB; MUTUALISM; PHENOTYPE; POLLINATION; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; VISUALIZATION;

ERYSIMUM MEDIOHISPANICUM;

EID: 84858757258     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.2244     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Fortuna, M. A., García, C., Guimarães Jr, P. R. & Bascompte, J. 2008 Spatial mating networks in insectpollinated plants. Ecol. Lett. 11, 490-498. (doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01167.x)
2. Sih, A., Hanser, S. F. & McHugh, K. A. 2009 Social network theory: new insights and issues for behavioral ecologists. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63, 975-988. (doi:10. 1007/s00265-009-0725-6)
3. Barabási, L. 2009 Scale-free networks: a decade and beyond. Science 325, 412-413. (doi:10.1126/science.1173299)
4. Jeong, H., Mason, S. P., Barabási, A. L. & Oltvai, Z. N. 2001 Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411, 41-42. (doi:10.1038/35075138)
5. Barrat, A., Barthélemy, M., Pastor-Satorras, R. & Vespignani, A. 2004 The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 3747-3752. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0400087101)
6. Bader, D. A., Kintali, K., Madduri, M. & Mihail, M. 2007 Approximating betweenness centrality. In Algorithms and models for the web-graph. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
7. Habiba, H., Tantipathananandh, C. & Berger-Wolf, T. Y. 2007. Betweenness centrality measure in dynamic networks. Technical report. Rutgers, NJ: DIMACS.
8. Le Merrer, E. & Trédan, G. 2009. Centralities: capturing the fuzzy notion of importance in social graphs. In Proc. 2nd ACM EuroSys Workshop on Social Network Systems SNS '09, pp. 33-38. New York, NY: ACM.
9. Levy, S. F. & Siegal, M. L. 2008 Network hubs buffer environmental variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol. 6, e264. (doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060264)
10. Martín González, A. M., Dalsgaard, B. & Olesen, J. M. 2010 Centrality measures and the importance of generalist species in pollination networks. Ecol. Complex 7, 36-43. (doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.03.008)
11. Sazima, C., Guimarães Jr, P. R., Dos Reis, S. F. & Sazima, I. 2010 What makes a species central in a cleaning mutualism network? Oikos 119, 1319-1325. (doi:10. 1111/j.1600-0706.2009.18222.x)
12. Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. 1994 Social network analysis: methods and applications, 1st edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Krebs, V. 2001 Mapping networks of terrorist cells. Connections 24, 43-52.
14. Tsai, W. 2001 Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad. Manag. J. 44, 996-1004. (doi:10.2307/3069443)
15. Bulkley, N. & Van Alstyne, M. 2004 Does e-mail make white collar workers more productive? In Proceedings of the North American Association for Computational Social and Organization Science (NAACSOS), June 27-29. Technical report. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
16. Perliger, A. & Pedahzur, A. 2011 Social network analysis in the study of terrorism and political violence. PS: Political Sci. Politics 44, 45-50. (doi:10.1017/S1049096510001848)
17. Bascompte, J. & Jordano, P. 2007 Plant-animal mutualistic networks: the architecture of biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38, 567-593. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095818)
18. Araújo, M. S., Guimarães Jr, P. R., Svanbäck, R., Pinheiro, A., Guimarães, P., Dos Reis, S. F. & Bolnick, D. I. 2008 Network analysis reveals contrasting effects of intraspecific competition on individual vs. population diets. Ecology 89, 1981-1993. (doi:10.1890/07-0630.1)
19. Dupont, Y. L., Trøjelsgaard, K. & Olesen, J. M. 2011 Scaling down from species to individuals: a flowervisitation network between individual honeybees and thistle plants. Oikos 120, 170-177. (doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18699.x)
20. Fenner, A. L., Godfrey, S. S. & Michael Bull, C. 2011 Using social networks to deduce whether residents or dispersers spread parasites in a lizard population. J. Anim. Ecol. 80, 835-843. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01825.x)
21. Godfrey, S. S., Bull, C. M., James, R. & Murray, K. 2009 Network structure and parasite transmission in a group living lizard, the gidgee skink, Egernia stokesii. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63, 1045-1056. (doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0730-9)
22. Gómez, J. M., Bosch, J., Perfectti, F., Fernández, J. & Abdelaziz, M. 2007 Pollinator diversity affects plant reproduction and recruitment: the tradeoffs of generalization. Oecologia 153, 597-605. (doi:10.1007/s00442-007-0758-3)
23. Colwell, R. K. 2009. EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 8.2. User's guide and application published at: http://purl.oclc.org/estimates.
24. Gómez, J. M., Perfectti, F. & Jordano, P. 2011 The functional consequences of mutualistic network architecture. PLoS ONE 6, e16143. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0016143)
25. Barrat, A., Barthélemy, M. & Vespignani, A. 2008 Dynamical processes on complex networks, 1st edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Kolaczyk, E. D. 2009 Statistical analysis of network data: methods and models, 1st edn. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
27. Nooy, W., de Mrvar, A. & Batagelj, V. 2005 Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek, 1st edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. Freeman, L. 1977 A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40, 35-41. (doi:10.2307/3033543)
29. Newman, M. E. J. 2003 The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 45, 167. (doi:10.1137/S003614450342480)
30. Zelditch, M. L., Swiderski, D. L., Sheets, D. H. & Fink, W. L. 2004 Geometric morphometrics for biologists, 1st edn. New York, NY: Academic Press.
31. Gómez, J. M. & Perfectti, F. 2010 Evolution of complex traits: the case of Erysimum corolla shape. Int. J. Plant Sci. 171, 987-998. (doi:10.1086/656475)
32. Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A. & Smith, G. M. 2009 Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R, 1st edn. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
33. Crawley, M. J. 2007 The R book, 1st edn. New York, NY: Wiley.
34. R Development Core Team. 2011 R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. (http://cran.r-project. org/src/contrib/Archive/nlme/).
35. Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. 2002 Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
36. Olesen, J. M., Bascompte, J., Dupont, Y. L. & Jordano, P. 2007 The modularity of pollination networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 19 891-19 896. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 0706375104)
37. Estrada, E. 2007 Characterization of topological keystone species: local, global and 'meso-scale' centralities in food webs. Ecol. Complexity 4, 48-57. (doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.02.018)
38. Solé, R. V. & Montoya, J. M. 2001 Complexity and fragility in ecological networks. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 2039-2045. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1767)
39. Memmott, J., Waser, N. M. & Price, M. V. 2004 Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 2605-2611. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2909)
40. Kaiser-Bunbury, C. N., Muff, S., Memmott, J., Müller, C. B. & Caflisch, A. 2010 The robustness of pollination networks to the loss of species and interactions: a quantitative approach incorporating pollinator behaviour. Ecol. Lett. 13, 442-452. (doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01437.x)
41. Herrera, C. M. 2005 Plant generalization on pollinators: species property or local phenomenon? Am. J. Bot. 92, 13-20. (doi:10.3732/ajb.92.1.13)
42. Hoehn, P., Tscharntke, T., Tylianakis, J. M. & Steffan-Dewenter, I. 2008 Functional group diversity of bee pollinators increases crop yield. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 2283-2291. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0405)
43. Krause, J., Lusseau, D. & James, R. 2009 Animal social networks: an introduction. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63, 967-973. (doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0747-0)
44. Hersch, E. I. & Roy, B. A. 2007 Context-dependent pollinator behavior: an explanation for patterns of hybridization among three species of Indian paintbrush. Evolution 61, 111-124. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00009.x)
45. Smithson, A. 2001 Pollinator preference, frequency dependence, and floral evolution. InCognitive ecology of pollination (eds L. Chittka & J. D. Thomson), pp. 237-258. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46. Moore, A. J., Brodie, E. D. & Jason, B. W. 1997 Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process: I. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution 51, 1352-1362. (doi:10.2307/2411187)
47. Cameron, E. Z., Setsaas, T. H. & Linklater, W. L. 2009 Social bonds between unrelated females increase reproductive success in feral horses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 13 850-13 853. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0900639106)
48. Frère, C.H., Krützen, M., Mann, J., Connor, R.C., Bejder, L. & Sherwin, W. B. 2010 Social and genetic interactions drive fitness variation in a free-living dolphin population. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19 949-19 954. (doi:10. 1073/pnas.1007997107)
49. Silk, J. B. 2007 Social components of fitness in primate groups. Science 317, 1347-1351. (doi:10.1126/science. 1140734)
50. Agrawal, A. F., Brodie III, E. D. & Wade, M. J. 2001 On indirect genetic effects in structured populations. Am. Nat. 158, 308-323. (doi:10.1086/321324)
51. Wolf, J. B., Brodie III, E. D., Cheverud, J. M., Moore, A. J. & Wade, M. J. 1998 Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 64-69. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01233-0)