Conflict, metacognition, and analytic thinking

Thinking and Reasoning

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 215-244

  Thompson, Valerie A ^a   Johnson, Stephen C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Analytic Thinking; Dual Process Theories; Feeling of Rightness; Metacognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894322211     PISSN: 13546783     EISSN: 14640708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13546783.2013.869763     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ball, L. J., Phillips, P., Wade, C. N., & Quayle, J. D. (2006). Effects of belief and logic on syllogistic reasoning: Eye-movement evidence for selective processing models. Experimental Psychology, 53, 77-86.
2. Bonner, C., & Newell, B. R. (2010). In conflict with ourselves? An investigation of heuristic and analytic processes in decision making. Memory & Cognition, 38, 186-196.
3. Campbell, J. I. D., & Thompson, V. A. T. (2012). MorePower 6.0 for ANOVA with relational confidence intervals and Bayesian analysis. Behavioral Research Methods, 43, 679-690. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0186-0
4. De Neys, W. (2006). Automatic-heuristic and executive-analytic processing during reasoning: Chronometric and dual-task considerations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1070-1100.
5. De Neys, W. (2012). Bias and conflict: A case for logical intuitions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 28-38. doi:10.1177/1745691611429354
6. De Neys W., Cromheeke S., & Osman M. (2011). Biased but in doubt: Conflict and decision confidence. PLoS ONE, 6, e15954. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015954
7. De Neys, W., & Glumicic, T. (2008). Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking. Cognition, 106(3), 1248-1299. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.002
8. Elqayam, S., & Evans, J. S. B. (2011). Subtracting "ought" from "is": Descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(5), 233-290.
9. Evans, J. St. B. T. (2007a). On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories. Thinking & Reasoning, 13, 321-339.
10. Evans, J. St. B. T. (2007b). Hypothetical thinking: Dual processes in reasoning and judgment. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
11. Evans, J. St. B. T., & Curtis-Holmes, J. (2005). Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual-process theory of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 11, 382-389.
12. Evans J. St. B. T., & Over D. E. (1996). Rationality and reasoning. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
13. Evans, J. St. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223-241. doi:10.1177/1745691612460685
14. Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1-17.
15. Forgues, H. L., & Markovits, H. (2010). Conditional reasoning under time constraints; Information retrieval and inhibition. Thinking & Reasoning, 16, 221-232.
16. Fugelsang, J. A., & Thompson, V. A. (2003). A dual-process model of belief and evidence interactions in causal reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 31, 800-815.
17. Gilhooly, K. J. (2005). Working memory and strategies in reasoning. In M. J. Robers & E. J. Newton (Eds.), Methods of thought: Individual differences in reasoning strategies (pp. 57-80). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
18. Handley, S. J., Newstead, S. E., & Trippas, D. (2010). Logic beliefs, and instruction: A test of the default interventionist account of belief bias. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 28-43. doi:10.1037/a0021098
19. Hélie, S., & Sun, R. (2010). Incubation, insight, and creative problem solving: A unified theory and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 117(3), 994.
20. Jarmasz, J., & Hollands, J. G. (2009). Confidence intervals in repeated-measures designs: The number of observations principle. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 124-138. doi:10.1037/a0014164.
21. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697-720.
22. Pennycook, G., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2012). Are we good at detecting conflict during reasoning? Cognition, 124, 101-106.
23. Pennycook, G., & Thompson, V. A. (2012). Reasoning with base rates is routine, relatively effortless, and context dependent. Psychonomic Society, 19, 528-534. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0249-3
24. Pennycook, G., Trippas, D., Handley, S. J., & Thompson, V. A. (2013). Base rates: Both neglected and intuitive. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/a0034887
25. Perrotin, A., Isingrini, M., Souchay, C., Clarys, D., & Tacconat, L. (2006). Episodic feeling-of-knowing accuracy and cued recall in the elderly: Evidence for double dissociation involving executive functioning and processing speed. Acta Psychologica, 122, 58-73.
26. Rudski, J. M., & Volksdorf, J. (2002). Pictorial versus textual information and the ratio-bias effect. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 547-554.
27. Shipley, W. C., Christian, P. G., Martin, T. A., & Klein, A. M. (2009). Shipley-2. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
28. Shynkaruk J. M., & Thompson V. A. (2006). Confidence and accuracy in deductive reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 34, 619-632.
29. Souchay, C., Isingrini, M., Clarys, D., Taconnat, L., & Eustache, F. (2004). Executive functioning and judgment-of-learning versus feeling-of-knowing in older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 30, 47-62.
30. Stanovich, K. E. (2011). Rationality and the reflective mind. New York: Oxford University Press
31. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2007). Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability. Thinking & Reasoning, 13, 225-247.
32. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 672-695.
33. Thompson, V. A. (2011). Normativism vs. mechanism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(05), 272-273.
34. Thompson, V. A., Evans, J., & Campbell, J. (2013a). Matching bias on the selection task: It's fast and feels good. Thinking and Reasoning, 19, 431-452. doi:10.1080/13546783.2013.820220.
35. Thompson, V. A., Prowse Turner, J. A., & Pennycook, G. (2011). Intuition, reason, and metacognition. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 107-140.
36. Thompson V. A., Prowse Turner J., Pennycook G., Ball L. J., Brack H., Ophir Y., & Ackerman R. (2013b). The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking. Cognition, 128, 237-251. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.012
37. Thompson, V. A., Striemer, C. L., Reikoff, R., Gunter, R. W., & Campbell, J. I. (2003). Syllogistic reasoning time: Disconfirmation disconfirmed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 184-189.
38. Verschueren, N., Schaeken, W., & d'Ydewalle, G. (2005). Everyday conditional reasoning: A working memory-dependent tradeoff between counterexample and likelihood use. Memory & Cognition, 33, 107-119.