MorePower 6.0 for ANOVA with relational confidence intervals and Bayesian analysis

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1255-1265

  Campbell, Jamie I D ^a   Thompson, Valerie A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bayesian analysis; Power for ANOVA; Relational confidence intervals

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; METHODOLOGY; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLOGY; SAMPLE SIZE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BAYES THEOREM; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL; RESEARCH DESIGN; SAMPLE SIZE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84870543550     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: 15543528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0186-0     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716-723. doi: 10. 1109/TAC. 1974. 1100705.
2. American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3. Bakker, M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2011). The (mis)reporting of results in psychology journals. Behavioural Research, 43, 666-678. doi: 10. 3758/s13428-011-0089-5.
4. Berger, J. O. (1985). Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis. New York, NY: Springer.
5. Blouin, D. C., & Riopelle, A. J. (2005). On confidence intervals for within-subjects designs. Psychological Methods, 10, 397-412.
6. Bradley, D. R., Russell, R. L., & Reeve, C. P. (1996). Statistical power in complex experimental designs. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 319-326.
7. Campbell, J. I. D., & Thompson, V. A. (2002). More power to you: Simple power calculations for treatment effects with one degree of freedom. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 34, 332-337.
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Cumming, G., & Finch, S. (2005). Inference by eye: Confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. American Psychologist, 60, 170-180.
10. Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 274-290. doi: 10. 1177/1745691611406920.
11. Dixon, P. (2003). The p-value fallacy and how to avoid it. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 189-202. doi: 10. 1037/h0087425.
12. Dixon, P., & O'Reilly, T. (1999). Scientific versus statistical inference. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 133-149. doi: 10. 1037/h0087305.
13. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behaviour Research Methods, 39, 175-191. doi: 10. 3758/BF03193146.
14. Fidler, F., Thomason, N., Cumming, G., Finch, S., & Leeman, J. (2004). Editors can lead researchers to confidence intervals, but can't make them think: Statistical reform lessons from medicine. Psychological Science, 15, 119-126. doi: 10. 1111/j. 0963-7214. 2004. 01502008. x.
15. Glover, S., & Dixon, P. (2004). Likelihood ratios: A simple and flexible statistic for empirical psychologists. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 791-806. doi: 10. 3758/BF03195791.
16. Hays, W. L. (1994). Statistics (5th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
17. Hoenig, J. M., & Heisey, D. M. (2001). The abuse of power: The pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis. The American Statistician, 55, 19-24.
18. Hollands, J. G., & Jarmasz, J. (2010). Revisiting confidence intervals for repeated measures designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 135-138.
19. Jarmasz, J., & Hollands, J. G. (2009). Confidence intervals in repeated-measures designs: The number of observations principle. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 124-138.
20. Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability. Oxford, U. K.: Oxford University Press.
21. Kruschke, J. K. (2011). Bayesian assessment of null values via parameter estimation and model comparison. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 299-312. doi: 10. 1177/1745691611406925.
22. Levine, T. R., & Hullett, C. R. (2002). Eta squared, partial eta squared, and the misreporting of effect size in communication research. Human Communication Research, 28, 612-625.
23. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490. doi: 10. 3758/BF03210951.
24. Masson, M. E. J. (2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 679-690. doi: 10. 3758/s13428-010-0049-5.
25. Masson, M. E. J., & Loftus, G. R. (2003). Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 203-220. doi: 10. 1037/h0087426.
26. Pierce, C. A., Block, C. A., & Aguinis, H. (2004). Cautionary note on reporting eta-squared values from multifactor ANOVA designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 916-924.
27. Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1995 (pp. 111-196). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
28. Raftery, A. E. (1999). Bayes factors and BIC: Comment on A critique of the Bayesian information criterion for model selection. Sociological Methods and Research, 27, 411-427.
29. Reeve, C. P. (1986). An algorithm for computing the doubly noncentral F C. D. F. to a specified accuracy. [National Bureau of Standards Statistical Engineering Division Note 86-4, November]. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Standards.
30. Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2005). Relational and a relational confidence intervals: A comment on Fidler, Thomason, Cumming, Finch, and Leeman (2004). Psychological Science, 16, 77-79. doi: 10. 1111/j. 0956-7976. 2005. 00783. x.
31. Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225-237. doi: 10. 3758/PBR. 16. 2. 225.
32. Rozeboom, W. W. (1960). The fallacy of the null-hypothesis significance test. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 416-428.
33. Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779-804. doi: 10. 3758/BF03194105.
34. Wetzels, R., Matzke, D., Lee, M. D., Rouder, J. N., Iverson, G. J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Statistical evidence in experimental psychology: An empirical comparison using 855 t tests. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 291-298. doi: 10. 1177/1745691611406923.
35. Yuan, K., & Maxwell, S. (2005). On the post hoc power of testing mean differences. Journal of Education and Behavioural Statistics, 30, 141-167.