STUDIES ON REGIONAL AND NATIONAL REFORM INITIATIVES AS A MEANS TO IMPROVE MATHEMATICS TEACHING AND LEARNING AT SCALE

Participants in Mathematics Teacher Education: Individuals, Teams, Communities and Networks: Volume 3

Volumn 3, Issue , 2008, Pages 255-280

  Pegg, John ^a   Krainer, Konrad ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KLAGENFURT   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867482414     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Altrichter, H., Posch P., & Somekh, B. (1993). Teachers investigate their work. An introduction to the methods of action research. London: Routledge.
2. Beeth, M. E., McCollum, T. L., & Tafel, J. (submitted). Systemic reform of science and mathematics education in Ohio (US). In R. Duit & R. Tytler (Eds.), Quality development projects in science education. Special issue of the International Journal of Science Education (planned for 2008).
3. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, M. R. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester: University Press.
4. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces. Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer Press.
5. Glenn, J. (Chair). (2000). Before it's too late: A Report to the Nation from the National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century. Education Publications Center, US Department of Education.
6. Hattie, J. A. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Australian Council for Educational Research Annual Conference on: Building Teacher Quality.
7. Heffeter, B. (2006). Regionale Netzwerke. Eine zentrale Maßnahme zu IMST3. Ergebnisbericht zur externen fokussierten Evaluation. Ein Projekt im Auftrag des BMBWK [Regional networks. A main measure of IMST3. Report on the results of the external focused evaluation]. Vienna: BMBWK.
8. Im, Y.-K. (2007a). Issues and tasks of rural education in Korea. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Issues and Tasks of Rural Education in Korea and Australia, Kongju National University, November.
9. Im, Y.-K. (2007b). New University for Regional Innovation (NURI), Teacher Education Innovation Centre (TEIC) project: Midterm report. Report prepared for the Korea Research Foundation, NURI-TEIC at Kongju National University, South Korea.
10. Im, Y.-K., Lee, T.-S., & Kwon, D.-T. (2007). Analysis of the educational gap between rural and urban areas. Kongju, Korea: Kongju National University, New University for Regional Innovation -Teacher Education Innovation Centre (NURI-TEIC).
11. Kitawaga, F. (2006). Using the region to win globally: Japanese and South Korean innovations. PASCAL Observatory, November.
12. Krainer, K. (2001). Teachers’ growth is more than the growth of individual teachers: The case of Gisela. In F.-L. Lin & T. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 271-293). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
13. Krainer, K. (2005a). Pupils, teachers and schools as mathematics learners. In C. Kynigos (Ed.), Mathematics education as a field of research in the knowledge society. Proceedings of the First GARME Conference (pp. 34-51). Athens, Greece: Hellenic Letters (Pubs).
14. Krainer, K. (2005b). IMST3 - Ein nachhaltiges Unterstützungssystem [IMST3 - A Sustainable Support System]. Austrian Education News (Ed. BMBWK), 44, December 2005, 8-14. (Internet: http://www.bmukk.gv.at/enfr/school/aen.xml (last search: Jan. 7, 2008).
15. Krainer, K. (2007). Die Programme IMST und SINUS: Reflexionen über Ansatz, Wirkungen und Weiterentwicklungen [The programmes IMST and SINUS: Reflections on approach, impacts and further developments]. In D. Höttecke (Ed.), Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung im internationalen Vergleich. Gesellschaft für Didaktik der Chemie und Physik. Tagungsband der Jahrestagung 2006 in Bern [Scienctic literacy in international comparison. Society of didactics of chemistry and physics. Proceedings of the annual conference 2006 in Bern] (pp. 20-48). Münster, Germany: LIT-Verlag.
16. Krainer, K., Dörfler, W., Jungwirth, H., Kühnelt, H., Rauch, F., & Stern, T. (Eds.). (2002). Lernen im Aufbruch: Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften. Pilotprojekt IMST2 [Changing learning: Mathematics and science. The project IMST2]. Innsbruck, Austria: Studienverlag.
17. Little, J. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 325-340.
18. Lyons, T., Cooksey, R., Panizzon, D., Parnell, A., & Pegg, J. (2006). Science, ICT and mathematics education in rural and regional Australia: Report from the SiMERR National Survey. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.
19. MCEETYA (2006). National Report on Schooling in Australia 2006, Preliminary paper. Retrieved September 2007, from http://www.mceetya.edu.au/mceetya/anr/
20. McPhan, G., Morony, W., Pegg, J., Cooksey, R., & Lynch, T. (2008). Maths? Why not? Final Report prepared for the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR), March. Available at: http://www.aamt.edu.au/AAMT-in-action/Projects/Maths-Why-Not
21. Müller, F. H., Andreitz, I., Hanfstingl, B., & Krainer, K. (2007). Effects of the Austrian IMST Fund of instructional and school development. Some results from the school year 2006/2007 focusing on teacher and student motivation. European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI): 12th Biennial Meeting Conference, Budapest, Hungary, August 28-September 1, 2007.
22. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. J., & Smith, T. A. (1998). Mathematics and science achievement in the final year of secondary school: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Boston: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.
23. NCEE - National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983). A nation at risk [On-line]. Available: http://www.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/title.html
24. OECD (2006). Sustaining high growth through innovation: Reforming the R7D and education systems in Korea. Economic Department Working Papers no. 470, Paris: OECD.
25. Panizzon, D., & Pegg, J. (2008). Collaborative innovations in rural and regional secondary schools: Enhancing student learning in Science, Mathematics and ICT. Report submitted ASISTM Curriculum Corporation. Podcasts of Teacher comments available at http://www.une.edu.au/simerr/Science/index.html
26. Pegg, J., & Graham, L. (2005). The effect of improved automaticity and retrieval of basic number skills on persistently low-achieving students. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (V ol. 4, pp. 49-56). Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne.
27. Pegg, J., & Graham, L. (2007). Addressing the needs of low-achieving mathematics students: Helping students ‘trust their heads’. Invited Key Note Address to the 21st Biennial Conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers. In K. Milton, H. Reeves, & T. Spencer (Eds.), Mathematics: Essential for earning, essential for life (pp. 33-46). Hobart: AAMT.
28. Pegg, J., Lynch, T., & Panizzon, D. (2007). An exceptional schooling outcomes project: Mathematics. Brisbane, Australia: Post Press.
29. Prenzel, M., & Ostermeier, C. (2006). Improving mathematics and science instruction: A program for the professional development of teachers. In F. Oser, F. Achtenhagen, & U. Renold (Eds.), Competence oriented teacher training. Old research demands and new pathways (pp. 79-96). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
30. Prenzel, M., Schratz, M., & Messner, R. (2007). Externe Evaluation von IMST3. Bericht an das Bundesministerium für Unterricht, Kunst und Kultur [External evaluation of IMST3. Report to the Federal Ministry for Education, the Arts and Culture]. Vienna: BMUKK.
31. Reynolds, D., Creemers, B., Stringfield, S., Teddlie, C., & Schaffer, G. (Eds.). (2002). World class schools. International perspectives on school effectiveness. London: Routledge.
32. Roberts, P. (2005). Staffing an empty schoolhouse: Attracting and retaining teachers in rural, remote and isolated communities. Sydney: NSW Teachers Federation.
33. Specht, W. (2004). Die Entwicklungsinitiative IMST2: Erwartungen, Bewertungen und Wirkungen aus der Sicht der Schulen [The development programme IMST2: Expectations, experiences and results seen from the perspective of schools]. ZSEReport 68. Graz, Austria: Zentrum für Schulentwicklung.
34. Thomson, S., & De Bortoli, L. (2007). The PISA 2006 survey of students' scientific, reading and mathematical literacy skills Exploring Scientific Literacy: How Australia measures up. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
35. Thomson, S., Cresswell, J., & De Bortoli, L. (2004). Facing the future: A focus on mathematical literacy among Australian 15-year-old students in PISA. Camberwell, Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
36. Vinson, A. (2002). Inquiry into public education in New South Wales Second Report September 2002. Retrieved August 2005, from www.pub-edinquiry.org/reports/final_reports/03/
37. von Glasersfeld, E. (Ed.). (1991). Radical constructivism in mathematics education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
38. Wagner, S., & Meiring, S. P. (Eds.). (2004). The story of SUSTAIN: Models of reform in mathematics and science teacher education. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio Resource Center for Mathematics, Science, and Reading.
39. Willke, H. (1999). Systemtheorie II: Interventionstheorie [System theory II: Intervention theory]. 3rd ed. Stuttgart, Germany: Lucius & Lucius UTB.
40. Zammit, S., Routitsky, A., & Greenwood L. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement of junior secondary school students in Australia. TIMSS Australia Monograph No. 4, Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.