Suspending group debate and developing concepts

Journal of Product Innovation Management

Volumn 30, Issue SUPPL 1, 2013, Pages 48-61

  Stam, Daan ^a   De Vet, Arne ^a   Barkema, Harry G ^a,b   De Dreu, Carsten K W ^c,d  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d Association for Psychological Science   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT; GROUP MEMBERS; HIGH QUALITY; IDEA GENERATION; INNOVATION MANAGEMENT; INNOVATIVENESS; NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL PROBLEMS;

GROUP THEORY;

EID: 84893841177     PISSN: 07376782     EISSN: 15405885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12063     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Allport, F. H. 1924. Social psychology. New York: Houghton Mills.
2. Amabile, T. M. 1996. Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
3. Anderson, C., O. P. John, D. Keltner, and A. M. Kring. 2001. Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81: 116-32.
4. Anderson, N. R., C. K. W. de Dreu, and B. A. Nijstad. 2004. The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior 25: 147-73.
5. Ashton, M. C., K. Lee, and S. V. Paunonen. 2002. What is the central feature of extraversion? Social attention versus reward sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83: 245-52.
6. Atuahene-Gima, K. 2003. The effects of centrifugal and centripetal forces on product development speed and quality: How does problem solving matter? Academy of Management Journal 46: 359-73.
7. Baddeley, A. D. 2001. Is working memory still working memory? American Psychologist 56: 851-64.
8. Barrick, B., G. L. Steward, M. J. Neubert, and M. K. Mount. 1998. Relating member ability and personality to work team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology 83: 377-91.
9. Bechtoldt, M. N., C. K. W. De Dreu, B. A. Nijstad, and H.-S. Choi. 2010. Motivated information processing, epistemic social tuning and group creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99: 622-37.
10. Beersma, B., and C. K.W. de Dreu. 2005. Conflict's consequences: Effects of social motives on postnegotiation creative and convergent group functioning and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89: 358-74.
11. Belojevic, G., V. Slepcevic, and B. Jakovljevic. 2001. Mental performance in noise: The role of introversion. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21: 209-13.
12. Bolin, A. U., and G. A. Neuman. 2006. Personality, process, and performance in interactive brainstorming groups. Journal of Business and Psychology 20: 565-85.
13. Bradshaw, S. D., M. F. Stasson, and D. Alexander. 1999. Shyness and group brainstorming: Effects on productivity and perceptions of performance. North American Journal of Psychology 1: 267-76.
14. Brockman, B. K., M. E. Rawlston, M. A. Jones, and D. Halstead. 2010. An exploratory model of interpersonal cohesiveness in new product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management 27: 201-19.
15. Camacho, L. M., and P. B. Paulus. 1995. The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68: 1071-80.
16. Cassidy, G., and R. A. R. MacDonald. 2007. The effects of background music and background noise on the task performance of introverts and extraverts. Psychology of Music 35: 517-36.
17. De Dreu, C. K. W., M. Baas, and B. A. Nijstad. 2008. Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94: 739-56.
18. De Dreu, C. K. W., B. A. Nijstad, and D. Van Knippenberg. 2008. Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review 12: 22-49.
19. De Dreu, C. K. W., and M. A. West. 2001. Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology 86: 1191-201.
20. De Vet, A., and C. K.W. De Dreu. 2007. Does thinking aloud help or hinder creativity? The moderating influence of self-monitoring sensitivity and ability. European Journal of Social Psychology 37: 747-60.
21. Dennis, A. R., and J. S. Valacich. 1993. Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology 78: 531-37.
22. Diehl, M., andW. Stroebe. 1987. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Towards the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53: 497-509.
23. Diehl, M., and W. Stroebe. 1991. Productivity loss in idea-generating groups-Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61: 392-403.
24. Edmondson, A. C., and I. M. Nembhard. 2009. Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits. Journal of Product Innovation Management 26: 123-38.
25. Eysenck, H. J. 1990. The biological basis of personality. In Handbook of personality: Theory and research, ed. L. A. Pervin, 244-76. NewYork: Guilford Press.
26. Eysenck, H. J., and S. B. G. Eysenck. 1968. Manual for the Eysenck personality inventory. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
27. Friedman, R. S., and J. Förster. 2001. The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81: 1001-13.
28. Hart, S., E. J. Hultink, N. Tzokas, and H. R. Commandeur. 2003. Industrial companies' evaluation criteria in new product development gates. Journal of Product Innovation Management 20: 22-36.
29. Hinsz, V. B., R. S. Tindale, and D. A. Vollrath. 1997. The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin 121: 43-64.
30. Hoekstra, H. A., J. Ormel, and F. de Fruyt. 2003. NEO-PI-R/NEO-FFI. Big Five Persoonlijkheidsvragenlijst. Handleiding [Manual of the Dutch version of the NEO-PI-R/NEO-FFI]. Amsterdam: Harcourt Test Publishers.
31. Hofmann, D. A., and L. M. Jones. 2005. Leadership: Collective personality and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 90: 509-22.
32. Ilgen, D. R. 1999. Teams embedded in organizations: Some implications. American Psychologist 54: 129-39.
33. Kahai, S. S., J. J. Sosik, and B. J. Avolio. 2003. Effects of leadership style, anonymity, and rewards on creativity-relevant processes and outcomes in an electronic meeting system context. The Leadership Quarterly 14: 499-524.
34. Kester, L., P. A. Kirschner, and J. J. G. Merriënboer. 2005. The management of cognitive load during complex cognitive skill acquisition by means of computer-simulated problem solving. British Journal of Educational Psychology 75: 71-85.
35. Klein, K. J., and J. S. Sorra. 1996. The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review 21: 1055-80.
36. Kramer, T. J., G. P. Fleming, and S. M. Mannis. 2001. Improving face-toface brainstorming through modeling and facilitation. Small Groups Research 32: 533-57.
37. Laughlin, P. R., E. C. Hatch, J. S. Silver, and L. Boh. 2006. Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: Effects of group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90: 644-51.
38. Laughlin, P. R., S. W. Vanderstoep, and A. B. Hollingshead. 1991. Collective versus individual induction-Recognition of truth, rejection of error, and collective information-processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61: 50-67.
39. Laughlin, P. R., M. L. Zander, E. M. Knievel, and T. K. Tan. 2003. Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: Informative equations and effective strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85: 684-94.
40. Leenders, R. T. A. J., J. M. L. van Engelen, and J. Kratzer. 2007. Systemic design methods and the creative performance of new product teams: Do they contradict or complement each other? Journal of Product Innovation Management 24: 166-79.
41. Leggett, K. L., V. L. Putman, E. J. Roland, and P. B. Paulus. 1996. The effects of training on performance in group brainstorming. Paper presented at the South-western Psychological Association, Houston. April.
42. Lieberman, M. D., and R. Rosenthal. 2001. Why introverts can't always tell who likes them: Multitasking and nonverbal decoding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80: 294-310.
43. Miura, A., and M. Hida. 2004. Synergy between diversity and similarity in group-idea generation. Small Group Research 35: 540-64.
44. Mullen, B., C. Johnson, and E. Salas. 1991. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 12: 3-23.
45. Nijstad, B. A., M. Diehl, and W. Stroebe. 2003. Cognitive stimulation and interference in idea generating groups. In Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration, ed. P. B. Paulus and B. A. Nijstad, 137-59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46. Nijstad, B. A., and W. Stroebe. 2006. How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review 10: 186-213.
47. Nijstad, B. A., A. E. M. van Vianen, W. Stroebe, and H. F. M. Lodewijkx. 2004. Persistence in brainstorming: Exploring stop rules in same-sex groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 7: 195-206.
48. Orsato, R. 2006. Competitive environmental strategies: When does it pay to be green? California Management Review 48: 127-43.
49. Osborn, A. F. 1963. Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving (2nd ed.). NewYork: Charles Scribner's Sons.
50. Paulus, P. B., and V. R. Brown. 2003. Enhancing ideational creativity in groups: Lessons from research in brainstorming. In Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration, ed. P. B. Paulus and B. A. Nijstad, 110-36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51. Paulus, P. B., M. T. Dzindolet, G. Poletes, and L. M. Camacho. 1993. Perception of performance in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 19: 78-89.
52. Paulus, P. B., and H. Yang. 2000. Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82: 76-87.
53. Preacher, K. J., and A. F. Hayes. 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 40: 879-91.
54. Prussia, G. E., and A. J. Kinicki. 1996. A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology 81: 187-98.
55. Reid, S. E., and U. de Brentani. 2004. The fuzzy front end of new product development for discontinuous innovations: A theoretical model. Journal of Product Innovation Management 21: 170-84.
56. Rietzschel, E. F., C. K.W. De Dreu, and B. A. Nijstad. 2007. Personal need for structure and creative performance: The moderating influence of fear of invalidity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 33: 855-66.
57. Rietzschel, E. F., B. A. Nijstad, and W. Stroebe. 2006. Productivity is not enough: A comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming group on idea generation and selection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42: 244-51.
58. Riggio, H. R., and R. E. Riggio. 2002. Emotional expressiveness, extraversion, and neuroticism:Ameta-analysis. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 26: 195-218.
59. Riggio, R. E. 1986. Assessment of basic social skills. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 649-60.
60. Robinson, D. L. 1986. The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale and personality assessment: Towards a biologically based theory of intelligence and cognition. Personality and Individual Differences 7: 152-59.
61. Sarin, S., and G. C. O'Connor. 2009. First among equals: The effects of team leader characteristics on the internal dynamics of cross-functional product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management 26: 188-205.
62. Scholten, L., D. van Knippenberg, B. A. Nijstad, and C. K. W. De Dreu. 2007. Motivated information processing and group decision-making: Effects of process accountability on information processing and decision quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43: 539-52.
63. Silvia, P. J., and A. G. Philips. 2004. Self-awareness, self-evaluation, and creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30: 1009-17.
64. Stasser, G. 1999. The uncertain role of unshared information in collective choice. In Shared knowledge in organizations, ed. L. Thompson and J. Levine, 49-69. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
65. Stasser, G., and W. Titus. 1985. Pooling unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48: 1467-78.
66. Stasser, G., andW. Titus. 1987. Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53: 81-93.
67. Stasser, G., S. I. Vaughan, and D. D. Stewart. 2000. Pooling unshared information: The benefits of knowing how access to information is distributed among group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82: 102-16.
68. Stroebe, W., and M. Diehl. 1994. Why groups are less effective than their members: On productivity losses in idea-generating groups. In European review of social psychology, Vol. 5, ed. W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone, 271-303. London: John Wiley and Sons.
69. Sutton, R. I., and A. Hargadon. 1997. Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 685-718.
70. Sweller, J. 1988. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science 12: 257-85.
71. Van de Ven, A., and A. L. Delbecq. 1971. Nominal versus interacting group processes for committee decision making effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal 14: 203-12.
72. Van de Ven, A., and A. L. Delbecq. 1974. The effectiveness of nominal, Delphi, and interacting group decision processes. Academy of Management Journal 17: 605-21.
73. van Ginkel, W. P., and D. van Knippenberg. 2008. Group information elaboration and group decision making: The role of shared task representations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 105: 82-97.
74. van Knippenberg, D., C. K. W. De Dreu, and A. C. Homan. 2004. Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology 6: 1008-22.
75. van Vianen, A. E. M., and C. K. W. De Dreu. 2001. Personality in teams: Its relationship to social cohesion, task cohesion, and team performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 10: 97-120.
76. Wittenbaum, G. M., A. P. Hubbell, and C. Zuckerman. 1999. Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77: 967-78.