Systematic design methods and the creative performance of new product teams: Do they contradict or complement each other?

Journal of Product Innovation Management

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 166-179

  Leenders, Roger Th A J ^a   Van Engelen, Jo M L ^a,b   Kratzer, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b Department of Business Development ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION PATTERNS; CREATIVE PERFORMANCES; DESIGN PRINCIPLES; SYSTEMATIC VARIATIONS;

INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 33847053877     PISSN: 07376782     EISSN: 15405885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00241.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Allen, T.J. (1971). Communication Networks in R&D Labs. R&D Management 1:14-21.
2. Allen, T.J. (1977). Managing the Flow of Technology. Boston: MIT Press.
3. Amabile, T.M. (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity. New York: Springer Verlag.
4. Brauner, E. and Scholl, W. (2000). The Information Processing Approach as a Perspective for Group Research. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 3:115-22.
5. Bron, C. and Kerbosch, K. (1973). Finding all Cliques of an Undirected Graph. Communications of the ACM 16:575-7.
6. Cooper, R.G. (1981). An Empirically Derived New Product Project Selection Model. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 28(3):54-61.
7. Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive Barriers to Successful Innovation in a Large Firm. Organization Science 3:179-202.
8. Dym, C.L. (1994). Engineering Design: A Synthesis of Views. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Dym, C.L. and Little, P. (2000). Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
10. Erkens, A. (1928). Beiträge zur Konstruktionserziehung. Z.VDI 72: 17-21.
11. Hauptman, O. (1986). Influence of Task Type on the Relationship between Communication and performance: The Case of Software Development. R&D Management 16:127-39.
12. Hansen, F. (1956). Konstruktionssystematik. Berlin: Verlag.
13. Heneman, H.G.I. (1974). Comparisons of Self- and Superior Ratings of Managerial Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 59: 638-42.
14. Hoegl, M. and Gemuenden, H. (2001). Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence. Organization Science 12(4):435-49.
15. James, L.R., Demaree, R.G. and Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-Group Interrater Reliability with and without Response Bias. Journal of Applied Psychology 69(1):85-98.
16. Janis, I.L. (1972). Victims of Grouplhink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
17. Katz, R. (1982). The Effects of Group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 27: 81-104.
18. Kesselring, F. (1942). Die Starke Konstruktion. Z.VDI/86:321-30. Kesselring, F. (1954). Technische Kompositionslehre. Berlin: Springer.
19. Kratzer, J. (2001). Communication and Performance: An Empirical Study in Innovation Teams. Amsterdam: Tesla Thesis Publishers.
20. Leenders, R.Th.A.J., Kratzer, J., Hollander, J. and van Engelen, J.M.L. (2002). Managing Product Development Teams Effectively. In: The PDMA Toolbook for New Product Development, ed. P. Belliveau, A. Griffin, and S. Somermeyer. New York: Wiley, 141-63.
21. Leenders, R.Th.A.J., Kratzer, J. and van Engelen, J.M.L. (2003). Virtuality, Communication, and New Product Team Creativity: A Social Network Perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 20:69-92.
22. Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P. and Erez, M. (1988). The Determinants of Goal Commitment. Academy of Management Review 13:23-39.
23. Lovelace, R.F. (1986). Stimulating Creativity through Managerial Interventions. R&D Management 16:161-74.
24. Muller, P. (1999). Team-Based Conceptualization of New Products. Ph.D. diss., University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
25. Nicholas, J.M. (1994). Concurrent Engineering: Overcoming Obstacles to Teamwork. Production and Inventory Management Journal 35:234-46.
26. Nyström, H. (1979). Creativity and Innovation. New York: Wiley.
27. Osborn, A.F. (1957). Applied Imagination. New York: Scribner.
28. Pahl, G. and Beitz, W. (1977). Konstruktionslehre. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
29. Pahl, G. and Beitz, W. (1995). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, 2d ed. Berlin: Springer.
30. Shalley, C.E. (1995). Effects of Coaction, Expected Evaluation, and Goal Setting on Creativity and Productivity. Academy of Management Journal 38:483-503.
31. Simon, H.A. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Snijders, T.A.B. (1981). The Degree Variance: An Index of Graph Heterogeneity. Social Networks 3:163-74.
33. Van Engelen, J.M.L., Kiewiet, D.J. and Terlouw, P. (2001). Improving Performance of Product Development Teams through Managing Polarity. International Studies of Management and Organization 31(1):46-63.
34. West, M.A. (1990). The Social Psychology of Innovation in Groups. In: Innovation and Creativity at Work, ed. M.A. West and J.L. Farr. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 309-33.
35. Wögerbauer, H. (1943). Die Technik des Konstruierens. Munich: Oldenbourg.
36. Woodman, R.W., Sawyer, J.E. and Griffin, R.W. (1993). Towards a Theory of Organizational Creativity. Academy of Management Review 18:293-321.
37. Zwicky, F. (1948). Morphological Method of Analysis and Construction. New York: Wiley.