Designing cooperativity into the designed protein Top 7

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 364-374

  Yadahalli, Shilpa ^a,b   Gosavi, Shachi ^a  

^a TATA INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH   (India)

^b MANIPAL UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Computational protein folding; Folding cooperativity; Side chain packing; Structure based models; Top7

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; PROTEIN; PROTEIN S6; PROTEIN TOP7; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; MUTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

COMPUTATIONAL PROTEIN FOLDING; FOLDING COOPERATIVITY; SIDE-CHAIN PACKING; STRUCTURE-BASED MODELS; TOP7;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MUTATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84893777301     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24393     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Jackson SE, Fersht AR. Folding of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. 1. Evidence for a two-state transition. Biochemistry 1991; 30:10428-10435.
2. Chan HS, Shimizu S, Kaya H. Cooperativity Principles in Protein Folding. Methods in Enzymol 2004;380:350-379
3. Chan HS, Zhang Z, Wallin S, Liu Z. Cooperativity, local-nonlocal coupling, and nonnative interactions: principles of protein folding from coarse-grained models. Ann Rev Phys Chem 2011;62:301-326.
4. Portman JJ. Cooperativity and protein folding rates. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2010;20:11-15.
5. Dobson CM. Protein misfolding, evolution and disease. Trends Bioch Sci. 1999;24:329-332.
6. Cheung MS, García AE, Onuchic JN. Protein folding mediated by solvation: Water expulsion and formation of the hydrophobic core occur after the structural collapse. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2002;99:685-690.
7. Badasyan A, Liu Z, Chan HS. Probing Possible Downhill Folding: Native Contact Topology Likely Places a Significant Constraint on the Folding Cooperativity of Proteins with ~ 40 Residues. J Mol Biol 2008;384:512-530.
8. Abkevich VI, Gutin AM, Shakhnovich EI. Impact of local and non-local interactions on thermodynamics and kinetics of protein folding. J Mol Biol 1995;252:460-471.
9. Chan HS, Bromberg S, Dill KA. Models of cooperativity in protein folding. Phil Trans R Soc B. Biol Sci 1995;348:61-70.
10. Cho SS, Weinkam P, Wolynes PG. Origins of barriers and barrierless folding in BBL. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2008;105:118-123.
11. Ejtehadi MR, Avall SP, Plotkin SS. Three-body interactions improve the prediction of rate and mechanism in protein folding models. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2004;101:15088-15093.
12. Ghosh K, Dill KA. Theory for protein folding cooperativity: helix bundles. J Am Chem Soc 2009;131:2306-2312.
13. Jewett AI, Pande VS, Plaxco KW. Cooperativity, Smooth Energy Landscapes and the Origins of Topology-dependent Protein Folding Rates. J Mol Biol 2003;326:247-253.
14. Klimov DK, Thirumalai D. Cooperativity in protein folding: from lattice models with sidechains to real proteins. Folding and Design 1998;3:127-139.
15. Muñoz V, Eaton WA. A simple model for calculating the kinetics of protein folding from three-dimensional structures. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1999;96:11311-11316.
16. Zuo G, Wang J, Wang W. Folding with downhill behavior and low cooperativity of proteins. Proteins 2006;63:165-173.
17. Kuhlman B, Dantas G, Ireton GC, Varani G, Stoddard BL, Baker D. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science 2003;302:1364-1368.
18. Scalley-Kim M, Baker D. Characterization of the folding energy landscapes of computer generated proteins suggests high folding free energy barriers and cooperativity may be consequences of natural selection. J Mol Biol 2004;338:573-583.
19. Watters AL, Deka P, Corrent C, Callender D, Varani G, Sosnick T, Baker D. The Highly Cooperative Folding of small naturally occurring proteins is likely the result of natural selection. Cell 2007;128:613-624.
20. Dantas G, Watters AL, Lunde BM, Eletr ZM, Isern NG, Roseman T, Lipfert J, Doniach S, Tompa M, Kuhlman B, Stoddard BL, Varani G, Baker D. Mis-translation of a computationally designed protein yields an exceptionally stable homodimer: implications for protein engineering and evolution. J Mol Biol 2006;362:1004-1024.
21. Sharma D, Perisic O, Peng Q, Cao Y, Lam C, Lu H, Li H. Single-molecule force spectroscopy reveals a mechanically stable protein fold and the rational tuning of its mechanical stability. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2007;104: 9278-9283.
22. Zhang Z, Chan HS. Native topology of the designed protein Top7 is not conducive to cooperative folding. Biophys J 2009; 96:L25-L27.
23. Bryngelson JD, Onuchic JN, Socci ND, Wolynes PG. Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: a synthesis. Proteins 1995;21:167-195.
24. Noel JK, Onuchic JN. The many faces of structure-based potentials: from protein folding landscapes to structural characterization of complex biomolecules. In: Dokholyan NV, editor. Computational modeling of biological systems. US: Springer; 2012. pp 31-54.
25. Whitford PC, Sanbonmatsu KY, Onuchic JN. Biomolecular dynamics: order-disorder transitions and energy landscapes. Reports Prog Phys 2012;75:76601.
26. Hills RD, Brooks CL. Insights from coarse-grained gō models for protein folding and dynamics. Int J Mol Sci 2009;10:889-905.
27. Oliveira LC, Schug A, Onuchic JN. Geometrical features of the protein folding mechanism are a robust property of the energy landscape: a detailed investigation of several reduced models. J Phys Chem 2008;112:6131-6136.
28. Wu C, Shea J-E. Coarse-grained models for protein aggregation. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2011;21:209-220.
29. Hyeon C, Thirumalai D. Capturing the essence of folding and functions of biomolecules using coarse-grained models. Nature Comm 2011;2:487.
30. Schug A, Hyeon C, Onuchic J. Coarse-Grained Structure-Based Simulations of Proteins and RNA. In: Voth GA, editor. Coarse-Graining of Condensed Phase and Biomolecular Systems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2009. p123-140.
31. Zhang Z, Chan HS. Competition between native topology and nonnative interactions in simple and complex folding kinetics of natural and designed proteins. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2010;107:2920-2925.
32. Stordeur C, Dallüge R, Birkenmeier O, Wienk H, Rudolph R, Lange C, Lücke C. The NMR solution structure of the artificial protein M7 matches the computationally designed model. Proteins 2008;72:1104-1107.
33. Dallüge R, Oschmann J, Birkenmeier O, Lücke C, Lilie H, Rudolph R, Lange C. A tetrapeptide fragment-based design method results in highly stable artificial proteins. Proteins 2007; 68:839-849.
34. Chavez LL, Onuchic JN, Clementi C. Quantifying the roughness on the free energy landscape: entropic bottlenecks and protein folding rates. J Am Chem Soc 2004;126:8426-8432.
35. Clementi C, Nymeyer H, Onuchic JN. Topological and energetic factors: what determines the structural details of the transition state ensemble and "en-route" intermediates for protein folding? an investigation for small globular proteins. J Mol Biol 2000;298:937-953.
36. Noel JK, Whitford PC, Sanbonmatsu KY, Onuchic JN. SMOG at ctbp: simplified deployment of structure-based models in GROMACS. Nucl Acid Res 2010;38:W657-W661.
37. Guex N, Peitsch MC. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-Pdb Viewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 1997;18:2714-2723.
38. Noel JK, Whitford PC, Onuchic JN. The shadow map: a general contact definition for capturing the dynamics of biomolecular folding and function. J Phys Chem B 2012;116:8692-8702.
39. Jiang P, Hansmann UHE. Modeling structural flexibility of proteins with go-models. J Chem Theory Comput 2012 8:2127-2133
40. http://deposit.rcsb.org/depoinfo/print_nmr.html. Under "The coordinate file header"- A representative model should be identified and placed as the first model in the ensemble.
41. Krivov GG, Shapovalov M V, Dunbrack RL. Improved prediction of protein side-chain conformations with SCWRL4. Proteins 2009;77:778-795
42. Hess B, Kutzner C, Spoel D van der, Lindahl E. GROMACS4: Algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 2008;4:435-447
43. Gaye ML, Hardwick C, Kouza M, Hansmann UHE. Chameleonicity and folding of the C-fragment of TOP7. Europhys Lett 2012;97:68003.
44. Mohanty S, Meinke JH, Zimmermann O, Hansmann UHE. Simulation of Top7-CFr: A transient helix extension guides folding. Proc Nat Acad Scie USA 2008;105:8004-8007.
45. Indu S, Kochat V, Thakurela S, Ramakrishnan C, Varadarajan R. Conformational analysis and design of cross-strand disulfides in antiparallel β-sheets. Proteins. 2011;79:244-260.
46. Sharma D, Feng G, Khor D, Genchev GZ, Lu H, Li H. Stabilization provided by neighboring strands is critical for the mechanical stability of proteins. Biophys J 2008;95:3935-3942.
47. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. SCOP: A structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995;247:536-540.
48. The UniProt Consortium. Reorganizing the protein space at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res 2013;40:D71-D75.
49. Boschek CB, Apiyo DO, Soares TA, Engelmann HE, Pefaur NB, Straatsma TP, Baird CL. Engineering an ultra-stable affinity reagent based on Top7. Protein Eng Des Sel 2009;22:325-332.
50. Roche J, Caro JA, Norberto DR, Barthe P, Roumestand C, Schlessman JL, Garcia AE, E BG-M, Royer CA. Cavities determine the pressure unfolding of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:6945-6950.
51. Delano WL. The PyMOL molecular graphics system. 2002. http://www.pymol.org.