A change-resistance account of children's difficulties understanding mathematical equivalence

Child Development Perspectives

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 42-47

  Mcneil, Nicole M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

Arithmetic practice; Conceptual development; Mathematics learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893758630     PISSN: 17508592     EISSN: 17508606     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cdep.12062     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Alibali, M. W., Phillips, K. M., & Fischer, A. D. (2009). Learning new problem-solving strategies leads to changes in problem representation. Cognitive Development, 24, 89-101. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.12.005
2. Anderson, J. R. (2002). Spanning seven orders of magnitude: A challenge for cognitive modeling. Cognitive Science, 26, 85-112. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2601_3
3. Baroody, A. J., & Ginsburg, H. P. (1983). The effects of instruction on children's understanding of the "equals" sign. Elementary School Journal, 84, 199-212. doi:10.1086/461356
4. Behr, M., Erlwanger, S., & Nichols, E. (1980). How children view the equal sign. Mathematics Teaching, 92, 13-15.
5. Brown, J. S., & VanLehn, K. (1988). Repair theory: A generative theory of bugs in procedural skills. In A. Collins & E. E. Smith (Eds.), Readings in cognitive science (pp. 338-361). Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. (Reprinted from Cognitive Science, 4, 379-426, 1980). doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0404_3
6. Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 2, 123-152. doi:10.1037/h0043805
7. Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., Yetkiner, A. E., Ozel, S., Kim, H. G., & Corlu, M. S. (2010). An international comparison of Grade 6 students' understanding of the equal sign. Psychological Reports, 106, 49-53. doi:10.2466/pr0.106.1.49-53
8. Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking mathematically: Integrating arithmetic and algebra in elementary school. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
9. Case, R. (1978). Intellectual development from birth to adulthood: A neo-Piagetian approach. In R. S. Siegler (Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 32-72). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Chesney, D. L., McNeil, N. M., Petersen, L. A., & Dunwiddie, A. E. (2014). Arithmetic practice that includes relational words promotes conceptual understanding and computational fluency. Manuscript submitted for publication.
11. Church, R. B., Kelly, S. D., & Lynch, K. (2000). Immediate memory for mismatched speech and representational gesture across development. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24, 151-174. doi:10.1023/a:1006610013873
12. Cobb, P. (1987). An investigation of young children's academic arithmetic contexts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18, 109-124. doi:10.1007/BF00314722
13. Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Gesturing makes learning last. Cognition, 106, 1047-1058. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.010
14. Davydov, V. (Ed.). (1991). Soviet studies in mathematics education: Vol. 6. Psychological abilities of primary school children in learning mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (Original work published 1969).
15. DeCorte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1981). Children's solution processes in elementary arithmetic problems: Analysis and improvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 765. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.73.6.765
16. DeLoache, J. S., Uttal, D. H., & Rosengren, K. S. (2004). Scale errors offer evidence for a perception-action dissociation early in life. Science, 304, 1027-1029. doi:10.1126/science.1093567
17. Falkner, K. P., Levi, L., & Carpenter, T. P. (1999). Children's understanding of equality: A foundation for algebra. Teaching Children Mathematics, 6, 232-236.
18. Humberstone, J., & Reeve, R. A. (2008). Profiles of algebraic competence. Learning and Instruction, 18, 354-367. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.07.002
19. Jacobs, V. R., Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Battey, D. (2007). Professional development focused on children's algebraic reasoning in elementary school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 258-288.
20. Jones, I., Inglis, M., Gilmore, C., & Evans, R. (2013). Teaching the substitutive conception of the equals sign. Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 34-39. doi:10.1080/14794802.2012.756635
21. Kaye, D. B. (1986). The development of mathematical cognition. Cognitive Development, 1, 157-170. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(86)80017-X
22. Kieran, C. (1981). Concepts associated with the equality symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 317-326. doi:10.1007/BF00311062
23. Knuth, E. J., Stephens, A. C., McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2006). Does understanding the equal sign matter? Evidence from solving equations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37, 297-312.
24. Li, X., Ding, M., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2008). Sources of differences in children's understanding of mathematical equality. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 1-23. doi:10.1080/07370000801980845
25. Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 54(6, Series No. 248). doi:10.1037/h0093502
26. McNeil, N. M. (2007). U-shaped development in math: 7-year-olds outperform 9-year-olds on equivalence problems. Developmental Psychology, 43, 687-695. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.687
27. McNeil, N. M. (2008). Limitations to teaching children 2 + 2 = 4: Typical arithmetic problems can hinder learning of mathematical equivalence. Child Development, 79, 1524-1537. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01203.x
28. McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2000). Learning mathematics from procedural instruction: Externally imposed goals influence what is learned. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 734-744. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.734
29. McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2004). You'll see what you mean: Students encode equations based on their knowledge of arithmetic. Cognitive Science, 28, 451-466. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2803_7
30. McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2005a). Knowledge change as a function of mathematics experience: All contexts are not created equal. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6, 285-306. doi:10.1207/s15327647jcd0602_6
31. McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2005b). Why won't you change your mind? Knowledge of operational patterns hinders learning and performance on equations. Child Development, 76, 883-899. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00884.x
32. McNeil, N. M., Chesney, D. L., Matthews, P. G., Fyfe, E. R., Petersen, L. A., Dunwiddie, A. E., & Wheeler, M. C. (2012). It pays to be organized: Organizing arithmetic practice around equivalent values facilitates understanding of math equivalence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1109-1121. doi:10.1037/a0028997
33. McNeil, N. M., Fyfe, E. R., & Dunwiddie, A.E. (2014). Arithmetic practice can be modified to promote understanding of math equivalence. Manuscript submitted for publication.
34. McNeil, N. M., Fyfe, E. R., Petersen, L. A., Dunwiddie, A. E., & Brletic-Shipley, H. (2011). Benefits of practicing 4 = 2 + 2: Nontraditional problem formats facilitate children's understanding of mathematical equivalence. Child Development, 82, 1620-1633. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01622.x
35. McNeil, N. M., Grandau, L., Knuth, E. J., Alibali, M. W., Stephens, A. C., Hattikudur, S., & Krill, D. E. (2006). Middle-school students' understanding of the equal sign: The books they read can't help. Cognition and Instruction, 24, 367-385. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2403_3
36. McNeil, N. M., Rittle-Johnson, B., Hattikudur, S., & Petersen, L. A. (2010). Continuity in representation between children and adults: Arithmetic knowledge hinders undergraduates' algebraic problem solving. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11, 437-457. doi:10.1080/15248372.2010.516421
37. Molina, M., Castro, E., & Castro, E. (2009). Elementary students' understanding of the equal sign in number sentences. Education & Psychology, 17, 341-368.
38. Munakata, Y. (1998). Infant perseveration and implications for object permanence theories: A PDP model of the A-not-B task. Developmental Science, 1, 161-211. doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00021
39. Namy, L. L., Campbell, A. L., & Tomasello, M. (2004). The changing role of iconicity in non-verbal symbol learning: A U-shaped trajectory in the acquisition of arbitrary gestures. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5, 37-57. doi:10.1207/s15327647jcd0501_3
40. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
41. Perry, M. (1991). Learning and transfer: Instructional conditions and conceptual change. Cognitive Development, 6, 449-468. doi:10.1016/0885-2014(91)90049-J
42. Perry, M., Church, R. B., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1988). Transitional knowledge in the acquisition of concepts. Cognitive Development, 3, 359-400. doi:10.1016/0885-2014(88)90021-4
43. Piaget, J., & Szeminska, A. (1995). The child's conception of number (C. Gattegno & F. M. Hadgson, Trans.). In H. E. Gruber & J. J. Voneche (Eds.), The essential Piaget (pp. 298-341). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson. (Original work published 1941)
44. Powell, S. R. (2012). Equations and the equal sign in elementary mathematics textbooks. The Elementary School Journal, 112, 627. doi:10.1086/665009
45. Renwick, E. (1932). Children's misconceptions concerning the symbols for mathematical equality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2, 173-183. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1932.tb02743.x
46. Rittle-Johnson, B. (2006). Promoting transfer: Effects of self-explanation and direct instruction. Child Development, 77, 1-15. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00852.x
47. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Alibali, M. W. (1999). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 175-189. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.175
48. Rittle-Johnson, B., Matthews, P. G., Taylor, R. S., & McEldoon, K. L. (2011). Assessing knowledge of mathematical equivalence: A construct-modeling approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 85-104. doi:10.1037/a0021334
49. Rogers, T. T., Rakison, D. H., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). U-shaped curves in development: A PDP approach. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5, 137-145. doi:10.1207/s15327647jcd0501_14
50. Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building block of cognition. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Saenz-Ludlow, A., & Walgamuth, C. (1998). Third graders' interpretations of equality and the equal symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35, 153-187. doi:10.1023/A:1003086304201
52. Saffran, J. R. (2003). Statistical language learning: Mechanisms and constraints. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 110-114. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.01243
53. Seo, K.-H., & Ginsburg, H. P. (2003). "You've got to carefully read the math sentence...": Classroom context and children's interpretations of the equals sign. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills (pp. 161-187). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Sherman, J., & Bisanz, J. (2009). Equivalence in symbolic and nonsymbolic contexts: Benefits of solving problems with manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 88-100. doi:10.1037/a0013156
55. Siegler, R. S. (2004). U-shaped interest in U-shaped development-and what it means. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5, 1-10. doi:10.1207/s15327647jcd0501_1
56. Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 1-29. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2834